<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Scobleizer - Latest Comments in My OPML file uploaded</title><link>http://scobleizer.disqus.com/</link><description>Tech enthusiast, video blogger, media innovator, fanatical about startups at Rackspace, home of fanatical support for Internet entrepreneurs.</description><atom:link href="https://scobleizer.disqus.com/my_opml_file_uploaded/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 Nov 2005 20:04:03 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: My OPML file uploaded</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2005/11/27/my-opml-file-uploaded/#comment-9622870</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm getting more used to OPML now, but is it possible to tag the rss entries, e.g. Linux, .NET, Computing, Personal blogs etc. Alternatively have an opml file for each category.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RedKite</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 27 Nov 2005 20:04:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My OPML file uploaded</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2005/11/27/my-opml-file-uploaded/#comment-9622869</link><description>&lt;p&gt;About 25% of feeds in your OPML file have a last post saying that feed has moved to new URL.  Another 10% point to non-existant URLS.  I think you need to continue to work on cleaning your Feeds.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mark Alexander</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 27 Nov 2005 17:54:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My OPML file uploaded</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2005/11/27/my-opml-file-uploaded/#comment-9622868</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I just uploaded an OPML file that you all can use. See the post that follows this one.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">scobleizer</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 27 Nov 2005 17:24:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My OPML file uploaded</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2005/11/27/my-opml-file-uploaded/#comment-9622867</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Jay - opml are 'live' bits. Making the opml readable allows it to be pointed to - so as the opml changes, the app on the other side sees the updated version. My point is that opmls should have urls - this makes them v.useful.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alex Barnett</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 27 Nov 2005 17:17:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My OPML file uploaded</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2005/11/27/my-opml-file-uploaded/#comment-9622866</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It's evident looking at the OPML list that attention and interest ranking would be useful.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Enric</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 27 Nov 2005 15:09:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My OPML file uploaded</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2005/11/27/my-opml-file-uploaded/#comment-9622865</link><description>&lt;p&gt;What, most OPML tools can't handle unzipping after downloading? Isn't that what compression is all about? Lame!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Scott</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 27 Nov 2005 14:23:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My OPML file uploaded</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2005/11/27/my-opml-file-uploaded/#comment-9622864</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Jay - I think they mean for online tools not for their own personal use.  See the side bar (right side) on &lt;a href="http://scripting.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="scripting.com"&gt;scripting.com&lt;/a&gt; for one example of this&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tom</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 27 Nov 2005 12:45:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My OPML file uploaded</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2005/11/27/my-opml-file-uploaded/#comment-9622863</link><description>&lt;p&gt;My guess is because this isn't really Scoble's bandwidth he's having to do it this way and keep the leeches away from sourcing it directly. Another downside (or upside, depending on your perspective) to third party hosting.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TDavid</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 27 Nov 2005 11:57:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My OPML file uploaded</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2005/11/27/my-opml-file-uploaded/#comment-9622862</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Why is it so difficult to unzip it and tell your feed reader where the file is ? Or is it because other Web 2.0 services (AJAX Based) have spoiled you ?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jay</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 27 Nov 2005 11:51:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My OPML file uploaded</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2005/11/27/my-opml-file-uploaded/#comment-9622861</link><description>&lt;p&gt;thanks robert, can i suggest an unzipped version (only 160k)?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alex Barnett</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 27 Nov 2005 11:24:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My OPML file uploaded</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2005/11/27/my-opml-file-uploaded/#comment-9622860</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Scoble, because it's zipped, I can't really link to it using most OPML tools. FYI.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Randy Charles Morin</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 27 Nov 2005 09:18:32 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>