-
Website
http://www.scobleizer.com/ -
Original page
http://scobleizer.com/2008/10/06/were-in-a-death-spiral/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
danja
44 comments · 4 points
-
polizeros
52 comments · 1 points
-
AndyBeard
69 comments · 4 points
-
Zachary Adam Cohen
35 comments · 8 points
-
dbarefoot
40 comments · 3 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
The best and worst thing Twitter did in 2009: RT
17 hours ago · 20 comments
-
World-brand-building mistakes France’s entrepreneurs make
1 week ago · 181 comments
-
2010: the year SEO isn’t important anymore
6 days ago · 66 comments
-
iPhone developers abandoning app model for HTML5?
6 days ago · 51 comments
-
A 2010 real-time app development platform from Kynetx
14 hours ago · 2 comments
-
The best and worst thing Twitter did in 2009: RT
I think the positive to take out of this is the resurgence of the dollar in the currency markets. I think it says that the world's investors see what is going on and are putting their faith in the USD rather than other currencies, in large part because the US is acting a somewhat concerted fashion and trying to work their way out of this crisis, as compared to Europe which is more of a patchwork of band aids than ever.
As someone said, yea, we're going down, but the next web3.0 is being drawn out on cocktail napkins at dinner meetings with VCs.
Also, regarding the amount of power i ascribe to you - you may have a point there - but rest assured, a lot of young startups look to folks like you for thoughts on where the internet startup is going over the next few months. "Death Spiral" sounds like the scariest theme park ride ever - so if that's what you were implying then you hit the nail on the head.
And, anyway, I don't see any good positive economic news coming soon. That means we're in a death spiral and until someone tells me how we're going to get this plane out of its death spiral, I'm going to believe we're in one.
People don't care about an earthquake or a flood or a hurricane until it impacts them...
On the downside I'm working for a small web development firm that's barely a stable startup and if the economy really tanks I can see us going under with it. Hopefully the tech industry reasonably weathers the storm.
I guess the only hope is that we are so consumer minded that "buy buy buy" has been ingrained in our brains. I really don't think we'll hit the sheer depths of the Great Depression given that we are far more loose with our money than those during that time ever were. That is, of course, assuming things don't finally completely unravel.
We are looking at the movement of America being a democracy... toward a socialist society.
Soon, the economy will be so bad, that the only real choice will be to join the North American Union with the Amero currency.
This is the path they are leading us down...
The problem is created, wait for the reaction, then offer a solution. We are still in problem creation mode.
A correction it is, a death spiral it's not. See Commodore Business Machines for a death spiral.
Wait a few years - prices will have recovered and all this will be a distant memory.
2009 will be great. There is no reason for despair. Undervalued, undervalued, undervalued. Things will go back up. Our future is bright and our economy is resilient.
Take housing. Sure it's a difficult time to be a seller, but a superb time to be a buyer.
I've been a Republican since I understood the issues as a teen. I'm now in my forties and I doubt I'll vote Republican again any time soon.
We need change and rather fast.
Just kidding! I don't have Geico. I realize this is serious, but the more serious it becomes the more serious it will become. :o)
If people with good, stable jobs chill out and stop panicking, we might come out of this okay. I have virtually no 401K left, but I still plan to give my kids Christmas! Hey, I could die next year anyway. It could always be worse.
Joblessness is somewhere in the single digits 6%(?), vs 10.8% in 1982, inflation is essentially non-existent, vs. over 10% in 1982 and home mortgages are still around 5%, vs. 16% in 1982. And they were harder to get then than now.
How's that for perspective? We're ending the longest period without a recession in U.S. history (14 years) propped up by various artificial bubbles. First the internet bubble, followed by the housing bubble, with a war bubble thrown in for good measure. We're due for a correction. The longer it's put off, the worse it'll be.
When we recover from the correction, we'll be stronger for it, unless we do too many stupid things to try to prevent a downturn.
I hope in this economic crisis that we (small businesses) don't get labeled as "Rich" and they don't take more of our money (the companies) to be "fair"...that is what I fear...
P.S. You constantly support Obama, who do you think got us here? Jimmy Carter started this whole thing with the Community Reinvestment Act that gave loans to the wrong people, Bill Clinton expanded it and Barack Obama worked with the rest of the Democrats to shoot down John McCain and even (gasp) George Bush's attempts to fix it in 2003 and 2005.
