-
Website
http://www.scobleizer.com/ -
Original page
http://scobleizer.com/2006/11/28/what-mark-cuban-is-missing-about-hdtv/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
danja
44 comments · 4 points
-
polizeros
52 comments · 1 points
-
AndyBeard
69 comments · 4 points
-
Zachary Adam Cohen
35 comments · 8 points
-
dbarefoot
40 comments · 3 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
The best and worst thing Twitter did in 2009: RT
16 hours ago · 20 comments
-
World-brand-building mistakes France’s entrepreneurs make
1 week ago · 181 comments
-
2010: the year SEO isn’t important anymore
6 days ago · 66 comments
-
iPhone developers abandoning app model for HTML5?
6 days ago · 51 comments
-
A 2010 real-time app development platform from Kynetx
14 hours ago · 2 comments
-
The best and worst thing Twitter did in 2009: RT
..go figure !!
Nice setup!
Tell me though, can you use your Media Center Keyboard and remote control from your living room, and if so, how does that work?
Kind regards,
Scott Ferguson
New Zealand
The 360 is a slightly better choice if you get the external HD-dvd drive, since netflix rents those. (They do, don't they?) Plus, you get next gen gaming now, instead of waiting for Sony to get their poop in a group. It is a sightly worse choice, because you are locked into the media center OS. Presumably it will be possible to spoof that later, but later is still later. By the time later arrives, you could replace the mini with Apple's already-shown-but-not-available media extender device. I advocate for the linux server solution because you don't have to do as much maintainance, deal with WGA, nor pay licensing fees/pirate the OS. Even though linux isn't desktop-ready, it's been ready for this kind of server use for a decade.
*Yes you could probably use xp plus samba. At least with regular xp, you can replace it with linux someday. And wired is less finicky than wireless, but its been shown you can use wireless.
My computer is 3 years old and has the right connections. I have a 17"Mac Powerbook and conect with a built in DVI port. My only problem is the 3 year old graphics card which gets bogged down a bit by HD content.
Kevin: there is no DVI connection on my Sony HD screen.
Stuart: I can't hear my Xbox's fan. It's at least as quiet as my wife's MacBookPro.
Scott: I have a Media Center keyboard, but I haven't tried that yet. Won't be able to until I get home from Europe.
Alexander: huh? I'm using Vista as the driver and I'm pretty sure I'm getting 1080i throughput (my screen can only do 1080i, newer screens do 1080p with the Xbox 360 and Vista). I also have a HD-DVD, so I'll do some tests to see how close we can get to that.
Hell, I'd even watch your stupid show if you had HD. :-)
Oh man, I need to send you a hamburger and a pizza slice!
Sorry, I still have to disagree. Mark is right on this one. I think the blogosphere continues to have this misconception that the "normal" people of the world think and act the same way we do. Most people, even the ones who have HDTVs, don't even know what Ethernet is. I would be absolutely floored if I went to someone's house that wasn't a "geek" and they had their PC hooked up to their HDTV. Geeks are still the minority.
With built in wifi iTV already takes our one step...
You can't have this both ways. Here in Wales I interviewed several "normal, non geek" people. They DEFINITELY knew what 802.11 and ethernet were. Far smarter than you give them credit for.
And someone is buying those hundreds of thousands of Wifi access points that are now showing up, even in Montana, which is about the last place I'd expect to see them.
But, you are right for now.
Seriously, though, someone is buying these Xbox's. 15,000 are sold every day. That's not just Silicon Valley geeks buying them.
And my Best Buy buds tell me HDTVs are flying off the shelves.
It's only a matter of time before they figure out that they can play movies off of the Internet.
Just watch.
http://www.newyorker.com/talk/content/articles/...
so much for "losing $300 a unit is Just How The Console Industry Works."
We'll see what Apple's strategy is to get its logo connected to my HD screen.
Microsoft's is a bit hard to visualize, although once you see it in action you want it, and want it bad (we had "normal people" over our house for Thanksgiving and they wanted it for their own homes) but it isn't hard to hook up, and once it's setup it's easy to operate and use from within Xbox. If you have enough skills to turn on an Xbox game you have enough skills to get Media Center extender to work.
Now, you wanna bet how good that strategy will be five years from now when a good chunk of the market has moved to HDTV? I think it'll smell like the London sewer system, that's what.
Sony and Microsoft are losing money for a reason: they know the real prize will come in 2010.
iTV purports to do that much better than an xbox 360 does, and has the added bonus of working on Mac OS X and Windows.
Anyway, we'll see about iTV. I'll probably be first in line to get one of those, too. You didn't miss that we have three Macs in our house, right? I'd love to be able to share stuff from those onto my HD screen.
