-
Website
http://www.scobleizer.com/ -
Original page
http://scobleizer.com/2009/01/01/twitter-spam-effective-or-idiotic/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
danja
44 comments · 4 points
-
polizeros
52 comments · 1 points
-
AndyBeard
69 comments · 4 points
-
Zachary Adam Cohen
35 comments · 8 points
-
dbarefoot
40 comments · 3 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
The best and worst thing Twitter did in 2009: RT
22 hours ago · 20 comments
-
World-brand-building mistakes France’s entrepreneurs make
1 week ago · 181 comments
-
2010: the year SEO isn’t important anymore
6 days ago · 67 comments
-
iPhone developers abandoning app model for HTML5?
6 days ago · 51 comments
-
Google eating Yelp?
5 days ago · 25 comments
-
The best and worst thing Twitter did in 2009: RT
Some default to sending a message but offer an opt-out checkbox, and that's a little better, but too many folks are going too quickly to notice. Twitterank was a good example of that.
They claim to have an opt-out, but the phrase "Support Twply on your first login?" is in no way clear that they will send a tweet out on your behalf.
I'd certainly take a hard look. Thanks for the great blogging, & HNY!
The message on the page states :"I support twply ... every three weeks I show them love" which to me is not saying they will send out a message.
And one hour after signing up, I have still recieved no emails.
I have now changed my password as I considered totally unreliable
Perhaps these guys/gals took the wrong approach, but somewhat in their defense, their login process gives users the option to enable or disable the first broadcast.
People make mistakes. My $0.02
But is it a kind of an identity theft, in other words, steal username and password someone else then using it on an API or just pure someone retweets it without using 'RT/retweet' phrase?
Probably not the effect they had in mind.
It's also idiotic to send out this kind of response before the user has had an opportunity to validate that it's a tool they want to recommend. A tweet from the user after they've actually used something is far more powerful.
I will not even consider using a product from a company with a marketing campaign that subtly implies they are knowingly trying to game the system.
Sorry if this killed your twitter account, but dont say we didnt ask.
The service is currently down right now due how effective the marketing worked.
this.
Hugs,
Buns and Chou Chou
Adding a clearer message like "this will post a link to our website on your Twitter stream" would do a lot to resolve the issue. The wording you use is ambiguous even to a native English speaker like me - it is not clear what "supporting you" does.
Look at e-mail, I watch our spam filters daily and the amount of traffic coming across is at least 3:1 spam:legitimate. They take a wonderful communication tool and turn it into something used for self-serving reasons and to the detriment of the greater community!
Ken Stewart
I'm all about 3rd party apps that make Twitter more useful, but this is absurd.
what is your privacy policy?
It is indeed a new form of quasi-spam and of "possible" spam (spamming back your twitter account once i got to be your friend) and a new form of marketing.
More ranting on my blog:
http://thenoisychannel.com/2009/01/01/faux-vira...
Oh well, interesting to see so many people eager to give out their password to a totally unknown "entity" and then complain about something like a little message sent on their behalf :-)
Workstir.com did something similar when we were in private beta. We clearly stated what the message was going to be and stated that the info would not be saved.
Seriously, WE are the spammers. We use shit like ping.fm and then it goes to EVERY DAMN SITE and makes no coherent sense.
I HATED seesmic in the beginning because the users had everything on auto-post. It was sickening.
The fact that Twply is offending you, when users of other services (and I'm sure other services themselves) have done this time and time again.
Look in the mirror already. We are the worst spammers of them all.
this service at least strikes me as useful. someone was apparently trying to do something helpful for others, and if the final payoff was $1200 i mean that sounds pretty coder-altruistic to me. i don't see a ponzi scheme brewing inside this guy's head. this simply seems like a case study in contagion, and quite likely will become a "best practice" for a certain class of projects - as Eric Rice points out, it's Qik and Brightkite and such which proclaimed to the world "hey coders, you can program robots to talk into twitter, it's cool, no biggie". so this twply coder just did that too, which was adapt a best practice from inane fb apps and qik et al to his intentions (which apparently started with "i want a truck of people to use this" and ended when he got his wish).
is a tweet saying "hey i'm live streaming on _service_, come chat" automatically any better than this ? frankly, it's worse, isn't it? if you're a qik user do you see how annoying this "feature" makes you on twitter? whereas new signups to a service - at least that only happens once....
not a bad idea, def should be tweaked out more to be effective though.
I almost wish I were an affiliate ;)
I signed up for Twitter after reading an article about it in a reputable computer magazine that likened it to the invention of email.
While some of the social networking stuff was fun and useful during the election, most of what I see now is written in a foreign language (sorry, I only have two semesters of college level Spanish) or people "Tweeting" as a means to get free advertising for their business.
The remainder are posts similar to this: "Whoa, so tired today, Tweets!" Or, "Looking forward to spring!" Or, "My husband is away this week, I sure would like to meet you."
Am I missing something magical about Twitter?