-
Website
http://www.scobleizer.com/ -
Original page
http://scobleizer.com/2008/07/22/why-tech-blogging-has-failed-you/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
danja
44 comments · 4 points
-
polizeros
52 comments · 1 points
-
AndyBeard
68 comments · 4 points
-
ojbyrne
27 comments · 1 points
-
webomatica
22 comments · 5 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
Why Google Chrome OS has already won
6 days ago · 145 comments
-
Twitter to turn on advertising “you will love” (here’s how: SuperTweet)
6 days ago · 132 comments
-
More thoughts on in-Tweet advertising
5 days ago · 90 comments
-
The Droid fails AS A PRODUCT when compared to Palm Pre and iPhone
2 weeks ago · 379 comments
-
I was wrong about full-text feeds
3 days ago · 37 comments
-
Why Google Chrome OS has already won
Negative comments and online fights are no fun to read.
Twitter once a great communications now more more people add just a feed to their profile and are just sending, not responding to questions. PR Twitter feeds.
It is all part of the growing up pains of this web 2.0 area.
Curious to see where this is going.
This is especially the case when you blog about generak IT stuff, new products and services from the Big Boys, such as Microsoft, Yahoo, Google, IBM etc.
However, I think there IS value in blogging about niche markets or have a blog that specialises in a certain aspect of IT.
I have a news blog about FreeBSD and operating systems based on FreeBSD (www.freebsdnews.net) with a relatively small audience, but because it's small you get a chance to report news first, there's less competition and you have a more personal relationship with a a number of your readers
I agree that tech blogging is difficult to attract attention. The blog needs to have something "extra" in order to be able to compete with TechCrunch, Mashable, Ars Technica etc. This is especially the case when you blog about IT in general, new products and services from the Big Boys, such as Microsoft, Yahoo, Apple,Google, IBM et.
However, I think there IS value in blogging about niche markets or specialising into a certain aspects/niches of technology
I have a blog about FreeBSD and operating systems based on FreeBSD (www.freebsdnews.net) with a relatively small audience, but because it's small you get a chance to report news first and to have a more personal relationship with readers.
The average Joe or the average Joel?
And as you said, there are so many channels today that you can leverage, that it doesnt have to be 'OR'..
And if tech blogging has really 'failed', i dont think it'd be around and kicking as much.
One blog I do enjoy is Bob Warfield's smoothspan.wordpress.com
Incisive, opinionated writing. Not just news and links.
Working outside of the US, I have never seen the value of TechCrunch et al. I may as well wait and read the business pages in the Sunday newspaper as deals by giant west-coast companies have little urgency in my life.
BTW I'm a tech blogger that still uses Windows 2000, I just never saw the need to upgrade. I also use a five year-old iBook G4 because it's cheap and still works beautifully.
If on the other hand the readership shows its HOT interest on other things, let us say Google Friend Connect vs FB f8 then bloggers wouldn't make so much fuss about Microhoo and would focus on the above mentioned.
Do I sound naive? Maybe...and maybe not.
And if folks reply to your question "What blogs are doing the best tech blogging?" I'd appreciate seeing the list.
Cheers,
Bob Gourley
http://ctovision.com
So, blogging did fail, but did not become irrelevant. It just needs to be put in sync with mechanisms that allow us who's delivering the goods or not. You can't go wrong with the wisdom of crowds.
Techcrunch overcame the business focus - by creating TechCrunch IT and smaller vertical sites that CrunchGear.
Only a large blog could accomplish this and be successful - but it shows that there is an avenue for those who do not want to abandon tech for business.
Mashable too, is managing to keep some of their tech roots while focusing on the necessary business stories to survive
Great post! It circles a lot of the sentiment that's been bounced around by Fred Wilson and others around the importance of blogging (I did a little comment on it on my new blog).
One suggestion I had, which I'm also planning to do, is to link your blog comments with FriendFeed's -- I believe there's a plugin or something. I think this is the real, active, fun crowd that can give you that sense of thrill about technology (I know I do, every day, reading my FriendFeed).
Keep up that child-wonder feeling!
I feel the same way.
It would be easy for me to turn my blog into a PR machine to try and promote my investments 24x7.
But that wouldn't work for me and why work-related posts are the minority of my posts.
The part that really struck a chord with me about your post is all the negativity on tech blogs these days. I'm sure they are therapeutic for the blogger and they are trying to shine a light on something they care about it - but it seems like it's getting nasty.
We should try to help each other. Not kick each other.
Look forward to watching/reading your blog evolve.
I'd say in 10 years of using Linux there is more interest than at any time I can remember. It seems that Ubuntu is more popular than the iPhone for example, but the iPhone gets loads of coverage.
For the record - all my systems (work, home desktop, laptop) are single boot into Linux and only the laptop has a virtual machine XP install which I use to test IE7 and Safari rendering but I don't find it useful for anything else really.
1) When was the last time I sat and "SEARCHED" for new tech out there? (without being sent something to read out)
2) Do I care about New tech outside the valley on a 1 to 1 level, instead of finding out about it via VC's?
3) Do I like technology for technology's sake or for the people that are behind?
4) Evaluate a tech to see if it is genuinely new, not a BBS recreated on the web?
All the 'popular' blogs have gone down the shitter with content being pushed up front based on their sponsors, not genuine user interest. And, people are sheep, they will follow.
Am I allowed to say "Wow, Classical/Legendary Post" ?
Don't keep it in the category of 14-year olds; coz, I'm 17 years old :D
Yeah, it is long. But I read it full (twice!!).
Now, I'm not able to write a comment that'll compliment the class of the content that lies above this, but I just wanted to state that:
"I AGREE WITH YOU"
I'm a tech-blogger myself, but seriously a bit (or a lot ?) far away from the position you are enjoying now !!
I am totally 100% in agreement and you really had my attention when you talked about Apple and the latest and greatest stuff. I am just wrapping up the XP upgrade at my firm. Windows 2000 is not that far gone for us, and I know that many of the people in the firm are still using it at home (along with Windows 98). I do think though, that highlighting the new technologies is what helps to generate buzz, and I think that buzz will lead to new people moving on with more modern gadgets and operating systems. Every so often I will have someone at work as me a question about something new in technology, and bring up your name or Techcrunch or Mashable...the message does get down to the masses eventually.
