<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Scobleizer - Latest Comments in Satellite Radio Consolidates</title><link>http://scobleizer.disqus.com/</link><description>Tech enthusiast, video blogger, media innovator, fanatical about startups at Rackspace, home of fanatical support for Internet entrepreneurs.</description><atom:link href="https://scobleizer.disqus.com/satellite_radio_consolidates/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2007 05:12:03 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Satellite Radio Consolidates</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/02/20/satellite-radio-consolidates/#comment-9671317</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I agree wit your article "satellite"I love my satellite radio, but that AUX connector for iPods and Zunes on both of our cars has a strong calling too. I agree with Doc that listening to media you chose is a powerful thing with &lt;a href="http://www.satellitetvpc.org" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.satellitetvpc.org"&gt;satellite&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">lawrence</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2007 05:12:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Satellite Radio Consolidates</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/02/20/satellite-radio-consolidates/#comment-9671318</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"Long and short of it? Neither system has that many subscribers."&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;At the end of 2006 they had a combibed 14 million subscribers.  I think those are pretty good numbers.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mdoeff</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 02:19:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Satellite Radio Consolidates</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/02/20/satellite-radio-consolidates/#comment-9671319</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I agree with you and I think the merger makes great business sense. 55% of new vehicles in 2010 will have satellite radio head units installed by OEMs per long-term agreements. 2007 is the first year the impact of these preinstalled units will really be seen so the timing makes sense. Like you said, it's a very valuable service (to people like you and me). Build it and they will come.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MCF</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2007 14:22:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Satellite Radio Consolidates</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/02/20/satellite-radio-consolidates/#comment-9671321</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Also, XM is on DirecTV, so I can get the stuff in the house on the home theater. Yay!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Eric Rice</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2007 14:05:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Satellite Radio Consolidates</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/02/20/satellite-radio-consolidates/#comment-9671320</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It's like hardware-powered HBO and Showtime devices. There's stuff I want on both... at least now it's more friendly for me the consumer. Glad I never purchased both.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Eric Rice</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2007 14:05:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Satellite Radio Consolidates</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/02/20/satellite-radio-consolidates/#comment-9671322</link><description>&lt;p&gt;i love my XM radio...hopefully this merger will bring good things!!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.thumbwarz.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.thumbwarz.com"&gt;see what the rest of the world thinks&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jsutevan</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2007 12:03:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Satellite Radio Consolidates</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/02/20/satellite-radio-consolidates/#comment-9671325</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Love my XM (for the music and baseball), no interest in HDTV.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Marcus</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2007 11:26:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Satellite Radio Consolidates</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/02/20/satellite-radio-consolidates/#comment-9671323</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Robert, I have looked at Satellite radio several times but could never really decide which one to go with so I didn't go with either. I have a feeling I am not alone.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Greg Furry</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2007 11:01:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Satellite Radio Consolidates</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/02/20/satellite-radio-consolidates/#comment-9671324</link><description>&lt;p&gt;My family is the reverse; we have satellite but no HDTV. My wife is a huge Stern fan and listens to NPR and talk, I listen to music. I'm curious as to which hardware wins, XM or Sirius'. Would they keep both sets of satellites and hardware going? Who has to get new hardware?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jeff Cuscutis</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2007 10:27:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Satellite Radio Consolidates</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/02/20/satellite-radio-consolidates/#comment-9671326</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Finally!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ethan Bodnar</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2007 09:51:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Satellite Radio Consolidates</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/02/20/satellite-radio-consolidates/#comment-9671327</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"What you want, when you want" isn't the panacea many people make it out to be.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It's funny - no matter how many tracks I put on an iPod (right now, around 10,000) I still feel like they get old pretty quick. And perhaps oddly, I also feel the paradox of choice with that many tracks - deciding what to listen to becomes a chore.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;My XM radio, by contrast, I never get that feeling with. I just turn it on and see what's playing, and "channel surf" between the different formats I like. It works for me.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Eric</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2007 09:50:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Satellite Radio Consolidates</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/02/20/satellite-radio-consolidates/#comment-9671329</link><description>&lt;p&gt;When my group of friends first got word of the XM-Sirius thing, most of them shouted "It'll never happen" because of the antitrust issues.  I'm not so sure though, because if both companies are losing money, then how is it a monopoly?  Don't you actually have to be profitable?  And it's not hindering another sat. start-up from offering a better product later...though with all the sports leagues signed exclusively to either XM or Sirius, finding good content might be an issue.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Hmmm....do I see the "ScobleChannel" in the future on a future sat. network? :-)  It definatly won't be my  "Hard Drive Life Live" ... lol&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Corey Clayton</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2007 07:29:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Satellite Radio Consolidates</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/02/20/satellite-radio-consolidates/#comment-9671328</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"I like the serendipity of listening to stuff I wouldn’t otherwise listen to."&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Right.  Me too.  It's just like how on TiVo you subscribe to what you like, and if you don't channel surf anymore, you'll miss some new things you might enjoy.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve Garfield</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2007 07:20:09 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>