<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Scobleizer - Latest Comments in Podcasting not a good name? Huh?</title><link>http://scobleizer.disqus.com/</link><description>Tech enthusiast, video blogger, media innovator, fanatical about startups at Rackspace, home of fanatical support for Internet entrepreneurs.</description><atom:link href="https://scobleizer.disqus.com/podcasting_not_a_good_name_huh/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 09:09:38 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Podcasting not a good name? Huh?</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/06/07/podcasting-not-a-good-name-huh/#comment-9641478</link><description>&lt;p&gt;From my own personal observances -- and I do Internet marketing, seo for a living -- I LIVE on the Internet -- I think that the greatest market segment that podcasting can appeal to simply hasn't picked up on it yet.  I'd wonder what high percentage of people online really even know what RSS is yet.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Event Tickets</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 09:09:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Podcasting not a good name? Huh?</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/06/07/podcasting-not-a-good-name-huh/#comment-9641477</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"It's hard to discover new ones."&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Why is it more fun to wander through YouTube?  Maybe when podcasting shifts from 90% audio to audio+video, then you'll get more adoption.  But will it still be called podcasting?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Wing Yu</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 25 Jun 2006 01:25:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Podcasting not a good name? Huh?</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/06/07/podcasting-not-a-good-name-huh/#comment-9641476</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hope you like orange socks. Because guess what?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.wehaveorangesocks.wordpress.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="www.wehaveorangesocks.wordpress.com"&gt;www.wehaveorangesocks.wordp...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.wehaveorangesocks.wordpress.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="www.wehaveorangesocks.wordpress.com"&gt;www.wehaveorangesocks.wordp...&lt;/a&gt; is some random but awfully funny [if horrific] events that happen to some girl called Orange Socks. Funny. Not very ~. To be. Or not ~.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.wehaveorangesocks.wordpress.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="www.wehaveorangesocks.wordpress.com"&gt;www.wehaveorangesocks.wordp...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">poolejamie18</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 Jun 2006 08:23:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Podcasting not a good name? Huh?</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/06/07/podcasting-not-a-good-name-huh/#comment-9641475</link><description>&lt;p&gt;PodTech eh? What ever happened to full disclosure? ;)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anonymous</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 11 Jun 2006 01:04:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Podcasting not a good name? Huh?</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/06/07/podcasting-not-a-good-name-huh/#comment-9641474</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hello, When searching for podcasts, one doesn't simply sit down and begin a quest to locate them. That action falls outside of the human experience. Mostly, a person would be introduced to podcast episodes from referrals or by asking a close friend - that is how we work as humans, and no new technology is going to make out actions change.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Also, I just wanted to submit an information update regarding the MyChingo Audio Comment System.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;A new FREE Membership is now available!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The free audio comment system has all the same features as a paid membership, with a reduced recording time of 2-minutes per message instead of the 30-minutes which paid members receive.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Sign up for your free MyChingo Audio Comment System by visiting &lt;a href="http://www.mychingo.com/signup.asp" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.mychingo.com/signup.asp"&gt;http://www.mychingo.com/sig...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Michael&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Michael Bailey</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 10 Jun 2006 08:19:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Podcasting not a good name? Huh?</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/06/07/podcasting-not-a-good-name-huh/#comment-9641473</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Microsoft will get around to Podcasting when they feel like it and when they do, they will call it "Feedcasting"&lt;br&gt;Can't find a good rock and roll podcast? Look no further. The Rock and Roll Jew Show at &lt;a href="http://www.rockandrolljew.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.rockandrolljew.com"&gt;http://www.rockandrolljew.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">davidjacobs</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 09 Jun 2006 19:24:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Podcasting not a good name? Huh?</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/06/07/podcasting-not-a-good-name-huh/#comment-9641472</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Robert,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;You're right, the ability to search podcasts is key to their growth and mainstream adoption.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Have you tried PodZinger?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.blogzinger.com/2006/06/09/scoble-podcasts-are-hard-to-find%e2%80%a6-podzinger-try-searching/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.blogzinger.com/2006/06/09/scoble-podcasts-are-hard-to-find%e2%80%a6-podzinger-try-searching/"&gt;http://www.blogzinger.com/2...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jasmine</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 09 Jun 2006 17:14:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Podcasting not a good name? Huh?