<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Scobleizer - Latest Comments in I removed Snap&amp;#8217;s previews from here</title><link>http://scobleizer.disqus.com/</link><description>Tech enthusiast, video blogger, media innovator, fanatical about startups at Rackspace, home of fanatical support for Internet entrepreneurs.</description><atom:link href="https://scobleizer.disqus.com/i_removed_snap8217s_previews_from_here/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2007 00:35:39 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: I removed Snap&amp;#8217;s previews from here</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/01/30/i-removed-snaps-previews-from-here/#comment-9669310</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I thought Snap previews were extremely nifty the first time I saw them (me, magpie, chirp!).  And I contemplated using them on some of my sites.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Then, recently, I began noticing that most of the popup windows were empty.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;They gotta fix it so the popup doesn't pop up unless it has something to offer.  Otherwise, it's just STUPID.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Bacchus</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2007 00:35:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I removed Snap&amp;#8217;s previews from here</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/01/30/i-removed-snaps-previews-from-here/#comment-9669312</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Bring them back.  Maybe I am less geek than many of your readers but I really found them helpful.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I read in the thread that you (a reader) can easily turn them off if you don't like them.  (And if the vocal crowd is so advanced that they dont need them, why can they figure out how to turn them off.  Sounds simple based on the above!)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Keeping them on and making it easy to turn off seems like a great solution to keep everyone happy.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;ST&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve Thomas</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 11:20:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I removed Snap&amp;#8217;s previews from here</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/01/30/i-removed-snaps-previews-from-here/#comment-9669311</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I like the Snap previews. I like getting a glimpse of where a link would take me; it helps me to make a more informed decision.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;And for those who don't like the previews, it so easy to disable (and NO, you don't have to go to Snap's site to do it). You just click "options" on any preview bubble, and from there you can opt-out of the preview for the one site you are on, or all sites.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;So to me, leaving it running on your site gives me the option. Taking it off your site takes away my choice. I'd like to see it back.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">William</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 11:04:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I removed Snap&amp;#8217;s previews from here</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/01/30/i-removed-snaps-previews-from-here/#comment-9669313</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for removing them...they were driving me crazy and were terrible for usability as its so unexpected and disrupts your viewing of the site.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jacob Wyke</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 10:06:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I removed Snap&amp;#8217;s previews from here</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/01/30/i-removed-snaps-previews-from-here/#comment-9669314</link><description>&lt;p&gt;the snap previews is a time saver. the bubble let me decide what links are worth following at the "point of sale". i trust your linkink robert but i don't have time to follow each and every one of them. with previews i spend more time on your site or checking out sites you link to. with previews i spend less time on sites i did not want to visit after all.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;i wonder if the people complaining here are the same people that were whining and moaning when web designers all of a sudden started using graphics. good thing that practice never took off!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;change hurts... consider how much easier it is to say "no" than "yes" when confronted with something new and unfamiliar.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;status quo is NOT good enough!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">hubba</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 23:56:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I removed Snap&amp;#8217;s previews from here</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/01/30/i-removed-snaps-previews-from-here/#comment-9669318</link><description>&lt;p&gt;i don't get the complaining at all. for all the rants, how many users like it silently? i'm put it across my site. i also think it's great that snap is listening to users to figure out features and controls. any plan to grab the first frame of video for .mov files? thanks to everyone at &lt;a href="http://snap.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="snap.com"&gt;snap.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dr wires</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 19:53:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I removed Snap&amp;#8217;s previews from here</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/01/30/i-removed-snaps-previews-from-here/#comment-9669315</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Jason, what a wonderfully articulate and graceful response to what I always thought was too many people jumping on the bandwagon.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;If they all thought it was so bad isn't it funny how many people actually signed-up to it in the first place?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I wonder just how many people in these comments thought how good it was - well aware of the pop-up implications etc.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;There is a perfectly good reason you grew so quickly - because it was (and in my mind, still is) a great idea and I look forward to seeing further innovations!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">paulfabretti</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:58:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I removed Snap&amp;#8217;s previews from here</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/01/30/i-removed-snaps-previews-from-here/#comment-9669317</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hello,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I wanted to thank Robert again for taking the time and effort to give Snap Preview Anywhere a spin on this site.