Replying to your last question "What blogs are doing the best tech blogging?" I prefer to follow tech blogs that at least 5 out of 10 of their entries still today seem useful and interesting to me.
I think that labnol from Digital Inspiration is doing a great job.
He is choosing the most interesting news and tips and he tweets only when he has something really important to say or to notice.
Maybe it helps that he is thousand miles away from the "coolest events".
I look out for things I can use, and Evernote is one of them. I examine things for myself and usually don't take the hype at face value. I watch things come and go, and wonder why some of them ever came in the first place.
I imagine I am like most of your readers, most twitterers, most powncers, most bloggers.
I remind myself that quality derives from attention to detail, competence, and love of what one is doing. And if there is intended to be an audience for whatever it is that is being developed, then for the developer, quality also derives from respect for the audience and the users and a sense of responsibility in making sure the thing works right.
Some of the neatest things I use were made by people who made the thing to satisfy themselves.
So the task for you is to be a good detective, and find the good things.
Keep smiling -it's infectious.
:)
To use the subtitle of a book I like:
We could do with REDISCOVERING PASSION & WONDER.
Don't forget the early adapters but don't pander to them either.
Additionally the tech blogosphere is a giant echo chamber, with everyone basically scooping each other's news, clogging up readers' RSS feeds with identical articles. I once had to navigate seven different blogs until I actually found the original source of a story (probably Reuters). I (still) have more than 30 different tech blogs and "blognews" feeds in my Netvibes dashboard, and if iPhone is the big news, EVERYONE will be talking about iPhone (and saying the same things about iPhone). If the Yahoo soap opera is news today, sure enough Yahoo will show up in those 30+ feeds.
Here's a suggestion for bloggers: If, on a given day, CNET and Techcrunch and Techmeme and Om and BoingBoing and ReadWrite all have pretty much identical "Article+Commentary" posts about the MacBook Air--take that day to talk about something totally different. In fact, don't even mention the MacBook Air. Maybe write about the clever tech insight you came up with while skydiving yesterday. Write about the last conversation you had with a software developer who's over 50. Write about something that's not necessarily the BIG STORY OF THE DAY but that you can present from an angle that few others have considered.
Well, that's my rant. Take it or leave it
So there is this echo chamber where only tech interests are considered and everybody else's interests be damned.
I read you top bloggers religiously, and as of late, I've been pretty tired of the repetition and homogeneity. I can't say I'm doing any better myself. What can we do better to diversify, and appeal to larger audiences?
Chippy.
I keep coming back to your blog because you seem to have so much darn fun.
More than anything, I watch your videos. Your interviews are like gold to me - you have fun with them, I learn new things, and get to comment real time with the other viewers.
Your blog has more personality than the others. It's fun. And, unlike other tech blogs and sites, I learn how I can incorporate new tools into what I'm doing with my clients.
Keep it up, Scobleizer.
I've only begun reading your blog and following you on Twitter within the last year, but so far, you have intro'd me to Kyte and Qik (so I can tell others about streaming from a cell phone although mine can't do it,) you've told me about Sifry's Offbeat Guides (I just ordered one yesterday for Grand Rapids, MI - there's a beta test!) you've told me about FriendFeed and why you like it so much (I'm not that into it but thanks to you I can understand the appeal of better threading, like Plurk) and I've downloaded the Microsoft telescope thingie but just haven't had time to look at it, though I know it'll be great when I do. Finally, I met Rocky because of you, and now I can say Hi to him occasionally on Twitter and keep him updated on drag racing news.
I'm a "regular Joe" writer with a busy life who likes having you out there "on point" for me - you're my own personal tech scout.
You bring enthusiasm and kindness to a medium that is too often in danger of snarkifying itself. The fact that you sit back and think out loud about self-improvement like this is testament to your professionalism and genuine regard for your readers.
Thanks for what you do - keep writing and I'll keep reading.
The blogs with the most revenue have tricked their advertisers into believing teenage boys are business decision makers.
Seriously, great insight.
Please, do not stop what you do. Nor do I want TechCrunch and TechMeme or other folks like SmugMug (Don is an amazing guy) to stop what your doing. But please realize those of us outside the bubble just don't care about the fights and bickering. Business Reporting is a good thing. The best situation would be a well balanced mix of business, cool ideas, video, and case studies of this being used in real world situations, with real customers, impacting the real bottom line.
i started to blog about this a bit yesterday (more under the theme of not putting the same people on stage at conferences like Defrag):
http://defragcon.com/Blog/?p=244
let's catch up soon!
ejn
For as long as you've been around, I only just recently found your blog. It's one of the few I actually READ, rather than just skim. First, it's not just a shotgun approach to topics ... you put considerable effort and writing into your posts. Second, for the most part, I'm genuinely interested in your topics. Finally, yours has insight. As somebody who's been doing this for a while, your name is certainly out there ... you'd be pressed to find a "geek" who hasn't at least heard of Scoble!
Please don't change up your format too much. Like I said, I've only recently discovered you and am liking what I read. However, Lifehacker IS one of my favorite sites and anything along those lines is good too.
One more thought, I dig Apple products (for the most part). But also dig my XP box and my Linux distros too. IMHO, if it works, use it. Things are shifting away from being OS-centric to being more user-centric anyway. You can open just about any format file on just about any system nowadays. Half the applications people use are web-based too, so it doesn't matter what platform you get your data from ... Wii, XP, iPhone, etc. The smart companies will realize that and make interfaces generic enough to use on any device.
First thing I'd like to say is that I loved the post. I loved it because it proves more than ever that you believe strongly in the world you spend your life reporting on, which regardless of any failings that blogging has is the most important thing in the world (which I've been rambling on and on about for the last week).
The only part I had to comment on was HP reference you made. I am an Electrical Engineer by trade, and it stuns me so much how quickly we (as "blog people") convolve the concept of technology with neat gadgets. I've had to pleasure of seeing implementations of Natural Language Processing and Machine Learning (among other technologies, including so really cool Solid State research like you described) that completely blow every web app I have seen in the last 3 years right out of the water. Implementations of these technologies put together by grad students without any other commercial interest other than their degree.
There is so much more out there, and I think we get so caught up in the muck that we lose focus on a lot of it. Worse, we forget that the only point in any of this, as John pointed out, is to solve problems.
Solve problems, for people, using technology.
Either way, great post and I am looking forward to seeing what you come up with.
