-
Website
http://www.scobleizer.com/ -
Original page
http://scobleizer.com/2007/12/27/the-macmini-hdtv-revolution/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
danja
44 comments · 4 points
-
polizeros
52 comments · 1 points
-
AndyBeard
69 comments · 4 points
-
Zachary Adam Cohen
35 comments · 8 points
-
dbarefoot
40 comments · 3 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
The best and worst thing Twitter did in 2009: RT
16 hours ago · 20 comments
-
World-brand-building mistakes France’s entrepreneurs make
1 week ago · 181 comments
-
2010: the year SEO isn’t important anymore
6 days ago · 66 comments
-
iPhone developers abandoning app model for HTML5?
6 days ago · 51 comments
-
A 2010 real-time app development platform from Kynetx
14 hours ago · 2 comments
-
The best and worst thing Twitter did in 2009: RT
Price is of course the key for many folks as you pointed out, so if AppleTV 2.0 has a lot of the features of the MacMini but retains the near $300 price, that'll be huge for mass consumption.
Looking forward to your demonstration.
My daughter loves it, and my wife, who was skeptical does too. She pulled an all-night TV binge watching Season 2 of Dexter (stored on the Mini) two nights ago.
The Leopard version of Front Row on the Mac Mini makes for a great lightweight theater PC interface. I was convinced I would need to use equinux's MediaCentral, but Front Row is faster and has close to the same features these days.
It's definitely the best gadget convergence I've done in years at my place.
Cheers...
This does sound very exciting but for the price point, I'd like to know if it would be an effective DVR.
Right now the TiVo with music & pictures sounds less expensive & just one software update away from integrating Dave's social connectivity & subscription features.
However I would LOVE to see Google Earth on it, which you couldn't currently get on a closed Apple TV system.
I appreciate that you're waiting until the product is released. I don't want to piss off TechCrunch, GigaOm, RWW, et al. I asked you to use the software because I value your contribution as a user, and you surely did make a great contribution. There's a beautiful button in the UI that should be called The Scoble Button. Maybe I'll write a post with that title. Tomorrow. :-)
I'm a little shocked the 360 still doesn't have a Web browser, especially when the Wii has demonstrated you can have a very capable browser on an inexpensive console.
Have you heard anything about what Apple's next move on the Mini and Apple TV might be?
The thing I am waiting for is a wireless monitor cable, something I can plug into my monitor output on my computer and then attach to the back of the HD input on the TV. That would be the easiest, and best and you would not need a dedicated computer that costs over $1,000. Streaming boxes are not the same thing. I don't think it would be hard to make a wireless monitor cable, but so far nobody has. Hopefully this internet/TV thing will catch on and someone will make it.
I'd like to see a Mac Mini update that was large enough to use a normal 3.5" HD (available now in up to 1TB sizes), normal DDR2 memory (not SO-DIMMs), and better discrete graphics (rather than what comes on the chipset). Oh, and stick 1 or more eSATA ports on the back for expandability.
I could even see a version of this with no HD, but just with flash storage for the OS and whatnot, and leave the DVR storage to external HDs via eSATA. Lots of possibilities, but Apple blew it with lack of foresight. Plus this thing seems half-abandoned as it is.
Having used a Media Center PC and a Mac mini on my tv, there are a few differences. The major one being all I had to do was get the mac mini from apple and hook it up to my tv, that was it. A Media Center PC required me to build a box (or buy an expensive box from someone) and then get it all hooked up. Most of the time the box wouldn't show right on the tv and I would spend hours testing various resolutions before I found one that worked right. YUCK. I don't want to spend hours tweaking, I want to watch stuff :)
The one thing I do miss from Media Center PC is the direct show filter and zoomplayer. It provided a great way to upsample various videos and it always looked very nice on my HDTV. 350mb HDTV Xvid files off bit torrent look like crap on my mac mini with my 1080p tv. The more recent 1gb MKV files are much nicer, but you still tend to see rough spots.
Anyway, I love my mac mini on the HDTV and we have been using it for over a year now.
I wonder if Apple's miniatures will get things like HDMI etc. These console makers know how to make living room hardware, I wish the computer division did as well.
I think PS3 wins hands down for being THE definitive box that can see other servers on the network, directly access files on the web like photos and audio (and save locally), with the bells and whistles of things like wifi AND hi-def. I respect that box the most and it's the one I feel the most sorry for, sadly.
