<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Scobleizer - Latest Comments in Welcome from Forbes, but&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://scobleizer.disqus.com/</link><description>Tech enthusiast, video blogger, media innovator, fanatical about startups at Rackspace, home of fanatical support for Internet entrepreneurs.</description><atom:link href="https://scobleizer.disqus.com/welcome_from_forbes_but8230/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 08:22:19 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Welcome from Forbes, but&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/01/25/welcome-from-forbes-but/#comment-9667871</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Lunch20 was a success, there was lots of Thai Food, and even Jason Calacanis was there.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Catherine G from PodTech and I were there.  good times.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jeremiah Owyang</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 08:22:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Welcome from Forbes, but&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/01/25/welcome-from-forbes-but/#comment-9667872</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Both. The world is not binary.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Robert Scoble</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 02:51:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Welcome from Forbes, but&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/01/25/welcome-from-forbes-but/#comment-9667873</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"I’m very honored to be #9 on that list..."&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;"Personally, I’d rather give up my spot on that list to someone who actually DID something for the Web."&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Well, which one is it?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">anona</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 02:45:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Welcome from Forbes, but&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/01/25/welcome-from-forbes-but/#comment-9667851</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I say just bask in the love. :) Sure, people made important protocols that we all use, but you've played a large role in the rise of blogging too.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Scoble: The voice of a bloggy generation. :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Matt Cutts</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 00:22:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Welcome from Forbes, but&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/01/25/welcome-from-forbes-but/#comment-9667849</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I have to agree that you've had too many political posts since the John Edwards announcement. Your shared links definitely bear out this point, too. Frankly, I wish you'd just stick to technology.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I know. I know. Seemingly, your point is NOT to be political, but to highlight how  the new media will influence politics, which is a discussion that is continually amplified in the political blogosphere already.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;You excel at geekery and technology--and those are definitely the posts I most enjoy reading.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Bill Heyman</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 23:56:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Welcome from Forbes, but&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/01/25/welcome-from-forbes-but/#comment-9667850</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Congrats. While I do think they got a lot of the influential bloggers on there, I think the research was a little sloppy... in addition to the tech / political messup, seems like they just yanked down the most obvious photos they could find - like Mike Arrington's was just him at the ball game from his about page ... there are much better photos out there. But still, what bugs me the most is how big media sites are breaking up numerical list articles into multiple pages in likely a plot to increase page views... blah.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;But anyhow, ignore my rant... congrats on being an influencial blogger. You certainly are in my book! I look forward to reading your posts daily.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Webomatica</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 23:32:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Welcome from Forbes, but&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/01/25/welcome-from-forbes-but/#comment-9667852</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Robert you would make a great VP, or someone in the new administration's cabinet. :)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Rex&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RexDixon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 22:24:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Welcome from Forbes, but&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/01/25/welcome-from-forbes-but/#comment-9667853</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hey you are blushing :)&lt;br&gt;Congratulations. Even though I hate hollywoodization of tech - it was bound to happen -silicon and valley being common to both.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">met</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 20:21:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Welcome from Forbes, but&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/01/25/welcome-from-forbes-but/#comment-9667854</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You are the Paris Hilton of the Blogoshere!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Paris</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 19:44:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Welcome from Forbes, but&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/01/25/welcome-from-forbes-but/#comment-9667855</link><description>&lt;p&gt;What an awful web page that forbes thing is.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;An auto slide show that defaults at high speed so scobles blurb gets sucked to the next before I knew what was going on.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Awful web design.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">james</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 17:06:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Welcome from Forbes, but&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/01/25/welcome-from-forbes-but/#comment-9667857</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Dude, you rock! Fame is a bitch, though, huh? Twisted stories, inaccuracy, strange slants... it's part of the package. But you are humble, graceful, and honest... you wear it well!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Fred Davis</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 15:58:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Welcome from Forbes, but&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/01/25/welcome-from-forbes-but/#comment-9667858</link><description>&lt;p&gt;And of course Forbes missed the point that any global top (substitute your favorite number) list is made relatively insignificant by our web enabled ability to find exactly what we want within our own individualized needs and preferences.  