-
Website
http://www.scobleizer.com/ -
Original page
http://scobleizer.com/2007/07/25/iphone-vs-nokia-n95-a-month-later/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
danja
44 comments · 4 points
-
polizeros
52 comments · 1 points
-
AndyBeard
69 comments · 4 points
-
Zachary Adam Cohen
35 comments · 8 points
-
dbarefoot
40 comments · 3 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
The best and worst thing Twitter did in 2009: RT
22 hours ago · 20 comments
-
World-brand-building mistakes France’s entrepreneurs make
1 week ago · 181 comments
-
2010: the year SEO isn’t important anymore
6 days ago · 67 comments
-
iPhone developers abandoning app model for HTML5?
6 days ago · 51 comments
-
Google eating Yelp?
5 days ago · 25 comments
-
The best and worst thing Twitter did in 2009: RT
The iPhone's web stuff really really rocks, and it's a game changer for me and my employees. All of a sudden, we can do work 24/7. Every single piece of SmugMug works on the phone, so we can help customers, debug problems, and even beta test new features from anywhere there's connectivity.
I wrote a mini review of it for Business 2.0's Gadgets section about how useful it is to CEOs, but now that they're going under, it's not going to be published... guess I'd better stick it on my blog. :)
I don't mind the fact I might have to charge a device once a day (if necessary), but the thought that I can't use the device to any great length without worrying I might have to charge it before the end of the day. Come on! This is 2007!
I've gone back to my Blackberry 8800. Does all the N95 does (except camera and wi-fi), but better.... MUCH better and doesn't make me think twice about battery power. Big up the Blackberry.
There are only 2 devices I will upgrade to. Fristly the next 8800 series Blackberry, when it makes it over here to the UK (because it has wi-fi in it) and probably iPhone 2.0 - when ever that might be.
While I agree, the iPhone mobile web experience is a very nice but I've been using various Blackberry devices for viewing the web for a few years now. Not to mention the Google Map application which is great.
The biggest problem with the iPhone is the lack of an SDK and a closed platform.
I think I'll wait for version 5 of the iPhone, just like I did with an Ipod.
One small correction though :-) the N95 allows you to set six icons on the standby screen for quick access, and the two soft keys to any app. So Google Maps on my N95 *is* one press.
Robert, have you compared the picture quality between the iPhone and N95? (I think you compared them on your blog or Facebook some time ago but I can't find the link).
But I agree with the assessment about "most people". The simple fact is that the iPhone is not built for the early adopters - it's built for the masses. There are a number of reasons I haven't bought an iPhone yet, and none of them are relevant to the majority of users.
I wrote a couple of weeks ago that the iPhone is a game-changer because it's the first smartphone that the average user cares about. It's helped make the phone less of a commodity for the other 98%.
http://slashstar.com/blogs/tim/archive/2007/07/...
I have been following your iPhone journey from the beginning. The comparison that comes up in my head regarding the iphone vs other smartphones is just like the Mac and PC debate. I personally use a Dell laptop at work, but really enjoy using my wife's MacBook at home. It just seems easier and more enjoyable to me. I wonder why I put up with Windows sometimes. I had a Cingular 8125 and liked it because of all the things it could do, but after I had to restart it several times a day with heavy use it wasn't fun. It was frustrating(sounds like your N95 experience). I have enjoyed the iphone tremendously, not because I can show it off, but because it does the things I want without having to restart it several times a day.
I'll keep watching to see how it goes with the iphone.
http://dmiessler.com/archives/1385
And that's what happened. Here's the basic idea:
"Few things done beautifully beats many things done like crap."
Here's a good summary of the form vs. function debate:
http://dmiessler.com/archives/1429
...and why only the customers will determine who is ultimately right. You're right about that, Robert -- it's they who will decide.
http://www.atmasphere.net/wp/archives/2007/07/1...
Imagine my surprise when I got a call from my mother yesterday, asking me if she should get an iPhone for Dad so that he could use the Internet access feature to check weather charts while on his boat.
The iPhone has its drawbacks, we all know, but Tim @ #3 is completely correct. When the 65+ contingent is seriously considering buying an iPhone, the game has changed in a very big way.
- Convergence phone/itunes (I no longer have to carry two things).
- Transparent integration with my desktop address book, photos and music.
- Google maps
- Visual voicemail
Hopefully Apple will fix over time the data entry/keyboard issue (I see people sending email to themselves with URL so that they do not have to type in those URLs) and make it a true open platform.
