-
Website
http://www.scobleizer.com/ -
Original page
http://scobleizer.com/2007/07/02/nokia-users-hate-me/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
danja
44 comments · 4 points
-
polizeros
52 comments · 1 points
-
AndyBeard
69 comments · 4 points
-
Zachary Adam Cohen
35 comments · 8 points
-
dbarefoot
40 comments · 3 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
The best and worst thing Twitter did in 2009: RT
1 day ago · 22 comments
-
World-brand-building mistakes France’s entrepreneurs make
1 week ago · 181 comments
-
2010: the year SEO isn’t important anymore
1 week ago · 67 comments
-
A new addition here: the Meebo bar
1 day ago · 7 comments
-
iPhone developers abandoning app model for HTML5?
1 week ago · 52 comments
-
The best and worst thing Twitter did in 2009: RT
If you want to get ahead of the curve for once - instead of being a follower like you have been for basically all of your professional life - jump on the Linux bandwagon. It's a slight running leap but by the time you'll be a full-fledged Linux cult member in 6-12 months (after you get informed enough about the product) Linux will have matured to the point for mere mortals to actually agree with you.
And you'll be first because you started the hype before it was primetime.
I suspect the answer is "no, not really".
Isn't this much the same attitude you take when people question the value of blogging?
#2- that's it, you've hit it right on the head! If it didn't have the apple logo, and it didn't have Steve Jobs to stand up and lie to the entire world about his new toy, neither Scoble or any of the other bloggers would have anything positive to say about it.
For the record, I did read your entry about how the N95 was better than the iPhone... how does that equate to what you say now, you know... without making you look like massive, massive tool?
Rock on, Scoble.... rock on. You got mesmerized by the bright screen and the apple logo. Don't be ashamed, it's cute.
Remember, Nokia fanboys are fanboys for a REASON. Apple fanboys are fanboys because they're ignorant to what else is out there. That doesn't make you a fan boy, because yes... we all know you have an N95, very happy for you. Singing the praises of the N95 in relation to the iPhone, then signing the praises of the iPhone in relation to the N95 makes you a tool. I understand the iPhone has it's target market, which is not me, I can accept that. I just can't accept douchebag bloggers like you that can't make up their minds and personally attack your readership when they don't agree with you.
I'm getting a great deal of enjoyment out of this discussion, I must admit. Thanks!
What is all this about religion anyway?
Note that I don't write for a Nokia forum the way you do. Grand that you've built your entire identity around Nokia. Me? I want the best product and iPhone is it.
I'm sure you've installed a product on your PC/MAC before. If there were no developers, such products wouldn't exist.
Here's a concrete example of what a developer like myself would be interested in doing - instead of having to plug in your iPhone to your computer to sync your music, you should be able to set a "home" wifi connection which would automatically sync your media when you're in its vicinity.
Shouldn't you declare a conflict of interest before writing all of these posts?
How much free publicity have you personally gained thanks to the iPhone?
This isn't even about iPhone vs. N95. This is about irresponsible blogging.
If I want traffic we all know the best way to do that: attack Apple.
It's quite obvious you've never had your hands on an iPhone.
I was talking about all the free publicity you got because you bought an iPhone.
I think this is about saving face. How bad would it look if, after so publically camping out for an iPhone you said "This thing I've been waiting for...it actually isn't that great." After all of that press about you exuberantly getting an iPhone, you have no choice but to praise it.
I just wish you wouldn't be so hostile about it.
Oh, and I've used an iPhone for hours. I'm writing this from a Macbook. I also have an N95.
And I still don't have an iPhone. I use a Nokia N95, which is a plenty nice phone but it isn't an iPhone.
Every single person I've shown them both to agrees that they'd rather own the iPhone.
Walt Mossberg, of the Wall Street Journal, called it revolutionary.
I guess he's bought off too, right?
I read your blog. You wrote you're sick of the hype. Translation: YOU have a conflict of interest in this conversation.
Normal people do care about adding software features to their phones e.g. tens of millions of "normal" people buy, and install Java games on their phones every month. And now, non-gaming Java applications are really starting to take off too.
