<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Scobleizer - Latest Comments in J, J, J, K, oh, sorry, TWiT talking about Windows Vista</title><link>http://scobleizer.disqus.com/</link><description>Tech enthusiast, video blogger, media innovator, fanatical about startups at Rackspace, home of fanatical support for Internet entrepreneurs.</description><atom:link href="https://scobleizer.disqus.com/j_j_j_k_oh_sorry_twit_talking_about_windows_vista/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2006 01:14:48 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: J, J, J, K, oh, sorry, TWiT talking about Windows Vista</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/12/08/j-j-j-k-oh-sorry-twit-talking-about-windows-vista/#comment-9662717</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The H, J, K, L navigation in vi came from the ADM3a terminal (one of the first popular "smart" terminals, and common at Berkeley where vi evolved), which had the respective directional arrows printed on those four keys.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Michael Robinson</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2006 01:14:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: J, J, J, K, oh, sorry, TWiT talking about Windows Vista</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/12/08/j-j-j-k-oh-sorry-twit-talking-about-windows-vista/#comment-9662703</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Usefully, most mac apps support a set of emacs keybindings, like ^N, ^P for next and previous lines, ^K and ^Y for kill and yank, etc.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;They're subtle, but if you're used to them, it's amazingly useful.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">adam</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 09 Dec 2006 01:16:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: J, J, J, K, oh, sorry, TWiT talking about Windows Vista</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/12/08/j-j-j-k-oh-sorry-twit-talking-about-windows-vista/#comment-9662704</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Scoble, it's not like the "chose" them based on some usability studies or some such research. It was pretty much a lazy decision...use what a lot of geeks (but apparently not you) are already used to.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">LayZ</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 09 Dec 2006 00:25:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: J, J, J, K, oh, sorry, TWiT talking about Windows Vista</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/12/08/j-j-j-k-oh-sorry-twit-talking-about-windows-vista/#comment-9662705</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hehe, it's funny when non-geeks see the light. People often question why I use vi and instead of a full blown graphical text editor.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I can see Robert falling in love with vi if he invests the time to learn it.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anonymous</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 23:55:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: J, J, J, K, oh, sorry, TWiT talking about Windows Vista</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/12/08/j-j-j-k-oh-sorry-twit-talking-about-windows-vista/#comment-9662702</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I find myself hitting 'y' on webpages because that's the Gmail shortcut for "I'm done with this thread. (y)ank it out of my inbox and archive it." :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Matt Cutts</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 23:48:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: J, J, J, K, oh, sorry, TWiT talking about Windows Vista</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/12/08/j-j-j-k-oh-sorry-twit-talking-about-windows-vista/#comment-9662706</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'd really love to join you in the Vista changed world, but it simply won't install for me, freezes every time, even the upgrade advisor "encounters problems" See my post on it...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Perhaps it is related to the problem I have when trying to import OPML into Google Reader! :-) Only common thread is the dumb user I guess.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Maybe it is time to go skiing to Japan and take a break in the powder :-)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jonathan</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 19:17:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: J, J, J, K, oh, sorry, TWiT talking about Windows Vista</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/12/08/j-j-j-k-oh-sorry-twit-talking-about-windows-vista/#comment-9662707</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Ritchie: actually, I totally disagree. WHy? On my keyboard pageup/pagedown/and other navigation keys are off to the side. Not in a good place.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;J has a little bump on it, so is extremely easy to find (and is the home resting place for my hands). K makes sense cause it's next to J.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;These are BY FAR the best keys they could have chosen.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Robert Scoble</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 18:02:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: J, J, J, K, oh, sorry, TWiT talking about Windows Vista</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/12/08/j-j-j-k-oh-sorry-twit-talking-about-windows-vista/#comment-9662708</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think this finally settles the vi vs. emacs war. Sorry, jwz, esc-meta set-rss-mode lost. Thanks for the fine battle. :wq&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">fishbane</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 17:52:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: J, J, J, K, oh, sorry, TWiT talking about Windows Vista</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/12/08/j-j-j-k-oh-sorry-twit-talking-about-windows-vista/#comment-9662709</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm more of a start-at-the-the-bottom guy, so for me it's K,K,K,K,K,oops,J,K,K,K,K...