<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Scobleizer - Latest Comments in I&amp;#8217;m writing for Fast Company magazine</title><link>http://scobleizer.disqus.com/</link><description>Tech enthusiast, video blogger, media innovator, fanatical about startups at Rackspace, home of fanatical support for Internet entrepreneurs.</description><atom:link href="https://scobleizer.disqus.com/i8217m_writing_for_fast_company_magazine/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 10:20:58 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: I&amp;#8217;m writing for Fast Company magazine</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/04/24/im-writing-for-fast-company-magazine/#comment-9676996</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Speaking on seo traffic, do not consider redzee as a source of viable click through. We did a campaign with them and all the traffic never went past the first page. I think they are doing some shady stuff. We own a printing company, AREA Printing &amp;amp; Design &lt;a href="http://www.areaprinting.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.areaprinting.com"&gt;http://www.areaprinting.com&lt;/a&gt; and we have instant online chat, none of the clicks ever requested a chat session. It was a waste of money.&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.areaprinting.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.areaprinting.com"&gt;printing&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Neal Sumlin</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 10:20:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I&amp;#8217;m writing for Fast Company magazine</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/04/24/im-writing-for-fast-company-magazine/#comment-9676960</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Tnanks for demonstrating my point, Robert.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Podesta</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2007 18:43:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I&amp;#8217;m writing for Fast Company magazine</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/04/24/im-writing-for-fast-company-magazine/#comment-9676962</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Congrats Robert. I own a few restaurants in the Bay Area and we use google adwords to bring new customers to our restaurants. In particular, our restaurant&lt;br&gt;First Crush which is located close to union square gets  a lot of tourist business and corporate events. Google Adwords has been extremely effective in getting our brand out to people all across the country with minimal expense. We obviously can't take ads out in publications all across the country so google adwords is the perfect way for us to reach millions of people all across the country.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Shahram Bijan</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2007 18:29:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I&amp;#8217;m writing for Fast Company magazine</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/04/24/im-writing-for-fast-company-magazine/#comment-9676963</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Congratulations Robert!  I think AdSense would be worth highlighting.  It allows sites like mine (&lt;a href="http://www.mongabay.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.mongabay.com"&gt;mongabay.com&lt;/a&gt;) to monetize extreme niche content without having to line up direct advertisers, a time-consuming process.  I can spend all my time working on content, not ad management systems or sales.  Further, because the ads are so targeted, they can even be a useful to readers as a form of supplementary content, something you can't often say about conventional advertising.  AdSense have really opened up a new set of possibilities.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rhett</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2007 16:01:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I&amp;#8217;m writing for Fast Company magazine</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/04/24/im-writing-for-fast-company-magazine/#comment-9676990</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Congrats - who said we can't live with a little print too?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jennifer Fader</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 29 Apr 2007 04:42:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I&amp;#8217;m writing for Fast Company magazine</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/04/24/im-writing-for-fast-company-magazine/#comment-9676961</link><description>&lt;p&gt;hello all,&lt;br&gt;three quick points, over and above a big welcome to Robert to the FC blogsquad:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;1. Our circulation is actually more than 750,000 (not that we're counting!)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;2. Re: Mr Coulter's assessment that FC is nothing but "hype, wheeling in suckers...every single article reads like something from 1998." i gotta say, you haven't been reading the magazine for a while.  feel free to contact me if you'd like a virtual tour.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;3. grammar aside, when you get right down to it, FC is a "they [us]", not an "it." all are welcome to join in.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">willbourne</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 13:48:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I&amp;#8217;m writing for Fast Company magazine</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/04/24/im-writing-for-fast-company-magazine/#comment-9676964</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Ivan’s post from above; "No, surely not. He uses ads to get new customers? Now, why didn’t I think of that? Stunning."&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;What is stunning is how Google Adwords allows us to know exactly what we will pay for each new customer, what they will spend on their first order with us, how long they will stick around, and how many friends they will refer to us once they place their first order with &lt;a href="http://PrintingForLess.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="PrintingForLess.com"&gt;PrintingForLess.com&lt;/a&gt;. Our marketing team uses our own database and reporting tools in conjunction with Google's Adwords reporting to understand what type of return we can expect from each dollar spent on Google search advertising.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Google’s Adwords program is great right now, but I think that we’ll see its effectiveness wane in coming years as people become increasingly skeptical of marketers and interruptive advertising. Where Google really has the power to drive someone’s business is through their natural search results.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Google the word “Robert.” Look who’s #1 (That’s pretty cool!)&lt;br&gt;Google “brochure printing.” Look who’s #1. This is where &lt;a href="http://PrintingForLess.