<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Scobleizer - Latest Comments in Writing a killer blog</title><link>http://scobleizer.disqus.com/</link><description>Tech enthusiast, video blogger, media innovator, fanatical about startups at Rackspace, home of fanatical support for Internet entrepreneurs.</description><atom:link href="https://scobleizer.disqus.com/writing_a_killer_blog/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 15:59:55 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Writing a killer blog</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2008/04/06/writing-a-killer-blog/#comment-9703454</link><description>&lt;p&gt;all work kills us, its just how the system works, blogging dosent differ from dying as a cubicle monkey, in a car accident, in  a war, etc...studies show people before organized agriculture, industrialization, and nation states lived longer and happier...the new York times is just trying to shut down the greatest threat to its company and that is blogs, bloggers and blogging...don't let some sleazy corporation stop the revolution!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">joe</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 15:59:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Writing a killer blog</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2008/04/06/writing-a-killer-blog/#comment-9703428</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Robert,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The theme of the article was balance - which is a good topic anyways.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;However, the generalization across the blogopshere was a stretch. My take on the article is here:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://blog.lifebeyondcode.com/2008/04/06/nytimes-story-on-blogging-blog-till-you-drop-my-take/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://blog.lifebeyondcode.com/2008/04/06/nytimes-story-on-blogging-blog-till-you-drop-my-take/"&gt;http://blog.lifebeyondcode....&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;My $.02 of course.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Best,&lt;br&gt;Raj&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rajesh Setty</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 02:33:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Writing a killer blog</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2008/04/06/writing-a-killer-blog/#comment-9703431</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I guess I picked a bad time to start a blog!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://dailycrud.com/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://dailycrud.com/"&gt;http://dailycrud.com/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Stuart</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 23:56:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Writing a killer blog</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2008/04/06/writing-a-killer-blog/#comment-9703430</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;What did I do instead?&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Flap around all over the net, putting out fires over the Shel dust-up. I thought with Fascompany, you'd have a stable environment to finally get it right. Microsoft was too political, Podtech was clinically insane, Fast seemed ideal. But no, shaky phone cam videos, with the usual-suspect rambling-boring tech interviews and Shel proving he was a bad host choice, second by second. With Loren's triumphant return, satire extraordinaire. Great entertainment at least.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Christopher Coulter</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 17:38:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Writing a killer blog</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2008/04/06/writing-a-killer-blog/#comment-9703433</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You may die but in your blog you will live forever. 500 years from now schoolchildren and historians will be mousing on you.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Or not.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Neal</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 12:58:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Writing a killer blog</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2008/04/06/writing-a-killer-blog/#comment-9703432</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Forget dying...the NYTs should have added a piece about the DEPRESSION bloggers endure when they don't receive comments.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Amy Bowllan</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 12:40:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Writing a killer blog</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2008/04/06/writing-a-killer-blog/#comment-9703435</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Blogging is certainly proving to be deadly for another category of Journalists - the print Journos.&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://ideaburger.blogspot.com/2008/04/dark-side-of-blogging.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://ideaburger.blogspot.com/2008/04/dark-side-of-blogging.html"&gt;http://ideaburger.blogspot....&lt;/a&gt;\&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Jay, from Bangalore&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jayakumar Hariharan</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 10:30:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Writing a killer blog</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2008/04/06/writing-a-killer-blog/#comment-9703436</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Uh mm ... NO ... the article doesn't talk about you at all. It does talk about M.Arrington though!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I am guessing you just included yourself amongst those "tens of thousands of bloggers" ... that's fair.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Santosh</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 10:18:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Writing a killer blog</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2008/04/06/writing-a-killer-blog/#comment-9703437</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Here's &lt;a href="http://jeremyblachman.typepad.com/jeremy_blachman/2008/04/blogging-kills.