<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Scobleizer - Latest Comments in PayPerPost rebrands and goes after social media starfish advertising</title><link>http://scobleizer.disqus.com/</link><description>Tech enthusiast, video blogger, media innovator, fanatical about startups at Rackspace, home of fanatical support for Internet entrepreneurs.</description><atom:link href="https://scobleizer.disqus.com/payperpost_rebrands_and_goes_after_social_media_starfish_advertising/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 13:40:42 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: PayPerPost rebrands and goes after social media starfish advertising</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/10/31/payperpost-rebrands-and-goes-after-social-media-starfish-advertising/#comment-9693094</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I met with the folks from Izea last week. Izea is everything that PayPerPost should have been. I'm sure Arrington still won't be satisfied, but I think there are certain aspects of Izea platform that aren't evil and are worth visiting - most notably, their blogger empowerment tools (a place where brands can post content that bloggers and other social media users can use as a resource for information, embeddable content and more).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I'm not saying that this is a perfect or ideal platform, but it's worth a good long look.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jon burg</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 13:40:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: PayPerPost rebrands and goes after social media starfish advertising</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/10/31/payperpost-rebrands-and-goes-after-social-media-starfish-advertising/#comment-9693101</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think it was a good move from Ted and for PayPerPost the rebranding of the umbrella company needed to come sooner rather than later. However, this being said im not too sure about the branding itself. It all seems very web2.0 and tacky. There is no iconic imaging. Prob need a better graphic designer Ted.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steven Finch</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 12:23:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: PayPerPost rebrands and goes after social media starfish advertising</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/10/31/payperpost-rebrands-and-goes-after-social-media-starfish-advertising/#comment-9693093</link><description>&lt;p&gt;IZEA ~ IKEA ~ better than 'PayPerPost' but now just sounds Scandinavian. Happy Halloween.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">the constant skeptic</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 19:03:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: PayPerPost rebrands and goes after social media starfish advertising</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/10/31/payperpost-rebrands-and-goes-after-social-media-starfish-advertising/#comment-9693092</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Tanya : The name itself is too limiting. The name PayPerPost clearly described the business when we started but confines us long term. I am not saying PPP doesn't have a negative connotation for some bloggers, but that is not the driver behind this change. Were it the driver we would change &lt;a href="http://PayPerPost.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="PayPerPost.com"&gt;PayPerPost.com&lt;/a&gt; to &lt;a href="http://Izea.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="Izea.com"&gt;Izea.com&lt;/a&gt; and that is not the case. &lt;a href="http://PayPerPost.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="PayPerPost.com"&gt;PayPerPost.com&lt;/a&gt; will continue to operate as it is under the IZEA umbrella.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ted Murphy</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 18:31:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: PayPerPost rebrands and goes after social media starfish advertising</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/10/31/payperpost-rebrands-and-goes-after-social-media-starfish-advertising/#comment-9693102</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Ted: If PPP didn't have a negative connotation, why would you change it?  Why not just add other 'innovations' to your brand, with different names.  I'm completely confused as to why you would do this, if not to remove a negative perception?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tanya (@netchick)</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 18:06:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: PayPerPost rebrands and goes after social media starfish advertising</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/10/31/payperpost-rebrands-and-goes-after-social-media-starfish-advertising/#comment-9693095</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Robert,&lt;br&gt;With over 80,000 bloggers and 11,000 advertisers (including Fortune 500 companies) in our family changing the name of the parent company was a difficult decision. While we may not be loved by all A-Listers, I do feel we have a strong connection with the bloggers we serve. The name change may be hard for some of our long term supporters, but this is the right thing long term. &lt;a href="http://PayPerPost.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="PayPerPost.com"&gt;PayPerPost.com&lt;/a&gt; will remain our flagship product, it just won't be the name of the parent organization.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The name change itself is by no means disruptive, however it does provide a framework that will allow us to innovate by offering new services that don't necessarily belong under the PayPerPost brand.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I do believe that when it launched PPP was a disruptor. I think our newest innovation (codenamed Argus) will achieve much of the same success when it is released to the public.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ted Murphy</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 17:40:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: PayPerPost rebrands and goes after social media starfish advertising</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/10/31/payperpost-rebrands-and-goes-after-social-media-starfish-advertising/#comment-9693096</link><description>&lt;p&gt;wow, seems to me that they're going from a great name to a confusing one. I figured the controversy around them was limited to the "techo chamber". Either the negative press is a larger problem than I thought, or they really are just creating a larger brand under which to place their multiple products/properties.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jordan Mitchell</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 17:35:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: PayPerPost rebrands and goes after social media starfish advertising</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/10/31/payperpost-rebrands-and-goes-after-social-media-starfish-advertising/#comment-9693098</link><description>&lt;p&gt;A company does change it's name when they develop past the "message" of their existing name, however.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Colleen</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 17:23:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: PayPerPost rebrands and goes after social media starfish advertising</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/10/31/payperpost-rebrands-and-goes-after-social-media-starfish-advertising/#comment-9693097</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Never mind, I just read your earlier post defining the phrase. My bad.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">lux</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 17:23:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: PayPerPost rebrands and goes after social media starfish advertising</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/10/31/payperpost-rebrands-and-goes-after-social-media-starfish-advertising/#comment-9693100</link><description>&lt;p&gt;OK, maybe I'm really out of it from all the Halloween candy, but wth is a "social media starfish?"&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">lux</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 17:21:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: PayPerPost rebrands and goes after social media starfish advertising</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/10/31/payperpost-rebrands-and-goes-after-social-media-starfish-advertising/#comment-9693103</link><description>&lt;p&gt;you hit the nail on the head with "A company doesn’t change its name if it’s loved"&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">whatsnext</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 17:15:01 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>