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="PrintingForLess.com"&gt;PrintingForLess.com&lt;/a&gt; really benefits from Google. (Disclaimer: No SEO tricks used.)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I'm looking forward to seeing your new column.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Nick Runyon&lt;br&gt;Director of Marketing at &lt;a href="http://www.PrintingForLess.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="www.PrintingForLess.com"&gt;www.PrintingForLess.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nick Runyon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 18:32:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I&amp;#8217;m writing for Fast Company magazine</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/04/24/im-writing-for-fast-company-magazine/#comment-9676967</link><description>&lt;p&gt;oops&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.infoworld.com/article/07/04/17/HNgooglecalendardata_1.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.infoworld.com/article/07/04/17/HNgooglecalendardata_1.html"&gt;http://www.infoworld.com/ar...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">LayZ</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 12:08:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I&amp;#8217;m writing for Fast Company magazine</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/04/24/im-writing-for-fast-company-magazine/#comment-9676968</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Well, it looks like it might change the way McKinsey does business  he he&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="ttp://www.infoworld.com/article/07/04/17/HNgooglecalendardata_1.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="ttp://www.infoworld.com/article/07/04/17/HNgooglecalendardata_1.html"&gt;ttp://www.infoworld.com/art...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">LayZ</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 12:07:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I&amp;#8217;m writing for Fast Company magazine</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/04/24/im-writing-for-fast-company-magazine/#comment-9676971</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Congratulations, Robert.  I like Fast Company.  Great fit for you.  I'll look forward to reading your column.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dawn Douglass</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 09:42:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I&amp;#8217;m writing for Fast Company magazine</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/04/24/im-writing-for-fast-company-magazine/#comment-9676985</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Congrats, Robert! That's pretty cool.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Also, I want to print this thread out and stick it to the wall of my office at Google. It makes me that happy. :) gwhiz, sarah, and francine hardaway in particular, thanks for making my day.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Matt Cutts</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 01:59:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I&amp;#8217;m writing for Fast Company magazine</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/04/24/im-writing-for-fast-company-magazine/#comment-9676965</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Podesta: Fast Company is an "it" not a "they."&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Now, if you're talking about the editor who hired me, well, it's still not a "they."&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I thought you could write...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Robert Scoble</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 20:39:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I&amp;#8217;m writing for Fast Company magazine</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/04/24/im-writing-for-fast-company-magazine/#comment-9676966</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think they should have held out for someone who can actually write.   Maybe David Pogue is too busy to write for Fast Company or has heard bad things about it.  Still, Fast Company could do much better than you, Robert.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Podesta</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 20:35:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I&amp;#8217;m writing for Fast Company magazine</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/04/24/im-writing-for-fast-company-magazine/#comment-9676973</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Our company has seen tremendous growth through both organic and paid listings on Google.  In a traditionally less than technologically savvy industry, bolt manufacturing, we have been able to easily connect with new customer all over the world. Google's vast reach allows us to quickly communicate in a way we would have never imagined two years ago.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I look forward to seeing you in Fast Company.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Adam Oakley</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 16:09:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I&amp;#8217;m writing for Fast Company magazine</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/04/24/im-writing-for-fast-company-magazine/#comment-9676992</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I've gone to Google for all my desktop apps, because I live in two places and work on multiple computers.  I can see everything from anywhere.  But more important, I work with a not for profit and we are thinking of implementing an entire Google social media platform for its community, which is health policy oriented.  Stay tuned.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">francine hardaway</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 15:21:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I&amp;#8217;m writing for Fast Company magazine</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/04/24/im-writing-for-fast-company-magazine/#comment-9676995</link><description>&lt;p&gt;We are using Google Earth to help provide better service to citizens of San Jose with out spending any tax payer money on developing our own on-line air photo viewer.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Check it out.  Google Earth rocks!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.sanjoseca.gov/planning/data/google/default.asp" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.sanjoseca.gov/planning/data/google/default.asp"&gt;http://www.sanjoseca.gov/pl...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Greg Rose</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 14:54:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I&amp;#8217;m writing for Fast Company magazine</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/04/24/im-writing-for-fast-company-magazine/#comment-9676970</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thats great!