-
Website
http://www.scobleizer.com/ -
Original page
http://scobleizer.com/2008/01/16/why-were-going-to-fastcompanytv/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
danja
44 comments · 4 points
-
polizeros
52 comments · 1 points
-
AndyBeard
68 comments · 4 points
-
ojbyrne
27 comments · 1 points
-
webomatica
22 comments · 5 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
Why Google Chrome OS has already won
6 days ago · 145 comments
-
Twitter to turn on advertising “you will love” (here’s how: SuperTweet)
6 days ago · 132 comments
-
More thoughts on in-Tweet advertising
4 days ago · 89 comments
-
The Droid fails AS A PRODUCT when compared to Palm Pre and iPhone
2 weeks ago · 379 comments
-
I was wrong about full-text feeds
3 days ago · 37 comments
-
Why Google Chrome OS has already won
http://scobleizer.com/2006/09/05/stuff-printed-...
money quote: "I don’t read newspapers or magazines anymore either."
But yet your write a column for Fast Company? And now go work for a company most know for "printing stuff on dead trees"? It's a riddle wrapped in an enigma (to quote Churchill)
Best of luck, and we'll see you on the intertubes!
Looking forward to that.
What a mag group to work with!
When Wired started getting tired, I found Fast Company to be a more compelling read. Was disappointed when it went through some sort of recession. Glad to hear that it's getting better again.
You'll probably turn me into a Fast Company fan again. Yay!
Thanks for being the pioneer you are.
And thanks for introducing me to all the new tech you've been playing with.
If you ever need illustrations, please think of me. (And I'll be more than happy to come and do live visual facilitations of your chats as a sidebar live-cast.)
Blue skies
love
Roy
It does not have to be a 'doing it all' scenario...
this top 100 blog is a business - it just depends on how much you profit from it:
Look at how: Techcrunch, Mashable, Problogger, Shoemoney, Endagdget - have all started off with blog and took it to the sky.
I congratulated you earlier this evening in person but here is a written note to add to the chorus - awesome move and congrats!
One immediate suggestion - talk to the folks over at the Berkman Center & Global Voices - as you go to large venues like the World Economic Forum & Lift talk with about who else/where else you might go to get a truly global set of stories, companies and people.
(happy to make many intros there if you need any)
Shannon
Especially with your two boys, who will want to see something of their daddy - not to speak of your wife.
Outsourcing: You will need to spend a bit more though than Tim is suggesting in his book as his numbers are quite optimistic ;) Though it will be totally worth helping you move forward.
Nicole
Give my best to everyone in Davos - it is a WONDERFUL time, you're going to love it...
Dave
Congrats and all the best.
I'm sure your family will appreciate it - especially if it means you have the time to attend sports events, science fairs, concerts and award ceremonies.
Best wishes to you and your family and team as you go down this new path. I'll look forward to seeing what you produce!
Dan
I've been a firm believe that 2008 would be THE big year for established media companies to make their big push into the New Web. Sounds like Fast Company and Inc, both mags I enjoy very much (yes, I still read paper), are forward thinking. Good for them, good for you. Now, I just need to send you guys my resume. :-)
I am sure it will be a great success with a lot of high quality content.
Not to pick on your new employer... Tried to comment on Lynne's blog and it errors out for no obvious reason. Might try it yourself just to see if your mileage varies. If we're going to participate in a discuss/attention driven relationship... Either I'm going to have to get better at understanding what I did wrong on the blog there or they're going to have to wrench on their tech a bit. I know I can change! Please give me another chance? ;)
-Vlad
Hey Robert congratulations!
My experience up in NH covering the primary with Qik really got me excited all over again about the PARTICIPATORY aspect of this. I love that it's one of hte things you are focusing on.
I've experimented with Mogulus and hope to try some LIVE broadcasting with it. Finding the right technical solution that works is the tricky part here. I've tried a lot of the live streaming solutions at Boston Media Makers meetings and most times there have been issues that keep the stream from working. Computer issues, configuration issues, bandwith issues... I'll be experimenting more with these technologies to find something that works for me all the time.
