Scobleizer - Latest Comments in Why conferences don’t allow kids…

Re: Why conferences don’t allow kids…

Andrew Martin — Tue, 22 Aug 2006 16:59:18 -0000

One of the things that I love about Reboot is that everybody is welcome. There are even babies crawling about at the back.

Re: Why conferences don’t allow kids…

John C. Welch — Sun, 20 Aug 2006 17:03:08 -0000

The WWDC is a different issue. It is, except for the keynote, entirely under NDA, and each attendee has to be of legal age to "sign" an NDA, (as much as you actually "sign" it). Since a minor attendee can't sign for themselves, and you can't sign for someone else, the WWDC is 18 and up.

Re: Why conferences don’t allow kids…

DK — Sun, 20 Aug 2006 05:49:31 -0000

Long-time reader first-time commenter - agree with the original post and many of the comments here.

I would just like to add something I always say to fellow 'youth professionals': young people are not the future, they are the active citizens of today... are we (adults) creating those opportunities for young people to participate?

:-)

Re: Why conferences don’t allow kids…

Cory — Sat, 19 Aug 2006 19:12:07 -0000

I am 15 years old, and although I have never had the privilage to go to something cool like th WWDC or any other cool conference, I have done a few small 2600 meetings and local cons.

I deffinatly agree with the idea that parents should be force to sign some type of disclaimer making them ultimatly responsible for any damage done by their kids, which is how it always has been.

Re: Why conferences don’t allow kids…

joeduck — Sat, 19 Aug 2006 15:48:40 -0000

I still think excluding kids 1) sucks and 2) is a strategic mistake. I work with public access kiosks and find very few (zero) cases of vandalism after many years of use. Why? Kids respect computing, programming, etc. Excluding the next gen from conferences is shortsighted and so... um .... Web 1.0!

Re: Why conferences don’t allow kids…

Nancy — Sat, 19 Aug 2006 15:09:41 -0000

Is 18 really the cut-off? No kidding. That would have cut out 1) the boss of my first "real" programming job. He was 14 when he started his first software company. he was 18 when I started with his company. 2) Several of the best developers in the Visual FoxPro community: Mike Helland, 16 when he first made MVP, IIRC, and Christof Wallendorf, who might have been 14, but definitely under 18. Katheen Dollard, MVP for VB and .NET, has a son who's been a serious and good coder since he was in middle school. Maybe the insurance thing is real, but I'm always skeptical of the insurance claim. It's a handy blind. Dig deeper and find what exactly the insurance ramifications are...and for what age and what status.

Re: Why conferences don’t allow kids…

Albert Pascual — Sat, 19 Aug 2006 13:11:07 -0000

Those conference are lots of money, I wanted to go to the one in Las Vegas, they asking for $2,000 So do you think I'll pay for my kids as well? Crazy

Re: Why conferences don’t allow kids…

LayZ — Sat, 19 Aug 2006 11:59:56 -0000

@15. Well, your reasoning works for me. The less annoying teenagers the better. (and yes, I raised 3 of them)

Re: Why conferences don’t allow kids…

disenchantedtech — Sat, 19 Aug 2006 08:59:38 -0000

Ahhh, the good old insurance excuse, if you're ever asked to explain anything you don't want to admit the truth to you, just say "it's for insurance reasons".

The more likely reason is "kids without much (or any) money running around making noise are a deterrent / disruption for adults with lots of money to attend and spend" but that opens you up to criticism, people just tend to accept the insurance excuse.

Re: Why conferences don’t allow kids…

Jeroen Leenarts — Sat, 19 Aug 2006 07:33:02 -0000

I totally agree with earlier statements regarding signing a disclaimer for parents with kids at these events.

The weird thing to me though is this: Isn't a legal guardian responsible for any and all damages caused by a kid? It is where I live. When a kid wrecks something it's his/her parents problem. Not the public area's owner where the kid was messing around. I do agree that when kids are allowed some precautions should be taken, cause a Mac Pro tipping over on a table top can be pretty painfull.

The weid thing about people having kids is the fact that somehow having kids is a right above almost every other right. I agree with the freedom to live your live the way you want. But if having kids is no problem at all, why is it that shooting yourself through the head or living in a house which resembles a garbage dump is?

Re: Why conferences don’t allow kids…

Geoff — Sat, 19 Aug 2006 06:36:38 -0000

About time we started to roll back the nanny state and this crazy health and safety culture that is threating life today. I agree parents should be asked to sign a disclaimer end of story. More on the UK nanny state here http://nannyknowsbest.blogs...