-Edwin
My son's photos, all taken with the iPhone:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/miniscobleizer/
Are you saying that because you know the guy and know he's an addict, or are you assuming he's an addict because he finds a particular use case important that you think is unimportant?
Why is it good that there are desirable use cases where the iPhone can't be used?
Are you just getting preachy about driving and cell-phoning?
Okay, getting off my soapbox.
-Sam
Perhaps the next generation iPhone will provide more of the features that I'm looking for in a smartphone. For me, the Mogul is about as close as it comes.
I'm pleased to say that this feature has saved the day more than once for Andy and I.
IPhone reviews and feedback are overwhelmingly positive (yes, it needs improvements, but not as many as other phones). The ones that are not are either from people trying hard not to be branded as "Apple fanbois," or have uses for the device so narrow that one feature will trump all others. The latter is valid, though something that affects very few of us, the former is just silly.
cough....
I'm actually posting on Vista now, because a customer needs me to compile a flash movie of all things, but with that aside.
The N95 is worth $679 Canadian brand new and unlocked.
http://www.tigerdirect.ca/applications/searchto...
I can either get you $300 cash for it if I have to unlock it or $325 if you unlock it before sending it.
If not you can toss it up on eBay.
That way you'll almost have enough. Remember Canadians have to pay customs which amounts to sales tax on used stuff.
Thanks
As soon as they add that, the iPhone is mine. : -)
I will never go back because the iPhone is leaps and bounds above any other phone out there and it is simply more fun to use. I think that the best thing about the iPhone is all of the small things that Apple did right. I wrote about them here.
Bluetooth connection to my car.....sucks!
not being able to use third party headphones that could with my iPod....sucks!
Text messaging....sucks!
No ActiveSync....sucks!
Form factor is great. UI is great, with some minor annoyances.
The headphone issue really is a PITA. The iPhone headphones suck. (Yea, I know, you can get a $10 adapter, but still....)
And, hey Scoble, as far as your "broke all sales records" statement about the iPhone. Well, based on activations the day they went on sale....uh...not so much.
http://machinist.salon.com/blog/2007/07/24/ipho...
Activations and sales are not the same thing. Further, how can you not be impressed with 146,000 activations in 30 hours? That's 81 every minute!
As for real sales, well, we'll get a better idea (maybe) in Apple's results today. I say "maybe" because I'm not certain Apple will break iPhone sales out.
Not that that matters to LayZ who just likes to take a consistently anti-Scoble stance.
And Winer mentioned the NTY article with the same news. I notice you didn't take him to task over it. Again, don't blame me. I was one of the 140
And if there were 500,000 units sold as some speculated, why only 146000 activated? Don't tell me people bought them as an iPod. ;-). Dumping them to eBay or Craigslist? 350,000? Hardly.
http://www.thestreet.com/_yahoo/newsanalysis/te...
Nevertheless, despite the typical frustrations of the iPhone (Safari crashing + security issues, recessed headphone jack [wtf apple], poorly implemented gmail, minor text messaging quirks), the beauty of the interface and the joy that is now interfacing with my phone overrides those setbacks. A month after, people still like seeing my phone and I still take it out and enjoy using it every single day.
Damon is right. The interface is so elegant it's a joy to use. Minor quirks - yep. Joy factor so much higher. The screen resolution is simply brilliant.
I am, without a doubt, more effective in communicating and digesting online information with the iPhone than I was with the Blackberry.
"“We’re thrilled to report the highest June quarter revenue and profit in Apple’s history, along with the highest quarterly Mac sales ever,” said Steve Jobs, Apple’s CEO. “iPhone is off to a great start—we hope to sell our one-millionth iPhone by the end of its first full quarter of sales—and our new product pipeline is very strong.”"
They need to sit their butts down and draw a map of the user interface. Then they'll realize how many friggin' clicks it takes to do anything.
Another pet peeve is that I can't turn the Loudspeaker on until AFTER the phone call has connected to a tower. WTF? That's precisely when I want to use the loudspeaker -- while waiting to connect.
Their 3Q results are amazing.
I think I might have given in to my hunger for a nice touchscreen UI. I feel like Gollum.... ;-) I feel so disloyal to Nokia.. Sorry guys!
I don't have an iPhone, and am grateful for all the early adopters. I'm hoping iPhone 2.0 will deal with the shortcomings. And I don't care about the keyboard. I'm happy to read email on a phone, but can't imagine doing much writing of email. Never had a Blackberry or any other smartphone.