</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/06/07/podcasting-not-a-good-name-huh/#comment-9641471</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm not surprised Microsoft doesn't have a problem with the term. They've all but ceded the entire digital music player market to Apple. Windows Media players are a dead end.&lt;br&gt;Don't believe me? Check out the XBox 360 support for iPods (and compare it to the lack of support for most WM players).&lt;br&gt;I wish it weren't true - I own an XBox 360 and incompatible WM player.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Joshua Flanagan</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 09 Jun 2006 14:34:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Podcasting not a good name? Huh?</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/06/07/podcasting-not-a-good-name-huh/#comment-9641470</link><description>&lt;p&gt;My biggest hangup with Podcasting in general is most are so freaking long, and the speakers talk sooooo sloooow.  Yes there are a few gems out there, but unlike a blog where you can do your own self condensation of content in an age of information overload taking longer to make your point an educate me will quickly get you voted off the island.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Derek Dysart</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 09 Jun 2006 12:22:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Podcasting not a good name? Huh?</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/06/07/podcasting-not-a-good-name-huh/#comment-9641469</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I would highly recommend Dave Slusher's Amigofish (&lt;a href="http://www.amigofish.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.amigofish.com"&gt;http://www.amigofish.com&lt;/a&gt;).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It is a recomendation engine for podcasts. You can use it without any registration or uploads, or you can upload an OPML file of the podcasts you listen to and it will recommend other podcasts you would probably enjoy.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It is how I discovered a number of my current favorit podcasts.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I'm an outlier - I no longer listen to the radio (after listening to the radio every day since I was 7, I'm nearly 32). I grew up without a TV and when I moved to the bay area in January, my tv stayed behind  in Chicago. I've never been one to buy a lot of CD's (or download a lot of music). So other than reading (or viewing videos) online, my primary media consumption IS podcasts.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I listen to a mix of music and news/talk podcasts, with a few hard to categorize ones. A quick list (of names, don't have the urls handy):&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;"Must listen" podcasts - the ones I listen to any day they are published:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;- Cubscast - for my twice weekly update on the Chicago Cubs by fans for fans, a really fantastic example of the best of the medium - light use of music, great discussion and summary of the past set of games, and interesting interviews, rarely more than 20 minutes&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;- Digital Flotsam - amazing mix of storytelling and music, produced all to rarely, but worth listening to&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;- Down in the Flood - better than 99% of ALL media - "professional" radio, "professional/public tv" etc. This is a ~40 min exploration of the orgins of American Roots Music - always engaging and amazingly well done, one of the few podcasts I do not delete after listening to, but instead save and treasure&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;- Adam Curry's Daily Sourcecode - I've been a listener since nearly the very beginning and still enjoy it&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;- The Pacific Coast Hellway - relatively short mix of rants, comedy sketches and great music, produced five times a week - foul and profane, impossible to do on mainstream radio yet laugh outloud funny and intelligent at the same time&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;- Escape Pod (Robert - btw - this is likely one that you and Patrick would both really enjoy) - audio readings of some of the best of science fiction. A paid market for sf short stories they have done over 50 episodes and all are worth reading, they also publish a feed of just those stories that are not-explicit for their large audiance of families (all of the stories are good and always well read and produced)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;- Accident Hash - great mix of independant music, produced in Boston&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;- Digital Noice - another great mix of independant music from Detroit so with a slightly different perspective&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;- Karin's Themed Podcast - truly incrediable podcast out of the Netherlands of a set of songs all around a given theme. Karin mixes in music from all genres and times (so not "podsafe") creating a hour+ of solid music to listen to, one of my favorite podcasts for background listening while I work&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;- IT Conversations - I subscribe to the "full" feed and listen to those shows that interest me (full disclosure, my conference - MeshForum - is distributed online via IT Conversations, watch for my interview with Robert and Shel later this summer!)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;- Podtech news - again I subscribe to their full feed but generally skip through some of their episodes, but enjoy most of them for a different take on the tech industry, a more enterprise centric perspective.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;And I have about 20 other podcasts that I subscribe to that are published less often, though many of them are ones I also listen to immediately when they are published.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;So there are a lot of great ones out there - but yes, there are 1000's of not so great ones as well (but that's the appeal for me, all of these content producers are exploring and dicovering what works for them and their audiance - and the beauty is that it is a "niche" medium. So I listen to podcasts in the many niche's that I belong to - Cub's fan, sf reader,  geek etc.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Shannon&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Shannon Clark</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 09 Jun 2006 11:23:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Podcasting not a good name? Huh?