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mike Woodhouse</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 17:16:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: J, J, J, K, oh, sorry, TWiT talking about Windows Vista</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/12/08/j-j-j-k-oh-sorry-twit-talking-about-windows-vista/#comment-9662710</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It is command line-era but you do realize there are tons of people who still use it daily and there are GUI versions available for every platform?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mgreenly</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 17:11:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: J, J, J, K, oh, sorry, TWiT talking about Windows Vista</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/12/08/j-j-j-k-oh-sorry-twit-talking-about-windows-vista/#comment-9662711</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I haven't used Google Reader, so maybe I'm missing something, but I really don't understand why you're making such a big deal about its &lt;a href="http://www.google.com/help/faq_reader.html#keyboard" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.google.com/help/faq_reader.html#keyboard"&gt;hot-keys&lt;/a&gt;. From what I can see, this seems like a step backwards in usability. Why? Well, countless existing applications already perform preview, pagination and navigation using the cursor keys (left/right, up/down) and PageUp/PageDown. That's what those keys are there for! Secondly, according to the &lt;a href="http://www.google.com/help/faq_reader.html#keyboard" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.google.com/help/faq_reader.html#keyboard"&gt;Help&lt;/a&gt;, the choice of hot-keys is a mix between mnemonics and location specific characters. Ignore the fact that 'N' and 'P' (Scan Down and Scan Up respectively) would have been great mnemonics for, I don't know, Next and Previous, maybe? We're ignoring that. Instead, look at how Next (J) and Previous (K) are next to each other and then Scan Down (N) touches them... but where's Scan Up (P)? It's too far away, that's where (they should have used 'I'). Finally, what happens if I'm using a non-US English keyboard? The relative locations of J,K,N,P,H can't be guaranteed so they shouldn't rely on it to make a navigation model meaningful. Either use meaningful and localizable mnemonics or use the cursor keys.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ritchie</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 16:50:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: J, J, J, K, oh, sorry, TWiT talking about Windows Vista</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/12/08/j-j-j-k-oh-sorry-twit-talking-about-windows-vista/#comment-9662712</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Honestly, I don't like seeing command line-era application conventions entering into my current applications.  For forward &amp;amp; backward, I prefer the buttons on my trackball; for up &amp;amp; down, I prefer the mousewheel.  And if I am using the keyboard, I prefer using the arrow keys.&lt;br&gt;I haven't used vi in years, and I never found its command set very intuitive and thus a "use-by-mind-memory" app instead of a "use-by-muscle-memory" one&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Keith Patrick</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 16:35:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: J, J, J, K, oh, sorry, TWiT talking about Windows Vista</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/12/08/j-j-j-k-oh-sorry-twit-talking-about-windows-vista/#comment-9662713</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yep, those Google coders must be vi users. You can also use j and k in gmail to move between "conversations".&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mike Procario</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 16:05:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: J, J, J, K, oh, sorry, TWiT talking about Windows Vista</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/12/08/j-j-j-k-oh-sorry-twit-talking-about-windows-vista/#comment-9662714</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hey, pretty soon you'll be writing your posts using 'vi', then.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jim Russell</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 15:55:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: J, J, J, K, oh, sorry, TWiT talking about Windows Vista</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/12/08/j-j-j-k-oh-sorry-twit-talking-about-windows-vista/#comment-9662715</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Those keys come from &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vi" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vi"&gt;the vi editor&lt;/a&gt; key bindings.  Sometimes you can get vi key bindings for other applications too.  There are even &lt;a href="http://johan.fredin.info/firefox_vi-bindings.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://johan.fredin.info/firefox_vi-bindings.html"&gt;instructions&lt;/a&gt; for scrolling with J and K in Firefox.  You probably don't want that, though, since it might mess up your Google Reader behavior, and you really want "move my selection in a set" rather than "move the active part of the page".&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 15:52:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: J, J, J, K, oh, sorry, TWiT talking about Windows Vista</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/12/08/j-j-j-k-oh-sorry-twit-talking-about-windows-vista/#comment-9662716</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I wonder where the choice of "j" and "k" originates.  Perhaps it's inspired by the ancient unix text editor vi (that I spend hours in daily), which uses the same.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Gabe</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 15:33:50 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>