I started with the fact that the level-headed reviews were pretty spot on. The UI and user experience are unmatched and will set a new precedent against which all the others will be judged now.
Then I went on through every nit-picky thing that should be fixed (keyboard BTW, is not one in my opinion--I took to it straight away and type better than on my Treo). This took the majority of my 'review.' Palm lost it here, when they should have been leading the pack with their legacy in the PDA space. (in comparison to some of the other smart phones, they probably lost it a while ago, but this is the way the Palm products used to shine before languishing with no improvements since like version 1).
However, I concluded like this: Despite its faults and my desire for improvements, I would not give it up for any other phone out there. It is a 'game changer' and at the same time, a pleasure to use (on top of a remarkable software achievement). This is how things are supposed to work. And though it's a 1.0 device, it doesn't malfunction like a lot of 1.0 things. They got it right the first time. Not 100% right, but never the less, right.
And yeah, 270,000 devices is a lot of product to move in 1.25 days at an average price of $550.
No shit! I read the article. Thanks. Never suggested otherwise.
That still doesn't explain what accounts for the 124K that DIDN'T get activated in those same two days. Ebay? People thought they were iPods? People waiting to activate? Would be interesting to know the total amount activated to date.
AT&T is likely getting a good chewing out. Obviously, it had a lot more problems with activation than it admitted initially. There were thousands of initial attempts stuck in the activation pipeline.
Then, there is the whole ceremonial thing many Apple fans are into. The package must be photographed, both unopened and throughout the unpacking process. Each item inside must be examined and photographed. A shrine must be built. (Kidding? Maybe.) Friends must be invited to attend the event. Each of them will want a few minutes or more with the still unactivated iPhone. By then, the 30-hour period being focused on would have been over for many buyers.
Other factors:
•Gifting -- Some have to be mailed, others put aside until a birthday or anniversary.
•Procrastination -- Getting the iPhone was the thing. Since most buyers already have cell phones they can wait to use their iPhone if they choose to. But, having it in hand was a must.
•Sharing -- Remember that Scoble does not own an iPhone. But, that doesn't mean he does not have access. Multiply him by a few thousand. With two weeks to 30 days to return an iPhone there is an incentive to share until a buyer is sure.
•The non-activators. This factor is not as important as it will become. Some buyers never had any intention of two-year bondage with AT&T if they could find a work-around and put off activation for that reason. (There are now several ways to use most of an iPhone without the two-year AT&T contract.)
100+k could have bought their phones on Saturday afternoon and didn't activate after the quarter ended.
you and others are taking this two day period as a test.
It's just a freakin arbitrary deadline.
For one, it is just rock solid, physically feels great. I have been using my phone mostly for data for nearly 7 years now (yup, I'm an early, early adopter in that regard) and the experience on the iPhone is by far the best.
One little feature I love - multi-tasking. I can open up an email (I use gmail on web not the built in email) and switch between an email with someone's phone number and the dialpad - and enter & correct what I just entered.
Visual Voicemail also was a lifesaver today on the MeshWalk - I could just pull up messages as I wanted, no more waiting through prompts, listening to old messages before I could hear my new ones, and rewinding (or fast fowarding) is a simple flick. Amazing - simple sure - but also really productivity enhancing. I have been avoiding voicemail for years due to frustrations with it - this is so nice I don't mind getting voicemails now.
Wifi when I need speed is also really great (I mostly use it on my secured home network).
And I still get a smile on my face when things just work - the applications people are coming out with now are also really nice. I'm enjoying being able to play some embedded videos from webpages (has to be quicktime and in the right format - but still - really, really nice)
The sensors are all also great - the light sensor does help adjust the screen brightness - though it does it without much fuss I do notice that in most cases the screen is really readable. The sensor that detects when the phone is by my ear is also great - and quick to revert back when needed (to use the keypad for example).
Do I have some complaints? A few, mostly minor.
- I'd love to be able to program my own ringtones (I'm assuming this may come with a software update in the future)
- occasionally Safari will crash. But unlike my Windows Mobile device - a crash rarely means I have to do anything more than just relaunch Safari (though if I have unsaved work somewhere I might have lost it) On the the other hand, I love being able to just open up multiple pages and switch between them - really, really cool.