The dream has several components, including:
1) Movie & TV show rentals...with the option to apply the rental fee towards buying the movie/tv show later on.
2) HD Content...I don't want to rip DVD's. I want real HD content. HD Movies, TV Shows, etc.
3) Live Content...the pieces for this to happen are coming together. You can already go to MLB.com and watch a baseball game live online. You can already go to ABC.com and watch a widescreen & decent quality version instantly (no buffering) of a past TV show with limited ads. Why not combine the two, so you get the best of both worlds?
Once you have all of those pieces together...it will be real easy to cancel your Cable TV subscription. No need for it anymore.
Just my opinion.
One can easily shop around and find a basic media Center PC for $500. Build one for less if they choose. While it is true that adding HDTV recording and capabilities would jack that up quite a bit, you focused more on the digital media aspects then you did the HDTV recording and playback features.
The point being, this revolution is not a revolution. It has been around for a while now. I would even argue that the Windows world is also leading the charge and advancing technology in this area better and faster than on any other platform. Yes...I drink the Kool-Aid, but it tastes sweet and has been readily accessible for half a decade now.
As for an AppleTV+browser... that won't do anything to help sales, unless they license the Wiimote from Nintendo and get to hacking.
And finally, the benefit to using an Xbox or PS3 for your media viewing is that you're gonna have one of those boxes in your living room anyway. If the average person is anything like me, they can only switch three hi-def inputs, and mine are all taken up by a 360, a Dish DVR, and a Wii.
http://www.snapstream.com/community/articles/ma...
MikeB: I haven't considered a Sony Playstation. I like having full access to the OS underneath. I might buy a Playstation to get BlueRay, though.
And honestly, as a geek, I am running into format buying dilemmas. I'm not sure if I should buy a disc, buy from itunes or buy from on XBLM, depending how I'll ultimately consume the content.
I was annoyed they stripped out some features for the 40GB price drop (PS2 back-compat/the memory card slots/some USB ports). I don't really consider it a price cut if you negate it with missing features.
I have the earlier 60GB model and am getting a lot of use on it for movies and photos. Recent firmware upgrade added Divx like the recent Xbox upgrade. Now if they could just make some better games for it...
Tivo does a fantastic job at doing photos, not just via the HME but via RSS. And it uses a remote, versus a mouse.
I would go to ebay.com first. If you don't want to do that then drop in at any Fry's.
If you don't want to do that go to http://www.dell.com/content/topics/segtopic.asp... and build out the Dell Insprion 530. You can do one for $509. Add an HDTC Tuner card for $100 more.
Cheers!
I put a Shuttle PC on my HDTV about a year ago. I love it -- I installed Nintendo emulators, hooked up the original controllers via USB, and have a blast playing old games. Plus, the web browser is a cool feature, and often we watch clips or shows on it. I use it a lot more than I thought I would.
I bought a Shuttle P4 PC (square, small) with a 250GB hard drive and Windows Media Center Edition for $525. So I guess I came out a bit ahead, and the emulators are much nicer for Windows. ;)
Yet you link me to a Dell that looks like shit.
Let me repeat again: anything that goes on my home entertainment system must be small. Must be quiet. Must look freaking awesome.
MacMini does the job. The Dell thing you linked me to does not. Now, got any other URLs?
But, man, is it one sweet setup. From live/recorded TV to Front Row access to computer games to your "pièce de résistance", the web browsing. Plus I can rip, convert and propagate my videos on the mini to various solutions such as my iPhone and iPod as well as DVD storage.
It is just a sweet experience!
/
ericabiz noted that one can put together a small, shuttle based system (also intersting you are willing to do a search for something she mentioned yourself while what I spoke about you would not). There are also many, many custom Media Center Center builders that create beautiful, fanless Media Center machines. My neighbor has an elegant, fanless Media Center PC that I am quite envious of. They do cost more, but that isn't what this was all really about. Regardless, ANYONE can find a beautiful, quiet, simple to use Media Center PC with a simple search engine query - even you.
To bring this full circle - My original comment was in part regarding your "revolution" which is anything but. No mention of being beautiful or quiet or any other restrictions you wish to put in place. I also pointed out that you wasted money to get a capability you already had (albeit before knowing you had to have a pretty machine in your living room). I didn't have a pretty box in my living room 5 years ago, but I had the experience and capabilities you mentioned. I didn't miss out on them just because the box was ugly.
