-
Website
http://www.scobleizer.com/ -
Original page
http://scobleizer.com/2008/03/02/ted-jealousy/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
danja
44 comments · 4 points
-
polizeros
52 comments · 1 points
-
AndyBeard
69 comments · 4 points
-
Zachary Adam Cohen
35 comments · 8 points
-
dbarefoot
40 comments · 3 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
The best and worst thing Twitter did in 2009: RT
22 hours ago · 20 comments
-
World-brand-building mistakes France’s entrepreneurs make
1 week ago · 181 comments
-
2010: the year SEO isn’t important anymore
6 days ago · 67 comments
-
iPhone developers abandoning app model for HTML5?
6 days ago · 51 comments
-
Google eating Yelp?
5 days ago · 25 comments
-
The best and worst thing Twitter did in 2009: RT
At TED we were treated to an abundance of physics, energy and life sciences topics.
Re: Sarah Lacy - I think she's being silly and doesn't understand the model. TED isn't an invitation event. Not sure why people think it is. Chris Anderson explained that it wasn't. Why aren't "press" invited? Simple according to TED creator Richard Saul Wurman, who attended this year (several years after selling the event to Chris Anderson) - why give out a press seat when you can get someone to pay for it?
TED is a pay-to-attend event. If Sarah wants to attend all she needs to do is pony up $6K and apply early (2009 sold out several weeks ago). Or, have BusinessWeek pay her way. Several years ago I asked to get an "invitation" be applying to attend. That's it. Got the invite. Paid the bucks, and have been attending for several years.
I could be wrong, but I don't think anyone gets a pass to attend TED except the invited speakers. That means Meg Ryan, Tony Robins, Larry Page, Matt Groening, Paul Allen, etc., etc. are all paying $6,000.
Robert - you and Sarah should attend TED 2010! I suspect announcements and open invitations will be available next January. Apply early. Have your credit card ready. It sells out very quickly, though it grows by 10% each year (next year being the first year to be held in Long Beach, CA).
http://sundaygang.com/misc/responseToScobleBlog...
OMG, it's Scoble! :-)
you should feel lucky that you can go to other conference and meetings.
In an answer to Dave Winer:
He says these conferences are boring. From what the attendees tell me, TED isn't boring. The speeches sounded really interesting. Glad to see Brian Cox thrilled (he thrilled me at LIFT two years ago). Seeing Robin Williams jump up on stage must have been pretty fun.
But I agree with Dave that the value is NOT in what is on stage. After all, they give that away!!!
There is SOME value in going to these kinds of conferences for what's on stage, to be sure. But that might be $400, maybe $1,000. So, why pay the other $5,000?
Easy: the networking.
If you have a reason to get in front of, say, Al Gore, then all of a sudden those conferences become hugely valuable.
After all, if you can convince some business person to do a million dollar deal because you were at TED, then the $6,000 becomes worth it instantly.
For me, that's why going to Davos was valuable. I now have a book of every attendee with their phone numbers. 3,000 people who run almost every kind of business. So, for a journalist, this becomes a rolodex-building experience.
Good point.
plus it is not the same. you can talk to actual people, share your ideas etc. i cant have that. yes i know i can send messages live to you, but you know that it is not the same.
Try this out.
I bet when you go to a conference, you spend a lot of time listening to people who want to get five minutes of your time to hear their idea. Do you ever get tired of this? Do you wonder why you have to *pay* to have other people make demands on your time? Doesn't that sound like work??
Now imagine what it must be like to be Al Gore at one of these events. That's what I can't stop thinking about, and it's why I won't barge into their space with my pitch because I know he won't really be listening and there's zero chance that anything will come of it. In other words, that opportunity that you think you have is not actually an opportunity.
I don't know what the answer is. Maybe not defining your life in those terms. Or put yourself in places where there's a good balance, where you're as much sought after and well-known as everyone else. I don't think cornering celebrities, unless you're very beautiful and have something they want (which means they still aren't listening!), will get you anywhere.
