<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Scobleizer - Latest Comments in Qik&amp;#8217;s from SXSW</title><link>http://scobleizer.disqus.com/</link><description>Tech enthusiast, video blogger, media innovator, fanatical about startups at Rackspace, home of fanatical support for Internet entrepreneurs.</description><atom:link href="https://scobleizer.disqus.com/qik8217s_from_sxsw/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 19:20:45 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Qik&amp;#8217;s from SXSW</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2008/03/13/qiks-from-sxsw/#comment-9702446</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Robert, Whoa it was soooo cool hangin' out w/you at the Flyin' Saucer in San Antonio last Thursday night.  What a blast!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Bob Szymanski</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 19:20:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Qik&amp;#8217;s from SXSW</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2008/03/13/qiks-from-sxsw/#comment-9702436</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Just a random sample: 37327, 35843, 35701, 34133... No prep, no editing, poor quality. Painful to watch.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;There way more videos like these, than like the examples you provided.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">clem</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 01:40:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Qik&amp;#8217;s from SXSW</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2008/03/13/qiks-from-sxsw/#comment-9702445</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Clem: well, OK, then you'll want to watch our edited shows at ScobleizerTV, which are professionally shot on expensive HD cameras.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Qik videos let me get you different kinds of video.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;For instance, here's Guy Kawasaki in the airport tonight talking about his new service. That question WAS prepared. &lt;a href="http://qik.com/video/36369" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://qik.com/video/36369"&gt;http://qik.com/video/36369&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Here's R.E.M.'s lead singer talking about why he likes the Internet. Very short, and prepared question: &lt;a href="http://qik.com/video/35841" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://qik.com/video/35841"&gt;http://qik.com/video/35841&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Here's executives at Rackspace talking about their unique corporate culture. &lt;a href="http://qik.com/video/35737" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://qik.com/video/35737"&gt;http://qik.com/video/35737&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In all three cases, the quality is good enough to watch and learn something from. The player on all three starts immediately here. Not sure if you have a slower connection or something else that keeps Flash videos from playing.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Here's one of the guys who invented the Intel chip: &lt;a href="http://qik.com/video/35706" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://qik.com/video/35706"&gt;http://qik.com/video/35706&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Qik videos let me get content up much faster and much cheaper, plus you get to participate during the filming of the video.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Robert Scoble</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2008 01:37:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Qik&amp;#8217;s from SXSW</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2008/03/13/qiks-from-sxsw/#comment-9702444</link><description>&lt;p&gt;robert: What is pretty clear is that YOU haven't watched much of it.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;If you don't want feedback, don't ask.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">clem</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 23:07:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Qik&amp;#8217;s from SXSW</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2008/03/13/qiks-from-sxsw/#comment-9702443</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Robert, What a BLAST meeting you Rocky, Shel and EVERYONE else at SXSW. Thanks for the shout out!  As you can imagine, I've been spending my evenings adding new Twitter friends. ;-)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I've found that audio is sort of the weak link on the N95, so we've both learned to work the camera mic pretty close. Noisy environments obviously make that tougher.  To me, the game changer of the Qik platform is that it lets the audience  participate via chat.  That is beyond evolutionary.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Oh and that little spy camera that Ivan Pope was talking about is called a minox.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jim Long</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 21:00:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Qik&amp;#8217;s from SXSW</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2008/03/13/qiks-from-sxsw/#comment-9702433</link><description>&lt;p&gt;clem: it's pretty clear to you that you have no clue about what I'm doing with Qik. I doubt you even watched a single video.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Robert: I'm using a Nokia N95.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Robert Scoble</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 13:50:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Qik&amp;#8217;s from SXSW</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2008/03/13/qiks-from-sxsw/#comment-9702434</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It just occured to me that Qik is a spy's delight. When I was a kid, all spies (in the movies) had those tiny little cameras that they would use for photographing all sorts of stuff, documents mostly. Then they had the pressing problem of getting the film back to base - which is generally where they fell down. These days, they would just open up their phone and let it stream back - end of. No-one could find the film and destroy it. I might take up a career in industrial espionage!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ivan Pope</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 12:13:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Qik&amp;#8217;s from SXSW</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2008/03/13/qiks-from-sxsw/#comment-9702435</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Robert, and what cell phone do you use for interview recording? I mean what resolution (in Mpx) has phone's camera?