-
Website
http://www.scobleizer.com/ -
Original page
http://scobleizer.com/2006/02/13/popular-bloggers-delete-comments/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
danja
44 comments · 4 points
-
polizeros
52 comments · 1 points
-
AndyBeard
69 comments · 4 points
-
Zachary Adam Cohen
35 comments · 8 points
-
dbarefoot
40 comments · 3 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
World-brand-building mistakes France’s entrepreneurs make
2 weeks ago · 181 comments
-
The best and worst thing Twitter did in 2009: RT
3 days ago · 24 comments
-
2010: the year SEO isn’t important anymore
1 week ago · 67 comments
-
iPhone developers abandoning app model for HTML5?
1 week ago · 52 comments
-
A new addition here: the Meebo bar
2 days ago · 8 comments
-
World-brand-building mistakes France’s entrepreneurs make
I have been toying with positive versus negative comments lately. Nice findings...
I've actually deleted a comment before on my blog, but it's sole purpose was to say not so nice things about my mother IIRC.
Generally, what is the point of comments if you don't want people to comment? Seems like a lot of work as opposed to disabling comments.
The last comment I made that was deleted was made in response to a A-lister's post relating to censorship. My post simply disagreed with some of the premises of the argument. That level of hypocrisy is so far gone it's hilarious ;-)
"spams and monologs (or too select comments) and spams go all together" :cool:
http://battellemedia.com/archives/002339.php#co...
two, Like Robert sez.. we an always track comments for scoblizer at cocomments here
Steph turn me onto this foo.. which another way of tracking conversations... in and round blogspher
http://www.cocomment.com/comments/scobleizer
I suspect a major reason high-profile figures like Bill Gates don't blog is because they know they couldn't keep up appearances; every post they made would be scrutinized and ripped apart. Could you imagine Bill's blog retaining comments after being slash-dotted?
Comments are a sort of "policing" of blogs - the dialogue is the most important thing.
Robert,
Just as an experiment, couldn't you try to con[vince] Mr. Gates (or Mr. Ballmer) to write a guest post on your blog here and we could *see* what happens as far as comments? Would it not be extremely enlightening?
Will you accept this modest challenge?
-- Jack Krupansky
- Roger coComment Team
This guy is pushing the "The web has an identity crisis" and keeps the shouting down by avoiding any feedback whatsoever.
So, here's somethings to check out that Kim won't publish:
The Internet works pretty great without identity management. Look how many people are using it to create services, wealth and jobs.
Identity theft which seems to always be the justification for ID management do not go together. Just like the TV ads that claim broadband internet is "more secure" than dialup, it's nonsense.
My feeling is the "crisis" is manufactured to meet many goals:
1. Privatize the web. Kim's employer needs to know exactly who you are to limit your consumption for the service you paid. e.g. your computer as a pay-per-view-box. Where's the incentive for an individual to innovate?
2. Securitize the web. Establish control over content production on the web. This is the back-end to the pay-per-view model. Of course someone wants to further monetize that and make people pay for what was once almost free. Again, bye-bye innovation.
3. Better track individual activity. I don't really care about this because I'm not doing anything illegal. But some people get nervous.
4. Shift the economic liability of identity to the individual, away from the companies storing your personal information.
Welcome info-card!
Besides, sometime ya gotta delete. How many "comments" for male enhancement products and on-line poker should we really allow on our blogs? I kind of like Jim Turner's idea--add them to look more popular! now if we could only come up with a scheme to add links and game the Technorati 100 ;-)
http://NoBlogger.org
jveisdal.
Christopher: oh, and you don't think I get nutty stalker mode comments? Hmmm. What makes John so special? ;-)
But deleting is well within their rights. It's there property. Personally? I've left comments in when they point out how wrong I am (surprised it doesn't happen more often) or even point out silly spelling errors (I do most of my blogging at 5am). I'm human, you can disagree - it's fine. Heck, with the world the way it is today (Dems vs. Rep., Muslims vs. everyone) I feel like I should lead the way with a little opinion tolerance.
But seriously, if you're going to publish outright lies-- and with added photoshopped lies at that-- on your blog, you really need to be prepared to take a little heat on it. Moderate out the truth if you want. Maybe I seem like the troublemaker for bothering to blog this issue, but at least I don't seem the fool.
Outting is a bad bad idea, imposing your blog moral judgement on others. So I dearly hope Scoble bites.
Don't miss the "RSS Republic", the tool that will fix the blogosphere censorship issue :cool:
:D
Meg Kelso