In short, I am really happy to have the iphone and use it, I'm adjusting to it, figuring out if I want to use a case or not etc (I do like having it in my pocket so the vibrate is easy to detect)
Shannon
www.symbianworld.de
So, on to the iPhone. I bought 2 the day after it came out. One of the 4GB and one 8GB, which boils down to one for me, and one for the fiance. I have to admit that I use the iPhone for a music player and whatnot MORE frequently than I EVER used my iPod. The simple fact that it's an all-in-one device really makes me glad I dropped so much money to have one. Sure, the camera is a little lacking, BUT when it all comes down to it (and when you don't have a more appropriate camera...) it's perfect for catching those moments you'd miss otherwise. A simple click and it's there and one more and you've got a picture. The quality is fine for just that. If you want professional pictures, take them with a professional camera.
The GPS is something that doesn't bother me. But I've heard rumors that Apple will come out with a new iPhone that has GPS capabilities. I'm happy with Google Maps.
So, it's safe to say that I'm coming down on the side of the iPhone, and after only a month, I'm more than satisfied. Let's see what happens after month number 2.
Though windows mobile has limited web viewing, for exaple, NYTimes mobile version looks good and exactly fits on the screen. It just lists major headlines and then links to each section, I can just scroll it down with one hand and keep reading it (useful, say if i am standing in a line and am holding a drink in the other hand :))
I know I will sound a spoilsport, but I am not happy with the iphone :(
http://2aday.wordpress.com/2007/07/26/iphone-mi...
At $600 I don't think it targets "the masses". It targets the wealthy that wand a symbol of status/style. It's like wrist watches. The expensive stylish ones are made of gold but have no numbers. The cheap ones have no style, but have loads of features (reminds me of a scene from the movie U-Turn). Both serve different purposes. But the Blackberry targets "the masses" much more than the iPhone does.
Just thought I'd point that out.
#53- Most N95's were shipped with 1 GB cards- and it's not limited to 2gb- that's a lie. Even Nokia sells 4gb cards. 8gb cards are on the horizon, and I wouldn't be a bit surprised to be copying data to my 32GB microsd card before the middle of next year. By the end of next year, the iPhone is going to be a 4 or 8gb joke to the smartphone world.
The iPhone is wonderful if you're coming from a razr, if you're confused by gadgets that will perform more than three functions, or if you're just easily impressed by a pretty bright screen. If you're coming from S60 and found it too difficult to operate, you obviously need a phone without buttons.
Yippie for misinformation. Cheers, Scoble.
One thing I wanted to mention about Edge: sure 3G is cool, but a wireless network isn't much good if it isn't available. I was on Edge grabbing email and checking DIgg in the middle of nowhere on the outskirts of Shawnee, OK the other day. Nice.
I imagine a version will come that overs 3G+Edge support soon enough. Perhaps the network will catch up enough to make it useful by then. For now, I think Apple's decision about Edge was the correct one.
"The iPhone is wonderful if you’re coming from a razr, if you’re confused by gadgets that will perform more than three functions, or if you’re just easily impressed by a pretty bright screen."
Don't you Apple-bashers ever get tired of the same old "arguments" 20 years after the fact? Being easy to use is an ADVANTAGE, not a negative. A bright screen is an ADVANTAGE, not a negative. The fact that most people can actually use all the features the iPhone offers is an ADVANTAGE, not a negative.
You can pat yourself on the back all you want for apparently knowing how to work your phone, but the N95 is nothing more than a great camera at the core of a very unspectacular smartphone. It's a one-trick pony. Period.
Since you (and Nokia) haven't figured it out, let me explain it to you: Building simplicity into a complex device is hard. Apple excels at it.
The fact is your 1987-type Macintosh arguments making fun of the device's simplicity won't wash for most people 20 years later in 2007. Please come back when you have something better.
My name is Kenji Nakamura, when reading you blog I see you are interested in the new apple phone,
the iphone.
I am admin of the challenge iNeedmyPost, in which the prizes are iphones. The rules are simple create a post in our blog and get many views.
It will be an honor if you entered. Find us in http://ineedmypost.com
Bye! Kenji Nakamura. (Sorry if this seems spam XP)
No, not really. I'm just asking what the fact that it takes more clicks to access Google Maps on the N95 than the iPhone has to do with anything when GM is a minor application on the N95 which, as we know, has GPS and Sat Nav. It's an apples and oranges comparison.
Personally, I respect Robert's opinion. I don't agree with it but clearly the iPhone suits him better than the N95. What I do find slightly unfair though is the focus on the bits he likes without acknowledging what the N95 does better.
As for your comment, we could also argue that owners of the iPhone are akin to parents trying to convince themselves that their child is smarter than he or she actually is.
But hey ho, fanboyism is kind of a pointless exercise, isn't it?
