<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Scobleizer - Latest Comments in NewTeeVee Conference lacking substance?</title><link>http://scobleizer.disqus.com/</link><description>Tech enthusiast, video blogger, media innovator, fanatical about startups at Rackspace, home of fanatical support for Internet entrepreneurs.</description><atom:link href="https://scobleizer.disqus.com/newteevee_conference_lacking_substance/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 13:32:30 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: NewTeeVee Conference lacking substance?</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/10/13/newteevee-conference-lacking-substance/#comment-9691890</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Highest Quality HD Video Streaming Available on the Internet&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;View Instant HD Streaming Video at &lt;a href="http://www.alphaexposure.com/videostreaming" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.alphaexposure.com/videostreaming"&gt;http://www.alphaexposure.co...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Alpha Exposure, LLC and Zero Footprint Solutions, LLC have joined forces to deliver the next generation of Internet streaming media technologies. We provide video using completely new core and enabling technologies to instantly provide streaming High Definition video up to 1080p quality to virtually any broadband user. The system is optimized to support television networks and movie rental companies moving into the online video markets in terms of quality and concurrent users. “The timing for these services is perfect”, says Robert Brim, CEO and Co-Owner of Alpha Exposure. “We are a success driven marketing company that uses advanced technology to provide value added services to a new and rapidly growing online video market”.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Zero Footprint Solutions, LLC has developed the first and only currently existing Open Media Operating System for the Internet, which together with our unique core and enabling technologies, allows us to support instant on-demand worldwide application, data and media delivery and usage, without the need for installation of any software applications, media players or other software on the user’s computer. This allows us to instantly reach the other 72% of users who can’t or won’t download and install software to try/use a new service, with capabilities that previous downloads and installations of specialized applications and media have offered.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Zero Footprint’s rapid deployment technologies allow us to remotely distribute virtually any application functionality and opportunity-specific layout definitions to our clients, with little or no upfront infrastructure investment. Together with the efficiencies generated through Zero Footprint’s rapid development and deployment technologies, we enable transparent, fully automated private labeling and customization. This allows us to create highly scalable viral marketing opportunities without manual intervention, while simultaneously offering our clients and customers unprecedented real time micro targeted advertising possibilities to better monetize content.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;“People are looking for different types of entertainment, when and where they want to see it and we can deliver a high quality experience that meets their needs”, says Brim. To view demonstrations of advanced high quality HD streaming, visit us at &lt;a href="http://www.alphaexposure.com/videostreaming" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.alphaexposure.com/videostreaming"&gt;http://www.alphaexposure.co...&lt;/a&gt; or contact us at 1-417-332-0456.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Robert Brim</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 13:32:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: NewTeeVee Conference lacking substance?</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/10/13/newteevee-conference-lacking-substance/#comment-9691885</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I agree with what a lot of Scoble says in terms of how any conference should be planned and don't think many of the new shows will make it in the long run. Some can, if they are focused, but many of won't.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Many New Online Video Conferences and Events Lacking Focus, Won't Survive&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://blog.streamingmedia.com/the_business_of_online_vi/2007/10/many-new-online.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://blog.streamingmedia.com/the_business_of_online_vi/2007/10/many-new-online.html"&gt;http://blog.streamingmedia....&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dan Rayburn</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 14:03:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: NewTeeVee Conference lacking substance?</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/10/13/newteevee-conference-lacking-substance/#comment-9691886</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The thing I find fascinating about Joost, once you get past all the licensing deals, drm, p2p and whatnot, is the community part. Ask them about how they are using television shows and channels to create  opportunities for people to chat with each other while watching the same program. In other words, Joost is a context engine for live conversation. As Joost scales up, you'll find fellow Joosters to share the experience (think movie theaters or watching the ball game with friends at home) whether it's the first episode of Lassie or the last episode of V The Invasion.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Phil Wolff</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 13:29:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: NewTeeVee Conference lacking substance?</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/10/13/newteevee-conference-lacking-substance/#comment-9691888</link><description>&lt;p&gt;...err Henry da VIII.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Christopher Coulter</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2007 23:31:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: NewTeeVee Conference lacking substance?</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/10/13/newteevee-conference-lacking-substance/#comment-9691887</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Nothing 'new' about "NewTeeVee", just some of the tools, have become commoditized, and people are simply turning on cameras, thinking it's automatically a show. But don't let that fool you, good TV is all (and always has been) about the writing, "new", old, future or ancient.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;That conference is just a buncha blowhard hot-air, sight, sound and fury, accomplishing nothing.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;And Joost is a simple distributional method, nothing "new" in terms of content or even distribution there.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;New TV to me is the Fall Schedule, Pushing Daisies, Bionic (oddly) I like, but not sure they will survive. Glad to see ole Dexter back, and Califorincation seems all too me-me self-indulgent, but somehow I like it still. Betty back, Rescue Me, Eureka and Kyle get new life, Lost and Jericho coming back. Earl, Office and all the rest chugging along. Dullsville dead-pools: Life Is Wild, Moonlight, Nashville, Private Practice, Dirty Sexy Money, Big Shots, Cane, Carpoolers, Cavemen, Chuck. Journeyman, with ole Lucius Vorenus, a minor-hit. I still miss John from Cincinnati, pout, pout. Henry the VII, seeeeecoooond seasssson yay. Welcome relief after that movie disaster of 'Elizabeth: The Golden Age.' Gawd, Hollywood sucks, the real good writing is all TV nowadays; that's what happens when you make the writer the focus.