Scobleizer - Latest Comments in ScobleizerTV progress

Re: ScobleizerTV progress

asssuck — Fri, 18 Aug 2006 06:05:02 -0000

is it just me or is that one motherfuckin lame menu of options ? Just call it 'shitTVforRetards' and at least be honest.....

Re: ScobleizerTV progress

Eddie Codel — Thu, 17 Aug 2006 23:08:52 -0000

ScobleCamp - bring a sleeping bag and Robert will keep the campfire stoked

Re: ScobleizerTV progress

RickH — Thu, 17 Aug 2006 20:45:20 -0000

Ok, I guess no one got the Channel 62 reference. Here's the explaination...

From http://en.wikipedia.org/wik... :

"In the film, Yankovic plays George Newman, a "daydreaming loser" (to quote IMDb's plot summary), whose uncle wins a faltering UHF television station (Channel 62) in a poker game..."

"However, R.J. Fletcher (McCarthy), the owner of a rival VHF station, Channel 8, a network affiliate, is furious at being beaten by a UHF station..."

Re: ScobleizerTV progress

Nicole Simon — Thu, 17 Aug 2006 19:21:24 -0000

Because unless you are called Mythbusters, I will not watch for 42 minutes. ;)

If there is a standard format and you go over it, make two pieces out of it. If I want to watch it back to back, no problem. But if not, I at least have a choice - most people I know just forget about the second half they where going to watch.

And yes, why not call it something with scoble? We will call it that way anyhow. :)

Re: ScobleizerTV progress

Rich Cameron — Thu, 17 Aug 2006 18:20:31 -0000

Format? This is the Web, not TV. So why are we worrying about staying in a preset timed format? I’m not. If something takes an hour, why not take it? On the other hand, if what you need to communicate only takes 50 seconds, why take longer?

Because if I am going to carve time out of my day to become a regular viewer, I don't want to allocate 15 minutes and fid that you've got an hour show. If I allocate 15 minutes and you've got 20, that's not an issue.

Re: ScobleizerTV progress

Pat Moore — Thu, 17 Aug 2006 18:16:33 -0000

If you can get your showed delivered via Tivo, I'll subscribe!

Re: ScobleizerTV progress

heatherf — Thu, 17 Aug 2006 17:11:46 -0000

I looked it up and "geek" in Latin turns out to be "geek" so that wont work, I guess. Anyway, just wanted to let you know that all your encouragement at Off the Grid has been taken seriously. I have started posting my own blog with a very cheesy name, www.peoplegeek.tv, and I am working on some video productions. Aaron got me a web cam and is geeking out on shopping for mobile cameras I could use out in the field. Any suggestions? I know you are super-busy, but I am hoping that you might be my Obi-Wan and only, i.e. my biggest fan and supporter. Thanks again for all your kind words and encouragement. (Gee, that was terribly unsnarky.)

Re: ScobleizerTV progress

Jeffrey — Thu, 17 Aug 2006 14:38:58 -0000

Friend me on Dodgeball, yo! I signed up for it the day they got bought but didn't get addicted to it since I went indy and started doing half my work from wi-fi cafes. Join the SF wi-fi cafe posse!

Re: ScobleizerTV progress

Joe Pruitt — Thu, 17 Aug 2006 14:28:45 -0000

Hey Robert, if you need someone to represent the network security sector in your round table/tea time give me a shout.

As for the title of the show, keep with the brand, it's served you well. Scobleized! really sticks out.

regarding topics. Have you thought of throwing in some reality television to the mix? Have users video themselves on a treasure hunt of some sort and compile it into a weekly show. Rent an apartment and have a handfull of bloggers live there for a week. Just a thought as reality TV is screaming for a new medium.

-Joe

Re: ScobleizerTV progress

Robert Scoble — Thu, 17 Aug 2006 14:24:14 -0000

Christopher: don't play that game with me. You know I like pissing you off. I guess that seals it on the name thing.

Re: ScobleizerTV progress

Robert Scoble — Thu, 17 Aug 2006 14:22:52 -0000

Loic: we already bought geekentertainment.tv who has a girl host. She worked for Red Herring, went to the famous Columbia School of Journalism, and is funny too.

Re: ScobleizerTV progress

Loic — Thu, 17 Aug 2006 13:51:35 -0000

Hey Robert. Sounds good but don't underestimate that the success of Rocketboom or MobuzzTV is also based on the fact that there is a cute girl presenting. Neither of us are cute blond looking girls, unsure how many geeks want to see a geek like you everyday in video ! So just hire a cute girl for your show, don't forget ;-)

just teasing. see you soon.