Like this, for example:
"You can pat yourself on the back all you want for apparently knowing how to work your phone, but the N95 is nothing more than a great camera at the core of a very unspectacular smartphone. It’s a one-trick pony. Period."
Well, no. No it isn't actually. The N95 does a number of things better than the iPhone - or indeed other smartphones - just as the iPhone does some things better than the N95. Those of us who aren't blindly - and, frankly, illogically - attached to any particular company realise this.
At the moment I prefer the N95 for what it does, Robert prefers the iPhone. It's all good.
Waiting for the iPhone in Canada.
I don't need google maps on the n95; I have a far superior gps based product that shows me where I am in real time. I don't need to look at it when I'm driving; I have a voice direction system that tells me when to turn left or right - better, and safer, than using Google maps for directions.
It's clearly better... but Scoble here is pretending it doesn't even exist (maybe he doesnt know how to use it, yet?) - and running down the n95 because it takes so many clicks (actually not 11, untrue again, it can be set up as a 1-click app on the desktop just like the iphone) to access Google maps.
Like most n95 users, I don't use Google maps. I have something much, much better.
Doesnt mean the iphone isn't cooler. Doesnt mean the n95 has problems (it does).
But Robert here is being deliberately misleading, IMHO.
Scoble, you are free to choose the iphone over the n95 for many reasons. But at least be honest.
I used to respect Scoble's opinion. That's changing, right now.
So today, with 2 days left in my 30 day trial period, I called up Sprint and ported my number back over to them. A bittersweet moment, to be sure, but I think I made the right choice.
I'm confident that Apple will someday realize that tying itself to one carrier was a REALLY bad idea, and make it available with more carriers. That, combined with some much-needed feature updates (even simple things like the ability to filter and search e-mail), could definitely bring me back.
Your comments are the absolute pinnacle of ignorance.
I especially like the comment about adding memory and programs to the N95. How does the iPhone handle these feats?
Hi Robert, Ed Garay, here.
Let's just say that I only browse, read/write emails, Twitter and other text messages while I am driving when I find myself idle, waiting for the green light and at railroad crossings and traffic jams ;-) but that aside, I still make use of one-hand smartphone operation throughout my daily mobile life... but my aging eyes truly appreciate the extra screen real estate vacated by a physical thumb keyboard on the iPhone.
Those double buts, above, are hints to my dilemma: I like the iPhone an awful lot and I love its big bright beautiful screen, but I have been and would like to continue been a Windows Mobile smartphone user, not just for those one-handed mobile Internet moments at traffic red lights, but because I am used to having my contacts, calendar, voice notes, files and all in sync with all my Tablet PCs, notebooks and my good old iPaq.
That iPhone screen and UI are very appealing but I am holding back until the Motorola Q 9h hits the streets of Chicago, not just for the full QWERTY keyboard but for a plethora of reasons: HSDPA high-speed Internet, stereo Bluetooth, MP3, AAC audio *and* WMA, MPEG-4 and H.264 video *plus* WMV and H.263, replaceable microSD storage and battery.
The Web is beautiful on the iPhone, but it is not too bad either on the Windows Mobile smartphones. People usually stick with what they like and what they already use, so if I get an iPhone instead of the Moto Q 9h (or some other WM6 smartphone) I will miss Windows Outlook Mobile (not just for Exchange but for IMAP and POP), and I will miss Voice Notes for recording lectures, interviews, voice reminders, ad nauseum; I will miss Windows Media Player Mobile as well as seamlessly opening attachments in Word, PowerPoint or Excel. (I don't currently use Windows Mobile VPN, but I might), and if I have HSDPA, I don't need Wi-Fi.
So, I continue to ponder this inherent question: do I spend $200 and get that new super-fast Windows Mobile 6 smartphone that I already know I like, or do I spend $600 and get that Apple phone, not so fast, not so open, but with that nice big screen and lots of other new candy. Afterall, stereo Bluetooth, voice recording, WMA audio, MS-office attachments and some such could just be a firmware upgrade or two away, right?
So it boils down to physical stuff, like HSDPA electronics, replaceable batteries and memory cards, and an (optional) keyboard with real button for those idle moments during my daily commute.
Stay tuned. I shall make my mind by the end of August at the latest. In the mean time, Robert, give me a call next time you are in Chicago. I will drive you around Chicago, safety first, of course. ;-)
--- Ed
Personally I can't stand Windows Mobile 5 or 6 but love Blackberry because of the simplicity of use and ease of email functionality. However multimedia sucks on it. This doesn't mean I hate Microsoft or talk bad about users who use their Mobile products. They WILL mature.
