-
Website
http://www.scobleizer.com/ -
Original page
http://scobleizer.com/2006/11/22/memetrackers-revisited/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
danja
44 comments · 4 points
-
polizeros
52 comments · 1 points
-
AndyBeard
69 comments · 4 points
-
Zachary Adam Cohen
35 comments · 8 points
-
dbarefoot
40 comments · 3 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
World-brand-building mistakes France’s entrepreneurs make
2 weeks ago · 181 comments
-
The best and worst thing Twitter did in 2009: RT
3 days ago · 24 comments
-
2010: the year SEO isn’t important anymore
1 week ago · 67 comments
-
iPhone developers abandoning app model for HTML5?
1 week ago · 52 comments
-
A new addition here: the Meebo bar
2 days ago · 8 comments
-
World-brand-building mistakes France’s entrepreneurs make
"BuzzFeed distinguishes what is actually interesting from what is merely hyped. We only feature movies, music, fashion, ideas, technology, and culture that are on the rise and worth your time."
http://www.buzzfeed.com/
Thomas (er, I mean "Scott"), you're welcome to add Techmeme to popurls.
I see TailRank as a better platform for doing meme tracking in a general sense because it allows you to influence the seeding, and allowing that is really key for people like myself who care.
But for the remainder (~80%?), TechMeme is good enough. It's good enough because the only person influencing how it's seeded (and what pops up at the front) is Gabe, and the people who get linked to are more often than not a closed-link community. I'd be curious to see the reading list/opml of every blogger linked to by TechMeme, intersect them all, and look at the resulting list of blogs. I bet they're pretty close to the blogs seeding techmeme.
The thing I like about TechMeme is it keeps noise out. If I want to track the long tail about something I go to a blog search engine where I can see everyone like Technorati or Google Blog Search.
So then consider all the people in the list on Techmeme right _now_ and consider their RSS subscriptions. They likely allocate continuous attention to each other.
And this is all fine, really, and I'm not ragging on TechMeme because all it does is highlight this localized attention cluster, and it happens to be of some high profile web people, and that's great for traffic (for Gabe). That was my point. In fact I'm sure Gabe knows this; just consider his other web properties (focusing on attention clustering in the baseball fan + blogging subculture, as well as attention clustering in the tabloid + blogging subculture). There is a pattern of success here: he finds niches/accumulations of attention and builds a meme finder for them. Brilliant, no doubt.
What I was getting at is that there are lots of other attention clusters in the blogosphere, some smaller than others, and TechMeme is not likely (I think) to repeatedly highlight those. That's what makes it _Tech_Meme, after all.
As to other attention clusters, yup, that's true, but if there really is a TECH attention cluster that's good it'll be discovered by someone in this attention cluster and then all bets are off.
At minimum it'll get on Digg (good Digg stuff gets on TechMeme anyway) and Digg is sending about 20 times the traffic of TechMeme anyway.
If I'm being completely honest as a reader rather than as a blogger I have to admit that I love TechMeme. This is simply because it's always interesting to me whereas the other meme trackers and every other media source are less interesting. It's like have a front page of a newspaper with only things that interest you on it.
Not sure about this, but I get the sense sometimes that Gabe jumps in and moves stuff around based on his own likes and dislikes. Like this morning when Mike's post about the Nick and Jason fisticuffs suddenly jumped to the lead item. If I'm right about this type of intervention by Gabe, then he is one helluva editor because his instincts about what interests his audience are bang on most of the time.
There are some dull days for sure and I'm interested in maybe half of what's shown, and often it's the stuff near the bottom that I like the most. But overall, I'll go to TechMeme before any other news source. OK, that's enough loving from me.
After another look, I also find TechMeme's design much more usable and easier to read than Tailrank's, Megite's or BuzzFeed's. It has a clear hierarchy and less visual clutter.
I also like that TechMeme follows some basic usability conventions. Megite is also good for usability, Tailrank isn't bad, but BuzzFeed sucks for usability.
TechMeme's archive feature is great, too. I hardly ever use it, but it has been useful when I've had to. The others don't do archiving very well.
Megite has one thing TechMeme does not and that's a reasonable business/investing section, which is really my other main interest. But it's still far from a TechMeme for general business/finance news.