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Robert Bardou</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 11:55:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Qik&amp;#8217;s from SXSW</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2008/03/13/qiks-from-sxsw/#comment-9702447</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Qik is easier for you, more painful for us: no thought to questions, long dull sections, and poor audio and video quality.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Doing research, preparing a series of questions, editing the results to include the important answers, and capturing the interview in high quality audio and video is very hard work for you, but would make the resulting video much more interesting and valuable to us.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">clem</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 05:39:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Qik&amp;#8217;s from SXSW</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2008/03/13/qiks-from-sxsw/#comment-9702432</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Honestly, I think the Qik videos are much better for things like, say, the Mark Zuckerberg mulligan at Pangea where it's on the fly, not for an actual "interview."&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;When I talk to someone it's either off the cuff with the voice recorder or sit down with the table microphone into the laptop or GarageBand. Sometimes I'll use BlogTalkRadio. To me, having the camera between me and the subject makes it about the camera and not the conversation, and I think interviews flow better when they are conversations between equals.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Having someone else take the video while you talk to someone? You'll probably get more natural results and better answers that way.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andrew Feinberg</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 21:54:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Qik&amp;#8217;s from SXSW</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2008/03/13/qiks-from-sxsw/#comment-9702431</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Robert -- Although Qik is still an experiment, there is nothing else like it. Kyte announced live streaming, but thats nothing like Qik does it :)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Keep on Qikking!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Daniel Brusilovsky</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 19:12:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Qik&amp;#8217;s from SXSW</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2008/03/13/qiks-from-sxsw/#comment-9702442</link><description>&lt;p&gt;As you know I really don't care for the Qik videos (mostly they seem to waste my time) -- but the latest tactic (not sure if it is a new feature or not) where your twitter posts actually include some subject information is an improvement.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;But I do agree it is likely possible to get a different kind of video/interview using the cell phone because of its "invisibility". Hopefully the technology of the phones, network will improve so the usefulness of the strategy also improves.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Brian Sullivan</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 14:41:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Qik&amp;#8217;s from SXSW</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2008/03/13/qiks-from-sxsw/#comment-9702437</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Robert: I like your Qik videos as well. I know you're trying to work on the audio/video quality. If they could somehow be made sharper, that would be great. Thanks for streaming from SXSW BTW!!!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">anjali28</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 10:40:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Qik&amp;#8217;s from SXSW</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2008/03/13/qiks-from-sxsw/#comment-9702438</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Robert,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I also like the Qik videos.  One thing I would say is that, simply due to the quality issue - shaky camera and audio sometimes not being the best - I would prefer them to be shorter.  I think, sometimes, you are still approaching these interviews in terms of "the big camera".&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Snappier, punchier little vignettes of opinion I think would work a lot better.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Just my 2p worth (I'm Scottish.  We don't do cents here! ;-) )&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Scott O'Raw</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 10:08:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Qik&amp;#8217;s from SXSW</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2008/03/13/qiks-from-sxsw/#comment-9702439</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Jim Long is awesome! I have so much respect for him! He's a pillar of the DC tech community. Great interview Robert.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Justin Thorp</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 10:06:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Qik&amp;#8217;s from SXSW</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2008/03/13/qiks-from-sxsw/#comment-9702441</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm so jealous.  I was hoping to be at SXSW this year, but not luck.  Thanks for keeping us updated with great posts.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">justin</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 09:48:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Qik&amp;#8217;s from SXSW</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2008/03/13/qiks-from-sxsw/#comment-9702440</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Robert, I really like the Qik videos.  One thing, though, is it would really help me to always have a little meta data for each one, so people can judge if they want to watch.  A meaningful title would be enough.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I know that you put titles on many of your Qik videos, but there are also quite a few that have a title of "Untitled".  Seeing "Untitled" makes me less likely to watch the video.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Simon Brocklehurst</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 09:35:28 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>