I find it hard to believe that Steve Jobs doesn't understand this; especially now it appears that iPhone may have hardware Java acceleration built in and enabled, see:
http://www.psynixis.com/blog/2007/07/02/iphone-...
Why is that? You might ask yourself.
Does the Nokia have a huge screen that makes it a pleasure to read on?
Does the Nokia switch between wifi and cell service seamlessly?
Does the Nokia have a touch screen that's fun to use?
Does the Nokia have a Web browser that renders pages in a way that looks like what you see on your Web browser on your Windows or Mac machine?
Does the Nokia have an SMS client that works like an instant messaging client?
Does the Nokia have a QWERTY keyboard that matches the one that most people type on instead of a 1 - 2 - 3 style phone keyboard?
Does the Nokia have visual voice mail so that you can listen to the voice mail from your boss first (or your wife)? Even in a long list of voice mails?
Does the Nokia make it easy to do a conference call?
Nah, but you all keep thinking the N95 is a superior phone. Despite almost every serious reviewer who tells you otherwise. Heck, and most bloggers.
Hell, don't believe me. Ask yourself why Don MacAskill, CEO of SmugMug (a photosharing service -- you'd think he'd want to have a device with a decent camera, which the iPhone really doesn't have) is endorsing the iPhone. http://blogs.smugmug.com/don/2007/07/02/igot-ip...
Nah, on other hand. Keep telling me that I am an idiot for telling you the N95 is an inferior phone.
I've already had three people write me telling me that the attacks I'm getting from the Nokia folks have decided it for them: they are getting iPhones.
Keep it up! It's amazing that people from the Nokia community would want to behave like Apple fans usually do.
Have you ever done a survey of what people use their phones for? I have.
Very very very few have loaded ANY software.
Very few have even visited a Web page on their phones (not counting iPhones, cause that audience is TOTALLY different).
I was over in London recently and asked a lot of people to show me their phones and what was on them. Almost none had any Web experience. Mostly they used the SMS app.
So, when I say people don't care, that's what I mean.
Now, ask them if they want games, and they say "yes." Obviously those games have to be built in something. So to that end, yeah, I agree with you, they care about developers there.
Fair disclosure: I was given an N95 to try out by Nokia, and I fell in love with it. Feature-for-feature, the iPhone simply does not compare.
You can argue that the iPhone has a better interface, is easier to use, is pretty, fine. But once you start listing features, the N95 wins hands down.
5MP camera, VIDEO, GPS, VoIP, flash, etc.
There is no way you can favorably compare the iPhone's crippled, flash-less web browser to the N95. Want to know why?
Because the N95 web browser uses the same code as Safari on the iPhone! It's basically the same damn browser!
I thought you were a geek. Didn't you know that?
I thought you were a geek. Didn't you know that?
They make it very clear that Nokia has a better camera. IE, better "features."
But you can't answer why Zooomr's CEO endorsed the iPhone. You can't answer why SmugMug's CEO endorsed the iPhone. (Both photographers, who SHOULD care about "features").
Hint: it's not about the features. It's about how nice it is to use.
The extent this happens in the gaming world is notorious, and obviously in the computer world (mac vs. pc. vs linux.) But it just boggles the mind - and I believe, Robert, you make a good point when you mention the "mouse and ui" issue - so many people make the same comparisions. But here's the deal.... UI does matter. That's why Apple has been so successful at so much lately, they realize that and they make use of it. Because the average person on the street is, as you say, quite out of the loop s far as tech goes. I may not be thrilled at the poor web2.0 aspects of the iphone, but the average person doesn't know squat about that - they just know they are suddenly USING stuff like that.
The iPhone is not revolutionary because it does something new. Obviously that's not the case, and all the various fanboys lining up don't get that. I've had Palms, I've had windows mobile devices - all do more or less the same thing, often more things... But the iPhone makes such processes enjoyable, it makes it a pleasant experience. What's more, it makes it something that is now accessable to the mass as a whole - which will, in turn, drive more devices to offer such functions as people learn to expect such functions. That's where the revolution is. Most of this tech isn't that new, but until the average person is using it we won't see a lot of innovation in the field nor more reasonable prices.
