<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Scobleizer - Latest Comments in My stats from a few minutes ago</title><link>http://scobleizer.disqus.com/</link><description>Tech enthusiast, video blogger, media innovator, fanatical about startups at Rackspace, home of fanatical support for Internet entrepreneurs.</description><atom:link href="https://scobleizer.disqus.com/my_stats_from_a_few_minutes_ago/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2007 01:50:22 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: My stats from a few minutes ago</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/10/10/my-stats-from-a-few-minutes-ago/#comment-9691717</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Didn't you used to have a sponsored link?  What was the difference in results between a paid advert and an editorial link.  I looked up your site on compete and it showed a huge jump from May 2007 20K, to 113,000 in September (after a fall from July to September) ... many sites follow that same curve, maybe it's more about their panel than anything.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">angela penny</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2007 01:50:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My stats from a few minutes ago</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/10/10/my-stats-from-a-few-minutes-ago/#comment-9691716</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Did someone say stats?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;After this, I've started working on analysing TechMeme. Looks easy. I hope to have a post out in a day or two :)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Till then, TechCrunch: &lt;a href="http://blog.yuvisense.net/2007/10/11/statbot-techcrunch-data-analysis/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://blog.yuvisense.net/2007/10/11/statbot-techcrunch-data-analysis/"&gt;http://blog.yuvisense.net/2...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;1/3rd of all links from there are back to TechCrunch. Any implications?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Yuvi Panda</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 13:25:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My stats from a few minutes ago</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/10/10/my-stats-from-a-few-minutes-ago/#comment-9691731</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Keep bringin the news&lt;br&gt;Keep bashin M$&lt;br&gt;I'll be ur eternal reader&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">SunkenShip</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 11:03:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My stats from a few minutes ago</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/10/10/my-stats-from-a-few-minutes-ago/#comment-9691710</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I remember when i had a blog on WP community, often in top ten blogs (above all in italian language and also in En sometimes): you always are as the 1th blog or in the top 5. Your stats are great but as in the comment the plugin stats don't track uniques.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dario Salvelli</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 05:30:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My stats from a few minutes ago</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/10/10/my-stats-from-a-few-minutes-ago/#comment-9691718</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Aruni: I started blogging December 15, 2000. Dave Winer linked to me in early January of 2001 and sent me something like 3,000 people. I remember being impressed by that and thinking that I'd never have as many readers as he does.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Robert Scoble</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 22:18:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My stats from a few minutes ago</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/10/10/my-stats-from-a-few-minutes-ago/#comment-9691719</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for sharing...now I'll go back to my tiny stats and envy yours from afar...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;How were your stats the first year you started to now?  The first quarter, first 6 months?  Is there hope for us newbies?  Or will all the top blogs be the top blogs forever? I'm only half kidding here...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Aruni</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 22:13:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My stats from a few minutes ago</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/10/10/my-stats-from-a-few-minutes-ago/#comment-9691720</link><description>&lt;p&gt;edouard: what's weird is that I get way more comments per post than Valleywag does and sites I link to get way more traffic. I also get more traffic on many posts. Translation: I don't trust those numbers.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Robert Scoble</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 21:32:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My stats from a few minutes ago</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/10/10/my-stats-from-a-few-minutes-ago/#comment-9691721</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Robert's biggest spike was less than half of &lt;a href="http://www.sitemeter.com/?a=stats&amp;amp;s=s23valleywag&amp;amp;r=12" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.sitemeter.com/?a=stats&amp;amp;s=s23valleywag&amp;amp;r=12"&gt;Valleywag's daily average&lt;/a&gt;, interesting.  I'm in Silicon Valley and PR people keep trying to convince me that everyone reads Scoble and no one reads "Valleyrag."  Probably because it's easier for them to get a link on Scoble and charge me the client for it.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">edouard</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 17:47:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My stats from a few minutes ago</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/10/10/my-stats-from-a-few-minutes-ago/#comment-9691722</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Robert, somehow I think you're trying to make a point about Techmeme's relevance, but perhaps it's a bit too much thinking "inside the box".&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I have a site that gets about 10 million pageviews/month whose main source of visitors, besides Google, Yahoo (yes, Yahoo) and direct access, are &lt;a href="http://blogger.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="blogger.com"&gt;blogger.com&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://programas-gratis.net" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="programas-gratis.net"&gt;programas-gratis.net&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://stumbleupon.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="stumbleupon.com"&gt;stumbleupon.com&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://bloglines.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="bloglines.com"&gt;bloglines.com&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="http://msn.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="msn.com"&gt;msn.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Blogger, Bloglines? Mind you, it's not a blog nor a blogging platform!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;But &lt;a href="http://programas-gratis.net?" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="programas-gratis.net?"&gt;programas-gratis.net?