What worries me is the trickle down effect. People like myself who are very new to the tech blogging scene (though not new to the business) find it difficult to get in on the conversation. So, while the top bloggers begin to all cover the same stories, we end up emulating and only talking about those same exact stories. I blame myself for that though, more than I would blame you or any other blogger.
Anyway, I just wanted to say that I found this post to be really honest and inspiring.
I suppose the same will happen with web communications, once regular people--not geeks--reach critical mass. Robert, you can advance that evolution by writing for, and talking with, regular people about the things they need to learn and change to be happy in this complicated world. Thanks for you efforts.
I can do nothing more but agree.
I'm not going to put into words what a tech blog should be about. But if you'd ask me to give one great example, it would be Mark Hoekstra's Geektechnique.org.
Maybe it's not an allrounder or the most accessible blog to read, but it's about technology and guy who loves it to death.
It doesn't take much creativity or energy to sit back and rewrite press releases or fire off a screed about what your favorite (or least favorite) tech blogger(s) just posted.
I'm not sure FriendFeed is the tech holy grail you are seeking, though. Respectfully, I think you were on a better track when you used to keep up your Google Reader list and uncover the most interesting of the gems to blog about here. Speaking for myself, I was more interested in what you blogged about back then versus these days.
Sure, you could use FF to help out there, but if you're letting your friends/followers primarily dictate what's interesting that's not much better than writing about the top stories on TechMeme or following the digg/reddit pop lists.
I think part of the Web 2.blow movement that has it all wrong is that being popular and being interesting and/or useful are the same. Sometimes this might be the case, but not always. As we've seen through gaming these voting sites can be manipulated and thus what's "interesting" becomes muddy water.
And I don't understand the desire to push readers off to some third party, off site comment system either. What one might think is convenient could be very inconvenient to others who might not even know what FriendFeed is, much less how or why they should use it. Tell somebody who isn't a blogger and yet is interested in technology and the web why they should use FriendFeed? Forget you and I, Robert, where is the value add for this type of person?
I happen to like FriendFeed and find it personally useful (for non-Twitter non-Friendfeed discussions which unfortunately dominate the service), but feel it is getting too much hype, just like Twitter. Someday the reality distortion field clears and we get back to what is truly useful in the world. FriendFeed might be 'cool' but does it have mass market useful application in the world?
This may just be tangentially related but Umair's post today hits on the same thoughts from a 100,000 foot perspective. link
Good afternoon.
Could you tell me why my comment about Twitter was not used? It remained in a "To be moderated" position and has now disappeared. I am new to blogging so if I have broken some etiquette, it would be useful to know.
My comment made reference to me receiving spam via Twitter and linked back to the my original posting which I thought added something to Mr Scoble's blog. Obviously not so sorry about that.
Thanking you in advance
Cheers
I really enjoy the passion of your post(s). Your enthusiasm is contagious, your desire to share the discovered shiny objects is winsome in nature.
I am excited about The Large Hadron Collider because as an inquisitive human I want to peek under the hood and see the really tiny parts that make up the whole. The Tech Blogging Universe may not set records in size, but without the Explorers tapping furiously on their strings the general public would never know how exciting it is down here. Robert please continue to "pick" apart the features of various connective tissues so that someone may make it stronger. Finding the weakness of channels requires you look very close at the pipes, from that perspective it can get pretty remote. Keep digging though, it's clearly in your DNA. You encourage others to play in the sandbox of ideas. Your post prompted so many great comments, discoveries and connections- not a bad life indeed Robert.
It's about *content*.
By the time a technology hits one of those it's a shipping product, and I'm developing products in a competitive market place, I don't have the time to wait for things to get all the way through the development cycle before I use them, and if I wanted re-published press releases I'd go to one of the sources for such things.
There are plenty of *real* tech bloggers out there, and they're publishing schematics and source code and showing pictures of their soldered hacks, along side their pet rabbits. These are the people doing the innovation, the stuff that will end up on TechMeme in a year or three, but by the time it filters up that far we may as well read about it in the Finance or Lifestyle sections.
Other commenters have harked back to the days when you were excited about the tablet PCs. One evening several years ago I met you in a parking lot in the South Bay and you showed me why you were so excited about the products you were working with. Those are the sorts of stories that I want to see more of from you, the places where it's someone in the back lot after hours, not the front lobby during business. The times when someone's so jazzed about their technologies that they're going outside the channels of their company to push it. That's what pushes technology forward.
Let the mainstream journalists rephrase the press releases and represent the agendas of the PR guys, that's what they're good at.
Basically, I was wondering is Naked Conversations, your book, relevant anymore?
Should companies, or even people, blog anymore? Does blogging get lost in the shuffle behind the a listers, behind the "top x " post writers, etc?
Does blogging add value to the company or the individual anymore?
I'm not a twitter user nor a friendfeed user. I remember when blog comments were the thing to do. I still comment, but I noticed conversations are fleeting among the blogosphere. Twitter and Friend have all caused comments to be scattered across too many areas. Additionally, the comments are so short on twitter, that I wonder how that adds any value to anyone besides time wasting.
I see that Facebook, Plaxo, LinkedIn, etc... all have walls to leave comments on. How does that benefit me or you?
This post, Merlin Mann suggests, seems to hit on the head. Blogs are becoming impersonal. http://www.43folders.com/2008/07/21/blog-pimping
When Blog comments can force Kathy Sierra off the blogosphere, it makes things terrible and harsh. Who wants to write in that world?
The other part, authors, used to comment and follow up on comments. Now, people are too busy with emails, rss feeds, writing trying to catch the next digg, yahoo buzz, reddit wave.
So, what makes a good tech blogger or a good blogger in general, someone who interacts with tries to make personal communication with their audience. The rest is just public relations writing masked as a blog.
I still read 37signals.com/svn/ I follow liferemix.net blogs although that's kind of headline driven. otherwise, I use techmeme, popurls, and alltop to filter the noise to the popular.
What is slow blogging?
And I agree with Robert about tech blogs generally being an echo chamber.
I also agree his commentary on problems with comments, especially on digg. In my own case, rarely receiving bad comments is one of the benefits of not having a large readership... but I'd being lying if I said I didn't want to see traffic increase.
Blogging could (should?) be the antidote to competitive journalism, which in this fast-paced society doesn't take the time to check facts or at least provide a story in its true context.
Some content labeled as blogs is simply digital so-called journalism.
