<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Scobleizer - Latest Comments in I didn&amp;#8217;t know about Tech Crunch&amp;#8217;s new conference until today&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://scobleizer.disqus.com/</link><description>Tech enthusiast, video blogger, media innovator, fanatical about startups at Rackspace, home of fanatical support for Internet entrepreneurs.</description><atom:link href="https://scobleizer.disqus.com/i_didn8217t_know_about_tech_crunch8217s_new_conference_until_today8230/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2007 01:36:55 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: I didn&amp;#8217;t know about Tech Crunch&amp;#8217;s new conference until today&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/01/31/i-didnt-know-about-tech-crunchs-new-conference-until-today/#comment-9669580</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Fuck, scoble.  Not only are you a loser but you look up to losers as well.  Mike?  Sam?  Seesh!  Fuckin' clowns the whole lot of them - praying to be acquired by a newspaper.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2007 01:36:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I didn&amp;#8217;t know about Tech Crunch&amp;#8217;s new conference until today&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/01/31/i-didnt-know-about-tech-crunchs-new-conference-until-today/#comment-9669583</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"Ethical Lapse" - look who's saying. Mike - of all the things, ethical lapse sounds so funny when you say it :=) we all know why you fired him.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">shashark</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 04 Feb 2007 17:47:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I didn&amp;#8217;t know about Tech Crunch&amp;#8217;s new conference until today&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/01/31/i-didnt-know-about-tech-crunchs-new-conference-until-today/#comment-9669578</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Right. Translation -- I wasn't really on the advisory board until the conference was already announced so the advisory board is probably not going to really drive the direction of the conference but just be there to pick cool companies.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Robert Scoble</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2007 11:56:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I didn&amp;#8217;t know about Tech Crunch&amp;#8217;s new conference until today&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/01/31/i-didnt-know-about-tech-crunchs-new-conference-until-today/#comment-9669579</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"if Mike had advised me, I would have asked him to"&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I think you mean, "if Mike had asked me for advice".&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dan Guy</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2007 11:53:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I didn&amp;#8217;t know about Tech Crunch&amp;#8217;s new conference until today&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/01/31/i-didnt-know-about-tech-crunchs-new-conference-until-today/#comment-9669582</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think that bloggers, because of the openness of this medium, are often too quick to make EVERYthing public.  Private conversations are not inherently a bad thing and are often preferable and called for, seems to me.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dawn Douglass</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 17:16:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I didn&amp;#8217;t know about Tech Crunch&amp;#8217;s new conference until today&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/01/31/i-didnt-know-about-tech-crunchs-new-conference-until-today/#comment-9669581</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Somehow it feels nicer when Paris Hilton does it :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">met</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 15:38:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I didn&amp;#8217;t know about Tech Crunch&amp;#8217;s new conference until today&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/01/31/i-didnt-know-about-tech-crunchs-new-conference-until-today/#comment-9669584</link><description>&lt;p&gt;What Shelley wrote. I am getting tired of all the tits and tats on the blogosphere. On second thought, I am not tired of tits yet. Just drop the tats, please.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Don Park</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 13:48:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I didn&amp;#8217;t know about Tech Crunch&amp;#8217;s new conference until today&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/01/31/i-didnt-know-about-tech-crunchs-new-conference-until-today/#comment-9669585</link><description>&lt;p&gt;At some point, you all are just going to link to yourselves and your audience will be yourself. The worst attention is not attention at all, eh? Talk radio went through this as well. I stopped listening to radio and use my iPod now.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nathan</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 11:37:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I didn&amp;#8217;t know about Tech Crunch&amp;#8217;s new conference until today&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/01/31/i-didnt-know-about-tech-crunchs-new-conference-until-today/#comment-9669586</link><description>&lt;p&gt;One thing I do not get from 'traditional' journalism is the constant bickering of who said what and who's linked to whom. I guess you have to filter that stuff on your own. I appreciate scobleizer for its links to cool stuff I would otherwise not have discovered, but quite frankly when I read a heading about 'who said what' I might was well go back to &lt;a href="http://PC.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="PC.com"&gt;PC.com&lt;/a&gt; or other. I really would rather not see how the sausage is made, thank you. Keep up the other good work.