DISQUS

Scobleizer: The eight ways you can be my friend (or enemy) online

  • vaspers the grate aka steven e · 2 years ago
    With all due respect, videos are a bad way to disseminate information, and so are audio podcasts.

    You are brilliant, a role model for us all, but please consider making text summaries, and text versions of your recent controversial videos.

    Video and audio are nearly impossible to parse, to quote, and to deep link.

    Thanks, friend. Keep up the boat rocking!
  • Robert Scoble · 2 years ago
    You just found #9: do you watch Scoble's videos or not? Heheh!
  • dawn m. armfield · 2 years ago
    The Google App doesn't work for me, either.

    We have similar friends and apps but I don't write on walls a lot. I figure that your wall is busy and I don't much to add.
  • William · 2 years ago
    Yes, i hope i can be your friend Robert but Kyte sucks as a way to distribute video. Quality is just too bad to watch. Put something in writing :)
  • rslux · 2 years ago
    I may have said this before, but it bears repeating: Those of us who work in open offices and/or cube farms have a very hard time getting away with watching video during work hours.

    Even if I could make the case to my boss that watching the Scoble Show has bearing on my work, it's still disruptive for my co-workers.
  • Robert Scoble · 2 years ago
    Headphones?
  • David · 2 years ago
    Text translation?
  • David · 2 years ago
    P.S. Kyte is a resource hog in Internet Explorer.
  • RBA · 2 years ago
    So if I don't use Facebook, we cannot be friends? Pitty :-P
  • rslux · 2 years ago
    re "Headphones?"

    A fair point, but not every office encourages or even allows their use.
  • rohit · 2 years ago
    1.) then find a new employer.
    2.) scoble, try to go back to interviews with the power players.
  • Omar Shahine · 2 years ago
    "People don’t understand what the difference between a “real” friend and an “online” friend is."

    Actually, I think People have an easy time with the difference, the problem is that none of the social networking sites have a mechanism for segregating your friends accordingly.
  • Truden · 2 years ago
    Yes, people don't make difference between online friend and "real life friend", which makes me think that they don't really have real friends.

    @William(#4) - Kyte has very good streaming.
    If a video doesn't brake in South Africa with our poor ADSL connections then it is quite good. And the quality is not bad at all.
  • Robert Scoble · 2 years ago
    Rohit: a couple new interviews will be up shortly on http://www.scobleshow.com -- in higher quality than Kyte, even. :-)
  • Paul Roundy · 2 years ago
    I miss Robert's writing. The video doesn't do it for me for a host of reasons. The irony is that the video seems to devalue RSS. I want to read a whole article via my reader. In fact, it also seems to break your full feeds only rule in an odd way Robert. I realize you are in the video business these days but it would be nice to be able to read your stuff.
  • Mo. · 2 years ago
    never accepted mine "online friendship" on facebook - a regular reader of your blog
  • Patrick Grote · 2 years ago
    Paul ... agreed 100%. I don't have time to watch/listen to the thing all the way through. With text I can scan and read what interests me.

    This does have a plus, though. You no longer need to worry about partial vs. full feeds.
  • Mario Ruiz · 2 years ago
    Hi Robert,

    The advantage of Youtube over TV is the ability to find the "home-run," "touch-down," or how Beyonce fell in Orlando in seconds and watching in a minute.

    Long presentations (more than 2 minutes) is a step back in the fast notion of the sharing the info of Web 2.0.

    Mario Ruiz
    @ http://www.oursheet.com
  • bueller · 2 years ago
    I don't accept everyone's friend request on facebook, thats crazy talk

    www.drunkenpanda.com
  • Alison · 2 years ago
    Deaf here - didn't get a word of that. :(
  • David Mackey · 2 years ago
    I'm not a big fan of video either - text summaries are good.
  • ben · 2 years ago
    Robert,

    I'm sure people such as myself that have hearing problems are a very small part of your audience.

    I gave up trying to listen to podcasts a long time ago. The audio quality of most aren't good enough for me.

    I can read lips, so a video isn't too bad if the camera focuses on the faces of the people having the conversation.

    A written transcript is much better. Even if I didn't have poor hearing, I read faster than most people speak. If a a video takes one hour to watch, the transcript can be read in 15 or 20 minutes.
  • Logical Extremes · 2 years ago
    Right. Videos should be two minutes or less, and even at that, they have to be awfully compelling (no, how to be your friend is not very compelling). Also, Kyte doesn't work as universally as other video platforms, so you lose some folks that way. Arrogance oozing from every pore of this blog.
  • Sk · 2 years ago
    Sharing content thru video is good but Kytetv and the video quality sucks.
    In case you are going to preserve these videos for historic purposes then better buy a decent camcorder or digital camera (most of them can record 640 x 480 movies).
    I think more than the size of the video I would say the quality matters and that is where you need to improve on.
  • john griffin · 2 years ago
    there is def a major difference between an online friend vs. a real world friend. it seems pretty obvious to me that people should realize this.
  • Alexander Grundner · 2 years ago
    Now if Facebook could actually make meaningful sense of all the data collected, which you describe in your "seven ways", that would be fantastic! I would love to see a *real* top friends list of people who are interacting with you regularly, as well as, have shared interests without you doing the leg work.
  • Marc Duchesne · 2 years ago
    This Friend vs. Enemy stuff is no new in the CyberSpace. A long long time ago, in a galaxy not that far far away, there was a world where people got flammed just by showing up in a group, no matter what they were going to say (or write, in this case). It was called Usenet ;-)
  • John Whiteside · 2 years ago
    Nothing you have to say is worth bringing my day to a full stop to watch your video. Nothing. I might be sitting with my laptop at a cafe & can't watch it then. I might be on a dull conference call and skimming blogs. Most of all, maybe seeing the kind of disregard for users you exhibit just leads to me to the conclusion that you're full of hot air. Ciao, bambino.
  • William · 2 years ago
    @15 - if you say so.. lol
  • Michael Moncur · 2 years ago
    The fact that more people here are commenting on your media (a 24-minute long video in two parts) than on your message should tell you something very important.

    I, too, don't have the time or the inclination to watch you spend 24 minutes getting to the point, but I'd love to read an essay, or even watch a tightly-edited 2-minute video.

    Also, I don't use Facebook and you can't make me. :)
  • alien · 2 years ago
    Its clear you will lose lots of your cubicle audience if they can't quickly read your thoughts.
    Fear of Boss rises with headphones on and lengthy video
  • Jill · 2 years ago
    Oh - I wanted to know what the eight ways were, but I don't have time to watch 24 minutes of video... I want to be able to scan text!
  • Jonathan · 2 years ago
    Your content of late, Robert, has been utterly inaccessible to me. I'm profoundly deaf and, while I lipread on a daily basis, I am unable to lipread the vast majority of these videos. The quality is too low, the lighting is too poor and the framerates are too low.

    If online content is moving towards video then I hope transcripts become commonplace or the web is devalued as a medium for anyone who can't understand video for whatever reason (deafness, or just hard of hearing, or they just don't understand English well enough to follow a conversation or monologue).