It's not that reporting news is in and of itself is bad. I do this for a living. But the competitiveness and the nastiness is what I don't like.
First, thanks for your honesty and openness. It's refreshing to hear the human behind this screen I'm staring at. Your post actually gets me excited about the human race and about the tech community. I hate writing, but your post (nearly) inspires me to write! :) I look forward to reading more that you have to share.
Second, you're not an idiot. Idiots don't recognize their finite knowledge or respect the knowledge and intelligence of people who know more about something than themselves.
Finally, I had one idea about dealing with the flood of press releases. Perhaps bloggers should clearly identify the source of information. I believe my journalism classes called this "attribution." Rather than writing as the source of information, bloggers who want to be taken seriously ought to disclose the sources of information. Whether that is in a headline ("Apple Claims To Be Cooler Than You") or in the lead graph ("According to a document releases by Apple today, Steve Jobs is bigger than Jesus AND The Beatles"), sources should be attributed... even yourself ("I THINK owning an iPhone will increase your happiness by 12 percent").
Thanks for your contributions.
Thanks for asking the questions Robert. A lot to think about here. Many of the items you bring up would be worth a post and discussion of their own. Comments for example might be worth two - problems with being hard to comment and the idea of people just being nasty little children at times.
I write occasionally for bub.blcio.us, and I'm supposed to cover tech. That also includes when Company A buys Company B and so on. The journalist in me cringes at publishing anything before it is confirmed, so a lot of times I'm a little late to the party with announcements. I'm okay with that.
I have a hard time digging up stories that I really want to write about for bub.blicio.us, because so much of techmeme is mired in Yahoo and Google and Apple. I love Apple but really, I don't care about the big guys. I want to read - and write - about the little guys with the cool new web-based application, whatever that may be.
Tech blogging is changing, but there are still good bloggers out there who don't care if they aren't on the Techmeme Leaderboard (I could care less) and who search out the real story and ignore the business-y boring stuff. And there are still some great developers out there who haven't hired a huge PR firm and just want to be found.
I think you do a good job of exposing the flaws in the current paradigm in this post. I think eventually the dust will settle and there will be two types of blogs: the news-based, reactionary blogs, and the thoughtful, innovative blogs (or what I like to call the "good blogs"). It seems the blogosphere is going through growing pains right now, and what it will grow up to be remains to be seen.
Once again, great post.
I appreciate what you are saying, and am glad that others share the same opinion as myself. What happened to being the guys who always had some tech trick that seemed like magic to the uninitiated? The joy of tech for me is showing that magic to others and getting them interested in what's out there too, and lately we have all become business whores a little bit. I don't know how it happened, but I am glad that you have seen it too. I look forward to the future content coming from this blog.
"Bickering" and the like (from a commenter) - I think this more than anything has caused me to substantially reduce the amount of tech/geek/gadget/etc blogs I subscribe to. So often otherwise good blogs and eloquent writers degenerate into name calling and finger pointing - Arrington did this, Winer yelled that, Calacanis spun this, Scoble claimed that, etc. My view of podcasting is still stained thanks to reading all the Curry vs. Winer stuff years ago. It gets old - we all have enough stress and drama in our lives, we look to tech blogs to talk about...tech.
Tech blogs as PR outlets - having seen this first hand (worked on a PR team for a major tech company, reaching out to bloggers), I can say you are 100% spot on. Some of the highest trafficked tech blogs are nowadays indistinguishable from "traditional" news sources, albeit faster to the story and with more snark. They want (demand in many cases) the scoop or exclusivity, as that first 2 min of a story garner all the traffic. And traffic drives ad revenue, which is really all that matters. They love embargoes so long as it gets them "in" on early news or reviews, get invited to the cool parties and treated like royalty, etc. It's all part of the game, which has taken a chunk of the fun out of blogs as you mentioned. It also turned me off a lot of them when I jumped out of that game - why read them when they all print mostly the same story? I mostly read bloggers now with strong opinions and fun angles, with an occasional techmeme wander to see if anything big is happening.
Unlike Rodrigo, however, I'm dubious that tools like Friendfeed are "what blogging needs to be saved," at least yet. That's for a reason that you touch on--it's like turning on a firehose. I only subscribe to *seven people* on the site and it borders on too much for me to keep up with. If I subscribed to just a few dozen, I'd damn well *have* to find a way to be a professional blogger because I wouldn't have time for my programming job. I think Friendfeed is onto something with the idea of social networking aggregation, to be sure, but if a company goes mainstream with social networking sometime in the next decade--by which I mean "gathers an audience past the obsessively connected," which I don't think even Twitter has done yet--it'll be because they've crossed the next bridge past good aggregation tools: good mediation tools.
Anyways great post mate.
Obviously the purpose of a blog is going to depend upon the capabilities, or lack thereof, of the individual blogger. For example, when Twitter was having huge uptime problems in the spring, I tended to focus more on Twitter's then-lack of communication then on any technical issues. The reason was simple - I do not have the technical knowledge to state whether Ruby on Rails was, or was not, the cause of Twitter's problems. (My last professional programming job was in Hypertalk.)
Whether you're taking a technical approach, a business approach, or another approach to the topic, it helps if you can either (a) add original content, or (b) feature content which your readers may not know about.
Business blogging in and of itself is not bad, but business blogging which regurgitates press releases doesn't help anybody.
All the best,
Sally
Robert, could you do something to rescue those 14 year-olds you mention? They are, after all, the future. I think if you carved a little time to speak at schools, you could sew a few good seeds. They'll be adults in only a few years. They could use the in-person inspiration (lord knows they're missing that I'm afraid). Perhaps you already do this. If not, please think about it.
You're one hell of a blogger. Off to FF.
And this was the aggregated using the source URL so I get to see their views and opinions but it was all tried together as a single article/Aggregation view.
We need a new RSS value for source URL this would work a bit like add a keyword/tag for an event in Flickr etc.
Wish to different views but I do wish to have aggregated.
If we take some article written 3 months back on some new web 2.0 startup and compare with something similar that came up now, we find them almost similar. I have also reduced the number of feeds that I used to subscribe.
There's nothing inherently wrong with covering tech business, but I agree with ya, a lot of the blogs out there will cover EVERY story just because. There's also the problem of bloggers who will do and say anything to get hits.
On my site, I tend to just cover what interests me. That strategy isn't going to get me to the top of the techmeme leaderboard, but it's guaranteed to make sure that whatever I write is quality
I'm always going to do better work if I'm interested in the final product.
