-
Website
http://www.scobleizer.com/ -
Original page
http://scobleizer.com/2006/04/06/scott-isaacs-gives-the-skinny-behind-the-naming-of-ajax/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
danja
44 comments · 4 points
-
polizeros
52 comments · 1 points
-
AndyBeard
69 comments · 4 points
-
Zachary Adam Cohen
35 comments · 8 points
-
dbarefoot
40 comments · 3 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
World-brand-building mistakes France’s entrepreneurs make
2 weeks ago · 181 comments
-
The best and worst thing Twitter did in 2009: RT
3 days ago · 24 comments
-
2010: the year SEO isn’t important anymore
1 week ago · 67 comments
-
iPhone developers abandoning app model for HTML5?
1 week ago · 52 comments
-
A new addition here: the Meebo bar
2 days ago · 8 comments
-
World-brand-building mistakes France’s entrepreneurs make
but anyway, kudos to scott for bringing DHTML to us mere mortals.
cribot.com
"Scott Isaacs, the architect responsible for the AJAX bindings framework used by the Windows Live and MSN sites, showed some amazing Live Clipboard capabilities that he’s adding to that framework. Essentially, as a result of Scott’s work, you just need to add a small bit of XML to any page that uses his framework and the Live Clipboard icon/control is automatically added to any microformat on the page."
My name is *also* Scott Isaacs, and I'm the president of the WI .NET Users Group. We are having a free conference in Milwaukee this weekend, and one of the presentations is on building AJAX applications with ASP.NET and Atlas. Sign up for free here: http://www.wi-ineta.org/didn/06.
Five great speakers, five great topics, and it's free.
What was I thinking... :)
Only a very limited amount of those services which pop out actually survive. Besides that there's just a large amount of developers, whether amateur or pro's, which are thinking up new ways of using it, "creating" more possibilities.
Within several years AJAX will probably be integrated better within the web, how it will look like exactly will be hard to say right now, but I don't think that much will have changed. Just a difference in what way pages will be handled.
In the end though it'll be up to the visitor on what a page will look like, since if they don't like it most will stay away. For a lot of people the looks of a site have become just about as important, or even more important, as the content.
If you're bored with the term, just be patient. As with "DHTML," in a few years "AJAX" will simply be known as "web development".