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Christopher Coulter</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2007 23:28:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: NewTeeVee Conference lacking substance?</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/10/13/newteevee-conference-lacking-substance/#comment-9691891</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It is not a surprise to see the lineup at the NewTeeVee Live event. I stopped reading them a few weeks ago because I realized that there is much better content about internet TV out there with consistent and accurate coverage. The NTV NY event was a bust and the NTV writer in charge of putting together most of the panels for the Live event is notorious for misquotes and only talking about her friends. Thanks for bringing it all together in one great list! It could have been so much better.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jaime</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2007 21:33:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: NewTeeVee Conference lacking substance?</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/10/13/newteevee-conference-lacking-substance/#comment-9691889</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Wow. I promise my next video event will take all this into consideration. Next one, really. Hey look! A &lt;a href="http://Kyte.tv" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="Kyte.tv"&gt;Kyte.tv&lt;/a&gt;!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">chrisbrogan</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2007 21:05:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: NewTeeVee Conference lacking substance?</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/10/13/newteevee-conference-lacking-substance/#comment-9691893</link><description>&lt;p&gt;(someone will inevitably miss the point of my last comment btw. Think.)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Eric Rice</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2007 19:24:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: NewTeeVee Conference lacking substance?</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/10/13/newteevee-conference-lacking-substance/#comment-9691892</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Heh, you guys crack me up.&lt;br&gt;Anyway, back to Halo on the home theater.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;(Disclosure: I own 5 TVs. Also, I _am_ Web 2.0)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Eric Rice</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2007 19:24:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: NewTeeVee Conference lacking substance?</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/10/13/newteevee-conference-lacking-substance/#comment-9691895</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Multiple tracks solve time constraints. More important, they offer attendees a chance to vote with their feet, something the conference organizers learn from.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Phil Wolff</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2007 15:27:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: NewTeeVee Conference lacking substance?</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/10/13/newteevee-conference-lacking-substance/#comment-9691894</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Wow, great list, Robert. Those will be the talking points AT this conference for the next one, for sure.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Totoro</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2007 14:35:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: NewTeeVee Conference lacking substance?</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/10/13/newteevee-conference-lacking-substance/#comment-9691896</link><description>&lt;p&gt;What else is missing? Miro (&lt;a href="http://www.getmiro.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.getmiro.com"&gt;http://www.getmiro.com&lt;/a&gt;), Make Internet TV (&lt;a href="http://www.makeinternettv.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.makeinternettv.com"&gt;http://www.makeinternettv.com&lt;/a&gt;).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Another conference worth seeing: &lt;a href="http://www.convergenceculture.org/futuresofentertainment/2007/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.convergenceculture.org/futuresofentertainment/2007/"&gt;http://www.convergencecultu...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jeckman</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2007 13:40:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: NewTeeVee Conference lacking substance?</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/10/13/newteevee-conference-lacking-substance/#comment-9691898</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Sat here watching beautifully streamed BBC News 24 from Livestation (Skinkers) which used Silverlight. Surprised they're not included&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">steve clayton</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2007 12:45:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: NewTeeVee Conference lacking substance?</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/10/13/newteevee-conference-lacking-substance/#comment-9691897</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The OnHollyWood conferences get it right they have all their keynotes and sessions broadcast Live and open chat rooms right in the front page for everyone to participate in .They also archive the Keynotes .&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I hope Liz and Om have this planned and if not Why ????&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Matt_</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2007 12:19:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: NewTeeVee Conference lacking substance?</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/10/13/newteevee-conference-lacking-substance/#comment-9691884</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Sebastian: the problem is that I know a few things you don't. I don't like &lt;a href="http://Justin.tv" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="Justin.tv"&gt;Justin.tv&lt;/a&gt; either. But don't ignore Kyte and don't write it off just cause it's early in the process. I guarantee you that by the end of the year there will be some big names on Kyte (the CEO gave me a preview).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Joost is one-way media. Two-way media will prove much more viral in the end. But you're right. That's a bet I'm making and it might prove out to be wrong. I don't think so, though.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Robert Scoble</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2007 12:06:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: NewTeeVee Conference lacking substance?</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/10/13/newteevee-conference-lacking-substance/#comment-9691899</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I agree with most of what you say in this post, but &lt;a href="http://Justin.tv" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="Justin.tv"&gt;Justin.tv&lt;/a&gt; and Kyte having more traffic than Joost in a year's time? I'm sorry, but that's completely unrealistic.