To reiterate - What you are just now figuring that your MacMini can do today, I and many others were doing 5 years ago with a Windows Media Center PC. If being pretty is a requirement then I can make it so. In fact I can make it pretty in any way I want if I build it myself and not be locked into it being only as pretty as a Mac. I can rip the guts out and put it into any case and make it look any way I wish. My platform provides a degree of expandability and customization that your MacMini cannot match.
THAT is revolutionary.
Cheers...
Be sure to add Miro (http://www.getmiro.com/) to your Mini. It is a free Joost like app. What keyboard do you use? if you do not have the new Apple wireless one, get it immediately :-).
Right, I'll grant you that web browsing on one of those things from time to time, as well as random flickrage, could be pretty neat. Not to even mention showing some, you know, video.
But think of the electrons!
Ok, back to your party.
My wife doesn't like turning the lights out to watch TV even though I do. When I am alone it is lights out. My TV also has a High Power and Low Power bulb setting. It nevers leaves the Low Power setting which extends bulb life and conserves power. It is plenty bright enough even with all the windows in my living room.
Chris
As for Vista - which generally speaking has nothing to do with this larger Media Center vs MacMini discussion - I am happy to pass on any specific suggestions you have. "Fix Vista" is a little broad. Kind of like saying "Fix the US Government". I need something a little more actionable. My email and phone number are on my blog (note - I am on vacation till Jan 2nd)
Cheers....
But the 'web' on TV never caught on, the zillions of Microsoft attempts notwithstanding. Might get a minor boost with big screen HD'ers, but market bound to be limited. TV is passive, making it interactive will waste companies billions.
Many choices, if you avoid the pure commercial market.
The Mac Mini has one big issue as a HTPC - it often only will run at 1080i even when attached to a 1080p display. This makes stuff look like crap, and you have to install some extra 3rd party goodies to get it to work properly.
The AppleTV vs Mac Mini comparison isn't fair - they're different devices, used for different things, and I like both. I like the Mac Mini because it's a do-anything box, and I like the AppleTV because it's obvious there's a huge amount of potential there. It's disappointing that Apple hasn't done the things they should with it yet (direct access to iTunes Store, HD movies, and rentals) - but hopefully they'll get their act together.
My mother-in-law, though, has no interest in having a do-anything box like a Mac Mini attached to her TV. She wants an appliance accessible via remote control - an AppleTV. Of course, as I mentioned, the fact that the AppleTV is tethered to some other PC is stupid.
I *totally* agree that a web browser would make the AppleTV a killer box (at least for me) - but I'm not sure how to do it without a keyboard, which kills it for someone like my mother-in-law.
I just bought a Slingbox (which is revolutionary), but setting up the router was a nightmare, and now I'm 600 miles away, and I can't get into it, so the thing is going back when I get back home. (When I set it up, it said it was working, but as I now know, it really wasn't.) So it's not mainstreamable yet - I'm not blaming Slingbox as it needs to work with so many different types of routers and eventually it'll get there.
Making something mainstreamable is a lot harder than it looks. Windows Media Center connecting to the TV is still not mainstreamable.
I have heard some horror stories with CableCard implementations but that has less to do with the Media Center Software and hardware and more to do with the synching of the cablecards with the providers. Blame the cable industry for that foul up not Microsoft, *nix, Dell, Apple or any other OS/Hardware provider. I am jumping into this pond soon and will post my experience to my blog.
When the cable industry streamlines the cablecard process then the rest will fall in place.
My main interface to the TV is an AV input cable. I sneaker-net over to my TV with my iPod or my Sansa TakeTV ... the Sansa device is great since it is so simple and has a remote control. I would use it more if it accepted standard MP4 files.
Regarding the browser ... I would not use it on my TV ... again the remote keyboard/mouse issue is a show stopper.
However, I have been very surprised at how much I enjoy using Safari on my iTouch. I read my blogs, email, and such in my livingroom via wifi ... I can just curl up on my couch with it while my wife watches broadcast TV and we are both pretty happy with this arrangement. Occasionally, I will plug it in to my TV's AV input cable when we want to watch a movie from iTunes or some of my video podcast feeds.