Take your son for a walk today and tell him a story about your childhood? A funny one! What do I know. :-)
There's a lot of what you say in TED's philosophy. They don't want press or company people there. They want to create an entertainment event for CEOs, famous people, rich people. That's why they don't want bloggers there (someone shot some video in the hallways and they asked that person to take it down, I learned yesterday from one attendee).
They also, really, don't want average everyday people there (who are who showed up to Bil, which is why I liked Bil a lot).
I've been to Davos. I don't need to go to another entertainment event. I also don't have anything to pitch these people.
Oh, and I saw multi-million-dollar deals getting done at Davos. Because Davos is a filtering mechanism, executives lower their guard (which is exactly why it's such a great place for journalists).
One other thing. Because these events are so expensive CEOs and other "unreachables" don't bring their PR staffs along, so it's very easy to talk with them.
Or, did you forget the three hours I spent with Mark Zuckerberg at Davos?
THAT is the real value for journalists and bloggers.
It seems to me that a significant part of business/economic success is the result of a lot of discipline and focus. With events like Pop!Tech or TED, you can sit back, and just listen, and think, and truly enjoy the brilliance of the people who have been asked to speak.
I frankly wish there were more events like them and that they were more accessible.
I learned a while back that you meet some pretty interesting people when you are flying first class.
The daily techmeme noise of Arrington who bigs up his buddy Calacanis who disagrees with Winer which is video'd (qik) by Scoble and is reported as big news by Gabe (Techmeme) via Seesmic and then broadcast on to twitter. Here's the newflash no one cares.
To every entrepreneur grow your business, grow your business and sell because in a decade from now the pointless A-list bloggers will still be twittering (aka bitching) about something.
The reality is Robert both you and Arrington couldn't code your way out of a paper bag so what makes you think you should talk about tech.
Most of your posts are technically lightweight at best. All you both want is nano-traffic to fool dumb advertisers into thinking your opinion matters in exchange for ad dollars.
Bill Gates, in fact, used to fly coach for a long time.
You love it when people big you up (Davos) but when they ignore you (TED)you bitch. Both events are great and you are lucky to attend one of them. I attended both and paid my own way.
I'm envious of Peeps like Tara Hunt who says she's blown away being in Aspen for TED* + I also wanna go to SXSW this week + then Holiday on Paul Allen's Yacht off Ibiza with Bikini clad Heidi Klum + Giselle Bundchen + Monica Belucci!!
It's a Shame Boring Rich People can Afford going to these things* I'll have to startup a conference called Bil.ly*
;))
Maybe if more people told people like that to shut up and listen, the coders wouldn't keep getting slapped down by lawyers, regulators, and others who deal with people rather than machines for a living.
Hey "Wake up," people like Scoble (and myself, to a smaller degree) make a point of looking at the tech world from a "real world" perspective, from people who get real tans instead of monitor tans and don't go through live wearing t-shirts with DeCSS on them (although I do own one, but that's a story for another day).
To a great extent, Silicon Valley and DC area almost like sister cities, in that they live in a bubble all their own. The point is to break the bubble. We're helping, you're not.
Please read more.
Love,
Andrew
1.) The price - even $1,000 much less $6000 is way out of the realm of possibility for me or my company most of the time. Even if I had that much disposable income I doubt I would ever spend it on "high thinking" conference.
2.) Location - I live on the east coast and specifically in Greenville,SC also known as "Charlanta" as it's between Charlotte and Atlanta and unlike the rest of the area it's a growing area that attracts a lot of modern manufacturing and tech companies. Despite that you rarely see anything like TED, SXSW, MacWorld like events, CES, etc. coming this way. They are usually in L.A., S.F, Seattle or Vegas. It very hard for me to get away, buy a plane ticket and commit all that downtime to these events however I am hearing more and more from you A-List and tech celebrities that I'm not really missing anything by not going since I can pretty much access all I would really be interested in via the Internet
All that being said their is a part of me that is very jealous of those who can attend such event and often on a whim because they are either, "somebody", live or work close by or have employers who can foot the bill. Needless to say I am self-employed and still in the early days of my company. Some month are very good some not so good but regardless of the income I can't really afford to be away.
Is their a way we can have something "TED-Like" for the rest of us?