No matter how many PR people contact me, I just follow the stories that interest me. If there were more sites like that, I think we'd have a more honest and probably more interesting blogosphere. Keep up the good work!
Best of luck on finding what works. I will be watching.
Chuck
aloha, cw
Everyone needs to start having fun again. Tech blogging isn't just a job for some, it is a passion. Find that fire that's dying within. Excite people! If you don't, someone more interesting will come along to replace you.
As you say, tech blogs have left their primary audience to focus on things that the average geek doesn't care about. Thanks Scoble for a great post.
Right now I can't find a lot of good "hey, check out this cool service" articles from the mainstream tech blog articles because it's all anchored around the vicious cycle of buying into the PR process.
So I'll tell you what: you start writing about cool new services beyond the latest iPhone app, beyond "whatever's hot now," and I'll subscribe again. FriendFeed, iPhone, Twitter - they're all over-exposed and well known; tell me what I don't already know.
I'm glad Scoble is able to examine what he's doing while he's doing it; it's one of the more outstanding things I first noticed about him. Mostly, though, what really got me following is the endless exuberance over cool stuff and the people who think up cool stuff that is the solid thread. Is there money in it? Probably enough, but it's obvious Scoble's motivation isn't the cash (but it never hurts), and you really don't have to be friends with people to be friendly to them. The genuinely genteel approach he uses works very well across a wide variety of people, and raises the signal level above the noise.
One of these days I'm going to sort out my own experiences over the last 15+ years with the 'Net, from BBSs to a direct SLIP connection to the San Jose hub and all the blah blah in between then and now. 12 years ago we were video conferencing via CUSeeMe with people all around the world over a 9600 baud modem! Talk about your early adopters. So when I finally get it blogged someplace, you can blame Robert Scoble for reminding me how happy and exciting being around cool people doing cool things in and around the the ever-meshing, always morphing tech/life/art world can be if you stay focused on what you love about it.
Ze Frank recently said, "I'm trying to inject some humanity into this..." after a suggestion that perhaps Digg and YouTube commenting was becoming the training ground for young people in 'how to behave online'. Not encouraging. And unfortunately, it's not just 14-year olds.
Michael Arrington has made the point many times that the 'relentless background of hate' in his part of the tech world is not sustainable. But this post is one more example of why I continue to admire and be inspired by Robert Scoble.
But nonetheless, I'll add this:
Robert, I have gained a lot of additional respect for you with this post. I've not always agreed with your take on blogging and online communications (in fact, I've pretty strongly disagreed with you at times), but I found myself nodding my head in agreement again and again with you in this long but spot-on entry.
Thanks for the having the selflessness and thoughtfulness to post this, self-criticisms and all. Your points are worth reflecting upon by ALL of us who blog, all of us who read blogs, all of us who reward both the good and bad in the blogosphere with our time, our comments, and our respect.
This is a (very long) but excellent post. I want to thank you for writing it. I am someone who currently earns a full-time living from blogging, but would consider myself far from an a-lister, which I am OK with, and in some ways prefer because I can do a little more of what I like and not what other people think I should.
The portion about the PR and the same stories hitting at the same time really hit me, as its a topic that has been bugging me personally lately.
See, I wanted to get to a point of earning a full time income from blogging and that was the easiest path, so I to have become wrapped up in that same cycle and have been looking for a way to move past it, and also encourage the other writers on the site where I am a senior editor to do the same.
While I personally think FriendFeed is not all that its cracked up to me, maybe its just because I have not spent enough time on it. Perhaps because I have been to busy covering the "tech news" and have had less time to be a blogger.
And, PS, Evenote is awesome, especially the iPhone app.
Well there's your -- and their -- frikking problem right there. Stop doing the circle jerk and get out to blog that DON'T do all-tech all-the-time. Man, when the economic sh*t hits the fan, you'll all be crying in front of your HDTVs. Suckers.
http://mikecane2008.wordpress.com/
1. Seth Godin talked about something similar. It sounds like what you're describing is the "Passion Pop Gulf" (http://tinyurl.com/5zgmc7)
2. Marc Andreessen is the best tech blogger, hands down. He teaches people how to build companies, lead, and make the tough choices.
3. You remain valuable to the young guy. Take it from a new comer to the field (25 yr. old, about 1 year in). I watch your Fast Company TV religiously.
http://thepiratesdilemma.com/about-the-book
The first chapter is about the punk revolution, and the peoples' desire to break out from the status-quo. How this ultimately affected many industries from music to tech to retail. Mass media and the underdog individual are an important part of the story. Check it out, there is a PDF you can download on his website.
More contemplative, more relaxed, more in-depth blog conversations may flow from when we see a resurgance of writing as a labor of love, not a means of supporting one's self. When your postcount is a means of putting food on the table, that can't help but effect the output.
I've been feeling that something wasn't right in blogging--and tech blogging in particular--for a while now, and I think you might have just hit the nail on the head as to what it is. The coolest thing about technology isn't the glitzy packaging and the blinking lights, it's the way that it changes peoples' lives. In fact, this post goes a long way toward summing up why I've decided to have another go at blogging (shameless plug: First post today!).
I may be the freshest face on the social Web block, but I've considered the Web home for as long as there's been one. And bloggers, columnists, analysts, and activists like you have done a lot to build what I love so much.
Here's looking forward to the coming months.
For example, you write "Many of us can seem out of touch with the real world. Do we write about all the forclosures going on? No, and while we’re waiting in line for iPhones and buying the latest games, that can seem pretty out of place right now while people are losing their homes or their life savings."
Well, no, on tech blogs there's not a lot of coverage of foreclosures. But, on blogs like www.researchrecap.com, we started writing about subprime related problems before the first iPhone came out.
You write: "Tech blogging has become way too controlled by PR agents.". Well, yes, if your tech blog is focused on trying to "break" tech news. But many blogs are about insights, not just news. I think Read/Write Web is a great example and I hope that my own Content Matters fits that description as well. I get pestered by some PR types (not a fraction of the ones you hear from) but unless it's something that I think my readers would care about, I don't write it.
You write: "So, off I go to FriendFeed and Twitter where there are real people who don’t care about the business but who are just looking to use technology to have more fun, be more productive, or do something more interesting with their lives."