But it is good to see some bloggers like yourself on the list.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">gz</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 15:46:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Welcome from Forbes, but&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/01/25/welcome-from-forbes-but/#comment-9667859</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Robert,&lt;br&gt;I agree with teknologist @ 14, when you dip your toes into anything poloitical, you get consumed by it. I know your intention was to show the tech side of politics, and if I had the chance, I would have done the same.&lt;br&gt;I would have posted to a new blog about anything political so as to keep a seperation between my passion (tech) and this opportunity.&lt;br&gt;You have the readership to overcome this, however, you will suffer several mistakes like this (Forbes article).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Stay away from politics or at least, keep it somewhere else!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Guy&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Guy Pelletier</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 15:41:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Welcome from Forbes, but&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/01/25/welcome-from-forbes-but/#comment-9667860</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It's a list of the most popular/famous, not most deserving. So, while it's nice of you and Arrington to do the whole humble bit, but you are talking about apples and oranges!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Not that you wouldn't be on a most deserving/interesting list, of course! :-)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jesse Ciccone</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 14:51:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Welcome from Forbes, but&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/01/25/welcome-from-forbes-but/#comment-9667861</link><description>&lt;p&gt;as we've all been saying AGAIN and AGAIN... that you've been posting far too much POLITICAL junk. No wonder Forbes got confused.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;How many more people have to point this out before you believe us?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">teknologist</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 14:41:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Welcome from Forbes, but&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/01/25/welcome-from-forbes-but/#comment-9667856</link><description>&lt;p&gt;gina trapani was snubbed, imo.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">chris hollander</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 14:36:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Welcome from Forbes, but&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/01/25/welcome-from-forbes-but/#comment-9667866</link><description>&lt;p&gt;If you actually invented anything valuable enough that was worth protecting from detractors by hiring an independent contractor, your boast "nor will I pay anyone to edit that page on my behalf" might mean something. As it stands, it doesn't.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">DJ</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 13:53:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Welcome from Forbes, but&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/01/25/welcome-from-forbes-but/#comment-9667864</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Congrats, it's certainly well deserved.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;By the way, it looks like they've changed your description to "Tech blogger" now.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Hamish Macpherson</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 13:44:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Welcome from Forbes, but&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/01/25/welcome-from-forbes-but/#comment-9667863</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Interesting that the Getty photographers get credited (and I assume paid) but that the web photographers don’t.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://thomashawk.com/2007/01/forbes-thinks-web-photographers-dont.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://thomashawk.com/2007/01/forbes-thinks-web-photographers-dont.html"&gt;http://thomashawk.com/2007/...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Thomas Hawk</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 13:37:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Welcome from Forbes, but&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/01/25/welcome-from-forbes-but/#comment-9667867</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Scoble for president in 2008...???&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ET</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 13:29:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Welcome from Forbes, but&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/01/25/welcome-from-forbes-but/#comment-9667865</link><description>&lt;p&gt;More people probably know about Lonely Girl than the rest of the list, if you were to, say, poll a wide swath of people who are not aware of what RSS is, ie., not-tech-blogosphere-people.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Eric Rice</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 13:28:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Welcome from Forbes, but&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/01/25/welcome-from-forbes-but/#comment-9667862</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"I will not edit my page, nor will I pay anyone to edit that page on my behalf."&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;CLASSY!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mihir Gandhi</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 13:23:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Welcome from Forbes, but&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/01/25/welcome-from-forbes-but/#comment-9667868</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I was pretty ticked that they labeled you as a political blogger.  How did they screw that one up?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rob</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 13:13:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Welcome from Forbes, but&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/01/25/welcome-from-forbes-but/#comment-9667869</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Apparently they changed it already to Tech Blogger...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Matthias Zeller</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 13:02:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Welcome from Forbes, but&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/01/25/welcome-from-forbes-but/#comment-9667870</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Dude PLEASE blog on the Linear accelerator when you get out from under all the email! That is very cool.&lt;br&gt;Michael&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Michael Gannotti</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 12:52:01 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>