-
Website
http://www.scobleizer.com/ -
Original page
http://scobleizer.com/2006/10/04/the-suits-vs-the-geeks/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
danja
44 comments · 4 points
-
polizeros
52 comments · 1 points
-
AndyBeard
69 comments · 4 points
-
Zachary Adam Cohen
35 comments · 8 points
-
dbarefoot
40 comments · 3 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
The best and worst thing Twitter did in 2009: RT
1 day ago · 22 comments
-
World-brand-building mistakes France’s entrepreneurs make
1 week ago · 181 comments
-
2010: the year SEO isn’t important anymore
1 week ago · 67 comments
-
A new addition here: the Meebo bar
1 day ago · 7 comments
-
iPhone developers abandoning app model for HTML5?
1 week ago · 52 comments
-
The best and worst thing Twitter did in 2009: RT
You need the money to get going and money needs the talent to get the power.
Guy
Real people come from all walks of life. Robert, always take time for real people.
Don't loose the jeans.
Stealth is a good thing. It helps you find real people.
Eh? It's a country club...every club in the planet has a dress code, from Bath & Tennis at Palm Beach to the all-accepting Malibu clubs, faux 'suits vs. geeks' wars notwithstanding. That's a "war" you will never win...best to blend in and fly below radar.
Jeans wearing geeks, are just WiFi coffee-addict dreamers, you need the MBA suits just as much, if not more. Jeans don't make you "real", nor does a $1000 power-suit. It's not the treads, it's the person. Casual clothes don't automatically give you 'authentic' super-powers. Your logic is flawed, if "suits" are bad, merely being "suits", then somehow "jeans" are good, merely being "jeans"? That's a one-sided simplistic cartoon-rendering view of the world.
they released a research report that found that people liked their
GEEE IMAGINE THAT. You think if they found that people like Google BETTER, that you'd ever see such a report? Easy to move data around and ask differing questions, those "research reports" are nothing more than marketing drivel really. The wire services are FILLED with them...
If all you can see is 'suits' vs. 'geeks' in the world, you've probably already misjudged me, or will upon first sight.
Your loss, m'dear.
Sorry if you don't like it, but you don't belong in the tech industry if you can't accept that simple fact.
Also, Russ, it's "lose" not "loose." Loosing the jeans is a different topic than losing the jeans!
And... I´m in a creative role.
So? Do you judge people by what they wear?
Silicon Valley was made mostly by people in plain, everyday clothing who did amazing things; not people in amazing clothing who did plain, everyday things.
- dave mcclure
http://500hats.typepad.com/
Don't loose the Jeans. Is a two step joke. lol Pour attempt at humor. Sorry Raydar.
At least you are the right color and religion to get in. I'm sure that there are others in the Valley that couldn't even get the "no jeans" line. Like me. ;)
Reward of $10 million for Jean-mapping feet.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/15122834/?GT1=8618
Soory kuoldnt recyst. ; )
I work at Become, and as to the suits, well, I think my khaki pants, blue shirt and square-toed brown leather shoes pretty much preclude me from commenting on fashion one way or the other.
The country club thing sucks. It's another form of discrimination.
I'm off to a conference next week where I expect there will be a lot of suits and a few geeks. I haven't had a suit for more than 6 years. I left my last one in a hotel by accident and never replaced it. No loss - I only wore it occasionally as it was.
Gawd knows what'll happen if there's a dress code at this conference as I'm usually in shorts/jogging pants and Hawaiin shirts.
I wore a suit for 20 years before I was pretty much 'cured.'
The people who came in dressed like they were going to the beach (sometimes like they lived on it) were the people that spent the most, and if you treated them right they came back for more.
More than a few of them told me they went to other stores but were ignored by the salespeople because the way they dressed, even though they had a lot of money to spend and were ready to buy on the spot.
Since I didn't dismiss them for the way they dressed, they were happy to find someone willing to take their money.
Often wearing a suit is just a sign that you work at a job where you don't have the power to decide to wear whatever you want. It's kind of a lack of status symbol here on the west coast.
That being said, there are many ways to dress up or down. A fancy shcmancy pair of jeans can cost quite a bit:
http://www.luckybrandjeans.com/search.aspx?k=me...
it was great to see very few of them at the recent "future of web apps" conference
I switched from ties to bolos when I moved from the East Coast to Denver in the early 80's and lost the ties for good when I was consulting to Berkeley SSL in the mid-80's.
Robert, you've seen me and know I like henley shirts, Scott eVests and taboose pants. ;-)
Biggest scandal stories? Hah. Country Clubs are private ventures, they can pick and choose, exclude or not, might not always be wise, but that's the price and right of freedom.
PS - Anyone who banks on "status symbols" as a mark of character is doomed from the get-go.
Next time skip the Sharon Heights country club and walk down SHR to SLAC's dining room and lunch at the place where some real action indeed takes place ;)
"Often wearing a suit is just a sign that you work at a job where you don’t have the power to decide to wear whatever you want. It’s kind of a lack of status symbol here on the west coast"
And that is the heart of the matter. "Suits" usually aren't in control of their own work environments, with all that entails. Who is more powerless now? The cube jockey who has to wear a tie, or the cube jockey who can wear the jeans if he wants to?