Having stood in line at Fred Meyer most of the night to get my hands on a Wii I have to disagree with you. There was a good mix of young and old, men and women in line to get a Wii. Many of those I spoke with in line had a 360 and some even had a PS3. All were very excited about the Wii and not just for their kids. The Zelda games are amazing and the new controllers are a lot of fun. I like the review MSNBC did of all 3 consoles and mentioned by the end of the night, everyone was gathered around the Wii, even the hard core gamers. For some of us, just glitzy graphics don't make a good game. Nintendo understand this and I appreciate the fact they are not trying to take over my living room. If you have young kids, the Wii is a no brainer.
these strategies are what separates the Geek God from those Precocious Geek Kids -
http://digg.com/users/worldwideweb/dugg
Let's hope this becomes page one on Digg and take your stats through the roof
No dvi port? Get an adapter.
Anyway, if the point is that HDTV isn't consumer friendly/ready, I think we've all proven that :)
Lets leave the Wii out of this. Nintendo isn't making home entertainment systems, they are making game systems. Different markets, different strategies. When everyone has EDtv, they'll come out with a new system. When everyone has HDtv, they'll come out with a new system. They didn't use cutting edge components in their box, so they don't need to wait five years for full profitability to refresh and bring out something new. They can do that in two years.
High framerate FPS games are a niche, with a niche size audience. It doesn't look that way, since the majority of the gaming market likes that kind of thing, but the majority of the gaming market is a tiny slice of the general population. I mean, there's nothing wrong with that, but there's a reason why we are still called geeks instead of mainstream.
For PCs, its only the last 2 years that PCs have had enough CPU or Graphics power to push HD out a compatible port. Which means even IF those computers are compatible with HDTVs and can play HD content, they are small in number and those without arent going to run out and get HD compatible PCs .
Hooking up an XBOX to remotely stream. Get real. Possible. Yes. Has been for a while. To stream HD, works for some content formats. Certainly doesnt have a chance of becoming ubiquitous and the obvious solution to playing HD content from the net to an HDTV. THe Xbox w HD DVD had a far far better shot of being a ubquitous inhome media server that connected the net to HDTV but MIcroSoft chose to make Online a Walled Garden. A mistake they may never live down.
Works great when you are trying to subsidize your hardware costs, but kicks you in the ass when you are trying to become dominant outside of gaming. Its a back to the 1970s strategy of the mini and mainframe software strategy. Maybe they have hired some former Xerox Parcers ?
THe question I was answering, and maybe I didnt write it as well as some others would of was
"Will HD content from the Net to a consumers HDTV replace traditional distribution methods of content from a satellite or cable plant to a vendor provided box connected to an HDTV ?"
The complexity of alternatives in these comments just proves my point that they wont, and the comments dont consider the bandwidth issues of downloading or streaming content that pretty much has to be encoded at 9mbs or more for 80pct of the most popular content.
thanks for reading and commenting on the blog. Thats what makes blogging fun !
Technically, it’s not that difficult to connect PC’s directly to HDTV's either as suggested here or through a DVI/HDMI or component cable. Likewise, most recent computers certainly have the processing power to decode MPEG4 or VC1.
The real showstopper isn’t technical it’s legal. That XBOX component connection you mention is not a secure video path, so any protected HD content that you were to get on your PC wouldn’t be playable over your component connection. Only HDMI/HDCP connections can do that and the XBOX as of this time can’t do HDMI to my knowledge.
I find Mr. Cuban almost invariably disingenuous when it comes to discussions about HD. The technical issues he raises are generally smokescreens to disguise the public policy issues that are really the roadblocks to any attempt to bypass industry authorized methods of distributing and consuming content.
Lately, I've been going from my Mac to TiVo, and have been putting my media drives (Several TeraBytes of content) into HTPCs such as TVisto, TViX and MviX. (see Amazon)
I definitely look forward to the iTV with FrontRow as while these other Mac friendly options work well, they're not very elegant.
I guess I never considered "streaming" as being a requirement, or even desirable. Maybe I've been TiVo-fied (as a user from day one) such that when I sit down, I want to have a local library from which to watch, and the ability to tell a device what type of content I want to be receiving.
To me, the whole live broadcast model is dead for all content that's not time-based sensitive.
Bub
Then he says "only idiot would by YouTube" moments before people WAY smarter than him (by any metric you choose including bank balances) buy it. He says a PC won't connect to a HDTV and Scoble elegantly ans simply proves him wrong. He's not smart, he's not even telling the truth. He's just spouting attention grabbing one-liners designed to promote his own business interests, nit the truth.