<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Scobleizer - Latest Comments in Google Wave&amp;#8217;s unproductive email metaphors</title><link>http://scobleizer.disqus.com/</link><description>Tech enthusiast, video blogger, media innovator, fanatical about startups at Rackspace, home of fanatical support for Internet entrepreneurs.</description><atom:link href="https://scobleizer.disqus.com/google_wave8217s_unproductive_email_metaphors/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 03:21:09 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Google Wave&amp;#8217;s unproductive email metaphors</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2009/10/03/google-waves-unproductive-email-metaphors/#comment-20307710</link><description>&lt;p&gt;hahaha.. i didn't get it at all. It's ok. Thank's for info sharing ^_^&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">hanum</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 03:21:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Wave&amp;#8217;s unproductive email metaphors</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2009/10/03/google-waves-unproductive-email-metaphors/#comment-20210368</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Well Robert, I think you are maybe too much involved into Twitter et al. to see the beauty of Wave: It's designed for collaboration, not conversation as Daniel Tenner explained it much better than I ever could: &lt;a href="http://danieltenner.com/posts/0012-google-wave.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://danieltenner.com/posts/0012-google-wave.html"&gt;http://danieltenner.com/pos...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mario</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 14:16:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Wave&amp;#8217;s unproductive email metaphors</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2009/10/03/google-waves-unproductive-email-metaphors/#comment-19967467</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm glad that you're not drinking the Google Kool-Aid, but it is an early release and I would expect that by the time they get to say a version 2, it will be vstly improved.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve Yakoban</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 10:09:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Wave&amp;#8217;s unproductive email metaphors</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2009/10/03/google-waves-unproductive-email-metaphors/#comment-19947678</link><description>&lt;p&gt;United States President &lt;a href="http://www.7daysprinting.co.uk" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.7daysprinting.co.uk"&gt;Eco-friendly&lt;/a&gt; Barack Obama won the Nobel Peace Prize, causing international outcry, Eco-friendly with many countries in the world media, which questioned. One challenge is that, Eco-friendly even though he has all the beautiful vision and a slogan, but at the moment U.S. Eco-friendly troops are still stationed in Iraq and Afghanistan and other battlefields.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Another &lt;a href="http://www.smartcard-supplier.co.uk" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.smartcard-supplier.co.uk"&gt;smart card suppliers&lt;/a&gt; disappointment is that the Nobel smart card suppliers Peace Prize to the standard by smart card suppliers "based on past achievements" into a smart card suppliers "hope that the future success," unfair. Even the Associated Press, " smart card suppliers New York Times" are that Obama winning the "astonishing." Obama, I heard of the news, smart card suppliers also said he was "not qualified" that this only applies to his hopes and encouragement. smart card suppliers However, if thought about it, Obama is qualified to take this award.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In the &lt;a href="http://www.7daysprinting.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.7daysprinting.com"&gt;cheap plastic card&lt;/a&gt; George HW Bush, Bill Clinton, George W. Bush in power over the past 20 cheap plastic card years, the United States has participated in the Gulf War, the Yugoslav war, cheap plastic card the war in Afghanistan, the Iraq war. The war in Afghanistan and Iraq is like Vietnam, cheap plastic card I do not know what day is the end, bringing great economic pressure. cheap plastic card  In this international situation, &lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">djie</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 00:50:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Wave&amp;#8217;s unproductive email metaphors</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2009/10/03/google-waves-unproductive-email-metaphors/#comment-19907271</link><description>&lt;p&gt;OK, NOW you've got a point, Robert.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Google needed some way to hang a definition of Wave on a particular application, and e-mail was the culprit. I don't see how else Google could've explained it and launched it to the open source community, but there are probably some brilliant campaign message strategists out there who could make a recommendation or two.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It may be productive if the GoogleWave folks (and you, and the community) would shift from comparing fully mature, ripe Apples to just-planted Orange seeds.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;While the Wave team's original goal was to create a better email solution, what they discovered was a concept with what they sensed has for more potential.  So, rather than invest too much of their own time trying to find a nail for their hammer, they opted to open it up for the community and let Developers create their own Wave-based apps.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The challenge is, when one opens up code (and concepts) to the OS Community, one never knows where it'll go. That's a bad thing for those in the message-massaging business, for fear of the message getting out of control and taking on a life of its own. That's good news for the OS Community, that can't help but drool over getting their mitts on a past-proven genius-level team's code.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I commend Google for tossing a gem out to the Open Source Community to see what they can dream up. Let's face it, most companies wouldn't take that risk; and the ones that do often toss out their clunkers.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;My sense is, GoogleWave's not a clunker. That said, if it were 100% guaranteed to succeed, it wouldn't be so damn interesting to so many. ;)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Definition of Hype:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;1.     obvious and intentional exaggeration.&lt;br&gt;2. 	an extravagant statement or figure of speech not intended to be taken literally, as “to wait an eternity.”&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;So, "over-hype" is by definition, "hype."   GoogleWave will remain in "hype" mode until it has a practical application or two (or ten).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I'd like to think we could give it some time, and provide the 3PDs out there with some ideas and feedback on what we think GW could be good for.  