Oh, and here is a great feature of the iTouch ... you can display vlog video on your TV directly! Go to Rocketboom, plug in your AV output cable, click play and the iTouch will ask you if you want to display this on your TV. You can now watch Rocketboom on your TV via your iTouch with an AV out cable. Very cool! Hopefully other sites will support this ... please let me know if yours does.
I predict that wifi mobile browsing on the iPhone and iTouch will be the killer app of 2008.
Erik Herz
http://podslug.com
No, I didn't buy a fancy new Shuttle. Although they're cool, they're too pricey for me. I have a SB95P V2 (Pentium 4) sitting behind the TV. You can see a picture of its form factor here:
http://techreport.com/r.x/shuttle-sb95p/money.jpg
It's not as small as a Mac Mini, but it's cheaper and just as powerful. Plus, it sits behind my TV (a Panasonic 50" plasma), so you can't see it anyway. You can build one for about $400 right now. And it runs emulators better. :D
Forgot to mention I also use the iTunes sharing feature from my desktop PC upstairs (which is also a Shuttle.) My BF has a Mac Mini in the other room and he shares iTunes to the Shuttle as well. Very cool stuff. We are into small computers with big screens at this house. ;)
Sorry, I really respect Dave, and I actually used Radio a few years ago, but this setup really isn´t revolutionary, like other people already pointed out, you can replicate the same experience with other hardware configurations, and to make this a -real revolution- Dave (or any other people) will have to implement a heck of an application (a killer application so speak), in the mean time, I will wait for the next version of the Apple TV. I think that with the proper features and the right marketing campaign this really can push a revolution, beyond the niche solutions (for geeks like us) that the Windows Media Center / Mac Mini currently are.
Cheers
And really I don't think twiteer is any revolutionary btw ...
As a number of people have discussed, it is not a PVR solution by any means, but for me most of my content is from the web.
If you can use your influence at Adobe to get them to update the SDK to support Flash 9 (I believe it supports 7 at the moment) then sites like Hulu may have a chance at making their way to my Wii experience as well.
Regarding this discussion, I do think the HDTV experience needs to evolve. I would prefer to have a terminal style smart device connected to my HDTV set that gives me everything on demand. Instead of having the DVR in the entertainment center, keep the data in a data center somewhere and let me view what I want, when I want it, for an all-you-can-eat price.
Until then, I have a TiVo Series 3 and a Dell XPS 420 covering my HDTV recording, gaming and video editing needs.
There's so much 'prior art' here that you really should rethink this post, but whatever, have fun.
Peace,
Michelle
I don't mean to sound sarcastic or condescending when I state that now, as a Microsoft user, you know what for many years we Mac users have felt. Have a great idea, only to see the other guys steal the thunder when it becomes popular... it is the origins of zealotry!
For most normal people (non geeks) when they watch TV they want to be entertained and tune out and certainly not engage in a two way conversation with the producer of CSI.
Can you give some advice whether the Mac mini will work as a Tivo. At the very least it would require a TV tuner card which it does not seem to have.
You should try piclens on your mac mini and see how it compares with Dave's tool (if you have both firefox and safari, try the firefox version).
If you do not have the time to try it out, here is a link to a review which was done about 6-month ago. http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/26/full-scree...
Cheers,
Edwin
I was wondering what feed Dave is using for the AP photos. I poked around for it for a little bit and couldn't find anything. Thanks!
VoIP phone. All hooked up to your home network, thru WiFi, Bluetooth, and whatever cool technology Apple has in its labs (ever heard of 200Mbps powerline, for instance ?). The iPhone U.I., minus the Multitouch thing of course (at least as long as LCD TV sets don't come with a touch-screen). Price point : $299. Would sell like hotcakes.
Add the hard-drive, the connectivity, and al., and... enters the iMac-Touch ;-)
There are various hacks, which let you do most of things... As we know, Apple TV runs Tiger (10.4).
I am waiting for Apple to announce some SDK for developers, let developer do something with it. Currently, I check for software-update once in a month, with a hope there is something cool..
Apple TV can be improved, one example is by having caching of videos (YouTube or whatever), it doesn't cache it and costs us more bandwidth ($$$) everytime you watch the same video.
I now hate closed platform more than ever.
Thanks for the post, it surely has some geeky stuff I should try sometime :)
-abdul
However, I also have an Apple TV hooked up via component and love it too. Here is what it has that the Mac Mini does not - it is SIMPLE and a no-brainer for non geeks to set up.