The iPhone is the revolution that makes that happen.
I like Apple. I only started using their products last year, but I've quickly come to love how well they work and how happy I am to be using them. There are still issues, and some of the decisions made regarding the iphone are somewhat dubious but.... Fanboy? Not at all. I have enough good experience with Apple that I'm willing to give them some slack, but I'm not going to start deriding the next company over because they are NOT Apple.
This iPhone business has been a bit overwhelming, admitedly. I'm interested, and I have one, and I'm sick to death of it too... but, the "resistance" is certainly getting rather vile.
But, the reason I wrote 33 times about it is because of this: http://scobleizer.com/2007/07/01/iphone-stops-p...
No one has EVER stopped me in the street for carrying around my Nokia.
Oh, do note that picture was taken with a Nokia N95.
The fault, dear Brutus, lies not in our stars but in ourselves... People who can't tolerate hearing more about the iPhone have to take it upon themselves to ignore it. This attitude everywhere... with this disgusting sense of entitlement from the blogs they read... that they must quit telling the story because some people are sick of it, while the majority is still listening, is nauseating.
Hell, I write a culture blog and I have a hard time not writing about it, because it's what is going on.
And you're right - people do stop to see it. Seeing Transformers tonight I had everyone with 10 feet of me asking questions and talking about my iPhone - as I quite happily watched YouTube on the Edge service. No one cared about my Windows Mobile device, or Treo 650 back in the day.
Robert is right about how people use Internet enabled cell phones. Research reveals that about half of Internet enabled cell phone owners use their their phones to access the Web. That would be 12.5 percent of all cell phone users. So, there is still a huge consumer population to reach with Internet enabled phones.
Here's a report from Pew:
http://pewresearch.org/pubs/417/the-world-of-wi...
Does that make it a technically superior product?
It doesn't matter.
This debate is fruitless- it's impossible to argue with a true believer(this applies to both Apple and Nokia fanboys).
You can trade your N95 for an iPhone, and I can continue to use my N95, and we can both go to sleep smug and secure in our own superiority.
I don't believe that. I've seen many a stuck-in-the-gutter believer come around.
Remember those Unix heads at San Jose State who said the world didn't need a mouse or Windows? They all use them now.
I'm old enough to know that eventually all of you will come around to my point of view. :-)
Both the industry, and we as customers, win.
I laughed out loud at the guy on the nokia forum who said that maybe the N95 was just "a little bit too much machine" for Scoble. What, is your phone now some kind of sad macho bragging facility? You're not a real man, Scoble!
I also laughed at the guy above who seems to think that Robert is just interested in being the first and coolest, when his point about the iPhone is that it's a great product. Yeah! Get on that Linux bandwagon because it's new and no-one else is a fanboy yet! Then when Linux does take over the world, you can proclaim your Linux loyalty chops with impunity!
What kind of world do these people live in?
Probably one where they don't realise that it's the interface, stupid.
I'm waiting for Linux to get decent fonts. Everytime I look at a Linux distribution it doesn't come close to my Mac, which doesn't come close to Windows on the font side of things.
Not to mention why in the heck do we need another OS? What does Linux do that OSX or Vista doesn't? (And I'm NOT talking about the server -- I know very well that Google runs on Linux, but very few people can tell me why it'll be successful on the laptop or desktop).
I have used Nokia, Motorola, Samsung, now HTC mobile phones in last decade...and hope to some day also use an Apple...but to me having each fight like hell and innovate is fantsatic. When we get too rabid about a product that's when the vendor gets sumg and takes us for granted.
But it is like comparing a high end Mercedes to a high end Toyota. When it comes to the bigger market, Nokia is dominant and will continue to be for a few years. Nokia will sell more units in India and China in a week than Apple will sell in a year.
Let's not forget we have gotten the average person accustomed to paying $ 50 for a mobile phone. That is the Toyota Corolla market - Mercedes could never get there (nor did it want to)
Nokia used to be my favorite phone company but until they stop rehashing the same design that they've been using since last 10 years, they don't stand a chance.