Re: ScobleizerTV progress

Christopher Coulter — Thu, 17 Aug 2006 13:20:50 -0000

Umm, I vote against the ego-personalization, no Scobleisms...think Main Street and not Geek Street. Scoble won't mean a hill of beans to a wider audienece, think Z and not A.

Re: ScobleizerTV progress

Stephane Rodriguez — Thu, 17 Aug 2006 12:51:24 -0000

Segments of interest could be directly linked to, [start time, end time]. That'd be a much better way for anyone to watch the content of interest. That's built-in in RealMedia and WMV. Not sure about Quicktime though. Google introduced video hyperlinks in GV a couple of weeks ago.

Re: ScobleizerTV progress

Brian Shields — Thu, 17 Aug 2006 12:31:05 -0000

I love Scoblized! myself. It certainly has a nice marketing edge to it.

As a MSM-type, I think this is outrageously exciting. As we discussed at Blogher, I'm working on a project that is coming at this in a similar way from the television station side of things. I think there are tremendous opportunities for both of us here. Let's talk soon.

Re: ScobleizerTV progress

Kevin OKeefe — Thu, 17 Aug 2006 12:01:12 -0000

I like "Meet the Scoble's" Not everyone outside the online world knows you yet. And if you do things right and new media continues to grow, they will. Plus you'd be foolish not to get Maryam and Patrick involved to give it a well rounded edge.

You work because though you may be a geek, you're one of us.

Re: ScobleizerTV progress

brad — Thu, 17 Aug 2006 11:12:47 -0000

you should call it Scoble Unlisted.

Re: ScobleizerTV progress

eROCK — Thu, 17 Aug 2006 10:59:12 -0000

I have to agree with Jerome and Vijay. Either 'Scobleized' or 'ScobleShoots' works, IMHO.

Although I guess people could say you stole Hannity's 'Hannitized' if you chose 'Scobleized'.

Re: ScobleizerTV progress

Pradeep — Thu, 17 Aug 2006 10:35:44 -0000

how about something from ancient greece or something - was there a God of Technology, guess not...how about vscooble? just a suggestion.

Re: ScobleizerTV progress

Jerome Hughes — Thu, 17 Aug 2006 10:19:05 -0000

Scobleized! is my vote - links to and differentiates from the blog, doesn't have the "TV" baggage (turn that dang thing down/off, please!)

Re: ScobleizerTV progress

Michael Markman (Mickeleh) — Thu, 17 Aug 2006 09:50:24 -0000

The problem of helping viewers get right to the part they're interested in is tackled by www.veotag.com. Index a video with clickable tags so that viewers can see your rundown and jump right to any particular point. Think deep hyperlinking inside a video stream.

Tech tea time strikes me as a show in itself. (Strong model from TV: Jon Favreau's Dinner For Five on IFC.) I think you want to give these conversations room to breathe. (You might lift a segment from a good Tech Tea Time and pop it into an anthology show.)

Don't shy away from using your name. Face it, it's a brand. You and your name... why, you're a team. You've gotten this far together. Don't break up the act now. The name of the show doesn't dictate where you point the camera.

(BTW... I've seen some research with video chat users that people are much more interested in the background than the big head in the foreground. Show me your space plays better than show me your face.)

Re: ScobleizerTV progress

Jeff — Thu, 17 Aug 2006 09:16:15 -0000

The challenge is trying to do something that isn't being done already. Or doing it better than the person is doing it already. I am a media freak when it comes to watching "stuff." My Tivo is maxed at the moment and I have shows in I-Tunes that need to be watched and listened to. I wish there was something out there that focused on podcasts that aren't out there promoting or criticizing world events. I would hope that more stuff like ask a ninja will come out. I guess it is coming and I need to be patient with the evolution.

In either case PodTech should help me make my website fruitfull and get there advertisers at www.podsea.com.

Sorry had to shamelessly plug.

Re: ScobleizerTV progress

bluesaze — Thu, 17 Aug 2006 08:56:59 -0000

Hey there scoble I/we will be there at blogcamp to hear you. its Gonna totally rock.

Re: ScobleizerTV progress

Vijay — Thu, 17 Aug 2006 08:26:13 -0000

I suggest you name it "ScobleShots" (or "ScobleShoots") it would catch all that you wanted to convey and sounds geeky too :-)

Re: ScobleizerTV progress

RickH — Thu, 17 Aug 2006 07:55:08 -0000

What about Channel62. It pays homage to your Channel9 history, and includes an esoteric geek reference.