</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/06/07/podcasting-not-a-good-name-huh/#comment-9641468</link><description>&lt;p&gt;curious recomendations above.  My three major ones are music;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.americanheartbreak.com/movabletype/index.xml" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.americanheartbreak.com/movabletype/index.xml"&gt;http://www.americanheartbre...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/roadhouse" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://feeds.feedburner.com/roadhouse"&gt;http://feeds.feedburner.com...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.bfbs2.com/rnb.xml" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.bfbs2.com/rnb.xml"&gt;http://www.bfbs2.com/rnb.xml&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I don't listen to much talk on podshows.  In fact the only two I can think of are really timeshifted radio shows that I never get to listen to on air;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.abc.net.au/science/k2/podcast/drk_rss.xml" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.abc.net.au/science/k2/podcast/drk_rss.xml"&gt;http://www.abc.net.au/scien...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://triplej.net.au/thissportinglife/podcast/tsl.xml" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://triplej.net.au/thissportinglife/podcast/tsl.xml"&gt;http://triplej.net.au/thiss...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;BTW, Neither, especially the second one, rewards the skimmer.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">martin english</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2006 23:57:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Podcasting not a good name? Huh?</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/06/07/podcasting-not-a-good-name-huh/#comment-9641467</link><description>&lt;p&gt;DotNetRocks is a great podcast!  Interestingly, they call themselves "an internet audio talkshow."&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Anyway, Carl and Richard do a great job.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dan Ciruli</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2006 18:17:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Podcasting not a good name? Huh?</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/06/07/podcasting-not-a-good-name-huh/#comment-9641466</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Podcasting works for me as a name.  At this point, if you called it something else, I'd still be calling it Podcasting.  We probably should be spending our energy creating amazon like podcast referals for people looking for content rather than barking about the name.  And I have to agree with you, as much as I myself bitch about Dave's bitching, he does get alot of stuff done for alot of folks.  And as a side note, if he didn't bitch so much...he probably wouldn't be as interesting either.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Hank</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2006 14:38:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Podcasting not a good name? Huh?</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/06/07/podcasting-not-a-good-name-huh/#comment-9641465</link><description>&lt;p&gt;i love &lt;a href="http://Collectik.net" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="Collectik.net"&gt;Collectik.net&lt;/a&gt; for this. it's awesome for finding out what the best episodes of podcasts are, etc. it's like amazon's "if you like X, you'll like Y" thing, except for podcasts.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">julien</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2006 13:44:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Podcasting not a good name? Huh?</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/06/07/podcasting-not-a-good-name-huh/#comment-9641464</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Dave Winer complains about a lot of things, but his contributions to podcasting, RSS, etc., are the stuff of legends. He is a very intelligent individual, and I am thankful for his contributions to podcasting.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;As far as the word 'podcasting', nothing to see here. The name is stuck. Use it.....or not. All you have is choice. As podcasters, it is an unwritten law to educate your current, and potential listeners. All I say is it is like radio, but better. It is citizens media, which has been adopted by everybody else. The iPod stigma will pass, but only if we allow it.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">prp6040</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2006 13:31:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Podcasting not a good name? Huh?</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/06/07/podcasting-not-a-good-name-huh/#comment-9641463</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Jeff, Dave Winer invented "Edit this Page." He was on the SOAP committee. Invented XML-RPC. Popularized RSS, if not invented a lot of its core concepts. Invented OPML. Fathered blogging and popularized that. And just today he released a new OPML tool and news aggregator. Oh, and he also was involved in the first podcasts and came up with the core technology behind it.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;What have you done? Sounds like you're the one who just talks.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Robert Scoble</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2006 12:17:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Podcasting not a good name? Huh?</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/06/07/podcasting-not-a-good-name-huh/#comment-9641462</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Glad to hear your thoughts on all of this. I agree that it is currently less then optimal to discover podcasts on any of the services/sites/directories out there. I find good and bad points on all of them.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Have fun at Vloggercon. I'll be attending via SL&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">C.C.</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2006 11:40:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Podcasting not a good name? Huh?