-
Website
http://www.scobleizer.com/ -
Original page
http://scobleizer.com/2008/03/07/why-vista-isnt-as-good-as-the-mac/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
danja
44 comments · 4 points
-
polizeros
52 comments · 1 points
-
AndyBeard
69 comments · 4 points
-
Zachary Adam Cohen
35 comments · 8 points
-
dbarefoot
40 comments · 3 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
The best and worst thing Twitter did in 2009: RT
1 day ago · 22 comments
-
World-brand-building mistakes France’s entrepreneurs make
1 week ago · 181 comments
-
2010: the year SEO isn’t important anymore
1 week ago · 67 comments
-
A new addition here: the Meebo bar
1 day ago · 7 comments
-
iPhone developers abandoning app model for HTML5?
1 week ago · 52 comments
-
The best and worst thing Twitter did in 2009: RT
ditto on all machines. After some 5-7 sleep/wakeup cycles, problems begin with WiFi, Bluetooth, Ethernet, etc. Restarting helps, but it sux.
Installed Vista Sp1 and issues are gone.
"My Mac has only done that once and it turned out I had a bad set of RAM. This isn’t the first time the Dell has given errors or problems on boot, either."
So maybe your Dell has a problem.
Then again maybe what you mean to compare is Vista with Mac OS X? You are comparing an entire operating system and saying its not as good as a Mac because of Start Up and Shutdown is not as smooth or errors out while at the same time praising Windows (I assume you mean the Vista brand.)
"the fonts on Windows are more readable, for instance and things do seem snappier on my Dell, plus that darn battery life is just wonderful, especially when I’m flying across the US like I’m about to"
I usually love reading your posts but this one was way too confusing.
http://jkontherun.blogs.com/jkontherun/2007/10/...
For instance, I was bitten by the KB937287 bug (see here: http://windowsvistablog.com/blogs/windowsvista/...).
I resorted to renaming pending.xml. Still no update from Microsoft as to a fix past that for this problem. Will I be able to get SP1?
I would note that I'm also running Vista on a Dell laptop, but haven't noticed any substantial startup problems until the above one.
However, these little machines are absolutely wonderful now (since November, roughly)--they easily qualify as one of the best laptops I have ever used, if not *the* best. They are *very* fast for an ultralight notebook (ours have the regular Core2 Duo CPUs and 7200 RPM drives), and the sleep/hibernate/resume feature is flawless. I've even tried to "confuse" the laptop by closing the lid, then reopening it before it completes the transition to sleep/hibernate--it completes without issue, then resumes when the lid is reopened once again. About the only knock against it that I have is that it doesn't include an optical drive, but in a pinch it does have the slice-style dock that snaps on the bottom to add this capability if you need it (and even then, it's still a light notebook... just not so thin anymore).
My guess is that Dell hasn't fleshed out all the issues yet. At any rate, you may want to give the X61 a try--I highly recommend it.
My Dell XPS M1330 was pretty much a dog out of the box due to all of the 'value add' stuff which doesn't come with Windows Vista. It's been as rock solid as my MacBook AFTER I performed a completely clean install of the operating system -- even sleep works identical to my Mac with the out-of-box Windows Vista defaults (closing the lid makes it sleep, opening the lid makes it wake).
Dell *could* ship their boxes every bit as solid with Windows Vista as what Apple with a Mac + OSX -- they choose not to for a variety of reasons (some good, most not in my opinion).
Instead of finding fault with the OS you might be more appropriately finding fault with the OEM.
I don't quite get your Leopard comparison because my biggest pet peeve with Vista is its sluggish performance. Vista makes even a brand new PC feel two years old. Something is fundamentally wrong with the OS, and the fact that SP1 does little to improve things leads me to wonder if it will ever be fixed.
XP may be long in the tooth, but it sure runs a hell of a lot faster and more reliably than Vista.
How soon you forget...
http://scobleizer.com/2007/11/16/caught-in-appl...
Very sloppy!
My biggest complaint with Vista is that it keeps asking me, over and over, "You just tried to open APPLICATION. I know you clicked on it, and that you've clicked on this application thousands of times before, and answered YES to this dialog each time, but please, can you tell me if you're really, really totally 100% positive you want to launch this application?"
Um, yeah, I do. And I will want to again tomorrow, thanks.
I've had worse laptop problems Windows-side though - my mother's, for example, where ATI refuse to release drivers ("that's the manufacturer's job, even though it's an ATI chipset") - unhelpful at the best of times, but when the manufacturer went bankrupt two years ago, just after selling the laptop? Completely useless - and embarassingly pathetic compared to nVidia's stellar example of providing drivers!
That's what VmWare Fusion (or even BootCamp) is for! ;-)
Nvidia's proliferation of drivers isn't an act of charity. They release new drivers to flesh out the bugs created in previous releases. Who needs Microsoft to burden us with buggy software when we've got Nvidia?
Isn't it time some something really revolutionary in the battery field?
* To date it's been restarting fine.
I'm using a Mac Power Book 17-inch, so, yeah, I don't get that many hours. Maybe three if I turn everything down.
I also like the battery life on the M700. I typically use an extended battery which gives me a good 5 hours. Great for plane trips. And this is with a 2.6GHz Core 2 Duo, 7200 RPM drive, and lots of compiling.
Just finished the HIMMS show in Orlando and the tablet and battery got a lot of interest. Ignore the ugly woman in the video (me) here having a bad hair day doing the Vista dictation demo with no headset required. The picture shows the unit with the battery clipped on. There's also a plug in for an external SATA drive and fire wire connection.
http://ducknetweb.blogspot.com/2008/03/tabletki...