Finally, I have been reading Robert's blog for 3 years and I can confirm that he does not follow the hype he has always told it as he sees it even when he worked at Microsoft and had to trash their products.
So Robert I own N95 like it but am not a Nokia fan boy but I love the fact that Apple will make SE and Nokia better manufacturers.
When will those in the "Valley" realize that life and the internet itself does not revolve around them ???.
If the iPhone 8GB is $599 in the US with a 2 year contract, we can expect (comparing the price to the $599 Mac Mini) it will cost around £400 ($800) in the UK/Europe. There is no way, when I can buy a Nokia N95 for a TENTH of the price on an 18 month contract that anyone is going to buy it, just for the touch screen, and lots of features that most premium phones that cost less already surpass.
Unless they upgrade to include MMS, HSDPA (3.5G), NTSC level video recording, Bluetooth 2.0 that isn't crippled, open up the application market to other companies to make games and apps AND make it cost no more than £100/$200 here, then only the insane or ridiculously wealthy will be buying this phone outside of America.
I can't believe anyone believes the N95 camera is difficult to use. Open shutter, point, gently press button to focus, press it down fully to shoot, close camera shutter. It even locks itself!
Until the iPhone is both matching price and features, then the high end price will not sell in the REAL mobile phone markets.
Because free computing and true consumer choice is important, then again as an ex-Microsoft employee Scoble, I'm not sure you'd understand that!
Well, there is BSD! Yahoo servers runs on FreeBSD Unix. So Linux is dispensable. As are cameras by Nikon, because there are cameras by Canon. Or Macs because there are PCs and PCs because there are Macs. Or PS3 vs Xbox etc...
> Because free computing and true consumer choice is important
Oh come on! Whats with this propaganda about "free computing"? Do you know how many microprocessors are in your devices, from the washing machine to the dvd player or car or gadgets? Guess how many are "free computing"... They just work. I couldn't care less if I use open source software or closed source software. And look at the web: Some Web 2.0 applications like maps or Google Mail are built "with" open source software (php, ruby, Linux), but aren't open. "Free computing" is not a natural goal to which all software is drifting.
The Linux revolution is predicted since 10 years. And it won't happen in another 10 years. Deal with it.
http://nrkbeta.no/how-to-get-a-bigger-screen-on...
And yes, we did post a link to your blog when you previously praised the N95- so we did cheer you for your views on it at the time. I remember reading someone's comments that labeled those who want a 5MP camera half-brained and fools. Just as I was called an idiot by Scoble. So if we are talking about which user base attacks who- let's be fair in your analysis, everyone.
Cheers, Scoble. Thanks again for the link.
I am an avid reader of your blog and I am commenting for the first time. It is probably old topic by now to talk about this, but I thought I would share some of my thoughts on this topic.
I am not "religious" towards any product and appreciate anything that is creative and better than the ones developed before. If at all I am religious I am towards bloggers like you as you guys are on the frontline providing so much of update to couch potatoes like me and I really appreciate that.
Coming back to the topic, I personally think that a comparison between iPhone and N95 is not justified as they are completely different products. Accepted that N95 and iPhones serve the same purpose but given the advancements in technologies we cannot simply take for granted that since they are both mobile phones they are fit to be compared. All those who do it would never reach a true verdict that which is better simply because we are not comparing the right products.
I am in Singapore where it is summer throughout the year. People naturally perspire a lot and the body generates quite a bit of oil. I have to wash myself several times a day just to look fresh. If I carry a phone which has no keyboard and I have to touch the screen for practically everything I need to do with the phone, the phone is going to be so sticky and oily in couple of hours that it is simply not possible to handle it myself. This is not to say that N95 does not get dirty but atleast I am not touching the display all the time.
On the contrary, the iPhone is a really "cool" product. Nothing can compare to it's beauty and simplicity. But imagine trying to blog from your phone (I haven't used one so I may be wrong here), it is definitely going to be more difficult than a phone with keyboard. I use a E65 and I blog quite easily with it even though it does not have a QWERTY keyboard.