I think that is the point many are missing in this discussion. Most of the posters here, and Robert Scoble, and Dave Winer, are all technophiles. We can "hack" something to get it to do what we want. Most consumers are NOT capable or interested in that level of effort.
And that is why the Apple TV, in the right context, is still a great device.
But I'll say this too: I also have a Nintendo Wii, and guess which one I do most of my web surfing with?
The problem is that a Mac Mini still requires a keyboard and mouse to do anything other than use FrontRow. You just can't do that comfortably from a couch - you really can't do it in your lap, and leaning forward to use it on a coffee table just isn't comfortable.
Nintendo gave me a controller that functions as a mouse, that I can use while leaning back. For casual surfing, that makes all the difference. Apple needs to do the same thing, maybe offer up the iPhone/iPod Touch as a remote control?
One of the more popular ones is Big Screen Photos, http://www.mobilewares.net/mce/bsp2/default.htm.
Version 1 was released in mid 2006.
Big Screen Photos also works with Media Center Extender devices. So you can use it either with your Media Center PC directly connected to your HDTV or use it via an extender device connected to your HDTV.
Give it a whirl and see how it compares to Dave's new Flickr app.
Cheers
I wonder if Apple omitted the browser because having a browser means you need a KEYBOARD and that really SUCKS for just watching TV. I thought about getting a mini w/Bluetooth KB for my living room, but when I want to watch TV I don't want to have to log in, etc. With the AppleTV you don't have to do that, it's super easy.
IMO, Apple messed up with AppleTv 1.0 and they need to do 3 things to make it a game-changer:
(1) allow on-line rental of movies (this is the biggest and it sounds like they are going to do it)
(2) allow direct purchase from iTunes without syncing to a Mac
(3) add in a DVD player, at least as an option; I don't want a ton of wires etc to my TV
If they do those 3, they'll have me as a customer.
-Mike
http://tinyurl.com/22xmzh
Clearly you are missing the entire point. You say things like "The hardest thing is setting up the infrared transmitter" or "You can easily transfer your system to a pretty case". The point is, I don't want to do any of that. I did that for years, I built a Media Center PC and got a nice custom case with quiet fans and custom VFD displays, etc. I spent hours upon hours working on all that crap.
Perhaps if I outline my mac mini setup again, it will be easier to understand:
1) Go purchase a tiny computer from apple, along with the DVI->HDMI converter and the mini-optical jack converter.
2) Go home and hook up power, sound, video, and network.
3) Turn on Mac mini
4) Enjoy DVDs or content on the network using the nice 5 button remote
There are a few key points you might miss in there:
1) My 2 and 3 year old understand how to work that remote
2) My fiance also loves the simplicity of the remote
3) I didn't spend time tinkering with hardware
4) It just all works, and it works even better under Leopard!
"A MacBook Pro with an HDMI cable works pretty nicely too. Why would I need a Mini?"
A MacBook Pro costs a whole lot more than a Mac mini.
I messed with Dave's new app and it's pretty darn good. I have been thinking of RSS to big screen TV for years but don't have the coding ability to even know where to start. iPhoto can take care of it locally but the fun in Dave's app is that I can get pictures from everyone (this is good or bad depending on the source..LOL).
I was reviewing exchange of words between you and Chris from Microsoft and I have to say that Chris is right. The revolution you speak about has been around for awhile, it is not something new and MS has had it for many years with the Media Center editions. If you remove the 'look of the computer' you will notice that all the features you are talking about were already in MS Media Center. If you were talking about the external look and feel of the computer then Apple would win hands down, but you are mentioning the features more than the look in which case it is not revolutionary.
It's a stealthy way to get a full computer into the living room, and once it's there, the possibilities are open. :)
I get what you are saying. A MacMini is easy to set up and it is pretty. It is also the exact same pretty as every other MacMini out there.
My point about IR cables only applies if you have Tuners in the box which the MacMini does not have. So take the tuners out of a Windows Media Center PC (which by the accounts for the bulk of MCE machines sold today) and it matches the MacMini in simplicity of configuration.