&lt;br&gt;re: "Fast Company has 700,000 circulation, which will bring a whole new audience to my blog."&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Fast Company will also see a huge increase in circulation, no doubt. Good luck!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sameer</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 14:42:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I&amp;#8217;m writing for Fast Company magazine</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/04/24/im-writing-for-fast-company-magazine/#comment-9676984</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I work for a small, 80 year old, family business that happens to be one of the big 2 or 3 in our space online - &lt;a href="http://nutsonline.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="nutsonline.com"&gt;nutsonline.com&lt;/a&gt;. Obviously a huge piece of our success id thanks to Google AW, and organic Google search, but what's espeically interesting is how a little company like us gets taken seriously by a big company like Google. We've been invited to join their PPA trial - not because we're a fancy giant brand, but because we're a small, important, long tail era brand that does  huge business, quietly. This is an important piece of the story - that it's not all about the Amazons, etc, that can own all the top keywords.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">sarah</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 13:57:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I&amp;#8217;m writing for Fast Company magazine</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/04/24/im-writing-for-fast-company-magazine/#comment-9676989</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Again, I'm confused. I thought you said print was dead.  Or is it only dead when you can't get exposure from it?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I mean why in the world would you do something for a product you admit you don't consume?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://scobleizer.com/2006/09/05/stuff-printed-on-dead-trees-whats-that/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://scobleizer.com/2006/09/05/stuff-printed-on-dead-trees-whats-that/"&gt;http://scobleizer.com/2006/...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;sell out much?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">LayZ</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 12:02:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I&amp;#8217;m writing for Fast Company magazine</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/04/24/im-writing-for-fast-company-magazine/#comment-9676991</link><description>&lt;p&gt;From my perspective, Google has set a standard for speed and results that our employees now expect from our own internal IT resources.  Our stuff gets compared to theirs all the time.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Paul Roundy</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 11:33:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I&amp;#8217;m writing for Fast Company magazine</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/04/24/im-writing-for-fast-company-magazine/#comment-9676983</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Before google I had piles of books on or around my desk, to name a few: 'DirectX in 24 hours', 'Advanced Graphics Programming for Windows', 'Programmer's Guide to Windows 95'. Costs a fortune and takes up a lot of space. I hardly buy any books now and thanks to google have the equivalent of an entire library at my disposal. For free!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;So without Google, I doubt I would have build programs like CastBlaster, WinPodder, VidBlaster or StudioRack :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mike</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 11:22:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I&amp;#8217;m writing for Fast Company magazine</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/04/24/im-writing-for-fast-company-magazine/#comment-9676972</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Congrats Robert! I also subscribe to Fast Company and think it is a great mag, which will only be better with your articles!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Michael Bazzoni</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 11:07:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I&amp;#8217;m writing for Fast Company magazine</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/04/24/im-writing-for-fast-company-magazine/#comment-9676974</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Way to go! Congrats!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Rex&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rex Dixon</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 10:52:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I&amp;#8217;m writing for Fast Company magazine</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/04/24/im-writing-for-fast-company-magazine/#comment-9676975</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Wow, this is great!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jeremiah Owyang</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 10:47:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I&amp;#8217;m writing for Fast Company magazine</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/04/24/im-writing-for-fast-company-magazine/#comment-9676976</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Google Scholar and Google Books are both 'highest priority' for the publisher I'm working for. Once we're in those programs two things are expected to happen: 1) our reach and sales opportunities goes WAY wider than present 2) our revenue increases. AdWords also worked well for us in trial. We'll hire a pro to help us improve performance there though.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Also, for a fellow I met on the plane LAX to DEN using Google Checkout is going to be another (maybe bigger) way for him to sell his packaged picante sauce spices (add your own tomato). A little "Google Base" will go a LONG way for him.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The thing about Google though... you never know when a beta program (like Scholar or Base or Froogle) might be discontinued... Regardless, for the right products it's a wild ride while it lasts (kinda like getting Digg'd, TechMem'd, SlashDott'd, etc)... people need to remember to diversify their channels and not become too dependent on a handfull. Battelle's cites a couple of interesting bugaboo's in his book where erosion of positioning in the Google Search results terribly impacted a certain company (shoes or window blinds?... can't recall). Anyway, pays to have a belts-and-suspenders approach to this stuff.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">gwhiz</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 10:46:44 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>