Some positive things: price of oil is going down. Also, I see that the pace of global economy is very high - the momentum of the storm will be exhausted soon. Furthermore, there are several important lessons learnt; we become better prepared for the next one.
Sorry Robert. Delete this if you want.
The bad news is that the taxpayer is funding that + any credit bail-out.
People are afraid....no need to throw more gas on the fire.
Yes, bad things are happening, people are losing money, and people will be losing jobs.
Is this the end of the world? No.
I don't know about you, but I refuse to live in fear. Yes, things are changing, but change brings opportunity.
Look to find and seize these new opportunities!
Heck, we in the Telecoms/IT industry have been hit badly 8 years ago ONLY. Now it's the Banking system at large that is collapsing. Pretty much narrow deeps. Time to think again, right ?
The economic gains of the last 5 or so years were based on a bubble. Like the tech bubble before it, this one is bursting and we're sliding heavily. The difference between the tech bubble and the housing bubble is that this bubble had a lot more individuals buying into it. The tech bubble had the benefit of not really dealing in tangible things like houses.
Remember that the Dow didn't cross 10k until April of 1999. We spent much of 2002 and 2003 below 10k on the DJIA. We're not even close to our lowest point of 7527.4 on Oct 3th 2002 (Since crossing 10k).
Did we have some massive recession or depression in 2002? Nope. Were times tough in the job market? Yup. Did we bounce back from it fast? Heck yeah.
People are panicing worse than they should. Sensationalist media, and some incredibly irresponsible money decisions are amplifying to the point where people are thinking it's the financial End Times. Even with the loss of 30% on the DJIA since October 2007, we still have very low unemployment. GDP still grows. Outside of banks you don't hear about companies closing their doors left and right. In fact, so far the companies most hurt by this are the ones who were exploiting the bubble the most, who were playing the subprime game.
Everyone repeat after me: It's. Not. As. Bad. As. It. Looks.
Another piece of good news? Some (most?) people only learn by being seriously disrupted, and I'm expecting a lot of learning is going on right now. The pattern of buying more of everything than you can possibly afford based on the assumption that your earning power will increase "next year" is a self-destructive. Yet a lot of folks have been living this way for years. Buying a $300,000 home with a $200,000 mortgage is reasonable behavior (and yet can still get you in serious trouble). The folks who really need a lesson are the ones buying a $300,000 home with a $400,000 mortgage- how can that be a smart thing to do? And yet it is done.
The one thing that I really wish would change likely never will, and that is the all consuming extreme greed that pervades our society. Healthy growth is 10% per year; cancerous growth is 10% on top of whatever you made last year. 30% this year? Nice, but it better be 35% next year, and your company is a dog if isn't growing at 43% the year after that. Heck, what is wrong with a healthy profit, damn the annual expectation of endless growth?
Back in ancient times (30 years ago), a firm wouldn't lay staff off unless they were losing money. Now they lay people off if their profit didn't grow as much as expected. At every turn, the greed leads to incredibly self-destructive behavior: we are eating our own children here.
the dems guarding freddie and fannie coupled with the mandate that banks maintain a portfolio of 50% of subprime loans is at the heart of this mess.
if you don't believe that, please just shut your computer off and jump out your window.
Grab anything with a straight edge, a ruler, a piece of paper and lay it over the plotted points on the following 3 charts connecting around 1982 to 1994. Notice where the trend line take you for 2008.
http://finance.google.com/finance?client=ig&...
http://finance.google.com/finance?client=ig&...
http://finance.google.com/finance?client=ig&...
Dow = 7000
Nasdaq = 1200
S&P 500 = 750
The U.S. is not a democracy. It's a PLUTOCRACY. The measures will not move America toward socialism. These measures are set in motion to protect the wealthy. Simple as that.
(The good news is that most of us cannot afford more debt.)
Watch when this 700 billion dollar bailout does to our inflation, and the continual destruction of the dollar the government is doing that isn't even restoring confidence to the markets.
