-
Website
http://www.scobleizer.com/ -
Original page
http://scobleizer.com/2007/10/01/techmeme-list-heralds-death-of-blogging/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
danja
44 comments · 4 points
-
polizeros
52 comments · 1 points
-
AndyBeard
69 comments · 4 points
-
Zachary Adam Cohen
35 comments · 8 points
-
dbarefoot
40 comments · 3 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
The best and worst thing Twitter did in 2009: RT
12 hours ago · 19 comments
-
World-brand-building mistakes France’s entrepreneurs make
1 week ago · 181 comments
-
2010: the year SEO isn’t important anymore
6 days ago · 66 comments
-
A 2010 real-time app development platform from Kynetx
10 hours ago · 2 comments
-
iPhone developers abandoning app model for HTML5?
6 days ago · 51 comments
-
The best and worst thing Twitter did in 2009: RT
What will we do once all this stuff matures? (I'm thinking that, like the hermit crab, we'll simply find new digital homes to suit our new, larger, digital selves)
Note the above doesn't apply to the ENTIRE leaderboard, but it's sure heavily skewed that way.
It's a fine line to be sure.
I did a very, very quick and dirty comparison of the Techmeme Top 100 with the Technorati Top 100 (and the Digg Top 100 as well) in a kind of a mini Statbot, and the numbers show that the Techmeme Top 100 is more closer to the Digg Top 100 than the Technorati Top 100. Supports my theory that it's a list of Top 100 news sources. Here's that mini statbot: http://blog.yuvisense.net/2007/10/01/mini-statb...
My problem with Twitter? You can't follow conversations unless you are subscribed to all the people in the conversation. If you are talking to Dave Sifry and Dave Winer, I can make sense of the conversation only if I am subscribed to them both. Bummer.
On a side note, I'm waiting for December, so that I can analyse how your Blog, LinkBlog and Tweets changed before and after Milan was born. Should be fun :D
http://smoothspan.wordpress.com/2007/10/01/the-...
Maybe Twitter is the answer to seeing beyond the A-list, but I hunger for tools expressly aimed at sailing off the edge of the known world.
I hope that doesn't include my wife, who sometimes helps me find what I'm really trying to say hidden in a long, rambling first draft.
If some of the "noise" of blogging is moving to twitter, though, I'll gladly enjoy the less noisy blogs.
Why?
Because it gives me an outlet for all those little twitters of thought that, while interesting at the moment (maybe), are not going to be interesting 5 minutes or 5 days from now.
And turn, Twitter's limited message length keeps everyone terse. I can catch up on what's up in the Twitterverse in a few minutes. Try a few hours for my RSS catch up :)
If they "stuffed shirt" it, people will just ignore them, but to define blog as one person only doesn't quite cut it for me either. It's just a content management system, it could be used well or poorly, by individuals and companies...
My two cents...
Let's also not forget that there are a lot of people airing out their thoughts on the Facebook's, Twitter's, Vox' etc of the world. I know a lot of people, especially back home in India who are not on Twitter, but are on Vox, cause they can control who gets to see what.
Yes, this is a tech list - and lists are not bullshit, despite others claim - but it still is a measuring stick of influence. One that is important and valuable to a lot of various people. Robert, she wouldn't have had you come to AZ if you weren't high on that list. ;)
And while Twitter has value, the downside to Twitter is that the very stupid stuff gets buried. You stick your neck out on your blog, people notice it. You Twitter something interesting, odds are it's going to get buried or die. Or, well, get erased before becoming part of the Google cache.
One last thought - while the A list might be insufferable at times, it is a ranking of influence for certain areas. But each space has its own A-list, and those are the people that are passionate about products, spaces, services, etc.
I am curious by your definition of blogs being "single voice of a person"? So what about group blogs? Is the group I'm a part of that has never had an editor not a blog in your eyes because we all share our writing at one place instead of having eight different less updated blogs?
Can't "single voice" bloggers band together on a publication like Boing Boing and still be considered bloggers? I think so.
Beyond that, I don't read blogs for my news. I read blogs for the insight and perspective of others on a recent topic.
The Twitter evangelism is getting a bit old. The value of your twitter posts are 1/10th of the value of your blog posts a year or even 6 months ago. Everytime I visited your blog, I found something worth investigating further. I don't think I've seen that yet on Twitter.
FTR, Twitter's hit me too. I'm amazed that a single app could have such an impact on attention.
For years newspapers and magazines have had their columnists - essentially print versions of individual bloggers. It's not what we call the system we use that matters - it's the content that's important. Most people have given up blogging and gone to Twitter because they don't have much to say - or unlike news organisations - have no system in place to generate content.
The reason the Techmeme list has so many news sites in its top 100 is because they provide fresh, updated content, constantly. That's the secret to online success - fresh content. Whether you do that using what you call "content management", "blogging" or just "web design" doesn't matter. It's not the system that's important - it's the content; that's what readers are looking for, they don't care how you produced it or how we define it.
As I commented on in Andrew's post when it came out, I think it's pretty impossible for Twitter to kill blogging. We will always need people like you, Scoble. But what we are seeing is the death of bloggers without business-models, which has been going on for several years. Scoops + blogging takes money, as sad as that may be.
Not everyone likes writing run-on 10-tweets messages, Robert ;)
Thankfully, it all happened, and I'm loving it!
(http://www.wordyard.com/2007/05/20/amateur-hour/)
The blogospheres (the spheres within the sphere, as Tish wisely observed) are alive and well and carries on without these sort of doomsday predictions from myopic A-list tech bloggers. I mean that in the nicest possible way, Robert.
Anyway, Twitter is "lite" beer. A good blog piece is a pint of stout. There will always be a need for both brews. It's a well stocked tavern, this World Wide Web of ours.
/cheesy pub analogy
Those of us blogging around passion points have plenty to write about.
If Jeremy is blogging less, then I think that must mean the sky is falling so far blogging is concerned.
There are just more options now and everything is finding its place in the conversational media spectrum.