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nathan</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 11:33:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I didn&amp;#8217;t know about Tech Crunch&amp;#8217;s new conference until today&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/01/31/i-didnt-know-about-tech-crunchs-new-conference-until-today/#comment-9669588</link><description>&lt;p&gt;@ 13: John...I don't REALLY think that Michael will have posted something he would likely be able to tell Robert himself! Note how whoever DID write it didn't link to anything.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;@ 14: Paul...no, but the point is that money is the currency of credibility at the moment - if you have the money to get to this stage: either someone is already funding you because THEY think it is a good idea or you are so confident that it IS a good idea, that you will gladly fund it yourself.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">paulfabretti</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 10:09:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I didn&amp;#8217;t know about Tech Crunch&amp;#8217;s new conference until today&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/01/31/i-didnt-know-about-tech-crunchs-new-conference-until-today/#comment-9669590</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Are the Hotest new start ups the ones who pay the most?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">paul</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 09:45:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I didn&amp;#8217;t know about Tech Crunch&amp;#8217;s new conference until today&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/01/31/i-didnt-know-about-tech-crunchs-new-conference-until-today/#comment-9669589</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Robert, I made the same comment as Ivan above when I saw the post on Techcrunch.  It's astonishing to read Mike's comment above "you’ll understand how this is a completely different situation."  Does he mean because he's not close friends with the Demo organisers, then its ok to operate in this manner?  He certainly appears to be both trashing a competitor whilst promoting his own event.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wilson</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 08:33:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I didn&amp;#8217;t know about Tech Crunch&amp;#8217;s new conference until today&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/01/31/i-didnt-know-about-tech-crunchs-new-conference-until-today/#comment-9669587</link><description>&lt;p&gt;wooooo...out come the claws Scoble. Dare one say: CAT FIGHT! :-)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Duncan</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 07:09:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I didn&amp;#8217;t know about Tech Crunch&amp;#8217;s new conference until today&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/01/31/i-didnt-know-about-tech-crunchs-new-conference-until-today/#comment-9669591</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Here's Mike, launching a competing event while at DEMO. You judge whether this is trashing a competitor while launching your own event:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;"Many tech conferences today allow startups to pitch ... although there is almost always a hefty fee involved that ranges from thousands to tens of thousands of dollars. DEMO, where I am currently, is probably the quintessential example of this model. The entire conference is paid startup demos. There are way too many to digest—60—and it is a well known secret that if you are willing to pay the $15,000+ fee, your startup will really need to suck to be turned down ... I’m not sure the startups or attendees attending get much out of it other than a great networking event. There are too many startups for press to give even passing coverage to many of them, and attendees are lost in a sea of pitches that all begin to blur together ... there is a serious conflict of interest at the conference level ... Attendees don’t know if they’re really seeing the best startups, or just the best startups that are willing to pay the exorbitant participation fee. A few (or a lot of) duds always make their way in."&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Here's Mike on firing Sam Sethi: "“This is driven entirely from Sam’s ethical lapse in trashing a competitor while simultaneously promoting his own events.”&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Sheesh.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ivan</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 06:37:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I didn&amp;#8217;t know about Tech Crunch&amp;#8217;s new conference until today&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/01/31/i-didnt-know-about-tech-crunchs-new-conference-until-today/#comment-9669594</link><description>&lt;p&gt;SV has its 'politics' and 'drama' as anywhere else.  But lets put aside differences and look at the big picture here...these conferences are about the entrepreneurs and finding SV's newest talent.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It's not about x guy trying to outdo y guy or disrespecting him in anyway...it's really not about x and y guys at all.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;*'You're so vain' song pops into her head*&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Michelle</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 03:03:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I didn&amp;#8217;t know about Tech Crunch&amp;#8217;s new conference until today&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/01/31/i-didnt-know-about-tech-crunchs-new-conference-until-today/#comment-9669596</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This is super-great :-D having two conferences -&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;one is for those brilliant startups that are relatively more financed ...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;One is for those brilliant startups that have very little capitol ...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;But, Brilliance is Brillance&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Web 2.0 is about information sharing - politics is for those traditional, old business models&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Most of these Start-ups are also offering  optional FREE version of their services - so everyone benefits by knowing about them.