<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Scobleizer - Latest Comments in Let&amp;#8217;s get rid of sploggers</title><link>http://scobleizer.disqus.com/</link><description>Tech enthusiast, video blogger, media innovator, fanatical about startups at Rackspace, home of fanatical support for Internet entrepreneurs.</description><atom:link href="https://scobleizer.disqus.com/let8217s_get_rid_of_sploggers/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2007 06:04:15 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Let&amp;#8217;s get rid of sploggers</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/12/31/lets-get-rid-of-sploggers/#comment-9664996</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Robert,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Great blog! Keep up the good work!&lt;br&gt;Perhabs you've seen it already but if not...check the newest splogger-software; &lt;a href="http://afeeda.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://afeeda.com"&gt;http://afeeda.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;(I found this info at &lt;a href="http://www.mattbrindley.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.mattbrindley.com"&gt;http://www.mattbrindley.com&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Marc&lt;br&gt;eyelite photography&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Guest</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2007 06:04:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Let&amp;#8217;s get rid of sploggers</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/12/31/lets-get-rid-of-sploggers/#comment-9664994</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I watch Firefox pretty closely, aggregating and reading the latest search hits at feedster, google blogsearch, technorati, icerocket, blogpulse, bloglines, and blogdigger (and a couple of others that don't come immediately to mind) and in aggregate I'm getting about 15% splog content.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It seems like most of the splog content I'm seeing are complete posts from legitimate blogs wrapped in a splog with an unrelated page of links. This doesn't sound like a very difficult algorithm for Google or Technorati to come up with. Look for "old" content that's being excerpted with a high link to content ratio where the links don't share a lot in common with the content -- or something like that.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I'm not too worried at the current levels since I can quickly move past splog content (only occasionally getting caught by an old post I don't recognize) but if it gets a lot worse, then I'll be forced back to the old whitelist approach and that's just so boring :-)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;- A&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Asa Dotzler</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2007 03:07:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Let&amp;#8217;s get rid of sploggers</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/12/31/lets-get-rid-of-sploggers/#comment-9664982</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'd like to report &lt;a href="http://blogspot.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="blogspot.com"&gt;blogspot.com&lt;/a&gt;. They have thousands of splogs.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Randy Charles Morin</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2007 15:20:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Let&amp;#8217;s get rid of sploggers</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/12/31/lets-get-rid-of-sploggers/#comment-9664992</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It's impossible to not find splogs on any search.  I've found lots of splogs in Bloglines.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;If only we could stop them, as well as spam (I can't believe someone would go through the manual effort of reading my blog to manually send me spam with my name and relevant info on a contest I'm holding including what to put in the subject to avoid spam filters.  Unbelievable.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">May C</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 31 Dec 2006 21:17:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Let&amp;#8217;s get rid of sploggers</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/12/31/lets-get-rid-of-sploggers/#comment-9664995</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Sphere sucks balls&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Google blog search a little less&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Technorati even less&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Bloglines and Blogdigger are my blog search engines of choice. There is practically no spam on them at all.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Stefan Constantinescu</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 31 Dec 2006 14:40:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Let&amp;#8217;s get rid of sploggers</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/12/31/lets-get-rid-of-sploggers/#comment-9664983</link><description>&lt;p&gt;How about a simple option to ignore MySplogs, I mean MySpace blogs?  That alone would dramatically clean up search results.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">aaron</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 31 Dec 2006 13:30:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Let&amp;#8217;s get rid of sploggers</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/12/31/lets-get-rid-of-sploggers/#comment-9664984</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.splogreporter.com/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.splogreporter.com/"&gt;http://www.splogreporter.com/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Douglas Karr</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 31 Dec 2006 13:22:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Let&amp;#8217;s get rid of sploggers</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/12/31/lets-get-rid-of-sploggers/#comment-9664988</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Ah I see&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://whatis.techtarget.com/definition/0,,sid9_gci1137059,00.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://whatis.techtarget.com/definition/0,,sid9_gci1137059,00.html"&gt;http://whatis.techtarget.co...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">monkeyleader</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 31 Dec 2006 08:08:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Let&amp;#8217;s get rid of sploggers</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/12/31/lets-get-rid-of-sploggers/#comment-9664989</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Whats a splogger ?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">monkeyleader</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 31 Dec 2006 08:07:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Let&amp;#8217;s get rid of sploggers</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/12/31/lets-get-rid-of-sploggers/#comment-9664990</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Robert,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The sad part is that effectively finding sploggers is an issue in the first place and one, it seems that the search engines either don't want to address or would rather wait for someone else to do it.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The ability for a splogger to churn out hundreds or thousands of splogs is relatively easy.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tony M.</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 31 Dec 2006 08:05:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Let&amp;#8217;s get rid of sploggers</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/12/31/lets-get-rid-of-sploggers/#comment-9664991</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Edelman now uses Google blog search, I’ve seen it in my logs.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">paul</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 31 Dec 2006 07:51:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Let&amp;#8217;s get rid of sploggers</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/12/31/lets-get-rid-of-sploggers/#comment-9664985</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I want companies like Technorati and Sphere to succeed, and have seen Google's Blog Search get more relevant over time, but I don't often use any of those services at all. The way I find new blogs are through sites like yours and TechMeme or from Steve Rubel, et al. By linking to others and mentioning their work, I discover new sites and add them to my Google Reader list. That one search engine or another is being hit by splogs is frustrating, but blog searching is not yet as ubiquitous as Web searching in my opinion. The Web was born through linking, and continues to be.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Louis Gray</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 31 Dec 2006 04:42:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Let&amp;#8217;s get rid of sploggers</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/12/31/lets-get-rid-of-sploggers/#comment-9664986</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Of course!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I wanted to see who else called me an idiot. :-)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Robert Scoble</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 31 Dec 2006 03:41:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Let&amp;#8217;s get rid of sploggers</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/12/31/lets-get-rid-of-sploggers/#comment-9664987</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Vanity search after the explosive burst onto the political scene?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;;o)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">yeahsurewhateverok</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 31 Dec 2006 03:32:46 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>