-
Website
http://www.scobleizer.com/ -
Original page
http://scobleizer.com/2008/05/02/microsofts-real-problem/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
danja
44 comments · 4 points
-
polizeros
52 comments · 1 points
-
AndyBeard
69 comments · 4 points
-
Zachary Adam Cohen
35 comments · 8 points
-
dbarefoot
40 comments · 3 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
World-brand-building mistakes France’s entrepreneurs make
2 weeks ago · 181 comments
-
The best and worst thing Twitter did in 2009: RT
3 days ago · 24 comments
-
2010: the year SEO isn’t important anymore
1 week ago · 67 comments
-
iPhone developers abandoning app model for HTML5?
1 week ago · 52 comments
-
A new addition here: the Meebo bar
2 days ago · 8 comments
-
World-brand-building mistakes France’s entrepreneurs make
I can't help feeling you're missing the point slightly. Microsoft core business isn't in building vertical applications. They build platforms so that OTHER people can build vertical applications. They're trying to get into the vertical-application-on-the-web-game by buying Yahoo. THAT is Ballmer's vision.
Now I'm not saying they're doing a good job of building that platform or that its the right strategy (I wish I knew the anser to that one), but let's be clear about what their strategy is, rightly or wrongly.
-Jamie
So, until there's a video on EVERY search, there's a lot more opportunity for video to see huge growth than there is for anything else.
Also, if I'm going to convince you to try something new, what works better? Video or text?
Let's talk about travel around the world. What will convince you to visit, say, Switzerland? 10,000 words? Or five minutes of video.
I know which one works better. Video. By far.
So, expect to hear more about video in this new search world ahead.
Have I upset you or something Robert? :)
Seriously, though, the billionaires at Microsoft got there by selling Windows or Office.
What does THAT have to do with building a great Web property and putting advertising on it?
Not nice fo rthos working in the bits of Ms that are duplicated in yahoo but hey that capatisiam for you :-)
But google realy should try and not atract the regulators attention WTF are they thinking with that yahoo idea where is the adult supervison.
Its a bit like walking around downtown bagdad with a tshirt saying hi ime stupid please shoot me"
The cool stuff that's come out of Live so far have been small things - Photo Gallery, Writer are the two that I can name, because I just can't think of myself using anything more too seriously.
Just wish they went out and bought Automattic, Twitter, FriendFeed, and something that can stand up to flickr before it's too late. I still hate 'em for passing up on flickr (Their API is full of bugs :()
That said, here's my take on M$:
They will never get over the Evil Empire stigma. They can't innovate. They should keep their core business to the fat apps and rather than acquire lots of little companies, they should have controlling shares in a lot of little companies. Let the new companies establish their own brands and keep the money flowing to the mothership.
M$ owns a piece of FB ... they should increase it, but not the point that FB looks like it's a M$ company. Likewise with the 400 other interesting internet companies out there.
Lever owns Dove Soap *and* Axe Spray ... two totally different company messages but all the money flows back to the mothership without appearing evil.
Google builds platforms, not portals.
I've been using Word (I'd give anything to try Pages - based on what I hear the Mac guys say) more lately to improve my proposals. I can't get through a document without Word deciding to change the indent and style of my bullets or ordered lists on a consistenly random basis :-).
Their programs aren't easy to us and their web apps aren't easy to use. They can't do anything simple. Get the simple things to work correctly and then add featues/complexity.
What does it say about MS (or Yahoo or Google or...) that 3-4 guys/girls sitting in their dorm room or basement can design some of the most successful and popular web apps out there (Facebook, Digg, Flickr, Twitter)? Apparently money and PhD's aren't everything.
Everyone in MS needs to learn how to K.I.S.S. Until they do, they are going to continue to build boring apps (online and off) that just don't work well.
Grand vision will not take them anywhere. They have to do the small things right first.
I guess your "good for morale" contention is now moot? ;)
Amazing how, every other post, gets invalidated every other day.
Predicting that you will start cursing Twitter in 5-6 weeks or so.
It is easy to theoretically criticize when you are on the outside looking in - things are a lot more complex than that in the real world
Reacting to Google, et al, or building from Microsoft's viewpoint delivers a solution looking for a problem. Ballmer, from recent comments, at least publicly, regarding XP, is espousing the corporate view.
When you're attempting to satisfy investors, rather than the user community, it's a losing proposition.
Sounds just like a Microsoft manager. Sigh.
Christopher Coulter: like SearchEngines says. It's a complex world and people who see things as black and white rarely succeed. Steve Jobs excepted.
And even then, it's 70,000 people. Our idea of business run by a few people is sorta outdated. I looked at the ideas coming in from the ranks right before I left. Very few Internet ideas.
I want a search engine that searchs quick and fast without a lot of links to other crap, especially paid for crap that doesn't make sense with what I'm searching
I want to be able to access my information on my home computer, my work computer (whether I boot into Linux or Vista), my smartphone, and to share information with my wife and her Mac. I want it to just work....
I'm excited for Live Mesh.... Just wish I could get invited to see if it works like I want it to
Gosh I love developing small companies!
www.jbraggiotti.com
I personally hope Microsoft wake up and smell the coffee before it is too late.
For example, how much profit is Facebook and Twitter taking in. How much profit is FriendFeed taking in.
MS needs to focus on what is knows, which is not building niche web sites that appeal to a miniscule market. Look at the books and look where they make their money.
I don't think they have a clue how to do narrow, focused and viral though. Like you said.. look at live spaces. How is that more compelling than WP?
they never learn until they fall.