No, the best thing we get about this is cheap markets and lucrative deals ;)
we can be fearful and do nothing or goes berserk. But I want to encourage everyone to keep our heads up and keep on doing great things. For me, I'm steaming ahead with my startup, and I hope everyone is the same. Fear is a bitch, and we need to kick it in the rear. Onward!
Now if I were told I had a serious illness, I might be fearful. But over MONEY???? Future money? Paper losses?
Get your priorities straight.
also, partly socializing the banking system with the 700bill, even though it set a bad precedent, will (theoretically) thwart the full socialization of those tending toward that form of government, if they make it into the white house.
I think the stock market still has a ways to go before there's a sustained reversal, (I’ve been predicting low 8,000’s for a while now), so you need to look at your holdings and sell off those that are still at-risk. I think the credit crisis isn't over yet, and won't be until the major consumer credit companies get beaten-up. That will surely be the next wave as people already overextended run out of available credit to off-set their expenses, and start defaulting on balances as they divert available cash to essentials. Companies big into consumer debt will take losses as they write-down balances, increase interest rates to cover risk, and then write down more balances. This will spill over into consumer product sales as credit for new flat-screen TV's and iPods disappears. Coal might be a popular and even sensible Christmas gift this year!
So, government-insured 3.5-4.5% CD’s and high-yield savings accounts are looking like safe harbor right now; particularly compared to the 30% hit the stock market has collectively lost over the past 12 months. Individual corporate bonds might generate better yields, if you are confident in the company’s ability to pay off. The return on federal stuff isn’t worth the effort, and I think muni’s are going to be a problem in 12 to 18 months as tax revenues drop to reflect what’s happening with real-estate markets.
I think it will be a cold winter, quite literally, for many people. But I also think the bottom of the real-estate market is in sight, and by late next summer prices should stabilize. As real estate stabilizes, so should the credit and stock markets. Residential rental properties look like a good investment if they can be purchased at good prices. A big factor in how long this might go on is the severity of the upcoming winter and price of oil, natural gas and coal. Energy commodity markets will play a big part in this equation, as they have over the past 3 or 4 years in driving oil over $50, then $75, then $100 a barrel. Personally, I think some government limits on speculation are going to be needed to keep prices under control.
The people I feel the sorriest for are those who were due to retire in the next 5 or 10 years. I was on track to semi-retire in 10 years. But now my portfolio has taken a huge hit, my company pension is uncertain, and Social Security isn’t looking too good with all this bail-out money being passed-around. Fortunately, at 48 I still have time to build it back up, and maybe with prudent investment and rebounding markets, I can rebuild my losses and still retire as planned. Or maybe I have to buckle-down and save even harder to retire in 20 years.
With any luck, some good will come out of all this. I believe in free markets and capitalism, but I think that there does need to be better control and accountability in the banking, investment and financial services industries. Looking back through history, we see time and time again that these industries have failed to exercise restraint and have resulted in many of our financial crises. We need to do a better job of encouraging long-term growth versus short-term profits. We need to develop and implement long-term strategies for reducing the cost of energy: more oil drilling, more nuclear power, more biomass power, more wind power, more solar power, more electric cars, higher taxes on inefficient cars, lower taxes on diesel cars and fuel; leave nothing off the table. And we need to find some plan for rewarding corporate execs for meeting these long-term goals, rather than focusing on bumping short-term gains and salaries, (I advocate paying execs in stock rather than dollars, negotiated once a year and requiring 50% to be held for at least 24 months).
And consumers need to learn to shun the plastic economy. People should not be buying groceries or paying for Happy Meals™ or Grande Cappuccinos with credit cards. No more 30 years of $10-per-month payments at 24% interest for a new HDTV. Take $80 or $100 out of the bank on Monday, fill your car with gas, (saving 10-12¢/gal versus credit), and live the rest of the week on what’s left.
But most of all, we need to learn to resist the Madison Avenue, and even government campaigns to believe we can spend our way out of financial turmoil and charge our way to nirvana. Gluttony, not frugality, is the sin.
BTW, I am not an economics or financial expert, nor do I play one on TV. I've just got some common sense and street smarts, and my predictions haven't been off-base for a long time. Your mileage my vary considerably!
In the grand scheme of things, money isn't as important as we all try to make it out to be. Recessions provide a good, healthy reminder of that.
