-
Website
http://www.scobleizer.com/ -
Original page
http://scobleizer.com/2006/08/18/why-conferences-dont-allow-kids/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
danja
44 comments · 4 points
-
polizeros
52 comments · 1 points
-
AndyBeard
69 comments · 4 points
-
Zachary Adam Cohen
35 comments · 8 points
-
dbarefoot
40 comments · 3 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
World-brand-building mistakes France’s entrepreneurs make
2 weeks ago · 181 comments
-
The best and worst thing Twitter did in 2009: RT
3 days ago · 24 comments
-
2010: the year SEO isn’t important anymore
1 week ago · 67 comments
-
iPhone developers abandoning app model for HTML5?
1 week ago · 52 comments
-
A new addition here: the Meebo bar
2 days ago · 8 comments
-
World-brand-building mistakes France’s entrepreneurs make
Are you SURE you communicate for a living? You're real bad at it on a regular basis.
On the other hand, MacWorld was in the exact same place. I never saw such a sign and no one tried to stop Patrick from getting in.
surely under 18 with parent/guardian could be a compromise?
Of course, at NV, Patrick would have been welcome in sessions.
16-year-old Caleb Eggensperger, is being praised by Google as “a genius” and someone who “is going to take over the world some day.”
http://google-code-updates.blogspot.com/2006/08...
Is requiring the kid stay with their parent all day even through the conference lectures not adequate? Are there are really parents dumb enough to take kids to these things that aren't ready to be interested in the material being presented?
"You know, Mrs. Buckman, you need a license to buy a dog, to drive a car - hell, you even need a license to catch a fish. But they'll let any butt-reaming asshole be a father."
The weird thing to me though is this: Isn't a legal guardian responsible for any and all damages caused by a kid? It is where I live. When a kid wrecks something it's his/her parents problem. Not the public area's owner where the kid was messing around. I do agree that when kids are allowed some precautions should be taken, cause a Mac Pro tipping over on a table top can be pretty painfull.
The weid thing about people having kids is the fact that somehow having kids is a right above almost every other right. I agree with the freedom to live your live the way you want. But if having kids is no problem at all, why is it that shooting yourself through the head or living in a house which resembles a garbage dump is?
The more likely reason is "kids without much (or any) money running around making noise are a deterrent / disruption for adults with lots of money to attend and spend" but that opens you up to criticism, people just tend to accept the insurance excuse.
I deffinatly agree with the idea that parents should be force to sign some type of disclaimer making them ultimatly responsible for any damage done by their kids, which is how it always has been.
I would just like to add something I always say to fellow 'youth professionals': young people are not the future, they are the active citizens of today... are we (adults) creating those opportunities for young people to participate?
:-)