<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Scobleizer - Latest Comments in Hoax</title><link>http://scobleizer.disqus.com/</link><description>Tech enthusiast, video blogger, media innovator, fanatical about startups at Rackspace, home of fanatical support for Internet entrepreneurs.</description><atom:link href="https://scobleizer.disqus.com/hoax/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2007 17:50:17 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Hoax</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/04/12/technology-evangelist-to-take-over-for-imus/#comment-9675901</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Dear John,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Have bridge steel available.  Last used to span lowlands (also avaiable).  May be used to reconnect reason to reality.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Also have brother-in-law able to transport same at reasonible rate.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Lemme'kno Bubba&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Hue Mann</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2007 17:50:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hoax</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/04/12/technology-evangelist-to-take-over-for-imus/#comment-9675896</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;"Sigh. They got me to bite hook, line, and sinker. Got to be more skeptical. I hate these things too. It’s one thing to do it on April 1. A whole nother thing to do it on April 11."&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Robert, &lt;em&gt;every&lt;/em&gt; day is April Fools Day!  :)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;(Seriously, as web readers we need to be &lt;a href="http://www.google.com/search?hq=%22salinger+syndrome%22" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.google.com/search?hq=%22salinger+syndrome%22"&gt;skeptical&lt;/a&gt;, because some out there &lt;em&gt;are&lt;/em&gt; trying to influence us.)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;jd&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Dowdell</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2007 15:57:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hoax</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/04/12/technology-evangelist-to-take-over-for-imus/#comment-9675898</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Roscoe: yes, there are lots of examples of hoaxes I didn't fall for. But, what's your point?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Robert Scoble</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2007 14:29:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hoax</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/04/12/technology-evangelist-to-take-over-for-imus/#comment-9675902</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Has there ever been a hoax you didn't fall for, Scoble?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Roscoe</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2007 14:11:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hoax</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/04/12/technology-evangelist-to-take-over-for-imus/#comment-9675903</link><description>&lt;p&gt;For a discussion on this topic: I posted audio interviews with Ed Kohler and Scoble on my blog, wavLength.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://minnesota.publicradio.org/collections/special/columns/wavlength/archive/2007/04/podcaster_pulls_hoax_claims_he.shtml" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://minnesota.publicradio.org/collections/special/columns/wavlength/archive/2007/04/podcaster_pulls_hoax_claims_he.shtml"&gt;http://minnesota.publicradi...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It may also be the subject of my public radio show, Future Tense, on Monday.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jon Gordon - MPR News</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2007 13:42:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hoax</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/04/12/technology-evangelist-to-take-over-for-imus/#comment-9675893</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Ed: true, I was a bit skeptical. Sounded a bit like too much of a move up in the world. Now, if they called on Leo, THAT I would believe! :-)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Robert Scoble</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2007 13:30:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hoax</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/04/12/technology-evangelist-to-take-over-for-imus/#comment-9675905</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Robert, it seemed like you were at least a bit skeptical since you included a question mark in the headline of your post. April the 13th would be WAY too late for something like this, but the 12th with a hint that it's 11 days late? Sure.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ed Kohler</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2007 13:01:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hoax</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/04/12/technology-evangelist-to-take-over-for-imus/#comment-9675899</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm not enjoying some of the pre/post April Fools stuff.  Tech news is hard enough to follow when it's reliable.  I can handle the April 1 stuff but this was ridiculous - blogs have enough credibility problems as it is, we don't need to spend time second guessing every story.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">JoeDuck</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2007 12:48:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hoax</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/04/12/technology-evangelist-to-take-over-for-imus/#comment-9675906</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Sigh, and bloggers wonder why they aren't considered credible. Newsflash to Ed-April Fools jokes aren't that amusing on the net anyways-11 days later doesn't even qualify, except as trolling at the expense of credibility. Congrats on all the extra hits at Robert's expense though, I guess.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Se7en</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2007 12:24:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hoax</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/04/12/technology-evangelist-to-take-over-for-imus/#comment-9675889</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Don't feel bad. I woke up to this, and wrote the congrats post, only to have to quickly retract it with a "we have all been fooled" post.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I will agree that April 12th is a bit late for an April Fool's joke. Personally speaking, I think the holiday/event is a stupid one.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Rex&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rex Dixon</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2007 12:17:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hoax</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/04/12/technology-evangelist-to-take-over-for-imus/#comment-9675888</link><description>&lt;p&gt;John, good point. I changed my links to nofollows.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Robert Scoble</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2007 12:13:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hoax</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/04/12/technology-evangelist-to-take-over-for-imus/#comment-9675891</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Obviously this joke was done for extra inbound links by leveraging the hoopla surrounding Imus. That's pretty shady if you ask me.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Scoble - You should go back and edit your article and change links to his site to all rel="nofollow" links and ask all others who wrote about this story to do so as well.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;His site may already have decent PageRank, but he doesn't deserve any more from you. One should earn PageRank, not scam others to get it.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Caruso</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2007 12:07:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hoax</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/04/12/technology-evangelist-to-take-over-for-imus/#comment-9675890</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Sigh. They got me to bite hook, line, and sinker. Got to be more skeptical. I hate these things too. It's one thing to do it on April 1. A whole nother thing to do it on April 11.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Robert Scoble</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2007 12:05:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hoax</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/04/12/technology-evangelist-to-take-over-for-imus/#comment-9675892</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You got it, Marie.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ed Kohler</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2007 11:37:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hoax</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/04/12/technology-evangelist-to-take-over-for-imus/#comment-9675897</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This is a 11 day old april fools joke.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">T3k</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2007 10:03:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hoax</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/04/12/technology-evangelist-to-take-over-for-imus/#comment-9675894</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Robert I think this is a joke--a delayed April 1st spoof. There is no way CBS would shift this audience in this way. Gosh when will spoofs and parodies end. We need to be more discerning. LOL&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Marie Germain</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2007 09:34:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hoax</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/04/12/technology-evangelist-to-take-over-for-imus/#comment-9675895</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Just what I needed -- another reason to hate April Fool's Day. Please note the sentence at the end of the blog entry where he mentions that he's running 11 days behind. . .&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Augie De Blieck Jr.</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2007 08:48:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hoax</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/04/12/technology-evangelist-to-take-over-for-imus/#comment-9675900</link><description>&lt;p&gt;LayZ: I agree with you there. It's just interesting to me that a videoblogger got picked to be a substitute.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Robert Scoble</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2007 01:21:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hoax</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/04/12/technology-evangelist-to-take-over-for-imus/#comment-9675907</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Clearly a stop gap, like the link says.  "until a permanent replacement is found".  CBS needs to fill the  time with something. But NO WAY this carries an adequate audience for Imus' time slot, or makes up the $15MM in lost advertising and syndication revenue CBS will realize by their over-reaction in firing Imus. Clearly that went with a knee-jerk reaction given they didn't have an adequate replacement lined up.  A more likely long term replacement could be "Mike and Mad Dog" given that WFAN is a sports-talk station. No way a tech show lasts in that time slot on that station.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">LayZ</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2007 01:18:42 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>