As for the pretty cases....just do a query in your fave search engine for "htpc cases" and you will find some beautiful cases. If you are aghast to moving the hardware yourself I understand that. Don't fault Microsoft for that though. We don't make the PC's. PC users enjoy a freedom to create a machine that looks anyway they want it to look. We get to show our individual style and taste through the plentiful options presented to us by the wide variety of case manufacturers that are out there. With the MacMini you get the exact same looking box that every other MacMini owner has.
Cheers....
http://www.123macmini.com/gallery/
Its been going on for a while.....
"The doesn't do anything that my doesn't already do."
1) Apple isn't worried about self-important geeks. They're going after the 90% market of regular users who have a life and don't want to spend there time building systems that require a CS degree to turn on.
2) Apple is winning by making the features actually work easily and elegantly.
Oh and...
"Yes - I work for Microsoft and the day we become a hardware company and start producing the machines along with the software I am sure you will see some prettier machines. Until that day comes along, try to restrain your self."
Apple is shaking in their boots about that one. The brilliance of MS hardware design would be found it perhaps the crap-brown Zune with its interface-from-hell and exploding 3-day content?
MS can't even do software well, and can't market anything that isn't forced on the customer. People don't choose MS software, they submit to it.
I welcome MS entries to the hardware market for comedy relief.
The -insert apple product here- doesn't do anything that my -insert MS-cellphone product here- doesn't already do.
Seriously. This is not a revolution, i know it makes for a good headline but it's not.
Laser TV's 100+ inches at only $400 is a revolution. A computer hooked up to your tv is not.
But wait it only becomes a revolution once *you* can afford it...
http://vaio.sony.co.uk/view/ShowProduct.action?...
Now, I expect more from my MacMini hooked into a 108" projector system with surround sound while it accesses my home server (G4 loaded with 1.25tb worth of drives) under the basement hooked into the ReplayTV units on the regular TVs.
Man have we come a long way.
Me? I don't really care who makes the cool stuff as long as they can talk to each other. Apple doesn't seriously seem to be chasing this market yet, but I still find that their stuff does yeoman work at it.
I recently bought Apple Tv on craigslist for $170 and am very happy with usefulness of Apple TV to play Itunes music , Podcasts, Scobel SHow and TED video podcasts, Youtube videos etc.
I would like flickr smugmug photo streaming and at least weather gadgets etc if not full fledged web browser.
I also bought my first MacBook Pro and am selling 3 Vista PC's because of Vista drain on my productivty. The VISTA SP1 RC helps but it is not enough to make up for all IE7 and Firefox crashes and carshes trying to process video for Canon HD camcordr and photos form Canon 40D. I am selling my HP Tablet PC running Vista Business, a 1 1/2 year old Dual Core running Vista Premium and Quad Core running Vista Ultimate that I just built 2 months ago.I may keep quad corte and install XP pro just for HD video editing.
One week with MacBook Pro has convinced me to dump the Vista PCs as my main computers and build a Media Server and Network Attached Storage .
Now I have to recode all my media files to work with MacBook and Apple TV or possible upgrade to Mac Mini. My plan is to upgrade Apple TV with 250 gig hard drive and hack it to run a browser and wireless keyboard as described on AwkwardTv.org and AppleTVhacks.net.
I am waiting for MacWorld to see what next macbook lite will look like. I wonder if Dave's app will run on a hacked Apple TV running OSX.
I have also my mac mini connected to my 42" Plasma. My configuration is:
1. Connected through VGA port (is there a difference between VGA port and DVI?)
2. Connected 500GB external hard drive for media content through USB.
3. Connected Wii through airport settings.
4. using a wireless keyboard and mouse.
5. Cable TV connected directly to the Plasma.
6. iSight connected to mac mini through Firewire. (Image is not working and I don't know why).
7. Screen resolution is 1024x640.
Now, if you allow me, I wish to make some questions:
1. How did you connect ur mac mini to ur TV set.
2. What's ur best screen resolution?
3. How the hell I put my iSight to work on my 42" plasma. Audio works but image appears just a black screen on the iChat window and also I tried changing my screen resolution and it still won't work.
4. How to connect mac mini to my home theater since mac mini doesn't have RCA or component output.
That's all. I hope u to keep goin' with the mac mini lounge idea since I also prefer it than the apple tv.
Regards.
I have since dropped a 2.0GHz C2D ($175 on ebay) and now I don't even have to quit Firefox or iTunes before I fire up HDTV content for smooth playback in MythFrontend.
I think that is exciting, nothing mac excites me anymore.