<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Scobleizer - Latest Comments in Kyte.tv vs. PodTech.net (Adobe announces new Flash player)</title><link>http://scobleizer.disqus.com/</link><description>Tech enthusiast, video blogger, media innovator, fanatical about startups at Rackspace, home of fanatical support for Internet entrepreneurs.</description><atom:link href="https://scobleizer.disqus.com/kytetv_vs_podtechnet_adobe_announces_new_flash_player/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 23:44:01 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Kyte.tv vs. PodTech.net (Adobe announces new Flash player)</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/08/20/kytetv-vs-podtechnet/#comment-9688894</link><description>&lt;p&gt;i was wondering wether or not the fact that i just updated my shockwave player and flash player efects the kyte player ? becuase the website as far as i know isnt orking since i installed them or one of them.I just get that little box with the square circle and triangle. Could someone help me with this problem please ?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Amy</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 23:44:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Kyte.tv vs. PodTech.net (Adobe announces new Flash player)</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/08/20/kytetv-vs-podtechnet/#comment-9688893</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Blu-Ray leading HD-DVD 2:1, which makes this move inquisitive, but there are advantages and disadvantages to each arrangement we seeing in our family. I agree with you whole heartedly that voice is far more powerful than text. That is one of the actually cool things. Pleasant talking with you the other night.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cindy</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 11:04:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Kyte.tv vs. PodTech.net (Adobe announces new Flash player)</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/08/20/kytetv-vs-podtechnet/#comment-9688892</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I know this is old but I can't help in finding humor in the HD-DVD VS Blu-Ray comments.  What are you going to do with your HD-DVD now, Robert?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Craig</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 20:26:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Kyte.tv vs. PodTech.net (Adobe announces new Flash player)</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/08/20/kytetv-vs-podtechnet/#comment-9688891</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Almost all of the comparisons you make where podtech loses have no relevance to the viewer. The viewer doesn't care how long it takes to upload a video of if they can upload a video, I might even add that the viewer doesn't care how advertisers interact with the player (a case where podtech wins but maybe from the viewers pov podtech loses). The things a viewer cares about is being informed/entertained and audio/video quality and a small percentage is interested in interaction. Almost everything else you mention here is irrelevant to the audience. Which is where you should start with any comparison, because without an audience you got nothin.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">billstreeter</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 09:05:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Kyte.tv vs. PodTech.net (Adobe announces new Flash player)</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/08/20/kytetv-vs-podtechnet/#comment-9688859</link><description>&lt;p&gt;How about just letting peers rank comments? I like the way Joystiq and Engadget do it.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sandmax</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2007 13:03:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Kyte.tv vs. PodTech.net (Adobe announces new Flash player)</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/08/20/kytetv-vs-podtechnet/#comment-9688860</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Siamak: thanks. I've been getting many of the same kind of feedback from many of my readers. I'm not going to allow attacks to survive here anymore and am moving my comments to "living room" rules. IE, if I wouldn't put up with it in my living room it wouldn't be allowed to stand up here.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Robert Scoble</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2007 01:09:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Kyte.tv vs. PodTech.net (Adobe announces new Flash player)</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/08/20/kytetv-vs-podtechnet/#comment-9688890</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Robert, I am so happy you are finally considering filtering out LayZ's comments. I have no idea why you have been bothering to reply to his constant nitpickings. He doesn't know how to behave in public and his large ego makes him wants to prove how much smarter he is than top blogger Robert Scoble and the more you reply to his comments, the more you encourage him and others like him.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;You have been incredibly patient with him till now. If you really hate the idea of imposing even such a limited form of censorship, please try to ignore him, but I know that I would have a very tough time doing so.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;If you don't start disallowing LayZ from commenting here or don't learn to ignore him completely, the danger is that either you will turn off commenting for all your readers or even worse you might get so fed up that you will quit blogging.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I and many others love your blog and find it highly informative and entertaining. Please do not let a few rude people amongst your audience to destroy this wonderful blog. Remember, the needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Siamak</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2007 00:52:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Kyte.tv vs. PodTech.net (Adobe announces new Flash player)</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/08/20/kytetv-vs-podtechnet/#comment-9688861</link><description>&lt;p&gt;LayZ: I'm deleting your comments if all you do is attack me. Go some place else if you think I need this shit.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Robert Scoble</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2007 00:05:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Kyte.tv vs. PodTech.net (Adobe announces new Flash player)</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/08/20/kytetv-vs-podtechnet/#comment-9688889</link><description>&lt;p&gt;@29 For the near term the winner will likely continue to be plain ol' DVD.  Consumers will sit back and wait as long as they can continue to buy the old format.  Price will win out and given that DVD players are very cheap now, it's unlikely Joe Sixpack will be going out and making a $500-$800 bet on one format or the other.