<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Scobleizer - Latest Comments in IE 7 says Scobleizer &amp;#8220;not secure&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://scobleizer.disqus.com/</link><description>Tech enthusiast, video blogger, media innovator, fanatical about startups at Rackspace, home of fanatical support for Internet entrepreneurs.</description><atom:link href="https://scobleizer.disqus.com/ie_7_says_scobleizer_8220not_secure8221/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Aug 2006 16:13:48 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: IE 7 says Scobleizer &amp;#8220;not secure&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/08/22/ie-7-says-scobleizer-not-secure/#comment-9650148</link><description>&lt;p&gt;David Brunelle, did you report your "phishing" problem to the IE team?  After all, that's what betas are for, to get bug reports from scenarios in the field so the problems can be addressed.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Molly C</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 23 Aug 2006 16:13:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: IE 7 says Scobleizer &amp;#8220;not secure&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/08/22/ie-7-says-scobleizer-not-secure/#comment-9650145</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Well, removing the trusted site designation from the non-HTTPS &lt;a href="http://amazon.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="amazon.com"&gt;amazon.com&lt;/a&gt; URLs got rid of the unknown (mixed) designation.  I don't see https fetches for the blog page, but posting a comment does generate some https action.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;By the way, although I don't get a warning message now, I do get the little stop sign in the status bar, and my browser has blocked three cookies from &lt;a href="http://amazon.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="amazon.com"&gt;amazon.com&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It annoys me when sites that I am not accessing directly put cookies on my system because they use fetched images to do it.  (My blog does that to its visitors because I must show the blogger icon and Google happily drops cookies on all visitors who accept them.)  So I can't write an honest privacy statement for my blog, which is on my own web site.  Ick.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">orcmid</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 23 Aug 2006 13:03:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: IE 7 says Scobleizer &amp;#8220;not secure&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/08/22/ie-7-says-scobleizer-not-secure/#comment-9650146</link><description>&lt;p&gt;In IE6 for me, It's the way the &lt;a href="http://amazon.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="amazon.com"&gt;amazon.com&lt;/a&gt; ad for the book is handled.  The Barnes &amp;amp; Noble image doesn't have the problem.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I get one warning per image on pages that have lots of &lt;a href="http://amazon.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="amazon.com"&gt;amazon.com&lt;/a&gt; ads/referrer links, mostly because &lt;a href="http://amazon.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="amazon.com"&gt;amazon.com&lt;/a&gt; is on my trusted site list and this blog isn't.  I guess it is time to take them off of my trusted site list and see if their scripts all still work.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; - Dennis&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">orcmid</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 23 Aug 2006 12:57:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: IE 7 says Scobleizer &amp;#8220;not secure&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/08/22/ie-7-says-scobleizer-not-secure/#comment-9650139</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I am not that doo doo bird.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">shel israel</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 23 Aug 2006 11:00:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: IE 7 says Scobleizer &amp;#8220;not secure&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/08/22/ie-7-says-scobleizer-not-secure/#comment-9650143</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Maybe IE7 suspects your 'naked conversations' :D&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Abby</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 23 Aug 2006 07:12:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: IE 7 says Scobleizer &amp;#8220;not secure&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/08/22/ie-7-says-scobleizer-not-secure/#comment-9650144</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Funny! But bitter! But funny! ;)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">radaronpaws</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 23 Aug 2006 04:41:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: IE 7 says Scobleizer &amp;#8220;not secure&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/08/22/ie-7-says-scobleizer-not-secure/#comment-9650147</link><description>&lt;p&gt;David: just checked with IE7beta3, and yep... you da phisher man. Well, your site is suspicious, says IE7. I wont hand over my personal information to you then. :)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;False positives like these could have some interesting ramifications for Microsoft. Not the first one I've heard of either.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Juha</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 23 Aug 2006 02:34:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: IE 7 says Scobleizer &amp;#8220;not secure&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/08/22/ie-7-says-scobleizer-not-secure/#comment-9650142</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I wrote a post on &lt;a href="http://www.davidbrunelle.com/2006/06/03/how-to-get-free-software-from-microsoft/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.davidbrunelle.com/2006/06/03/how-to-get-free-software-from-microsoft/"&gt;obtaining free software from Microsoft&lt;/a&gt;. IE7 thought it was a phishing site. Besides the comment fields asking for a name, email, and URL - I was in no way collecting personal information.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I determined the process of getting Microsoft to exempt my URL was not worth the trouble.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">David Brunelle</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 23 Aug 2006 01:24:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: IE 7 says Scobleizer &amp;#8220;not secure&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/08/22/ie-7-says-scobleizer-not-secure/#comment-9650141</link><description>&lt;p&gt;OK, this is going to be embarrassing, but... even though I checked the source on the page, I missed it.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I loaded an HTTPS version of Scobleizer, but that page had some elements served over HTTP. So, IE7 told me the page had "non-secure" items in it, and refused to serve'em up.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;So, in summary:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;1) IE7 was right to refuse to display all the page.&lt;br&gt;2) I'm a n00b for missing the obvious.&lt;br&gt;3) Scoble's a n00b too for mixing HTTP with HTTPS :).&lt;br&gt;4) Microsoft's IE7 team really, really, really should come up with error messages that tell you exactly what the hell's going on.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Fixed blog post on this subject coming up in a moment.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Juha</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 23 Aug 2006 01:21:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: IE 7 says Scobleizer &amp;#8220;not secure&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/08/22/ie-7-says-scobleizer-not-secure/#comment-9650140</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I don't get that error with IE7 on MY end.  But who's to say.  Firefox is show in 2 more recent posts than IE 7 right now.  Maybe it doesn't read as quick either.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jeff</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 23 Aug 2006 00:50:55 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>