For years people have been spending more than they are earning. Now suddenly everyone is either building savings either by choice or by force. Regardless it's a good thing.
Personal savings does help insulate against recessions, which are a normal part of a healthy economy. It pads us for the hard times (that's why it's strongly suggested you have some).
What's the lesson to learn here? Never spend more than you can afford, always put a % of your cash into a place with enough liquidity and stability that you can quickly retrieve it at a moments notice (savings account, money market account, etc.).
Unfortunately everyone is feeling it, even if they weren't the individuals (and companies) who made these mistakes.
One other extreme principle is complete deregulation because markets will sort themselves out (hint: they won't). Now here one can claim Ronald Reagan has had a hand in. The S&L crisis was the first fruits of this labor, this one is yet another. But somehow few see it as the failing of a deregulated economy, where banks are allowed to use financial instruments that put layer on layer of leverage products that stand away miles from the real economy, where goods and services are actually produced. Of course we are far away from a barter economy and taking a loan to buy a house or start a business is great, if not necessary. But a loan that is 5 times your annual income for your third car or a bank taking a loan orth many times their assest and buying and reselling mortgages with it, or using it to trade in options and futures (never, ever trade in derivates with money you don't own), that's insane.
[I stole this more or less from an English comedian] If, in the UK, I go to Ladbrokes and want to place a bet worth my annual income on the price of oil going up 15% in 3 months, they'll say 'go home, son, you're drunk'. Banks will not only take thes bets, they will place them themselves, several times a day. With a straight face. It's legal too. Go figure.
Why should I still take the captains of the financial industry (or any industry, remember Enron?) seriously when they prove time and time again they either don't have a clue or see no problem in gambling with other peoples money (and why should they? they get a severance bonus the size of a small countries' GDP and the state will hand them a blank corporate wellfare check for the bank itself)?
The economy cannot be influenced let alone be controlled. So don't do your best to make it worse. Just make sure you build reserves in case of a storm.
And anyone who thinks that keep spending will avert recession: you are as naive as they were in the Sovjet Union. Everything will work in a growing economy. The cardhouses of completely regulated and completely unregulated economies will fall over the first slight bump. There is a middle way. CEOs and governments: redeem yourself be finding it. Now.
I dont mean to ignore the reality, I just mean dont exacerbate it. The great depression, and from what I understand the failure of WaMu was in some measure a result of a 'run on the banks' - what does this mean really? it means that people freaked out and thought they needed to horde cash in their matresses. By reducing the amount of cash the banks had on hand, it changed their leverage - how much they had outstanding in loans against the deposits. So when the deposits dropped below a certain point, it required them to file bankruptcy even though they weren't 'out of cash' per se.
The point is, what it is, is up to us. Real leadership in a time like this requires calm, rational thought.
http://www.fdic.gov/bank/analytical/fyi/2006/03...
Included is this fun summary of our economy: "The Banking Industry Appears Well Positioned for the Next Recession..."
Date? March 2006 - two years and the world is a whole different place...
Credit default swap
markets.
As I have written in my own blog, this is simply the Biblical truth found in 1 Tim 6:10 Love of money has caused this death spiral
You're kidding..
I'm in college too and I feel the crunch myself..
Maybe I should quit reading the WSJ for awhile?
Both political parties led us down this road. Bill Clinton signed a major deregulation bill. Congressional Democrats encouraged (and allowed) Freddie Mac and Fannie Ma to write un-capitalized loans. The Republicans dropped nearly all regulation for large corporations, and allowed the resulting good and bad paper to be re-packaged together and resold.
Corporation execs garnered enormous, bloated salaries while their companies languished. The Repubs encouraged this, as well as permitting corporation execs to over-value their companies to encourage investment, even though their profit margins were inadequate to support that.
What a MESS.
This is going to be painful. Two weeks ago, I thought it might take a month or so for the bottom to occur. I was WRONG!
The market could easily go to less than 4,000 in the coming weeks.
If you're over 55, GET OUT of the market.
It's all a matter of age. You may not have too much longer to protect your 401K. It could take easily another 10 years to wind down from the effects of the worst possible market calamity since 1929.
I am sorry to hear myself say this.
But it is reality.
sanjosemike