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://jeremyblachman.typepad.com/jeremy_blachman/2008/04/blogging-kills.html"&gt;Jeremy Blachman on that NY Times article&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Martin</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 08:43:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Writing a killer blog</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2008/04/06/writing-a-killer-blog/#comment-9703438</link><description>&lt;p&gt;its difficult to manage both blogging and actvity in several day. dobt push your self to blogging,..i think is really great blogging is colour your life.&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://sahabat88.wordpress.com/2008/04/04/perlahan-tapi-pasti/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://sahabat88.wordpress.com/2008/04/04/perlahan-tapi-pasti/"&gt;salamhangat&amp;gt;/a&amp;gt;&lt;br&gt;:D&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">sahabat88</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 07:07:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Writing a killer blog</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2008/04/06/writing-a-killer-blog/#comment-9703434</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hmmm...I read that whole article, then read this blog post, then went back and RE-READ the article, and sure enough not once is your name mentioned.   An article about blogging where Scoble's name is NOT mentioned?  That's gotta hurt!  I know it's tough to get your head around, but not every blogging story is about YOU.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Bob</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 00:43:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Writing a killer blog</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2008/04/06/writing-a-killer-blog/#comment-9703439</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Honestly, those with health issues are no different than every other middle-aged man with health issues who does nothing to rectify the issue.&lt;br&gt;These men probably aren't much different than the average workaholic who needs to have his health looked at, basically all this article did was define blogging as a job with the possibility of there being workaholism associated with it.  These guys are addicted to their jobs.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The benefits of said job as you stated here only make it more addicting because there ARE positive benefits to all of the social media.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Whats next, "In Web World of 24/7 Stress, Twitterers Tweet Till They Drop "  They'd probably have to go back to the editor for the title though, too many T's.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">charlieoliver</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 00:39:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Writing a killer blog</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2008/04/06/writing-a-killer-blog/#comment-9703440</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It is my personal opinion that while there are many blogs coming out with the intention of global success, however in the near future we will see a huge rise locally operated and targeted blogs for every city on this planet. This movement basically eliminated the need to read news papers!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;That's why NY Times is picking on blogs&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Bam Azizi</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 00:15:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Writing a killer blog</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2008/04/06/writing-a-killer-blog/#comment-9703441</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The big political economy question is: Who's making the money while all these blogger schlepps wear themselves out?  Freelancers used to work their butts off for peanuts.  Now we have bloggers, MySpacers, Facebookers, etc., working even harder and not getting paid at all, yours truly included.  Just goes to show you: Writers are sluts -- we'll do anything to get, um, published.&lt;br&gt;Victor Kulkosky&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://outofmymindblog.wordpress.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://outofmymindblog.wordpress.com"&gt;http://outofmymindblog.word...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2xvoice</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2008 20:47:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Writing a killer blog</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2008/04/06/writing-a-killer-blog/#comment-9703442</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Blogs are simply the new form factor for journalistic excess and exhaustion. Reporters at newspapers and magazines have never had any trouble  working themselves into serious health problems when driven by the nature of their jobs or size of their ambitions. You think politial reporters covering campaigns don't wind up overtired and overcaffeinated? I worked in newsrooms for 20 years, and saw plenty of this.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Many journalists are adrenaline junkies, and blogs, RSS and 24-hour news channels make excess more accessible. That holds true in both newsrooms and home offices.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rich Miller</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2008 19:11:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Writing a killer blog</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2008/04/06/writing-a-killer-blog/#comment-9703443</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Gosh, I even named my blog KillerConsultant ... so this means I am doomed for sure, right?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Seriously though - looking at the NYT article and OM's post (&lt;a href="http://is.gd/4pO)" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://is.gd/4pO)"&gt;http://is.gd/4pO)&lt;/a&gt;, I think as screenworkers we are in danger to ignore our natural rythms, be it because we blog for fun after work, because we blog for money, or because there just is no sleep in the internet.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Florian Hollender</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2008 16:18:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Writing a killer blog</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2008/04/06/writing-a-killer-blog/#comment-9703444</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm confused. I read the NY Times article, and don't see Scoble's name mentioned at all. Where does it say that you are going to die if you blog?