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">LayZ</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 23:50:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Kyte.tv vs. PodTech.net (Adobe announces new Flash player)</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/08/20/kytetv-vs-podtechnet/#comment-9688862</link><description>&lt;p&gt;LayZ: we're talking about two different things.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;One distribution method has a cost involved. Bluray and HD-DVD players are expensive so most people will only buy one.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;But Web distribution methods? They are all free to you.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Not the same thing.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I really don't care which Web video distribution method you use as long as I can watch your video.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;But if you make me buy another player to watch your movie? Yeah, I'll care about that.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In the long run, though, the format wars go away. One of my friends gets all his movies from Bittorrent.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Robert Scoble</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 21:56:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Kyte.tv vs. PodTech.net (Adobe announces new Flash player)</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/08/20/kytetv-vs-podtechnet/#comment-9688888</link><description>&lt;p&gt;A pay-off and you are saying winner? I doubt they will make it beyond 10 months, reaction has been seriously bitter.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;The NY Times has confirmed via two Viacom executives, who spoke on the condition of anonymity, that Paramount has received a $150M pay-off to support HD DVD exclusively for a period of 18 months. The $150M is comprised of cash and future marketing deals. Also re-confirmed is that the deal includes no films directed by Steven Spielberg.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;-----------&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;"Paramount pisses me off!", Michael Bay says, "I want people to see my movies in the best formats possible. For them to deny people who have Blu-ray sucks! They were progressive by having two formats. No Transformers 2 for me!"&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Christopher Coulter</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 21:31:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Kyte.tv vs. PodTech.net (Adobe announces new Flash player)</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/08/20/kytetv-vs-podtechnet/#comment-9688883</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I am not wrong. Most have already gone Blu-Ray. Paramount will come around, you just wait, the $150M bout-out only extended the format wars for another year or so. Losers are the customers.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;5 major studios vs. one, and double the sales with Blockbuster going only Blu...what will you bet on? Man, stay away from Vegas or the stock market, with your picks. You did notice in that "exclusive" the Spielberg exception clause? Interesting, eh?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;But really why do you care so much? Get a hybrid and be insured against all the insanity.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Christopher Coulter</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 21:21:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Kyte.tv vs. PodTech.net (Adobe announces new Flash player)</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/08/20/kytetv-vs-podtechnet/#comment-9688887</link><description>&lt;p&gt;@24  "When you watch Lost do you care how that got to you? No.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;WTF?  Then why the hell do you care that Dreamworks went with HD-DVD?  Why the hell do you care if your HD TV monitor supports 1080p or not?  Why the hell do people bitch about the quality of DirecTV's HD signal?  Why the hell do football fans want EVERY NFL game broadcast in HD? Because they DO CARE how a program gets to them&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Since you don't care how a program gets to you, can we have no more whining about not getting HD content through your cable or satellite provider?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">LayZ</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 20:52:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Kyte.tv vs. PodTech.net (Adobe announces new Flash player)</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/08/20/kytetv-vs-podtechnet/#comment-9688886</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Lets not forget YouTube, &lt;a href="http://Blip.tv" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="Blip.tv"&gt;Blip.tv&lt;/a&gt;, Splashcast, etc in this discussion.  If you want to get a video of your cat out there, and there is no need for interactivity, YouTube is as good a place as any.  If you want to get your video podcast distributed, Blip is fabulous.  For aggregating content and making it available to others (or just yourself), go Splashcast. UStream and Kyte have been discussed above.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;What I find amazing is how quickly video has become part of the personal content distribution.  As a particular fan of audio podcasts, I almost feel sorry that podcasting might never really get its day in the sun because video will just become the dominant medium.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Deepak</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 19:38:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Kyte.tv vs. PodTech.net (Adobe announces new Flash player)</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/08/20/kytetv-vs-podtechnet/#comment-9688884</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Chris: absolutely. Live definitely has its place. I want to watch sports live, for instance. Same with a building burning down or a disaster or weather news.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Robert Scoble</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 19:21:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Kyte.tv vs. PodTech.net (Adobe announces new Flash player)</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/08/20/kytetv-vs-podtechnet/#comment-9688885</link><description>&lt;p&gt;K-Dog: if you thought Podtech was an end-user video system then that's the bug I was working to fix here. It's not and you're right.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;When you watch Lost do you care how that got to you? No.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Robert Scoble</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 19:19:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Kyte.tv vs. PodTech.net (Adobe announces new Flash player)</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/08/20/kytetv-vs-podtechnet/#comment-9688882</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"What do you think?"&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I think you just posted a message that threw your employer under the bus.  WTF-- you basically just admitted that Kyte has more end-user functionality than the guys who write your checks.