I use Twitter and Friendfeed, but also find that it's a much more insular community than the blogging world. So, it's all about the fail whale and waiting in line for iPhone 2.0 or, perhaps, seeing the Batman movie or riding in Jason's Tesla demo.
There are hundreds of compelling blogs out there providing interesting insights. It's not the medium that's broken, its just the noise that many of the tech bloggers are now generating that makes it harder to hear.
And this is coming from a guy who thought you were the "People Magazine" of tech bloggers, at best.
Great work, and I look forward to more of the same in the coming months.
I love discovering new ways normal folks and real businesses are using new technology to improve life and business. Robert, you're one of the lead scouts, a kid in an expanding candy store with the ability to take the complex and simplify it for non-geeks ... explain how tasty and challenging that new jawbreaker is.
Most interesting thing I did today, besides spend time with a client and discover ways to bring her dreams to life, was enjoy Chris Brogans Webinar on 'Who Owns the Brand'. Watching live video discussions interlaced with real-time Twitter questions and comments ... centered on a rally interesting topic ... now THAT was an hour I"m glad I spent in front of my computer.
And tomorrow, I"m going to interview an ice cream shop owner, use my Nokia N95 to do some Qik-ing (learned that from you Robert), post about his secret sauce, why people are so passionate about it. Can't wait.
I just write about the same four firms, over and over, in what's been called a "refreshingly unexpected" way. I've also been called a "bitch" who "talks shit". And I'm a girl who wears stilettos. No one else really writes about these things in the same way that I do. Call me old school, but my blog has an audience and it's growing.
The "tech blogs" are no longer focusing on the "tech" and instead of looking more and more at the "business" because that's the lowest common denominator among the readers. We can all easily understand business news but real tech news has a much smaller audience.
Do what brings you joy. Not standing in line isn't going to save those folks' homes one iota.
Cheers, Neil
http://www.cyclelogicpress.com
Second - how has tech blogging failed me? Well, everyone keeps talking about the iPhone, which I have determined is NOT all that, much less a bag of chips, and I'm sick of it. It clogs up my Google Reader something awful! Please, make it stop! :D
I used to really enjoy what you were doing at Microsoft & Channel 9. Sometimes I wish you'd go back to that. Except I still want to see transcripts and/or better sound, because (as someone with hearing problems) I could barely understand many of the interviews.
And the comments were better back then, too. How can you bring that back? Go deep again, talk with the people doing stuff, not the people selling stuff. Don't worry about the next big thing, or about kudos/criticisms of newly launched products. Talk to people who are doing stuff. Show us what they are up to - and let the other folks pick the trends, write the kudos, write the criticisms.
Go back and watch your own video on the Kindle. Ask yourself if you really wanna be that guy. Then go back and look at when you interviewed Jeff Snover, and ask if you wanna be more like *that* guy.
I know which one I'm rooting for!
Try not to be too hard on yourself. Posts like yours above that offer perspective and a bit of humility are few and far between. It never hurts to take a step back and look at the true purpose/focus of your content. It could be said that the whole nature of tech news is always going to involve some frivality - most people don't find these shiny gadgets as essential as those "in the know"... Keep up the good work.
-Luke.
http://www.designkloud.com
Please get behind the camera again and away from tech for tech sake alone. Just as people find it fascinating to watch a "star" cook, chat, or generally opine on things unrelated to their profession -- so too this can apply to the general coverage of tech.
I watched a video segment of Jay Leno in his garage and read follow up articles on his fascination with cars. I would never have watched or read something about how he tells jokes for a -living-.
Nerds and geeks are interesting but there is no Barbara Walters for this medium. Everything has been dissolved into an elixir of buzzwords and business drama.
Can you be Bahbwah Wawah?
-J
Dont bother as to why you are unable to follow up on shiny objects two weeks down the lane. COme on - its teh tech industry and we can expect things to be stagnated. We like to see new tings coming really fast and thrashing out the old. We like staying updated about the new and not necessarily the old things. Isn't it one of the many reasons why Mac OSX is beter than anything Windows. The duration between Vista and Windows 7 was enough for Apple to lauinch 2 OSs and that means that they were/are much ahead and its Windows doing teh catching up. Similarly, when blogs like techcrunch and say yours talk suddenly about what you heard and what you saw[referring to WWT], it brings in interest in us readers and thats what is prime. We are all fine with your posts - cant be happier. or lets say, we are in need of 10 scoble's updating scobleizer - yes 10 updating one blog. Its not the info overload, its not you failing us - trust me.
ps: The Apple/MS comparison is inevitable you see. One stands for latest stuff soon out of the box and the other is just outdated n all that. When was iPhone design started tell me and did you hear about teh Zune phone? nah! Apple is much ahead and we want to stay much ahead with others doing the catch-up. So, there is nothing like the follow-up syndrome you should get into.
You asked what we read - for me, I read a very few blogs but then, I dont follow Gizmodo/Engadget for the Gizmos - I love to read DVICE.com for the latest in gadgets and crazy stuff and according to me, it satisfies "my" needs. I dont follow techcrunch or crunchgear other than have them as a widget on my iGoogle page but I follow you using Google Reader and my friends would vouch for the fact that I keep sharing your posts everytime I really like something and want others to read. In short, we readers would read what aligns to our though process and to teh pace with which we want to stay updated - you dont have to change anything just because you think you have failed us. It might be just a few whom you failed - forget them because you cant please everyone all the time. Today if you get back to WWT after say you ee something nice on your monitor, you think we all might love to read about it - I really doubt that ;-)
Keep scribbling..
Two years ago I became a partner in a company, and we created a blog on our business Web page. That blog is a mix of technical stuff and ads of our training.
I turned the other blog into a personal one. 80% of that blog is my observations of IT. But once in a while I use it too to announce some events that are important to our business. I don't see anything wrong with it.
I don't publish there any PR announcements of other companies even though I receive lots of such emails - just delete them.
As long as I'm not bored with blogging, I'll keep doing it. Tried twitter for a little over a month, but it seems to be a waste of time. Some people just write something like I'm now at this location. Great. Let's tell this to the entire world. Noise. If you don't have anything to say, just leave the keyboard alone. Lots of junk there and Twitter is the most unstable software I've ever seen so far.
I just got around to reading this, and it almost brought me to tears with how right you are.
What do you care about? Not just the shiny objects, but how have they changed your life?