&lt;/a&gt; This is a rustic website with only a 1,500 rating in Alexa (regardless of what it can be said about Alexa). Nonetheless, it scores (at Alexa) much better than Techmeme.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Your stats may show Techmeme as a major source, but in the big picture, I don't think it means much, neither to prove your point nor to disregard it about Techmeme's relevance.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RBA</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 17:44:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My stats from a few minutes ago</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/10/10/my-stats-from-a-few-minutes-ago/#comment-9691723</link><description>&lt;p&gt;i would kill for these type of stats...... sigh&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kystorms</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 15:49:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My stats from a few minutes ago</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/10/10/my-stats-from-a-few-minutes-ago/#comment-9691724</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You mean, I'm just another hit on your blog....:-(&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Seth E</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 15:20:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My stats from a few minutes ago</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/10/10/my-stats-from-a-few-minutes-ago/#comment-9691725</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Actually Google Reader is my most consistent source of traffic. Twitter is moving up fast, though.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Robert Scoble</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 15:05:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My stats from a few minutes ago</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/10/10/my-stats-from-a-few-minutes-ago/#comment-9691726</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It's funny. I advertised on my blog earlier today that I got my 1000th visitor (that's 1000 total visitors ever since my blog started -- not today or anything). And here I read Robert's blog today and he is advertising his stats. I am feeling tiny in the blogosphere now :-)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Joel Marcey</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 14:06:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My stats from a few minutes ago</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/10/10/my-stats-from-a-few-minutes-ago/#comment-9691711</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It was also interesting to see your Twitter stats. I dont use twitter myself and i never knew you could get decent traffic from your site on twitter to your actual home page. Thanks again for showing us your stats. It is very helpful and it would be great if you could everyone some more stats in the future.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steven Finch</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 13:43:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My stats from a few minutes ago</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/10/10/my-stats-from-a-few-minutes-ago/#comment-9691727</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks a lot Robert for showing us your stats, they are quite interesting. I never realised so few people actually clicked through from Techmeme. Is Techmeme your most consistent source of traffic??&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">insomniamg</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 13:39:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My stats from a few minutes ago</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/10/10/my-stats-from-a-few-minutes-ago/#comment-9691712</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Nice job, Robert. Good to see somebody has TechMeme's back. :-)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Louis Gray</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 13:34:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My stats from a few minutes ago</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/10/10/my-stats-from-a-few-minutes-ago/#comment-9691715</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"Although, I just realized that WP stats bases it’s “overall” hits on post clicks and not based on unique visitors (like Google analytics)."&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Our pageview numbers map very closely to external services like Google Analytics and Quantcast because we all use similar methods to count, but you're correct that we don't track uniques.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Matt Mullenweg</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 13:12:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My stats from a few minutes ago</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/10/10/my-stats-from-a-few-minutes-ago/#comment-9691713</link><description>&lt;p&gt;OK, OK, I admit, I was there too yesterday and today.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Curiously, my own blog stats shows a very similar traffic curve (oh no, wait, the y-scale is a bit off :-)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Congratulations, you are obviously providing lots of bloggers and readers (including me) a lot of value!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alexander van Elsas</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 12:47:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My stats from a few minutes ago</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/10/10/my-stats-from-a-few-minutes-ago/#comment-9691728</link><description>&lt;p&gt;So how about this...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I read TechMeme through Google Reader. Is that going to show as a Google Reader referral or TechMeme??&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jezarnold</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 12:38:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My stats from a few minutes ago</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/10/10/my-stats-from-a-few-minutes-ago/#comment-9691729</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Could you at least scroll down to the part where my blog shows up for those 2 referrals and take the snippet :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Vic Berggren</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 12:32:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My stats from a few minutes ago</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/10/10/my-stats-from-a-few-minutes-ago/#comment-9691714</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Filed Under: Rubbing-Faces-In-it.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Although, I just realized that WP stats bases it's "overall" hits on post clicks and not based on unique visitors (like Google analytics). I wish they'd get that worked out because right now it's not giving you a accurate number.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Seth E</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 12:29:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My stats from a few minutes ago</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/10/10/my-stats-from-a-few-minutes-ago/#comment-9691730</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Holy cow.  I'll never be a real blogger.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">weiszguy</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 12:27:27 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>