-
Website
http://www.scobleizer.com/ -
Original page
http://scobleizer.com/2007/05/08/whats-next-facebook-vs-linked-in/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
danja
44 comments · 4 points
-
polizeros
52 comments · 1 points
-
AndyBeard
69 comments · 4 points
-
Zachary Adam Cohen
35 comments · 8 points
-
dbarefoot
40 comments · 3 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
World-brand-building mistakes France’s entrepreneurs make
2 weeks ago · 181 comments
-
The best and worst thing Twitter did in 2009: RT
3 days ago · 24 comments
-
2010: the year SEO isn’t important anymore
1 week ago · 67 comments
-
iPhone developers abandoning app model for HTML5?
1 week ago · 52 comments
-
A new addition here: the Meebo bar
2 days ago · 8 comments
-
World-brand-building mistakes France’s entrepreneurs make
I haven't gotten alot of interaction from my Facebook account.
I saw a panel last week with the founder of LinkedIn, the CTO of Facebook, a VP at Google and some other dude. I asked a question about user control of our own data. Facebook and LinkedIn gave me honest, detailed answers. The other two looked at me like I was from another planet. (though to be fair the acoustics were awful)
Meanwhile, I got a friend invite via Bebo yesterday and I still can't get over it!
face book is stil a bit gosh jeepers which school did you go to and which greek did you join
You have to manage your linked in network more activley the first one I get was an EX CTO of Exact and I can actualy find people ive worked with onlinked in (Ivan Pope for example) but not on facebook.
This may be a UK vs US thing all of my alumni from high school are 20+ years younger.
Actually floated that idea to a VP there. Not sure that they understood what I was talking about.
How often do these fads change hands? Sure Facebook is the popular site among college kids (and get real - that is still their primary market - they are getting their pants beaten in the high school mkt by MySpace) but since when did they hit super fad? 2006? 2005? 2004 at the earliest. Let's say they're irrelevant in 2010. Not a bad prediction given how relevant is geocities, tripod, and AOL are these days.
Who's going to pay $3B and have to monetize that in 3 good years? And is a company that ran it's complete cycle in 4-6 years really worth $3B?
I don't think I will end up spending a lot of time on there, but I can see how it would be addictive to some.
What they have right now is a good thing, and as long as they don't deviate too far from that point too quickly, I don't see it stopping any time soon.
However, I read somewhere that they are thinking about doing "Facebook Music" or something equally as stupid, which I think has the potential of outright ruining the experience.
Facebookers don't want a MySpace clone.
I'm not quite sure what you mean about "the amount of email traffic it generates". Apart from invite requests, I never get anything from them -- certainly nothing that feels like spam.
fixed that for you. ;-)
Linkedin's Answer and Job Posting are business productivity tools that Facebook is not focusing on.
Use Linkedin the right way will lead you to some possible interested deals. Use Facebook the right way will lead you to possible romance or love.
Linkedin saves me time by avoiding keeping multiple copies of contacts on different computers and email account address book. It offers more than listing your contact and profile at your blogs.
Linkedin won the Webby Awards this year 2007.
I have both a Facebook account and a LinkedIn account but prefer the last one. this is a) because Facebook is mainly US focussed and I'm Europe focussed and b) because I value staying in touch with a business network more than with people who were randomly introduced into my life just because I went to school with them.
I see all three of these as important platforms. While MySpace can be annoying, Facebook is a fairly clean interface and quite useful. LinkedIn is a little quirky, but can usefully make the social networks visible.
None of these will be a waste of time, especially with the kind of leverage MySpace and Facebook are waving around during negotiations...
Cheers, Jeff McNeill
"Find the people you know, from your company, from your school"...
By using the word "school" at the first place, LI is running on Facebook's field. The words "School" and "University" are, definitely owned by Facebook (for the next years at least).
Instead of pursuing this strategy, LI should clarifying its positioning and focus only on the business market. Who goes on LI to find classmates ? There are bunch of sites for this : classmates, reunion, FACEBOOK. You go on LI only for business purpose, to grow your network, find co workers, business colleagues. Ok, sometimes they happen to be your old classmates but the site shouldn't exhib rhis aspect, like it's a big part of the concept, or LI could loose its relevancy (and market) on the long run.
You cannot be everything for everyone. If a site ever done this, we would only go on this one site and the Internet would be called thissite.com.
Yahoo, Google and MSN try to do this, but do you use even 10% of the services of these 3 sites ? In users mind, they are only email, search engine and instant messaging services, nothing more.
LI in general has big ambiguity issues with its design and business model(and positioning). Just take a look at this thread and you'll understand:
http://www.linkedin.com/answers/using-linkedIn/...
We think Kuhnektid might be that application.
http://www.kuhnektid.com