And finally Seesmic. Although the videos are recorded, they are live. Alive with people, and timely. On New Years Eve Carol and I had dinner with the world as we watched everyone celebrate and recorded our own toast.
2008 is going to be an exciting year.
See you in the internet and in person...
--Steve
Like podtech will you again be focused on interviews / startups and communities in the usa? Any plans to have the viewpoint from Europe / UK?
Nige
-Dan
Best of luck to you!
Break a leg.
And I'd love to book you as a guest on my show one of these days!
Rock on.
Good luck in your next journey!
Jim
>Paul Roundy: we're still working through what kind of ads, and what kind of redesign will happen to my blog. More details to come closer to March 3.
that's fantastic news, congrats on the move.
And remember, if Fastcompany are looking for anyone to help you in Europe, I'm in the market for work at the minute(!)
Rocky-
Rocky, back at ya buddy!
On another subject, I'm dying to find out what you thought about the annoucements Steve Jobs made at MacWorld! Especially regarding Apple TV. Do you think the changes they made will cause you to use it?
I tried out the position locator button in Maps on my iPhone and it works pretty darn good! It's only about a block and a half off!
Anyways, all the best.
Orville
Are you going to consider your assets, blog and FastCompany.TV as one outlet. If so, will your blog reflect a higher standard of journalistic professionalism?
You know, one thing that keeps your viewership around is that you come across as a type of reporter who doesn't elevate the technical content so high that it seems out of reach for most of the viewers. I'm sure that most of your current viewers are indeed technical and enjoy the casualness of your approach. We deal with very technical issues all day and you give us a break from the gritty details.
Now, sometimes this works against you when you go off on a tangent and try to hard to get too deep into the details.
But anyway, good luck on the new journey... we look forward to the next chapter.
Oh yea, and here's an idea for content. Give your son a show about MACs. Use his passion and let him turn on the younger crowd to Interenet based media!
Good idea about my son! He was on Dave Winer's podcast yesterday and did great.
Just kidding of course. Congrats and good luck.
Good Luck - and will definitely look forward to the new work! :)
It took me a lot more years. I'm a little jealous.
I'm expecting you and Oprah will be partying together at the mansions.
Cheers
Good luck in your venture.
One minor correction - you don't NEED Steve Jobs to invite you to the keynote. If you haven't heard, it's possible to hack the MacWorld site to get a VIP pass for free. Not to discount connections, but there are other ways to get things (if you ignore the question of legality). Not sure whether this fits into the category of a stunt Woz would pull... :)
Out of curiosity, who are you guys using for your video infrastructure? Is it a homegrown solution or are you partnering with someone?
There's no rss access from your homepage (only on articles). Maybe add that?
Good luck with it all! Dawn
Anyway, congrats on your new gig, Robert.
Cheers!
Good Luck!
Yeah, kind of like what I have been going through trying to create my business as a full time photographer. I've spent easily 20K in the past year on equipment and I worked multiple jobs to earn it. I tried to explain my very similar dilemma to the public over the Richter Scales drama a month ago - how I need to be able to earn a living off my work so that I can continue working. Yet you were one of my most vocal opponents insisting that I should give my work away for free and criticized me for trying to charge for what I do and maintain control over it.
I thought you were going to give everything away for free? I thought you were against the idea of people creating original content and selling it. Are you volunteering your services? Does Fast Company know that you think copyright is dead and that you want people to "steal your content"? Did you tell them you plan to give it all away?
Your hypocrisy is astounding.
Best of luck on your new venture. We look forward to a Scobleizing year!
Congrats on the big news. Your points are very thoughtful and encouraging. You made a great choice and are joining a great company with huge potential. Can't wait to see how you shake things up. Looking forward to meeting you in person in March.
*Cheers!
Best of LUCK!!!
Rocky - I have those new Whole Food Multis for you (and Robert) to test. Where shall I send them?
We need you boys around for the next 70 years, at least.
Kim Klaver Kimklaver[at]mac[dot]com
The profile on your blog needs to be updated. You are clever, yet I am reminding you.