You have a job. This isn't your job. Write about you, your family, your interests, what you care about. Have a conversation, and I guarantee the less you engage in the "tech blogosphere" and the more I see of the guy I spent a week in DC with, you'll be on the right track.
What excites YOU?
The larger bloggers have become exactly what they claimed not to be. Some of the larger blogs are businesses, no different than the NYTimes or any other medium.
The focus has been on expanding distribution, be it via the new tools that enhance the blogging medium or some other method (Twitter, FriendFeed, etc.).
Focus has been on friends (twitter, facebook, friendfeed, etc.). This is the old quantity over quality argument...
Tech blogs, in particular, all tend to gravitate towards the same topics. See below:
Microsoft xxx
Google yyy
Twitter zzz
Yahoo and Microsoft xxx, yyy, zzz
Apple aaa, Iphone this.
This is honestly the first post of yours I've read in a bit, for a wide variety of reasons. If some of the tech bloggers focused on the reason(s) why they started blogging to begin with, I am certain that many things would change for the better (simply for the love of talking about the things that they love) . Right now, and I say this with all honesty, the average person probably questions the honesty of many of the blogs and/or the intent behind a post of any sort.
And, without sounding like a complete ass, the average person only cares about the following:
1. Does it make my life simpler?
2. Does it help me keep in contact with the ones I love?
3. Does it make my life better?
4. Can I still send email?
Too many of the technologies launched these days are more advanced than the average person cares to use. I have a wife, one that is not a techie at all, and she questions why we spend so much time on things not connected to establishing real relationships with real people. She almost crapped her pants when two of my friends, and yours truly, were stuck on laptops not talking to one another whilst in the lush beauty of Koh Samui, Thailand.
Even if she (my wife) isn't as tech smart as I am, I am starting to actually question if she might be smarter than I am.
Other facts:
- search engines really love blogs,
- search engines love comments even more,
- a lot of people are looking for an angle to get heard above the "noise",
- publishing tools have never been easier to use.
i.e. the problems are just beginning and the only current solutions require "un-democratizing" the Web. there is no easy short-term fix.
Go ahead and do the early reports, but come back with more later. As to the folks getting on daily with Win2K/etc., I think a realistic assessment of where the new stuff gets us with respect to that is something worth commenting on. I often find myself asking where I stand now with my present systems vs. my Kaypros of years ago. There are a lot of places I can easily point out real-world results showing my present situation is better--but not everywhere, and its worthy of some concern and reflection.
My gray Win laptop is the one with the tattered old "Linux, It's not just for breakfast any more" sticker on the lid. ;)
I can relate to most of what you've said, and I can imagine the rest. Been there, done that. It was the past weeks that I also started thinking about blogging in general, not just for myself but for everyone. It evolved, but just like you said, it evolved to become just another medium for PR Agents.
As someone who also acts as a PR Agent (on an unofficial level), I am guilty to that practice. Shape the bloggers to be a PR tool, no more and no less. But ask me, do I allow it on my blog? Not much (I used to). I realized, there are just too many sites and blogs out there who are doing the same thing, why follow? And I don't blog to become their PR tool.
Also true that most A tech bloggers caters to the Western World, where most of the English speaking nations are. Here in the Eastern Hemisphere - ASEAN, Hong Kong, India, Pakistan, Oceania, we are mostly ignored. Yes, most of us can't relate with all the Apple stuff being blogged (I ignore them all, I don't even care about iPhone). Only few English speaking Easterners care about Apple. Yes it is a good product - but "we already know that", anything else we don't know?
Sadly, as much as we want to cover that "anything else we don't know", we do not have access to that as much as you guys in the West have. In this side of the world, it is all about politics and we are tired of it.
So can we all or most of us go back to the "golden years" of blogging? It is about LIFE. Go back to it and let's retrace AND enhanced it for the future.
Are you in? Or are you out?
the link which is at http://metadatta.wordpress.com/2007/03/02/why-i...
See, you and me we're born the same day same year. It's time for our generation to prepare the ground for our children' s children, don't you think ?
ps : what a tremendous step forward you've made between Milan' s birth day and today, right ?...
TL - http://offur.com/BetterThanTechCrunch
They write advertisements for products and sites while trying to disguise them as articles. Blogs such as Techcrunch have become infomercials.
A reputation system (votes by other members + site activity) determines the ranking of every member on the site. The higher the ranking, the greater authority to delete posts and even terminate members.
As such, we now have hundreds of highly-ranked and trusted members providing moderation on the site.
It has served to eliminate 95% of the noise and increase quality by several magnitudes.
I would guess that a similar system would work very well for blog comments.
Regards,
George
I just blogged this "Scoble Wars: Attack of The Trolls"
Hope you enjoy it!
Jim Connolly
www.thetechnewsblog.com
Sewing the two worlds together is difficult for the top tier. Realistically, blogging brought them/you fame. Given the choice of being an idol focusing on celebrity topics vs normal life, what's more exciting? Many people have serious trouble hanging on to reality.
I know I'm disconnected at times. I'm arranging a geek dinner outing in Philadelphia while For Sale signs stand in neighbors windows for 12+ months. I use Google Docs on OS X, iPhone, N82, and EeePCs while my wife uses Win2k and Excel to wrangle hundreds of thousands of lines of data (65k per file).
Gary Vaynerchuk compared blogging to the 1980's hip-hop movement. He's exactly right... A few big names will become extremely famous. Huge numbers of others will try and fail. And the people that made it to celebrity status will have psychological issues and disconnects with the world.
"We used to link to each other all the time, telling you when all the other cool bloggers have done something new and useful."
cheapsuits:
"The problem is the small blogger goes through life unheard much of the time. Big zero’s in the comments section."
The little guy who blogs purely out of a desire to share his thoughts can't get noticed. And it's not helped by the A-list bloggers when they're trackbacks are broken, and they don't respond when they're told about it (That wasn't you, Robert - but it's happened a few times elsewhere)
I have my own blog (shameless self-promotion: http://patternsofchaos.net/ ) - and I like to think that I'm offering worthwhile content. But I have no way to know, since, as far as I can tell, nobody reads it.
I can't help but wonder how many blogs like mine are out there, that I can't easily find. Blogging was supposed to give a voice to the little guy, but they're now drowned out by the big players - just like happens everywhere else.