I am not bashing iPhone or glorifying the N95 or vice versa but people have to put things in perspective before bashing either of the phone just on the basis of comparing each other. N95 is for sure a much more productive phone than iPhone and on the other hand iPhone is amazing when it comes to simplicity.
So instead of fighting the religious crowd one should come up with enough reasons and options that both Apple and Nokia go back to their drawing board trying to appreciate what the competitor has developed and finding ways to achieve it.
Well, my 2 cents worth. And thanks for adding me on Facebook.
Keep blogging...
Not being in the US I'm vague on the price, but we can divide the world into 3 groups.
(a) Those who think spending >$500 on a phone is idiotic. My Windows phone hooks into my corporate mail, my personal address book, my corporate address book and my corporate calendar. It browses the web, has a camera, plays music and videos. AND IT'S FREE on a contract. Why would anyone *pay* to have a phone ? A lot of readers don't want to hear about the i-phone.
(b) Those who have spent >$500 on a phone. Clearly they don't believe they are idiots themselves, but anyone who buys a phone other than theirs must be an idiot. That means all those with expensive fashion phones other than the iPhone don't want to hear you telling them they wasted their money.
(c)Those who agree with you. But after a while it gets dull to be told, again, how smart you were to buy Scoble's choice, so they're probably pretty bored with you.
So Robert, you don't have to post an answer, but you should think about the question "I am as interesting and relevant as when I was at Microsoft".
Your blogging used to be relevant and interesting. Lately you've become 1) boring, 2) combative, 3) insulting, and 4) irrelevant. When you aren't attacking your readers with petty insults, you are posting the same recycled news that I can read anywhere. What happened to the interesting and innovative content?
I don't make these comments to be harsh. I'm serious when I say that you seem to need a break.
Aditya, I think your claim that the iPhone will not be a productive device will likely be proven wrong. People use their iPods as productive devices, by loading useful text, audio and video files on them, or accessing iTunes U. So, considering the additional functions of the iPhone, such as email and the camera, it can't be any less productive.
James, the N95 cost $750. That fact is rarely mentioned on Nokia blogs or even in comments here because it is another negative for the phone. I even watched an interview of a Nokia executive promoting the N95 on iDay in which he did not mention the price until the reporter asked point blank near the end of the interview. So, if you are going to criticize the iPhone based on price, the same criticism applies to the N95, only more so.
There are good things to be said about the N95. The camera is probably among the best on cell phones anywhere. GPS can be handy, though I found the example of using it as a Neighborhood Positioning System during one's daily run silly. (Get Nike + iPod instead.) It offers the second best browser, apparently. But, the iPhone will exceed expectations in the market with good reason.
And by the way, no one from our 'tribe' asked you to make a comparison. You took that upon yourself. Maybe they are Apples and Oranges. But you've never made that clear, at least not that I've seen. I think you owe it to your readers to say what's inferior about the iPhone.
It has been one extraordinary laugh though, I'll give you that. Also, tell me, how is this hurting the technology companies???
The reason the price of N95 is rarely mentioned is because N95 is usually free/dirt cheap under contract (e.g. in Europe). Though, in the US you can only get it SIM free and pay the full price up front.
As for whether I'm more or less relevant since leaving Microsoft. At Microsoft I interviewed one CEO in two years. Since leaving a year ago I've interviewed more than 100 CEOs and a presidential candidate. If that's "not relevant" I want more of not being relevant! :-)
I think that really says it all. You don't deny the n95 has a better camera, GPS, 1200+ apps...
you just want the cool factor.
Admit it and be done with it. Just don't tell us its a better phone.
See my small cartoon:
http://geekandpoke.typepad.com/geekandpoke/2007...
Bye,
Oliver
But it is a superior phone, too. But I'm done arguing with you guys. You aren't here for a conversation about why, you're just here to "win" an argument. Hint: having a GPS, a better camera, video, 3G networks, and all that doesn't MATTER to having a better phone experience.
Come to think of it, the conversations were extremely similar to the ones we're having today.
And the end result will be the same, too.
You haven't until now, addressed anything I've said, so you can't tell me you're done arguing :). Plus, I'm not here to win - there are two things I'd like to point out, that's all.