Ironically, the most likely exceptions to that are the people in the country club - after a certain point, you can use really bloody expensive suits to signal your financial power.
Back in the days when tailored, custom made clothing was the norm, not the exception this worked in the opposite direction: jeans were a sign that you were one of those powerless joes who had to sling steel in the mills, or slaughter cows in the stockyards. The old country club rules are all about keeping the riff-raff out, which Scoble correctly percieved.
-r.
This also reminds me of a story Sam Simon, one of the creators of the Simpsons tells. He was dressed really ratty and walked into his Mercedes Benz dealer to buy some new floor mats. He saw a new model of SUV and asked a salesman about it. The salesman was very dismissive, so Sam went to his manager and bought the $80,000 SUV on the spot -- out of spite!
A few years back at the peak of my corporate, well-paid, pre-bootstrapping start-up days I wanted to get a new car. I went to all the dealers: BMW, Lexus, Mercedes, Audi, etc. etc. etc.
BMW, without question, treated me the worst, and I gave them three chances. Each time they were condescending, dismissive, rude.
My mother asked me, "Well, how were you dressed?" The answer is: in sweats and a pony tail, but the bigger answer was: I don't feel I should have to dress up to "let" someone sell me a 40K car.
I will never ever buy a BMW.
The thought that in Silicon Valley they couldn't realize that I might just be able to pull out my checkbook and drive off the lot with that car fully paid astounded me.
The two most respectful dealers? Respectful about talking to me, not my boyfriend. Respectful about my desire for no leather interiors because I'm a vegan. Respectful enough to talk horsepower and engine size, not vanity mirrors. For me it was Audi and Volvo. I got the Audi.
Of course the t-shirt was black.
And it did say diggnation on it.
so I kind of felt like I was dressing up for the party.
T-Shirt and jeans are great. You still can't wear them to a country club though.
I greatly appreciate being both allowed to and not disrespected for wearing *comfortable* (for me) and not-fancy clothing at work.
With that said, though, I lament what I perceive to be the lack of class of people who wear ripped jeans and grimy t-shirts to the symphony. I miss the days (boy I'm sounding old!) when people *dressed up* to go to a nice restaurant or to the theatre. Doesn't have to be a nice suit... but I'm talking about cleanliness, some pride in one's appearance, etc.
You can image - monkey wasn't best pleased !
Nige
PS: oh the bar, Henrys in Cambridge, UK !
"Signs" by the 5 Man Electrical Band. Did you write that song, Scoble:
"Now, hey you, mister, can't you read?
You've got to have a shirt and tie to get a seat
You can't even watch, no you can't eat
You ain't supposed to be here
The sign said you got to have a membership card to get inside
Ugh!"
Right on, Man! Power to the People! Stick it to the Man!
(for the clueless, that was sarcasm)
Scoble I'm guessing you wouldn't have the first clue about how to get a good suit, shirt or shoes made? Sad, really.
Geez, dude. Generalize much? What's next? All Asians are good a math? All blacks are good at sports? All people from India are computer geeks? All white people from the south are redneck racists?
Your 95% surely hasn't been that broad of a spectrum. I'm guessing you spent no significant amount of timetime in Japan (you, either Scoble) in London at Docklands, or a lot of other places where wearing suits to your job is almost a cultural requirement. But you and Scoble go on living in your shortsighted world.
Put a suit on once or twice. You'd be surprised at how well it works.
Adam: I do almost agree on people now not dressing up ever. BTW: Remember when air travel was something one dressed *up* for? OK, some of you may not be old enough to remember that, but it's true!
Maybe the geeks can start a Suit Liberational Front movement, dumping paint on suits over just fur coats. And stage protests and firebombings at Macy's and Men's Wearhouse's.
http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/exec/craig/d...
T-shirts don't look good on most people either. They don't stay ironed, and quickly lose their shape.
It seems to me much more that wearing jeans for indoor work is a cultural and fashion statement that shows that the person concerned is actually very concerned about how they are perceived by others.
The problem with wearing suits, on the other hand, is that they cost a lot to buy initially, and require expensive dry cleaning. Additionally, the accessories like shoes, shirts, and ties may also be expensive.
Either way, jeans and T-shirt or business suit are both uniforms, and the important thing is to know what you need to wear or not wear to be acceptable in whatever work environment you operate. If you dress in such a way that you alienate others, then clearly you are dysfunctional in that setting.
It's not unlike the royals in their silk clothing wigs and slippers living off the spoils of their craftsmen and peasants.
If you go to battle, put your armour on - just that we don't use swords any more, but keyboards. Suit of armour changed from iron to wool/silk. What does an amour do to you self-esteem?
This only relates to courtlings. REAL leaders always made their own rules.
Also does not relate to startups/rebels. See Robin Hood and his startup in the woods.
So if you are a courtling at the court of, let's say, MS, you will have to fight against the other courtlings, as wells as against the other courtlings of the other majesties.
If you were a productive peasant then, or are a productive geek now: love it, change it or leave it. (Possible now, not then - that is were the "progress" hides)