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;As Robert alluded to in his post, we here at Snap are acutely aware of the issues described and we have several enhancements scheduled to release over the coming couple of weeks that in different ways will address these issues.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Rest assured that your and your readers' viewpoints have been, and will continue to, inform the ongoing development of this product.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Jason Fields&lt;br&gt;Product Evangelist, Emerging Technology&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.Snap.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="www.Snap.com"&gt;www.Snap.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">snapsearch</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:44:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I removed Snap&amp;#8217;s previews from here</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/01/30/i-removed-snaps-previews-from-here/#comment-9669316</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Quote: "I have been talking with the Snap folks, though, and they are working hard on answering these concerns."&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I've seen all the complaints registered in the comments of this post from others, but I was just wondering: are these complaints the same as yours? Do you have other issues with this feature? I've been doing a site for a co-worker &lt;a href="http://movielanddirectory.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://movielanddirectory.com"&gt;http://movielanddirectory.com&lt;/a&gt;, which is a movie related tour guide of the LA area, and he was asking me about the possibility of adding Snap to the site. I definitely do not want to do that if it will just irritate most users.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Any-hooo, any info on the details of your concerns would be appreciated. Though the comments here already make me abit leary.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Orville Chomer</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:29:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I removed Snap&amp;#8217;s previews from here</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/01/30/i-removed-snaps-previews-from-here/#comment-9669271</link><description>&lt;p&gt;How about like key shortcuts,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;say shift+click, that way it wont be intrusive.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;just a thought.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Copyright 2007, genius comment inventions inc.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">papavb</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 11:26:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I removed Snap&amp;#8217;s previews from here</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/01/30/i-removed-snaps-previews-from-here/#comment-9669265</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It could be worse.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Those sites that have the double underscore links to seemingly random words within articles that come up with similar pop up ballon ads that are related to that word are especially annoying.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The ads are usually are unrelated article, only that one word or phrase that has the double-underscored link, which made the ads even more awful as they were non sequiturs.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;At least the Snap links were an attempt to be useful and relevant.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Shawn Levasseur</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 10:16:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I removed Snap&amp;#8217;s previews from here</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/01/30/i-removed-snaps-previews-from-here/#comment-9669264</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Good move, Robert. I absolutely can't stand them; I never really understood why people have them.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Daniel Goldman</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 10:05:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I removed Snap&amp;#8217;s previews from here</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/01/30/i-removed-snaps-previews-from-here/#comment-9669263</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Good idea Neil...!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">paulfabretti</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 09:46:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I removed Snap&amp;#8217;s previews from here</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/01/30/i-removed-snaps-previews-from-here/#comment-9669270</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Snap has to visit these web sites to generate that preview picture.  I just wonder how long it will be until certain, less ethical, web site owners start feeding Snap a completely different page.  Then Snap preview shows clean, safe looking, ad free, page but when you visit you get a thousand ads, porn, goatse, and spyware downloads.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Neal (Again)</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 09:34:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I removed Snap&amp;#8217;s previews from here</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/01/30/i-removed-snaps-previews-from-here/#comment-9669269</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thank goodness you came around.  I saw Snap for the first time the day of your birthday post.  Within three minutes I'd bitched at you in your comments, blocked Snap via Opera, and entered Snap's servers in my hosts file for IE.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Neal</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 09:26:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I removed Snap&amp;#8217;s previews from here</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/01/30/i-removed-snaps-previews-from-here/#comment-9669259</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think I'm not as bothered with Snap as some people, only because I don't link that often.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I love it, personally.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Corinne</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 09:22:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I removed Snap&amp;#8217;s previews from here</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/01/30/i-removed-snaps-previews-from-here/#comment-9669282</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I add my thanks as well. I tend to avoid sites that employ that irritating behavior, which is what I consider the Snap preview.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Tool-tips such as the service IntelliTXT from &lt;a href="http://www.vibrantmedia.com/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.vibrantmedia.com/"&gt;http://www.vibrantmedia.com/&lt;/a&gt; (i.e., used at &lt;a href="http://www.activewin.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.activewin.com"&gt;http://www.activewin.com&lt;/a&gt; )are just as irritating.