Choose the iphone, there are plenty of good reasons and I don't deny it... certainly coolness is an acceptable factor.
The first thing that annoyed me was your statement that the iphone offered a 'better picture taking experience'.
In the real world, Robert, believe it or not, the PICTURE is part of the "picture taking experience"... so the result matters.
I don't care how great it feels to press the button, what matters is the end result. The iphone has a crappy camera... and no, "go buy a camera" isn't a defense either... it's an admission, by you and Steve Jobs, that they screwed up in the camera department.
My second problem is that every reference you make to the n95 - a good, solid convergent device - is filled with backhanded compliments (GPS? "yes, I’ve used it, it takes four minutes to get a lock most of the time" - simply not true, mine locks on in 20 seconds or less, and I can demonstrate it on yours if you send me your n95 - I'll do a video of it)... yet your blog is also filled with all kinds of excuses for the iphone (such as: "if you want a camera, buy a camera!")
Where's the balance there?
Lastly:
Scoble said: "Hint: having a GPS, a better camera, video, 3G networks, and all that doesn’t MATTER to having a better phone experience."
Scoble, I bought a convergent device that does many things, mostly very well... I didn't want just a phone...
Is that all you bought the iphone for?
Sorry to hear it!
That's why I said the "photo taking experience is better on the iPhone."
Oh, and to demonstrate you are NOT listening to me. I don't even have an iPhone. I bought one for my wife. Get your facts straight and maybe we can have a decent conversation. I love my Nokia N95. You HAVE noticed I use it for all the pictures I take, right?
But it is no iPhone.
With my n95, I very rarely have crashes, and have been very pleased by the results of the n95 camera, including the fun of geocoding. I love the GPS and other functions. Every day, I bike 15 miles and the n95 records my speed, altitude, time, and maps my course to google earth! And I take pictures and answer the phone, along the way.
I admit, I am sure I would love an iphone too, it is undoubtely a cool device.
My offer still stands... I can get your n95 gps locked in under 20 seconds or... I dunno, did we settle on a beer?
They are two different phones. I hope you continue to explore some of the amazing features of the n95 ...
"GPS can be handy, though I found the example of using it as a Neighborhood Positioning System during one’s daily run silly. (Get Nike + iPod instead.)"
The nike device won't map your route to a satellitel photograph on Google Earth. Plus, now you're using two devices, not one :)
It maybe an unnecessary use of GPS (I used the phone to drive 2800 miles this summer, across country, where it was incredibly useful) - but it is FUN. Try it sometime... the Nokia SportsTracker.
Mossberg wouldn't know revolutionary if he were dropped in the middle of King Street in Boston on March 5, 1770.
Mossberg more or less loves the last thing he's reviewed, particularly if it comes from Apple. Hardly a "non-partisan" endorsement.
My opinion? Features aren't everything. Something to keep in mind in the seemingly endless iPhone vs N95 debates...err if they can be called debates, that is.
What percentage of those CEOs are running companies that are profitable? What percentage of those CEOs are running companies with >1000 employees? Point is, anyone can start a Web 2.0 company and call themselves a CEO. Doesn't mean they actually know how to run a business. So, unless ALL those CEOs were part of the F500, that's really not something to necessarily brag about nor does it make for a great barometer.
Yesterday we had a kinda surreal discussion on the iphone - the highlights of which were:
* The main thing is HSDPA. Not even regular 3G can keep up with my internet phone demands, and the way I see wi-fi, whereever it is available to me (work and home) a desktop or laptop is nearby. I don't sit in coffee shops to browse the net.
* An RSS reader, although I understand there will be apps that can do this.
* User customisable ringtones and sms alerts. Major oversight that can be rectified by firmware upgrades I suppose.
* No MMS is terrible. It really shows how much they only think about the US market. I send pictures all the time, email isn't as immediate.
* No ObEx bluetooth profile... thats like going back to GX30 Sharp days.. again, people won't stand for it.
* No proper Cam
* No camcorder
* No phone as Modem functionality.
Both of us are considering the iphone, but as 2nd phones (dope dealer style)...