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;For user generated content, and lets not forget that the great minority of people create content on video networks, people can go to YouTube. There you have a bigger audience. No live-streaming, ok. But that doesn't matter. Nobody (= not more than 0,5% of the population) wants to see a person's whole life. People want to see funny or interesting snippets, and they are on YouTube.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Joost offers premium content. Sure, they haven't yet proven anything, beside content deals with a lot of major companies, advertising deals with a lot of companies and a beta-tester group of more than a million people.&lt;br&gt;What have &lt;a href="http://Justin.tv" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="Justin.tv"&gt;Justin.tv&lt;/a&gt; and Kyte proven? They have no great content (ok, they have Justin and iJustine), no major advertising deals (eg made no ground in monetizing) and have considerably smaller tester teams.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Yes, there is a risk in Joost. But they have come way further than Kyte and Justin together.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sebastian</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2007 12:02:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: NewTeeVee Conference lacking substance?</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/10/13/newteevee-conference-lacking-substance/#comment-9691900</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Robert,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Wow, you don't pull any punches.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I think you forgot another issue:  NewTeeVee live looks like a half-dozen events that are out there already, including my own.  I think we should all dig deeper to come up with more innovative conferences on the topic of web-based video.  See my post &lt;a href="http://www.ipdemocracy.com/archives/002702thank_you_robert_scoble_but_theres_one_more_thing.php" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.ipdemocracy.com/archives/002702thank_you_robert_scoble_but_theres_one_more_thing.php"&gt;http://www.ipdemocracy.com/...&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Cynthia Brumfield&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cynthia Brumfield</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2007 10:53:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: NewTeeVee Conference lacking substance?</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/10/13/newteevee-conference-lacking-substance/#comment-9691883</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I disagree. I think their conference panel is nicely stacked, particularly for a relatively new event. I think it's too early to say that Joost isn't a success, and way too early to say some of these start ups are defining any part of the category. Beyond the handful "web 2.0" blogs, nobody knows who they are, and I think most people take the perspective from some of these with a very fine grain of salt to begin with. I think having a show with young, new and still unproven start ups (including many on your list) would be a mistake.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I think NewTeeVee is smart to look to the larger audience, though I agree with Apple being on the list.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dan</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2007 10:47:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: NewTeeVee Conference lacking substance?</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/10/13/newteevee-conference-lacking-substance/#comment-9691901</link><description>&lt;p&gt;does it strike anyone else as odd that a conference about online video is being done offline?&lt;br&gt;Robert: let's do an online conference together instead&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tim Connors</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2007 08:23:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: NewTeeVee Conference lacking substance?</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/10/13/newteevee-conference-lacking-substance/#comment-9691903</link><description>&lt;p&gt;What about Zattoo?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.zattoo.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.zattoo.com"&gt;http://www.zattoo.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;They've managed to sign up a lot of European TV stations.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">nchenga</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2007 04:37:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: NewTeeVee Conference lacking substance?</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/10/13/newteevee-conference-lacking-substance/#comment-9691882</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You pretty much have to conferences now.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Photar</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2007 01:42:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: NewTeeVee Conference lacking substance?</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/10/13/newteevee-conference-lacking-substance/#comment-9691902</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Robert:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Great ideas. So here's another idea -- why don't we do our own conference with all of this rolled in. If you're game, get in touch.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Jan&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jan Kabili</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 13 Oct 2007 23:50:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: NewTeeVee Conference lacking substance?</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/10/13/newteevee-conference-lacking-substance/#comment-9691905</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Robert great list one big category to add the content delivery networks which are helping power many sites with much more to come. Also hd radio and hdtv plus perhaps the blurring of tv vs games with devices like xbox360 etc&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">shannonclark</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 13 Oct 2007 22:05:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: NewTeeVee Conference lacking substance?</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/10/13/newteevee-conference-lacking-substance/#comment-9691904</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hmm, sounds like there are similar problems for many conferences these days, including the recently cancelled Etel show.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Erik</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 13 Oct 2007 22:05:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: NewTeeVee Conference lacking substance?</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/10/13/newteevee-conference-lacking-substance/#comment-9691906</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I am right in the middle of producing a conference and realizing how fast the time fills up and how panels don't let anyone speak enough to be meaningful. The alternative is Gnomedex, and the single track in which you can't cover a large topic.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I have a great idea: next year you and I put on the conference you think should happen. I will help.  I think it's time you did one rather than just commented on one, and you see so much stuff that it's bound to be good.  I will provide the adult supervision :-)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">francine hardaway</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 13 Oct 2007 19:04:15 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>