-
Website
http://www.scobleizer.com/ -
Original page
http://scobleizer.com/2008/03/13/qiks-from-sxsw/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
danja
44 comments · 4 points
-
polizeros
52 comments · 1 points
-
AndyBeard
69 comments · 4 points
-
Zachary Adam Cohen
35 comments · 8 points
-
dbarefoot
40 comments · 3 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
The best and worst thing Twitter did in 2009: RT
1 day ago · 22 comments
-
World-brand-building mistakes France’s entrepreneurs make
1 week ago · 181 comments
-
2010: the year SEO isn’t important anymore
1 week ago · 67 comments
-
A new addition here: the Meebo bar
1 day ago · 7 comments
-
iPhone developers abandoning app model for HTML5?
1 week ago · 52 comments
-
The best and worst thing Twitter did in 2009: RT
I know that you put titles on many of your Qik videos, but there are also quite a few that have a title of "Untitled". Seeing "Untitled" makes me less likely to watch the video.
I also like the Qik videos. One thing I would say is that, simply due to the quality issue - shaky camera and audio sometimes not being the best - I would prefer them to be shorter. I think, sometimes, you are still approaching these interviews in terms of "the big camera".
Snappier, punchier little vignettes of opinion I think would work a lot better.
Just my 2p worth (I'm Scottish. We don't do cents here! ;-) )
But I do agree it is likely possible to get a different kind of video/interview using the cell phone because of its "invisibility". Hopefully the technology of the phones, network will improve so the usefulness of the strategy also improves.
Keep on Qikking!
When I talk to someone it's either off the cuff with the voice recorder or sit down with the table microphone into the laptop or GarageBand. Sometimes I'll use BlogTalkRadio. To me, having the camera between me and the subject makes it about the camera and not the conversation, and I think interviews flow better when they are conversations between equals.
Having someone else take the video while you talk to someone? You'll probably get more natural results and better answers that way.
Doing research, preparing a series of questions, editing the results to include the important answers, and capturing the interview in high quality audio and video is very hard work for you, but would make the resulting video much more interesting and valuable to us.
Robert: I'm using a Nokia N95.
I've found that audio is sort of the weak link on the N95, so we've both learned to work the camera mic pretty close. Noisy environments obviously make that tougher. To me, the game changer of the Qik platform is that it lets the audience participate via chat. That is beyond evolutionary.
Oh and that little spy camera that Ivan Pope was talking about is called a minox.
If you don't want feedback, don't ask.
Qik videos let me get you different kinds of video.
For instance, here's Guy Kawasaki in the airport tonight talking about his new service. That question WAS prepared. http://qik.com/video/36369
Here's R.E.M.'s lead singer talking about why he likes the Internet. Very short, and prepared question: http://qik.com/video/35841
Here's executives at Rackspace talking about their unique corporate culture. http://qik.com/video/35737
In all three cases, the quality is good enough to watch and learn something from. The player on all three starts immediately here. Not sure if you have a slower connection or something else that keeps Flash videos from playing.
Here's one of the guys who invented the Intel chip: http://qik.com/video/35706
Qik videos let me get content up much faster and much cheaper, plus you get to participate during the filming of the video.
There way more videos like these, than like the examples you provided.