I found this interesting from the beet interview:
"Although he will continue to own and run Scobleizer blog independently from Fast Company, he is entering into agreement with the publisher to sell advertising. This would be the first time ads, besides banners for his book, have been sold on the influential blog."
Did you agree with Microsoft to sell advertising when you were working for them and had your "personal blog"? Why are you selling out your blog to your current employer? You can maintain all you want that it is independent, but advertisers will want something for their money, so you will need to be more careful who you skewer. Never can tell who your advertisers might have relationships with.
You really blew it on that issue.
You still might think about saying you were wrong on that issue.
I wish you the best on your new job.
Lane and Chris,
I do give everything almost all my content for free. You might visit http://www.qik.com/scobleizer -- I did 17 interviews yesterday and several more today, including some with some very hard to find people (like the CTO of Entertainment Arts).
I make my money from sponsorships.
You should read my post again. I didn't say that YOU should give everything away for free. I just differentiated myself from your approach -- you want complete control of ever image. I don't -- take my stuff and steal it please and watch what we do at Fast Company.tv (the companies that hold tight control to their stuff won't do as well in this new world as others who let their communities have a bit of leeway). I give away MY stuff for free, which gets me more distribution and then I put my sponsor's name on SOME of my stuff. I've found this has made me MUCH more money than trying to tightly control everything. You might look into how RadioHead did when they let their fans decide the price for their work. Some, yes, didn't pay, but lots did to the tune of more than $10 million now.
I've spent more than $5,000 on my photographic equipment, and have more than $10,000 in computers and thousands in video gear too, and got a lot of professional training in photography too (I was in the photojournalism program at San Jose State University where one three-unit class now costs thousands of dollars). So, congratulations on investing in your career the way I have too.
I don't try to make money with every image and, indeed, all my Flickr photography is given to the public domain so you, even, could reuse it if you find fit to.
I did seven years of blogging without even putting an ad on my blog, either, and I've read hundreds of thousands of feed items -- all for free over the past few years.
If that's hypocrisy, so be it.
I think a lot of people who start businesses either don't have that luxury, skill, or temperament.
Will you have downsides? sure everything does, even families. Well no my wife's perfect, but the rest of my five kids are not.
For the rest of the social media world this signifies two things, 1) the mainstream media is not fighting social media, but embracing it and 2) The New Influencers are getting a seat at the table of the old influencers a sign of respect for the work of pioneers.
All the best
As someone who watched so many great IT trade pubs fail during the bubble-burst, it's great to see Fast Company and Inc still alive and kicking.
And you definitely went through the right thought process of deciding whether building your own venture, vs. joining a bigger-ship, was the way to go. So many people just make the decision by the seat of their pants without thinking through pros/cons, personal likes/dislikes, family issues, etc.
Looking forward to tuning in with your broadcasts real soon!
http://scobleizer.com/2007/09/11/techcrunch-lin...
Clearly, if somebody tried making a mirror Scoble blog so that they could run advertising on it, you'd be up in arms and you know it.
Copyright isn't dead, but it IS dying because people like you keep ringing it's death chimes and making people feel like it's okay to steal other people's content while deriding those who stand up and say no.
Note: Nobody is "stealing" your content when you allow them to have it for free. If you don't want them to do that, if you've made it plain that you don't want them to help themselves to your stuff, THEN it is stealing.
First of all, congrats on your new start! Its great to have self awareness and above all I have your family as a priority. You have some gifts of information filtering and connecting that need to be fully leveraged. I've been thinking about how I can cultivate those skills as well (or are they simply natural talents that some people have and others don't?)
Also, thanks again for your encouragement around blogging about the Chinese blogosphere. We opened hour blog at http://cnreviews.com and will get in touch with you about stuff you might find interesting. Thanks again for your good ideas and inspiration.
and an early wishes to you for a great HAPPY BIRTHDAY!
I wish you lots of luck. I've really enjoyed your shows.