Re: Why conferences don’t allow kids…

carlo127 — Sat, 19 Aug 2006 01:09:14 -0000

Iagree with the fact that kids are sometimes anuisance to these seminars and that keeping them in check is not an easy job. Some kids depending on how old can be considered like the one you gave as example, the 12-year-old genius. Most kids tend to misbehave at such activities because they do not understand the discussions and you know how kids are when bored.

Re: Why conferences don’t allow kids…

Jeffrey — Fri, 18 Aug 2006 23:01:26 -0000

I'm glad you brought up that kid at VBITS, Robert -- he bought a copy of my book and I signed it for him; I got a big charge out of talking to him.

Re: Why conferences don’t allow kids…

LayZ — Fri, 18 Aug 2006 21:46:27 -0000

@9/ Are there parents dumb enough? Actually yes there are. We all know that. I mean, how many parents use school as a daycare? Let's recall that classic line from Parenthood:

"You know, Mrs. Buckman, you need a license to buy a dog, to drive a car - hell, you even need a license to catch a fish. But they'll let any butt-reaming asshole be a father."

Re: Why conferences don’t allow kids…

Scott — Fri, 18 Aug 2006 21:19:18 -0000

I wish in this country we could start over with the legal system. We need to ship everyone that sues at the drop of a hat out into space into a black hole.

Is requiring the kid stay with their parent all day even through the conference lectures not adequate? Are there are really parents dumb enough to take kids to these things that aren't ready to be interested in the material being presented?

Re: Why conferences don’t allow kids…

mike3k — Fri, 18 Aug 2006 21:04:29 -0000

MacHack, which unfortunately shut down after last year, always encouraged kids. There were always lots of brilliant kids there. I've seen 12 year olds who were intimately familiar with Darwin kernel code. Patrick would have had a great time there.

Re: Why conferences don’t allow kids…

/pd — Fri, 18 Aug 2006 20:30:35 -0000

then these type of org's need to take page out of googles textbook !!

16-year-old Caleb Eggensperger, is being praised by Google as “a genius” and someone who “is going to take over the world some day.”

http://google-code-updates....

Re: Why conferences don’t allow kids…

hadi — Fri, 18 Aug 2006 18:58:36 -0000

Why not just ask the parent to sign a disclaimer form that pre-empts any suing and makes it the parent's responsibility to take care of the kid?

Re: Why conferences don’t allow kids…

dbarefoot — Fri, 18 Aug 2006 18:45:15 -0000

We had a parent-managed kids room at Northern Voice 2006, and it worked great. Though, it was targeted at younger kids, I think. Regardless, the feedback from parents was very positive, and it didn't cost much extra.

Of course, at NV, Patrick would have been welcome in sessions.

Re: Why conferences don’t allow kids…

pt — Fri, 18 Aug 2006 18:20:35 -0000

at maker faire we had rockets, robots and fire - we managed to get insurance. macworld/wwdc also allows under 18 - that's at moscone...

surely under 18 with parent/guardian could be a compromise?

Re: Why conferences don’t allow kids…

Robert Scoble — Fri, 18 Aug 2006 18:20:21 -0000

John: You're right. Bad call on my behalf.

On the other hand, MacWorld was in the exact same place. I never saw such a sign and no one tried to stop Patrick from getting in.

Re: Why conferences don’t allow kids…

John C. Welch — Fri, 18 Aug 2006 18:18:48 -0000

Wait, so now they're at fault because the sign wasn't funny? Dude, it's not an ad for the improv, it's an informational sign. It needs to be clear, direct, and unmistakable in its message. Humor is SO not a requirement.

Are you SURE you communicate for a living? You're real bad at it on a regular basis.

Re: Why conferences don’t allow kids…

carolus.holman — Fri, 18 Aug 2006 18:10:08 -0000

Most of the future rests in the minds of the young. The endless talent out there amongst the youth of the world is untapped and hardly taken seriously. Why is it that the marketing we see is often pointed at younger people. If they were smart they would open their arms to the up and coming users and creators of tomorrows computer landscape. They have what money can't buy, enthusiasm and lots of time! I remember showing Word on my Mac to a guv'mint employee back in the early early 90's. He laughed said it was a toy, Word Perfect is the only REAL word processor. I kept using Word and now he probably is too. Maybe they should set a computer out front, ask potential child entrant to complete a series of tasks, then on success they could let them in?