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Lets take the politics&lt;b&gt; OUT &lt;/b&gt;of Web 2.0&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">searchengines</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 01:30:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I didn&amp;#8217;t know about Tech Crunch&amp;#8217;s new conference until today&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/01/31/i-didnt-know-about-tech-crunchs-new-conference-until-today/#comment-9669595</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Oh good god, people, get a life. You all have so damn much, and all you do is spend all of your time whining and bitching--at each other, about what you want to buy, about where you want to be invited, who likes you, who doesn't.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;There's a word, dignity. Try it some time.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Shelley Powers</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 01:10:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I didn&amp;#8217;t know about Tech Crunch&amp;#8217;s new conference until today&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/01/31/i-didnt-know-about-tech-crunchs-new-conference-until-today/#comment-9669593</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Robert, when we spoke it was before I saw this post. I think you misunderstand the Sethi situation and I think you misunderstand my position on Demo. I've spent the evening writing up the top 10 or so startups I saw here, which isn't exactly saying it's worthless. As someone who was so recently judged, I find it odd that you judge me so harshly, without knowing the facts. I hope that after the next time we talk you'll understand how this is a completely different situation.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Michael Arrington</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 01:05:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I didn&amp;#8217;t know about Tech Crunch&amp;#8217;s new conference until today&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/01/31/i-didnt-know-about-tech-crunchs-new-conference-until-today/#comment-9669592</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yawn!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">LayZ</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 00:53:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I didn&amp;#8217;t know about Tech Crunch&amp;#8217;s new conference until today&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/01/31/i-didnt-know-about-tech-crunchs-new-conference-until-today/#comment-9669599</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Paul: I'm still honored to be invited to be an advisor to TechCrunch's party. But, my friend did have a point that I thought was worth saying publicly. And I told Mike this to his face in the hall tonight.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I used to run conferences and if someone announced a new conference that competed with mine while running around the hall inside mine, I'd be pissed.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Part of having a conversation online about marketplaces and such is getting everything out on the table so we can discuss it openly and move on.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Mike made a big deal about his employee announcing an event while at a competitive conference. That deserves to be discussed and I needed to explain that I was uncomfortable with that.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Robert Scoble</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 23:16:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I didn&amp;#8217;t know about Tech Crunch&amp;#8217;s new conference until today&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/01/31/i-didnt-know-about-tech-crunchs-new-conference-until-today/#comment-9669598</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Seriously Robert ...  I don't know how you put up with all this stuff - my though |  ignore it.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;All I can add is that we appreciate our blog for your (Roberts) opinions.  The soap opera stuff (well said Tris) is for the rest.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Colin</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 23:01:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I didn&amp;#8217;t know about Tech Crunch&amp;#8217;s new conference until today&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/01/31/i-didnt-know-about-tech-crunchs-new-conference-until-today/#comment-9669600</link><description>&lt;p&gt;man, earlier @3pm scoble would be honored&lt;br&gt;and now @6pm "it seemed fairly tactless"&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;set's a new record for half-life to flip-flop&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">paul</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 22:42:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I didn&amp;#8217;t know about Tech Crunch&amp;#8217;s new conference until today&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/01/31/i-didnt-know-about-tech-crunchs-new-conference-until-today/#comment-9669601</link><description>&lt;p&gt;didn't arrington launch your book at his house? didn't he support you last week when you were getting hit by everyone else? nice way to show support. all he did was announce a conference.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 22:16:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I didn&amp;#8217;t know about Tech Crunch&amp;#8217;s new conference until today&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/01/31/i-didnt-know-about-tech-crunchs-new-conference-until-today/#comment-9669602</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Man we bloggers should get a soap opera ... As the blogosphere turns ... Days of my blog ...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I've been reading J&amp;amp;M being compared to Steve Jobs with the iPhone announcement during CES.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tris Hussey</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 20:59:52 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>