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">K-Dog</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 18:04:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Kyte.tv vs. PodTech.net (Adobe announces new Flash player)</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/08/20/kytetv-vs-podtechnet/#comment-9688881</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Great discussion about the various strengths of the different platforms.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I think what this discussion shows is that video is the future of online communications.  Ultimately, we are visual creatures, and the desire to see is so strong that we put up with what are still very early-stage implementations.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;At Ustream, we believe that the interactivity of live is a killer app, but I can also see the importance of recorded as well.  No one would argue that the music industry should consist solely of live performances, or solely of MP3 downloads.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Ironically enough, when the phonograph first came out, musicians fought the technology tooth and nail, figuring that it would kill the market for live performances.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The real interesting challenge is finding a way for all of these platforms (PodTech, Kyte, Ustream, Operator11, etc.) to work together.  I'll be watching with great curiosity.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Chris Yeh&lt;br&gt;CEO, Ustream.TV&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chris Yeh</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 17:30:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Kyte.tv vs. PodTech.net (Adobe announces new Flash player)</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/08/20/kytetv-vs-podtechnet/#comment-9688880</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I thought the format was Blu-Ray, not Blue-Ray :(&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">samcollins</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 17:06:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Kyte.tv vs. PodTech.net (Adobe announces new Flash player)</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/08/20/kytetv-vs-podtechnet/#comment-9688878</link><description>&lt;p&gt;If you want quick turnaround and HD quality for your Podcast work, you might consider investing in a direct-to-edit hard disk recorder for your camera. Unplug it from the camera, plug it into your Mac and it's instantly accessible in FCP. Given the quantity you shoot, it would pay for itself pretty quickly.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Michael Markman (Mickeleh)</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 12:09:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Kyte.tv vs. PodTech.net (Adobe announces new Flash player)</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/08/20/kytetv-vs-podtechnet/#comment-9688879</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Your Soloway interview was excellent.  Excellent comparison of Kyte and Podtech.  Questions:  Do you think audio only podcasts, like IT conversations, will eventually go away and be replaced by video?  I don't think a static head and shoulders video of an interview adds much.  And who has time to watch hours of that video?  You can listen to an audio podcast while driving, commuting, exercising, etc.  At least, PodTech should have a button for .mp3 download.  Or do you think flash memory is so cheap, why bother with having both .mp3 and .mp4 downloads?  Also, consider that the cheap players only play .mp3's.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jonb</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 12:06:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Kyte.tv vs. PodTech.net (Adobe announces new Flash player)</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/08/20/kytetv-vs-podtechnet/#comment-9688877</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I am using &lt;a href="http://Kyte.tv" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="Kyte.tv"&gt;Kyte.tv&lt;/a&gt; to supplement my blogging and online presence.  It has the capability of providing very interesting real time feedback and for me to discuss things with a different audience.  I definitely find it to be the most effective of all the platforms out there, at least for me.  Picked it up after your interview on Podtech and I am glad I did.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Deepak</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 10:14:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Kyte.tv vs. PodTech.net (Adobe announces new Flash player)</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/08/20/kytetv-vs-podtechnet/#comment-9688876</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Robert,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I also use Wordpress. Let me take a different point of refference to make my point.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I like Kyte rather than YouTube.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;1. Seems cleaner&lt;br&gt;2. Seems a better breed of video tool&lt;br&gt;3. Seems more professional in format&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The advantage of YouTube today is the amount of plugins we have.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Mario Ruiz&lt;br&gt;@ &lt;a href="http://www.oursheet.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.oursheet.com"&gt;http://www.oursheet.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mario Ruiz</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 07:38:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Kyte.tv vs. PodTech.net (Adobe announces new Flash player)</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/08/20/kytetv-vs-podtechnet/#comment-9688875</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Which video system is getting your attention?&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://Operator11.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="Operator11.com"&gt;Operator11.com&lt;/a&gt; is great! We use it a lot in the Netherlands to broadcast our own shows. What's so good about is is that while live you can switch to other users and "give them teh camera".&lt;br&gt;I just got a &lt;a href="http://www.mogulus.com/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.mogulus.com/"&gt;http://www.mogulus.com/&lt;/a&gt; account but cannot say much about it yet.&lt;br&gt;I think Operator11 wins...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Trendmatcher</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 07:12:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Kyte.tv vs. PodTech.net (Adobe announces new Flash player)</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/08/20/kytetv-vs-podtechnet/#comment-9688874</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Robert,&lt;br&gt;A good comparison about those two services.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;You are already used to the new chatting features:&lt;br&gt;Video/Audio chat instead of text chat is way more powerful!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Marius</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 06:14:48 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>