It used to be a closed-chummy-club, now it's all play-doh journalism niche-news hounding, but even yet still lots of good tech and non-tech blogs out there, but prayers chance they will ever be noticed. Blogging is just another power distributional curve, "blockbusters" still exist and those in the "long tail", might as well cash in chips for all the time and effort, hardly worth it. But when you do a massive rant, with machine-gun name dropping, you are beyond fixing. Nor do you really want to fix it, you are on top, occasionally insincerely self-flagellate and move on. That way you can say, I know it's broke, but it's the system...dontblameme.
I've followed your postings for several years. This one made me jump out of my feed reader (RSS Bandit) to see your blog Website and check things out directly. Clearly, blogging is now an establishment of its own. Please continue shaking things up!
technologies that fall outside of personal productivity, he has little or no training to judge and rarely takes the time to find authorities who do. be warned: make business decisions using scoble's advice regarding technologies outside of personal productivity at your career's peril.
much like rush and geraldo, that small minority of people responsible for creating or managing technology that read scoble do so for his entertainment value.
he is very entertaining.
just don't mistake his certainty for learned or researched insight.
One thought occurred to me after I read it: In some respects, technical blogging sets itself up for problems in that most of it takes the form of a "one-person" show. Hubris is an easy trap to fall into when you're working alone.
Gathering and reporting the news requires a variety of skills (investigation, interviewing, writing, editing, fact checking, cultivating reliable sources, etc.) that have traditionally been handled by team members that brought their individual areas of expertise to bear on each of those requirements. In short, the skill set necessary to do a good job of reporting is usually beyond the compass of any but the most rare and gifted individual.
So why is it so many bloggers believe they have become such merely by virtue of the fact that they share their thoughts online instead of at a saloon?
Plus at the time, Facebook was getting these insane deep-space bubble-territory valuations, knowing that you were hot on it, was a sign that it would cool seriously off, becoming just another fad, and it has, stooge Microsoft, wanting to be the cool kid on the block, knew not such.
And more people use MySpace, so can we call that a winner too? Raw numbers mean very little, the 'eyeball-accounting-era' should have taught us that well enough. And Nielsen Online surveys, in April, showed only 22.4M, and seriously dropping...so from your 90 million to 22.4 million, I mean you called it perfectly right, just in reverse, predicting Facebook fatigue, just by getting interested in it. Valuable service indeed.
But, I guess you will back to your same ways, within few days.
Isn't blogging becoming like that in a sense? There's just so much content out there, so we skip straight to the summaries, and ignoring possibly useful, insightful, out-of-the-ordinary gems of blog posts and writers?
Blogging has also become about rules; mostly, rules aimed at SEO, media relations, brand reputation, and most important for bloggers, self-promotion.
Blogging stopped being about simply writing and sharing years ago. Those days are gone and will not return. You can't go home again. Game on.
...I’m going to be changing my approach to being one that’s more practical and useful ... Do you agree or disagree?...What blogs are doing the best tech blogging?
Reply:
Yes I agree. Thank you for noticing and implementing changes.
As for the best tech blogs - I don't know - I seek your help - but I didn't notice many of the 180 previous comments identify any.
The truth is that a blog w/o the ability for people to leave comments is NOT a blog (it's just a standard ol' webpage). The moment I get the impression a site is moderating comments so that only people who conform get heard, that's when I leave. Now that you've made it clear that readers won't have an equal say on your site from here on out, you can expect a huge drop off. Honestly, this may be exactly what you want. Less readers, but more "me too" people. I dunno...I personally don't mind criticism if it helps me later on and when I'm wrong I'll admit it.
As far as saying other blogs are pointless because they repeat info from other sources, that's unfair also. The whole point of most well-known blogs now is to keep up that visitor traffic for advertising reasons. Why YOU may not like it that sites A, B & C are talking about the Microsoft/Yahoo deal, that doesn't make it any less of a good topic to post about.
Personally, I'm absolutely sick and tired of all the Apple gushing that goes on in the tech community. I'm almost positive the key bloggers of the world are Mac fanboys and use their insane web traffic (through Podcasts, Blogs, etc.) to try to push this on everyone else. I'm getting to the point where I'll just ignore a person for awhile if they talk about the iPhone or how superior OSX is, but why should I have to? If you really want to be a different sort of blogger, blog about different things instead of complaining about what other bloggers do.
Maybe it's time for you not to blog anymore at all. I'm not saying do it...but if you honestly feel like blogging is a chore, maybe that's a sign you should stop. I've never thought blogging and business should mix because there's just too much risk of becoming blatantly biased...and when that happens, you better expect readers to be just as divided or leave altogether.
I agree with much of what you're saying, but wouldn't be so hard on most of the top bloggers, including yourself.
a) Everyone has trouble dealing with success at first, especially when it's been brought from the bottom up. How do you remain famous and down to earth!? It's tough.
b) The last four years have been the social bubble. Noise. Noise. Noise... and I'm not talking economics and companies -- I'm talking social interaction wise, with the "tech set." This will mellow out (though we'll always, due to our closeness with innovation, be a little hyped up in this area).
Downplay the value of links and look for better content ratings systems that use community input more effectively. Former is risky but worth a shote, latter is happening, but slowly.
I really appreciate you standing up and making this statement. It takes a lot to discuss where you think issues have arisen and to take agency with finding a solution. You mention that there is a disconnect from many discussions taking place in this sector of the internet and the rest of the online community (and the world in general), but have you thought about ways to rectify that, or if it's even necessary to?
If you have some time, I had some thoughts: http://rabidspacedog.com/?p=435
-Ethan
(former commenting troll hoping to rekindle discussion)
I ran into you at SXSW and even called your cell (following a Twitter post) to find out where Gary V was having his wine shindig (DeLoach). You're very accessible, so don't go changing! I look to tech blogs to find the shiny things and share them with us so don't go changing that either. Just stay true to yourself, brother; the rest will follow.
I'd give you a link but as I actually lost my pen today, I don't think I'm a good advertisement for luddites ;)
One of your prime sponsors is SAP. You know, boring old ERP, yet they remain one of the most interesting companies on the planet and have some of the most interesting and engaging people I've ever met. As does Oracle, Adobe, Microsoft and a few others. They're old skool if you like but they get what delivers the bacon and pays the bills.
It may not be your thing but tech needs business just as much as business needs tech. That's how the money gets made to support Silicon Valley the way it does. Learn to love the business just like I've had to learn to love the geeks. You might be surprised at what you discover.