-
Website
http://www.scobleizer.com/ -
Original page
http://scobleizer.com/2006/09/20/hello-from-a-taxi-in-chicago-mary-jo-leaves-ziff/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
danja
44 comments · 4 points
-
polizeros
52 comments · 1 points
-
AndyBeard
69 comments · 4 points
-
Zachary Adam Cohen
35 comments · 8 points
-
dbarefoot
40 comments · 3 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
World-brand-building mistakes France’s entrepreneurs make
2 weeks ago · 181 comments
-
The best and worst thing Twitter did in 2009: RT
3 days ago · 24 comments
-
2010: the year SEO isn’t important anymore
1 week ago · 67 comments
-
iPhone developers abandoning app model for HTML5?
1 week ago · 52 comments
-
A new addition here: the Meebo bar
2 days ago · 8 comments
-
World-brand-building mistakes France’s entrepreneurs make
http://c9park.wordpress.com/2006/09/20/taxi-niner/
"Yep, this is my new gig. No more Microsoft-Watch for this Microsoft watcher. I decided it was time to move to a place that reflects my opinion that blogging is the future of journalism."
I hope that this isn't the start of another secretive CNet/Ziff cutback, although last time I looked into it they had some bad timing issues on new office space and furnitture right at the start of the dot-com thingy in 2000. Maybe Yahoo isn't the only one affected by lower ad revenue eh?
What, you think it's her job to say "oh, sorry, those are internal docs so I'm not going to use them?" Not in my world of journalism, sorry.
Et tu Robert, et tu. What you described is a parrot, or perhaps more accurately a fax machine. A reporter doesn't just blindly report all news they get. One that's worth the name actually verifies things of that nature, because they know that just because they say "internal documents" doesn't mean they really are.
You need to stop confusing "first" with "correct" and "parrot" with "reporter". A good reporter knows that difference, and will sacrifice first for correct, or even sit on a story until they are sure about their facts.
Journalism has nothing to do with medium and everything to do with content. You can be a journalist in a blog, a newspaper, a magazine, radio, TV, carrier pidgeon, drum relay, telegraph or smoke signal. It is the quality of the content that makes the producer of said content a journalist. Mary Jo, based on Robert's description, is a journalist. Dave Winer is not, yet both have blogs.
A blogger is no more automatically a journalist or not than some dude cranking out underground newspaper. Just because you get your stuff in (medium), that doesn't make you a journalist.
A journalist doesn't have to be a blogger.
Journalism is just the act of recording facts, stories, opinions, and passing them on. Sometimes I play a journalist here, sometimes I don't. But the laws that apply to journalists should apply to all bloggers.
Also, Mary Jo is now an independent editorial talent. We just are lucky enough to have partnered with her so she's blogging exclusively on ZDNet.
It's a standard comment-troll game. Go find someone else to play with, I already stated my point here, and I'm comfortable to let it stand.