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;You clearly don't "blog" to the extent that sites such as Gizmodo or Techcrunch do. Your model is obviously sustainable.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Short version: the article isn't aimed at blogs like yours.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Martin</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2008 15:22:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Writing a killer blog</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2008/04/06/writing-a-killer-blog/#comment-9703445</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yes I agree, blogging has brought a lot of great people together and a great way of sharing information.  On the subject of drinking the water, I see it this way, the folks are flushing the wrong drugs down the pipe, we get antibiotics and pain killers in the water; where's the Prozac to calm the anxieties of the bloggers?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;A little demented humor on the items at hand:)  We all do need to force ourselves to take a break here and there too...good point.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Barbara Duck</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2008 14:01:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Writing a killer blog</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2008/04/06/writing-a-killer-blog/#comment-9703447</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Robert, you are a smart man, with a good sense of balance (perspective) along with your extreme dedication. You may amount to something (lol, as you already very well have).&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alex Hammer</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2008 13:55:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Writing a killer blog</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2008/04/06/writing-a-killer-blog/#comment-9703446</link><description>&lt;p&gt;If blogging was a killer you would have died long ago, or maybe you're a lolcat with 9 lives....&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">paul</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2008 13:55:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Writing a killer blog</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2008/04/06/writing-a-killer-blog/#comment-9703448</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You really have to admire some of the bloggers who find time to offer insightful posts several times per day.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;But I have seen the other school of thought work effectively (Robert Scoble case in point) - of offering a thoughtful post every few days.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;You're better off posting a longer 500-2000+ word evergreen article twice per week - that is ofcouse if your niche lends itself to it.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Pamela Skillings</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2008 13:50:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Writing a killer blog</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2008/04/06/writing-a-killer-blog/#comment-9703449</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I was banned something like a year ago because that cartoon lady was e-fighting with me. I am breaking the ban to say that we're up and running in SoCal starting next week.&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://kepler.sos.ca.gov/corpdata/ShowLpllcAllList?QueryLpllcNumber=200809410214" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://kepler.sos.ca.gov/corpdata/ShowLpllcAllList?QueryLpllcNumber=200809410214"&gt;http://kepler.sos.ca.gov/co...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;We'll be at Adtech on the 15-16 visiting clients and Duc from Rubicon Project passing out business cards. We're doing a large jobs site based on YUI.&lt;br&gt;As per the topic, I found that blogging was lame, and stopped. It was probably the biggest waste of time I've encountered. It's different when they pay you though, so I have no comment on sponsored blogging. I guess it's as good as doing anything else for money.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chris</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2008 13:50:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Writing a killer blog</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2008/04/06/writing-a-killer-blog/#comment-9703450</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Tales: we didn't visit a single coffee shop, unfortunately. Only two nights in Amsterdam. First night Rocky and I were totally jet lagged. Second night we partied all night with geeks at the conference after party.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Robert Scoble</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2008 13:45:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Writing a killer blog</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2008/04/06/writing-a-killer-blog/#comment-9703451</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Admit it, you were in the coffee shops all the time:) there was no time to blog.&lt;br&gt;j/k&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tales</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2008 13:29:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Writing a killer blog</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2008/04/06/writing-a-killer-blog/#comment-9703452</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Never in my career did I have an issue with working too much. I've always been a strictly leave at 5-530p guy, until I started blogging. I quickly noticed that I was working 12-14hrs/day. One of the best things I started doing was literally setting a timer. I'm only allowed to blog for 8-10hrs/day, after that, I turn off the volume on my laptop and close the lid. Period.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I can still blog at night, but no more than 8-10hrs/day, broken up however is appropriate. I've actually noticed I'm more productive because there's less dilly-dallying, since I know I only have a set amount of time.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;And yes, I agree 100% with you, Scoble. Everything'll kill you if you give it the chance. Remember when chewing gum would kill you?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">symbianguru</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2008 12:56:20 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>