</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/06/07/podcasting-not-a-good-name-huh/#comment-9641461</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Podcasting, a term coined by Ben Hammersley, is great! I enjoy the daily cartoon from refrederator, the argument from the BBC Today programme, 43 folders, and Mark Kermode's film reviews and so on. Once you have subscribed to a feed, the content is thereafter downloaded automatically so you can enjoy it while travelling or later, at your leisure.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John V. Keogh</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2006 11:00:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Podcasting not a good name? Huh?</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/06/07/podcasting-not-a-good-name-huh/#comment-9641460</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Does Winer ever actually do anything, or just talk about stuff?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jeff</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2006 10:07:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Podcasting not a good name? Huh?</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/06/07/podcasting-not-a-good-name-huh/#comment-9641459</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Great points, Robert. (Because I agree with you!) From a year ago:&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://sethgodin.typepad.com/seths_blog/2005/05/thinking_about_.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://sethgodin.typepad.com/seths_blog/2005/05/thinking_about_.html"&gt;http://sethgodin.typepad.co...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">seth godin</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2006 06:39:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Podcasting not a good name? Huh?</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/06/07/podcasting-not-a-good-name-huh/#comment-9641458</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;So, why hasn't podcasting taken off more yet?&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Ummm, the answers easy enough, Sherlock -- lack of skimming, lack of talent, extreme niche, lack of worth, zero ROI...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Now where "podcasting" has caught on, and caught on bigtime, is merely mp3 sync, aka Rush Limbaugh and the videopodding aka Desp. Housewives, LOST, Battlestar Galactica and the like. A known commodity will always win out over some ego-fed geeks using gadgetry tech, thinking they have showbizy talent. Bad enough having to put up with the egos on the blogs, let alone listening to them yabber on for hours.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Just brand it, and let the artists take it over. How it always ends up working. But the geeks still think the medium is the message, always on the wrong end of the stick, seeking technical solutions to what is at core a talent issue. And as much as it takes off it's STILL narrowcasting, and braodcasting is always and eternally will be the big fish.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Christopher Coulter</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2006 06:16:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Podcasting not a good name? Huh?</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/06/07/podcasting-not-a-good-name-huh/#comment-9641457</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think that "podcast" is a bad name because it's misleading.  I've had to explain to multiple people that one does not need an iPod to listen to a podcast.  Even I thought that one needed an iPod to listen to a podcast when I first heard the term.  It's one thing to have a "cool" name (not that I think that "podcast" is cool), but it's another to have a misleading name.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;80% of podcasts are listened to on the computers that download them rather than an mp3 player of any kind, let alone an iPod, accodring to &lt;a href="http://news.digitaltrends.com/talkback109.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://news.digitaltrends.com/talkback109.html"&gt;http://news.digitaltrends.c...&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;But I won't lose sleep over being stuck with a misleading name. :-)  But I'm through explaining that an iPod isn't necessary for podcast consumption, I'll let those that champion the "podcast" name enlighten everyone on that matter.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;But Robert, I've seen some Microsoft literature or UI that referred to "blogcasting" rather than "podcasting" (I forget where I saw this).  What's up with that?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Molly C</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2006 05:38:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Podcasting not a good name? Huh?</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/06/07/podcasting-not-a-good-name-huh/#comment-9641456</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You could have at least plugged a bit more about your podcasts at MS. Or aspects which involve podcasting like for example &lt;a href="http://virtualteched.com/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://virtualteched.com/"&gt;http://virtualteched.com/&lt;/a&gt; ;)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nicole Simon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2006 05:15:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Podcasting not a good name? Huh?</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/06/07/podcasting-not-a-good-name-huh/#comment-9641455</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Looking for new Podcast? Robert go over to &lt;a href="http://PodcastPromos.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="PodcastPromos.com"&gt;PodcastPromos.com&lt;/a&gt; were getting some pretty heavy traffic and those in the know post their promos there.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Todd Cocharane</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2006 04:40:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Podcasting not a good name? Huh?</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/06/07/podcasting-not-a-good-name-huh/#comment-9641454</link><description>&lt;p&gt;We need &lt;a href="http://last.fm" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="last.fm"&gt;last.fm&lt;/a&gt; for podcasts.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Any chance of getting a 'new ideas' fee for that?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;monk.e.boy&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">monk.e.boy</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2006 03:54:22 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>