Pop!Tech came about because of a group people in Camden, ME wanted to get together and talk about the intersection of ideas and technology. No reason that couldn't happen in the SE. You have some pretty places, great weather, good food, etc.
So, just do it, start small, organize it around a theme, get a college involved, etc. Not impossible, but you have to start somewhere.
http://www.loiclemeur.com/english/2008/02/seesm...
ah, I actually also posted us all singing:
http://www.seesmic.com/Standalone.html?video=IT...
the formal request was no video cameras in the main hall and no laptops there except the last 3 rows at the back.
I do not think video blogging the hallways was in any way banned, you just feel like NOT doing that there.
other than that, blogging and twittering was perfectly allowed.
I loved TED, as I said, and will keep saying it, and I realize how lucky I was to be invited. It is worth any $ I have paid.
Solution for Scoble, Robert, Dave and Sarah: start your own very exclusive conference :)
TED, for me, is not about networking. Sure, I meet some fantastic people but I attend for the information, the sessions, the speakers. I don't go trying to sell myself or any of my ventures. Maybe this is simply because I'm a poor networker but, more than likely, because the days are crammed with information that after a 13 hour day, I'm exhausted. Most of the people I know attend all the sessions, talk over lunch, enjoy the evening cocktail party or reception and then crash.
Last year my father, a physician, attended with me (after I convinced him that it wasn't a computer event) and he loved it. One of his best moments was spending time talking to Jeff Skoll at one of the evening social events. Who's Jeff? He's a one of the first eBay employees and now a wonderful film producer - bringing to the screen projects like The Kite Runner and Syriana. I encouraged my dad to signup for this year's event. He hesitated just a tad too long - and it sold out.
Regarding the $6K price. It's a lot, for sure. Luckily, a bunch of people that attend TED spend even more than that so that others that are unable to pay the fee can attend. As soon as I'm in a position to do that I'll join their ranks. Few things would give me as much pleasure as being able to help someone else jump into the pool of energy and information that's presented at TED.
But Twitter and blog away...taking to thyselves about thyselves.
TED... the retort is Bel. (Oops, sorry, it's "Bil".)
The weak head nod to being a supposed journalist. Then comes the admission that - HEY! - it's video that matters.
It's all the same... the bottom line is Robert *always* whines when he's dissed.
Does it matter? Only to him. But to those others who attended (or not) this TED thing... or Davos... or Bil....
You know, us commonfolk... this all simply flies over our collective heads.
How easily Robert can PR most of us with his manipulaive whining about being slighted. And that's shameful.
To me... jealousy for the day-to-day experiences of others just seems like a major waste of energy! It's really just a reflection of deep insecurity with self. And .. while that may drive traffic and sell newspapers, it surely will not make you a happier, more content person. True success comes from inner security.
P.S. - I'm so happy you met Annie Leibovitz. How totally cool and amazing!
As for Mr. Arrington: Get over yourself. It ain't about you. ;-)
You would have 1,000 people who would want to go with you.
http://www.twistimage.com/blog/archives/marketi...
But I also think people need to get over the left out feeling, there will always be events like that. From a european viewpoint it's all quite far away anyway ;-)
But as you said, there are Barcamps and other such events which are also quite inspiring. And luckily we in Germany now have a barcamp nearly every 2-3 weeks ;-) (ok, admitted that it might become less inspiring if you go to every one of them as topics and people might be the same but therefor it then feels more like family ;-) ).
And btw, even in open source settings there are sometimes events which are limited, like the recent Plone Strategic Planning Summit the Plone project did. Here some effort was done though to include community thoughts but the event itself was limited in order to handle the amount of discussions. Now of course it's the question if it wouldn't have worked with more people and certainly communication could always be enhanced but it seems that not too many people felt too left out.
And everybody feeling jealous about somebody else regarding a cool event maybe think again and you migth remember some cool event you attended which was unique and inspirational and which all those people did not attend.
The six grand will really hurt, but I would like to go for the experience. I don't imagine networking will be a big thing in my case. I find it hard to imagine that anybody would be interested in having a former academic/ novelist on their rolodex. Or Blackberry.
So I have to decide by the end of this month. It's hard to think about anything else.