Here's more from the site on the 10 hour battery coming out. The stand shown on the picture comes off as well so you can use it as a mini docking station . Cool stuff and not your ordinary tablet by any means.
http://www.tabletkiosk.com/tkstore/pc/viewPrd.a...
Is their any event like saltlick bbq last year?
Adnan
This is a good way to draw traffic to your site Robert but otherwise, this is an old argument that leads nowhere.
You must be kidding.
I have a MacBook Pro which also runs Vista. OS X is a dream, but I almost never boot into Vista. Its not the speed--it the philosophy of Vista that seems primitive.
I waiting for my MacBook Air.
1) If you actually do have to shutdown or restart, the Mac will have all this done in under a minute, every time.
2) more importantly, the sleep functionality is almost flawless. On a laptop, you close the lid and it will go to sleep, and can last weeks on battery. When you open the lid, by the time the lid is all the way open you're already back to your desktop, and you will be connected to wireless within another second. This is one major place where the "it just works" mantra is undeniable.
If you use Windows, then yeah, you might not have a specific problem with your laptop startup/shutdown or sleep performance, but once you use a Mac for a while you start to see the kinks in the Windows armor. On my work IBM Thinkpad, for example, when I have to restart (which is way too often for my liking), i really never know if my computer will be out of commission for 2 minutes or up to 5+ minutes.
The as far as sleeping.... well i never know what will happen really. Sometimes when i close the lid it will sleep like I have it set to. Sometimes though it won't sleep, and it will continue to run and just drain my battery. Sometimes when I open the lid, it will pop out of sleep relatively quickly within a few seconds. Sometimes it will just sit there, and I have to hit the power button to awake it. Sometimes I get impatient and hit the power button twice, which restarts the PC. Sometimes it doesn't wake up at all and I have to force restart with the pwoer button. It's a mixed bag, really.
Too much bloatware (so I did a clean install) and no problems with the sleep/wakeup driven by opening/closing the lid.
I run Vista 64 bits and shutdown takes about 8 seconds. Startup takes about 25 seconds to get to the logon screen and 10 more seconds after it.
I always find these flame wars take on the aspect of a biblical zealotry in certain cases.
http://musings-cafe.blogspot.com/2008/02/zealot...
sent from: fav.or.it [FID36688]
BTW- How about giving an Axiotron Tablet Mac a try and tell us your impressions since you are a Windows Tablet user. I like the tablet concept, but am no fan of Windows and would like to see an established Tablet user give it a good shakedown.
On a plain (without wlan) I have 3hours + battery and if I need, I can change it.
I love Vista and have no problems with sleep and wakeup at all.
Vista is way better then its image!
I am using PC's for almost 6 years & believe me, I have never seen a blue screen - not on XP and not on Vista now.
And I will not for sure go for Mac because it is a one click start/shut down machine. I would rather dual boot my machine with Linux (which is free).
C'mmon guys, these are non-substantial features. I get bugged off when the fan of Mac next to me starts making helicopter's sounds and I can feel its heat.
sent from: fav.or.it [FID38090]
Microsoft sales are up and continue to trend upwards,its wishful thinking, but sorry.. Microsoft isn't going away.
I have a few Mac fan friends and we always agree to disagree, but otherwise we usually have a good time together without the stillborn arguments about who's OS is better and why.
The fact that the computer doesn't start properly means to me the product doesn't work. Period.
It's like buying a car that only starts properly sometimes. When it doesn't start you need to disconnect the distributor cab which in most cases will fix the problem but you don't really know why. Would you find that acceptable?
At the end of the day I believe manufacturers should get their act together and first make sure they have a working product before they pack more innovation in... or perhaps it's that "innovation" that is often causing the problem.
uhhhh, isn't that like AT&T of the 1970's stating that the rotary dial telephone is a big hit and will continue to sell well?
Vista will continue to sell since it is the defacto standard and that XP, at some point, will no longer be offered on packaged systems.
Granted a few will make the leap to Apple. Some may even be tempted to get the linux boxes that are being sold at walmart, since those will surf the web, do email and have Open Office.
A question on my part, is Vista a build of Windows Server 2003 with a different UI and other "innovations"? ( MS has really overdone that word)
MS wants everyone to know where the os is coming from. "Vista Ready", "Running MS Windows".... stickers tend to be all over the machine. And since MS dominates the market, well, they get the blame. Sometimes undeservedly. Most of the time not.
Thomas makes a good point as well. MS and OEM's are too worried about "innovation" that they don't take enough care of the essentials, or at least it appears that way. The sleep function is good example.
I run Vista on my Macbook. It never fails to resume from sleep. Never.
Leopard resumes slightly faster when I open it (although partly this may be deception because I don't resume to a login screen on Leopard, but do on Windows). It takes about a second to resume to Leopard, and about 2-3 seconds to resume to Vista. Very small difference.
Vista goes to sleep faster, though. Leopard sometimes sits there for up to a minute after I close it before the light on the outside goes into its "sleeping" heartbeat mode.
The good thing about Dell (and by extension Microsoft OS) is that they come out to us next working day to fix any faults. Is this type of support available for Macs?
Having said that, XP runs much better on our Vista capable laptops than Vista does.
The only people developing anything for Silverlight are the shills that Microsoft is paying to do so.
Yes, I know this an old (2005) machine and the problem is likely to be some Windows update. But this problem has caused me to give up the Tablet PC and switch to a MacBool Pro. But, I will still long for Tablet Mac.
SaS
CPAP machine