Although my major complaint about my new iPhone is lack of support for Exchange is how it still handles internet email. (I haven't heard anyone else mention this) But my problem is how it doesn't cache or download the emails. For instance if someone sends me an email with several pictures and I want to show someone later I have to wait again for it to load all over again. Annoying!
These sort of quirks I am confident will be worked out with software updates from Apple.
I think people should lighten up about all the negativity because NO smartphone suits everyone. Personally I think they ALL have their limitations.
>>> "Geoffrey, Google Maps accomplish the same goal on the iPhone as GPS on the iPhone — directing the driver to his destination. To claim that GPS puts the N95 over the iPhone is disingenuous. "
Comment by Podesta — July 27, 2007 @ 5:59 pm
You are perfectly right in your first statement. Google Maps (sans GPS) vs NokiaMaps (based on GPS) are obviously, ways of accomplishing the same goal - finding your way around - on two different machines.
One, - Nokia Maps - simply happens to be light years ahead of the other - Google Maps on the iphone. Realtime directions are better than guesswork, period. Knowing where you are is much better to hoping you've read the map right, period. Being told by voice, to turn, 200 yards ahead of the turn, all without having to take your eyes off the road, is obviously far better than desperately trying to read the road sign at 40mph while reading your iphone at the same time. Period.
It isn't disingenuous to say that gps based mapping is better than non-gps-based mapping. It's just the truth.
I never said - ever! - that gps alone make the n95 better than the iphone. In fact, I never - ever! -said the n95 is better than the iphone. They are two very different machines.
So at no point was I being 'disingenuous' at all. On the other hand, I did point out that Scoble was being *extraordinarily* disingenuous to compare the n95 to the iphone over the issue of Google maps - and never mentioned the superior n95 gps system at all. That's a little more than disingenuous, that's outright misleading.
He doesn't have to like his Nokia N95, but just plain trashing it without any justification (11 clicks??) and not understanding why others would prefer it makes him just an ordinary fan boy all forums are full of.
Such a shame.
Same for the GPS. Nice to know where I am... but waiting 5 minutes to pick up a satellite and then having the battery die is not cool.
Never managed to get streaming media working.
It inexplicably misses text to speech on its feature list despite having the capability (as it reads out who is calling me).
And what the hell is the barcode reader for? Anyone got that working?
On the other hand, I got a Newton Messagepad 100, a 110 and then a 120. I still use the MP120... if it had a phone built in and wi-fi I probably wouldn't use my N95 at all.
So I'm getting an iPhone.
I like the iPhone - but having a wonderful UI (touchscreen and menu) just doesnt do it for me. I mean, you cant even customize the menu, make an mp3 into a ringtone, change icons, or take a video. The iPhone is great - when you're playing around with it, but aside from email and browsing, what else can you do with it? It has no 3G or HSDPA, it has no MMS, no way to share stuff with another phone or connect to a TV or multimedia speakers - it's just too limited, it lacks substance.
I've always been fond of simple things, and this simplicity of the iPhone's menu, endears it to most users - as they say, even a 10 year old can operate it. I agree wholeheartedly on that. But will I pay 599 dollars to use such a menu? 599 for an iPod with a screen? It doesn't even have A2DP (stereo bluetooth) - so how great would it be on wireless music?
Granted that the n95 or any other smartphone will never be as easy to use as the iPhone.... those other phones gives you substance (features) that's really useful in real life. Other smartphones are NOT just a good menu, a large touchscreen, and storage of songs - they are so much more.
http://www.atmasphere.net/wp/archives/2007/07/1...
Sure. Now how long do you have to wait to download over that slooooooow data connection on your iPhone while the N95 shows me the result it got via 3G? I could barely believe it when I saw the spec for the iPhone. Shame on you, Apple.
3G vs. EDGE is meaningless in terms of map data, because the amount of data sent is actually pretty small so the faster speed of 3G doesn't really help.
For web browsing 3G is better, but mostly I'm browsing where there's WiFi of some sort which is faster than 3G anyway.
Google just put out a full S60 version of Google Maps that uses the integrated GPS. Set a shortcut to it on the main screen and its one click start and one click for your location.
Slingbox recently made their SlingMedia software available free for N95 owners. full control over your DVR and you can watch your TV anywhere.
Then there's the 5MP camera with VGA video recording.
I just cant see any reason to pick an iPhone over all that.