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Although it may not be the case now, but ASAP (Alliance of Security Analysis Professionals, see &lt;a href="http://asap.maddoktor2.com/charter.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://asap.maddoktor2.com/charter.html"&gt;http://asap.maddoktor2.com/...&lt;/a&gt; ) found tool-tips directed to malware installation sites. Both the MVPS Host file and IE-SPYAD list that URL of vibrantmeida.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Corrine</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 09:08:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I removed Snap&amp;#8217;s previews from here</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/01/30/i-removed-snaps-previews-from-here/#comment-9669280</link><description>&lt;p&gt;@47: John&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I can't disagree with you on the whole John, but it has some use. If on first glance, the Snapshot makes a blog look fairly good, I would probably give it a look.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Personally, the appearance of a blog says as much about the content as the content itself (although others would argue that the appearance attempts to hide a lack of quality content...like mine!!) so it is important for me to gauge credibility form looking at a preview of the page.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;That said, involuntary pop-ups died when Firefox came out so why all go back to it???&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">paulfabretti</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 08:38:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I removed Snap&amp;#8217;s previews from here</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/01/30/i-removed-snaps-previews-from-here/#comment-9669290</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks from over here too - I can't stand things like that that pop up and cover other things.  Maybe if they were transparent - but probably not.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Christina</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 07:45:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I removed Snap&amp;#8217;s previews from here</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/01/30/i-removed-snaps-previews-from-here/#comment-9669267</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I got rid of SNAP windows a couple of days ago; it's true: most readers didn't like them. I thought they were great and easier than looking a link to find a PDF or some such nonsense. But the other day, there were too many "waiting to load" windows and it started bothering me, too, so POOF! and they were gone. Suggestion to SNAP folks: there is an old JavaScript thing that lets you choose to open links on the same or a new window that you can code into a blog. They should provide a similar feature: turn SNAP off by default and let users turn it on if desired.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I'd turn it on. I like the choice. How about it?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sue</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 07:39:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I removed Snap&amp;#8217;s previews from here</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/01/30/i-removed-snaps-previews-from-here/#comment-9669276</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;Actually, a lot of the upset over Snap is jealousy. Why did I think of that!? If it didn’t have a logo, probably would be fewer complaints.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Hardly. It forced me to care about where my cursor was so I didn't accidently have some pop-up &lt;i&gt;block what I was reading&lt;/i&gt;. You're misspelling "annoyance".&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt; think Snap’s auto opt-in has a value in general, but not for what they do. Can’t say more.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;"auto" opt-in? That's um...that's what is normally called "opt-OUT". See, when you have to take action for it to STOP, that's an opt-OUT system. There's a difference.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;The service enabled me to look at blogs that with a standard text link I may not have bothered looking at.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In a bloody inch square? What, precisely, did that tell you about the link?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John C. Welch</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 07:20:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I removed Snap&amp;#8217;s previews from here</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/01/30/i-removed-snaps-previews-from-here/#comment-9669275</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I did too. I read all the comments, and I agree. So I ditched it also.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Rex&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RexDixon</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 07:16:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I removed Snap&amp;#8217;s previews from here</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/01/30/i-removed-snaps-previews-from-here/#comment-9669274</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Good move, can't see what they can do to improve it, it's just a bad idea in the first place.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Billy</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 06:28:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I removed Snap&amp;#8217;s previews from here</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/01/30/i-removed-snaps-previews-from-here/#comment-9669273</link><description>&lt;p&gt;C'mon guys, give the service a break.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;IMHO, anyone NOT liking it is not understanding the true meaning of being a blogger. Blogging is as much about posting information as it is linking to other sources (no need to tell Robert about THAT one!).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The service enabled me to look at blogs that with a standard text link I may not have bothered looking at.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Maybe the execution could be improved? How about a "Snap Certified Blog" icon which demonstrates to users that by hovering over the link for a period of time would trigger the link window? Can the code be set to pop open the window after a LONGER period of time?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Great idea and particularly relevant to the linking theme of the last few days. Anything that encourages people to respect the content of others by linking is a good thing for me.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">paulfabretti</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 05:49:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I removed Snap&amp;#8217;s previews from here</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/01/30/i-removed-snaps-previews-from-here/#comment-9669277</link><description>&lt;p&gt;THANK YOU!  Interesting service but terrible implementation.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Michael Specht</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 04:20:28 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>