<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Scobleizer - Latest Comments in Yahoo makes a better search through Flickr integration</title><link>http://scobleizer.disqus.com/</link><description>Tech enthusiast, video blogger, media innovator, fanatical about startups at Rackspace, home of fanatical support for Internet entrepreneurs.</description><atom:link href="https://scobleizer.disqus.com/yahoo_makes_a_better_search_through_flickr_integration/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2007 11:28:31 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Yahoo makes a better search through Flickr integration</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/06/26/yahoo-makes-a-better-search-through-flickr-integration/#comment-9683051</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"What do you think? Are you going to change where you search for images because of this new announcement?"&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Actually, yes, yes I am.  I have to say that today marks the first time I've ever used Yahoo Image Search, but I've pretty much always had a great experience finding relevant photos on Flickr.  I'm sold.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ruth</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2007 11:28:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Yahoo makes a better search through Flickr integration</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/06/26/yahoo-makes-a-better-search-through-flickr-integration/#comment-9683052</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Robert,&lt;br&gt;Thanks for the heads up and the links.  Thomas always has something insightful to add.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">tojosan</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 21:12:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Yahoo makes a better search through Flickr integration</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/06/26/yahoo-makes-a-better-search-through-flickr-integration/#comment-9683054</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I use the search within Flickr itself regularly as it is the best source of Creative Commons by-sa pictures which are perfect for blogging.  I think the best thing Flickr ever did was make this the default licence for all photos.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;No other source comes close in my opinion, especially if you search by "interesting" rather than "relevant".  It's amazing what turns up.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Picasaweb doesn't even come close. It's great for photo galleries (I use it to share photos of my son with my extended family) but as a resource it is quite limited.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">shane</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 19:11:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Yahoo makes a better search through Flickr integration</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/06/26/yahoo-makes-a-better-search-through-flickr-integration/#comment-9683053</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"Google is an index of whatever images it happens to run across on the web. You can’t even compare the two."&lt;br&gt;Copy Flickr, make it unsearchable/spiderable&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://picasa.google.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://picasa.google.com"&gt;http://picasa.google.com&lt;/a&gt; Picasa Web Albums&lt;br&gt;Copy MySpace, make IT unsearchable/spiderable&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.orkut.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.orkut.com"&gt;http://www.orkut.com&lt;/a&gt; Orkut Social Networking&lt;br&gt;For a site that raped the web and sold it by the pound, they sure are just a little greedy with their implementations/clones. Google has the goods, and they're not sharing. Do no evil.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chris</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 19:08:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Yahoo makes a better search through Flickr integration</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/06/26/yahoo-makes-a-better-search-through-flickr-integration/#comment-9683055</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The difference between Flickr and google images is that Flickr is a concentrated pool of actual photos that someone took the time to upload and catalog in some fashion.  Google is an index of whatever images it happens to run across on the web.  You can't even compare the two.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It is nice to know that the 3 people that still use Yahoo for search are going to get better results though.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">-gary</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 18:26:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Yahoo makes a better search through Flickr integration</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/06/26/yahoo-makes-a-better-search-through-flickr-integration/#comment-9683056</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I like the changes to the Yahoo search.  I'll probably be using this instead of Google Image Search for now.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Brent</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 16:52:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Yahoo makes a better search through Flickr integration</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/06/26/yahoo-makes-a-better-search-through-flickr-integration/#comment-9683057</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"Personally I’ve done a lot of testing of image search cause my Microsoft friends keep telling me “look at us, look at us”"&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Wasn't Macrosoft going to integrate the Mozilla Seadragon OpenGL tech into the image search?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The one they renamed photosynthesis or plant-map or something?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;That never materialized did it?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chris</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 16:17:00 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>