By the way, we put our entire book up on our blog. Did that affect sales? Yes, it is still the #1 blogging book, outselling all other corporate blogging books combined. Why? By giving the thing away it created market interest.
And, yes, I've discussed this with them.
Also, there's ways to embed advertising into the content so it's hard to remove if you're using automated copying tools.
Does an advertiser really care if you see their message here or there? No.
1) You can only make money from the Web if you can personally create a large audience.
Do you really think you would have such a large audience if it wasn't for the fact that you worked at Microsoft and were one of the first bloggers? I honestly like you, Robert, and I think you deserve your success, because you were in the right place at the right time and took the right actions. Nobody handed success to you, you made it.
But let me just ask you something: If you were starting today in the techfield, and you had zero contacts and zero visibility and nobody knew you from Adam, do you honestly think you'd make it so high now? If you do, then I think a lot of people would like to hear how you would do it and how long you think it would take to get back to where you are now if it all went away tomorrow and you started from zero.
I still strongly believe that people who are not A-type personalities, people who just want to create and not be salesmen, should have as much opportunity to make money from the Web as you hyper-social guys do.
2) You can only expect to make money from digital content if you can get it into material form somehow, like your book. Give it away digitally for free, but sell hard copies, because PRINT copyright is still valid, but online copyright doesn't count. Like you often say, "copyright is dead."
Just think about the longterm consequences of your stance as print continues to decline. Why will people buy books for the The Kindle, for example, when they've been trained by you not to respect copyright law?
Look, newspapers could have stolen content, too, way back when they formed. But they didn't. They paid people for it. There was A CULTURE OF RESPECT for creatives. Even now, online newspapers will pay me $250 and up for an editorial cartoon, but places like TechCrunch (which makes a lot more money than a lot of online newspapers!) have NO expectation AT ALL of having to pay for content they use.
And why? Because of your "copyright is dead" attitude that puts unrealistic expectations on creators, MOST of whom are not salesmen like you are.
I do think I have the solution to all this. My company is going to work hard to resuscitate copyright and I do think we'll be successful, though it's going to take us a few years to get fully there.
In the meantime, it just upsets me that we can't be on the same side here. It's like you're making me your enemy and vice-versa.
Esstentially, this is what you're saying, Robert: Give it up, *I* have *my* dream, but yours died with copyright law."
Is that REALLY what you want???
I look forward to viewing more Qiks and those from the FastCompany.TV on March 3.
I learned about you through my boss, Bob Giampietro. I am currently reading your book, Naked Conversations, and was happy to hear about this new assignment you've taken up with Fast Company. It's one of my favorite magazine - I read it religiously and it completely makes a difference in my career. All the best on your new adventure.
My advice (for what it's worth) in no particular order.
1. Make them buy you a Steadi/Glide cam. Tripods are so directional limiting. And plus, Steadicam's allow cameramen to get away with your jump-hop style.
2. Stop surrounding yourself with 'worshipping' yes-men. It's nauseating and self-defeating. Rocky (and others) should rake over coals, over the hyper-active puppy-dog lapping. As they say, iron sharpens iron.
3. Walk-Thru's and Demo's are better than talking-heads.
4. Run-on mega-paragraph sentences are bad, as are, videos.
5. No inside baseball games. I don't give an iota of a care what Mike Arrington or Om Malik had for breakfast.
6. Think Subject Matter Experts, over Tech Celebrities.
7. Incestuous navel-gazing is bad. Moving photo's of people taking still photo's, wheee. Stop covering the bloggers/techies covering themselves, covering themselves.
8. Impossible perhaps, but background yourself. Let the work speak for itself. Edit as if you aren't there. Conversations are endless and pointless. Focus and cut. History Channel over mindless never-ending Charlie Rose.
9. Prepare. The 'who are you' fumbling dumb Scoble Show questions, makes for a rough start. Do thy homework and get to the point, fast. Elevator pitch'es, if they can't do it, they have to learn.
10. Go documentary thematic, over personality-cult-of-the-moment.
Online TV Directory
http://www.jazib.com
I am sure you would like it.