More thoughts to add to the pot I guess (sorry about the length of post). Is my post off-topic? Damn, briefly - Robert isn't a Nokia hater and who wouldn't lust after a iphone - In Europe we just accept that the Nokia phone design department is where they sculpt BRICKS!!
And please, when somebody states a good point acknowledge that please. Try to admit that you were wrong at a certain point. That's exactly the reason why I think it's not religions colliding. It is simply the inability to accept that there are also positive things about other people's cellphones. That's why ppl start to discuss heavily now. Acknowledge the other and it's all good. On one hand Scoble lacks a bit the ability to admit when he was wrong; but on the other hand some of the BLOG READERS DO THAT TOO! I don't know what Scoble's real life occupation is, but I am pretty sure he is not a journalist. If he was he might have been more able to express that EVERY cellphone has a right to exist. He has just fallen in love with the iphone now. And we all now damn well that ppl who are heavily in love can't get their mind changed by other ppl. So leave it! Love is blind! Alright, now I want EVERY ONE here to try and put their emotions aside- please be more objective on here. Thank you! :-)
a) How easy I find the N95 to use, and
b) The features of each device and how often I would use them.
In answer to to a) I have to say "very easy". Everything is where it should be and my most important applications are just one key press away. So: Is a touchscreen UI cool? Yes. Do I really need one? No.
As for b), I use my 'phone mainly for calls, texts, music, quick web browsing, e-mail and navigation and find the N95 pretty good at all of them. Maybe the iPhone is better at some functions but that isn't a substitute for not having other essential features at all. Also, wi-fi is fine and dandy when you're sitting sipping your skinny latte in a hot spot enabled cafe but HSDPA is essential for mobile browsing on the tube or the bus which is where it's mostly going to be used.
I'll certainly give the iPhone a try out though. I just don't think it'll do for me and the majority of the European market though.
As a final point, Robert - have you updated the N95's firmware (currently V12)? This has corrected the stability issues and improved a number of the unit's features.
I'm really in utter disgust on the approach the N95 community is taking on the iPhone. Senseless jabs.. here, there. If you didn't read well enough, I love my N95 and it's clearly conquered over the iPhone by a mile on the features side.
I've actually mentioned something like this to Darla Mack, the N95 community or Nokia in general is becoming what the Apple ads are to the Microsoft community, and I hate that. WE DON'T HAVE ANYTHING ELSE TO PROVE but yet we can't shut up.
My two cents.
I just, as in, 2 days ago needed to get new phone because the piece of crap, Windows Mobile-Based Motorola Q, decided to die once again.. Because I also use the device for business communication, I need something I can rely on.. Windows Mobile apparently isn't it... (I hope that this doesn't start a WM5/6, Symbian, Apple, Palm, flamewar..)
I owned a Palm based Treo and was frustrated by some of its failings as well.. Ruling out all things Windows Mobile and Palm... I looked at, and played with the iPhone, and compared it to the N95.. For a number of reasons, I selected the N95, bought an unlocked/unbranded version and am, thus far, very pleased. I have not experienced any of the issues regarding battery life, instability, etc.. I am running the latest firmware..
I have never owned a Symbian Based Phone, or anything Apple... Unless you count the Apple II+, IIe, IIGS, and the few iPods I have owned or currently own..
The iPhone has some definitely eye-catching features.. it's just not for me... there were too many show-stoppers, and missing features that are important to me when I looked at it..
Will I eventually own an iPhone? Maybe.. But, definitely not a version 1.0 one, but things can change.. I think Apple has some work to do.
Hell, I know a lady that lives down the street that is still using a rotary phone hanging on the wall in her kitchen and she is perfectly happy with that...
To each his own.. Differing viewpoints drive creativity, competition. innovation and progress..
I spent a few days in Seattle around July 4th, and used my N95 mostly as a camera, and my iPhone for everything else :)
Of course, I'm still in the honeymoon phase, but as an Internet device, the iPhone beats the N95.
I'm still committed to teh N95 as my primary phone, but I'm using the iPhone more than I expected.
I am happy for you to make your money by blogging. You are totally funny guy.
BR,
DV