I'd hate to see this new way of thinking die on the vine before it even bears fruit.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;- John Coonen&lt;br&gt;Co-Host, CMS Expo Learning Conference&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Coonen</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 13:28:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Wave&amp;#8217;s unproductive email metaphors</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2009/10/03/google-waves-unproductive-email-metaphors/#comment-19861810</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You might be right at some points, as well as you might be wrong with other points, but I think is too early to make conclusions about something all new like Google Wave. I would wait 5 years to make a post like this. Many new tools will come up with Google Wave, is a tool to build many more tools. So now it depends on the programming community and our demand and imagination to make Wave what we want it to be. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">$387201</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 16:20:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Wave&amp;#8217;s unproductive email metaphors</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2009/10/03/google-waves-unproductive-email-metaphors/#comment-19851424</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I don't "get" Google Wave. Have tried to use it, not seeing the benefit. But then again, I didn't "get" blogging initially, either. Some things have to grow on us. Not sure if Wave will grow or go away, but as it stands now, I'm not feeling the love.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">rblevin</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 12:21:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Wave&amp;#8217;s unproductive email metaphors</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2009/10/03/google-waves-unproductive-email-metaphors/#comment-19793733</link><description>&lt;p&gt;For me at least, I view the current implementation of Wave to be a random guess from Google. The ability to have text be asynchronous in real time is the innovation that I see. Im holding off from decisions, until developers get some time to play with it.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">vitalscam</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2009 12:31:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Wave&amp;#8217;s unproductive email metaphors</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2009/10/03/google-waves-unproductive-email-metaphors/#comment-19791676</link><description>&lt;p&gt;What I dont like with de emails is 'It cannot be withdrawn once it is sent'.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jakes</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2009 12:09:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Wave&amp;#8217;s unproductive email metaphors</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2009/10/03/google-waves-unproductive-email-metaphors/#comment-19722816</link><description>&lt;p&gt;When was Google Wave ever promoted as a "social network"? It's not Facebook. It's not Twitter. It never was.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;What it is, is a really cool protocol for collaboration and app development. I really don't know why Google bothered inviting more users, rather than pulling from the developer signup form. Until a ton of cool stuff is developed, lots of users really aren't going to get it, and then they write unimaginative, whiny nonsense like this post.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">tille</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 23:40:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Wave&amp;#8217;s unproductive email metaphors</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2009/10/03/google-waves-unproductive-email-metaphors/#comment-19711533</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I notice you mentioning that Skype is a good option but TBH any time I get involved with it doing work it ends up being nearly worse than an email. I still find that even though people can be a real pain in the ass to talk to the phone is an incredibly useful and efficient way of communicating :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Niall Harbison</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 20:29:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Wave&amp;#8217;s unproductive email metaphors</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2009/10/03/google-waves-unproductive-email-metaphors/#comment-19599224</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think it has it's own purpose.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">adamscott</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 15:31:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Wave&amp;#8217;s unproductive email metaphors</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2009/10/03/google-waves-unproductive-email-metaphors/#comment-19458100</link><description>&lt;p&gt;There's one more complaint:  How will I use Wave with my family, some of whom -- like my parents -- have just figured out email?  They will never be able to use Wave!!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mattrs</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 17:43:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Wave&amp;#8217;s unproductive email metaphors</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2009/10/03/google-waves-unproductive-email-metaphors/#comment-19297992</link><description>&lt;p&gt;well i got mine from &lt;a href="http://clipsbar.com/waveinvite" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://clipsbar.com/waveinvite"&gt;http://clipsbar.com/waveinvite&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">craiglist</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 09:00:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Wave&amp;#8217;s unproductive email metaphors</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2009/10/03/google-waves-unproductive-email-metaphors/#comment-19291878</link><description>&lt;p&gt;But then everyone need to know all the different tools, and find the tool which is relavant for the content. It means that there should run a lot of different applications.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I have tried to write about how I see wave for productivity at &lt;a href="http://www.masteringwave.com/2009/10/my-view-on-productivity-with-google-wave/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.masteringwave.com/2009/10/my-view-on-productivity-with-google-wave/"&gt;http://www.masteringwave.co...&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Daniel Graversen</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 06:52:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Wave&amp;#8217;s unproductive email metaphors</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2009/10/03/google-waves-unproductive-email-metaphors/#comment-19282918</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks.&lt;br&gt;Looks like something great in making! &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">BNS</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 02:26:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Wave&amp;#8217;s unproductive email metaphors</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2009/10/03/google-waves-unproductive-email-metaphors/#comment-19260496</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Don't you find it kind of ironic that you're complaining about Google Wave's productivity problems while maintaining your usual blitz of stream of consciousness type messages on Twitter and other websites? The same kind of complaints could be made about those websites. Here's my point by point rebuttal to your rant:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;1. If you're not using it, use the amazing "Minimize" feature. That's why you can minimize the inbox and other waves. If you don't need to be looking at it while you're working, then don't. How hard is that?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;2. Social networking is hardly related to productivity. There actually is group functionality in Wave, but it's currently in its infancy, so expect to see more on that over the coming weeks.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;3. When everyone is removed from the wave, it goes into the trash by itself. Again, this is a problem how?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;4. BCC was never a desirable feature in email. It simply forwards an email that you've already sent to others.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;5. There's no integration with Google Docs in traditional email, either. That doesn't take away from Wave. Just be patient.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;6. You've totally lost me here. First you're complaining about being able to see everyone update instantaneously down to their very keystrokes, now you're saying it's too slow? Huh?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;7. There are already websites that do this. Why would we want a centralized "store" controlled by one company like iTunes? Shouldn't we be moving away from this model?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;8. Notice the Spam button in your Inbox? Maybe you should have actually researched this instead of Twittering about your Twitter clients.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;9. Waves are only open to other Wave users because Wave is in a private beta. Wait a couple of months and this will be a nonissue.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Regardless, I've found that whether a service can be used for productive work depends more on how it is used, than how it is designed. In that sense, I think email is one of the least productive tools ever designed, but it serves well as a communication medium. Notice how I replied to this three day after it was written? Learn to turn some things off and focus on your work now and then.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Old habits are hard to break. I'm sure ten years from now, email will still be used for forwarding chain letters and Scoble will still be trolling the Internet for Microsoft. Some of us will have moved on, but other things just never change.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">David</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 18:36:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Wave&amp;#8217;s unproductive email metaphors</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2009/10/03/google-waves-unproductive-email-metaphors/#comment-19229942</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Is there anyone out there testing Google Wave right now who has already given Zenbe's "Shareflow" a go?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.zenbe.com/shareflow" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.zenbe.com/shareflow"&gt;http://www.zenbe.com/shareflow&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;If there is, do you mind sharing your thoughts on wich service you think does the better job of the collaborative experience?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Masey</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 14:38:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Wave&amp;#8217;s unproductive email metaphors</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2009/10/03/google-waves-unproductive-email-metaphors/#comment-18968801</link><description>&lt;p&gt;wave deserves another review, let's wait for another release&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">disqusbeta</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 07:03:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Wave&amp;#8217;s unproductive email metaphors</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2009/10/03/google-waves-unproductive-email-metaphors/#comment-18908910</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Robert, interesting insights about the shortcomings of email and Google Wave.  Colayer recognized these shortcomings 9 years ago and has developed a platform to overcome these shortcomings.&lt;br&gt;For more details: &lt;a href="http://colayer.com/MetalayerCom/MCH/1/concept/C_Email.htm" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://colayer.com/MetalayerCom/MCH/1/concept/C_Email.htm"&gt;http://colayer.com/Metalaye...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;Also visit &lt;a href="http://colayer.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://colayer.com"&gt;http://colayer.com&lt;/a&gt; to experience the Colayer platform.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Arif Shaikh</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 05:55:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Wave&amp;#8217;s unproductive email metaphors</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2009/10/03/google-waves-unproductive-email-metaphors/#comment-18618631</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Last night I posted a public Wave seeking other women using it, nothing feminist just have no girls on my contacts list yet and was wondering what the gender ratios are - given social media is predominately female based (and possibly to it's determent).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Almost as soon as I posted the blip it was hijacked, my original post and comments following it were deleted. The Wave is now titled "Wave's sexiest ladies" and is just filled with spam.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It's sad that even with such limited access it's becoming degrading.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Watch the replay here: &lt;a href="https://wave.google.com/wave/?pli=1#restored:wave:googlewave.com!w%252BjnCM0XJYC.3" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="https://wave.google.com/wave/?pli=1#restored:wave:googlewave.com!w%252BjnCM0XJYC.3"&gt;https://wave.google.com/wav...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">annarose</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 21:58:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Wave&amp;#8217;s unproductive email metaphors</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2009/10/03/google-waves-unproductive-email-metaphors/#comment-18577024</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You can still get a Google Wave account here:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://freegooglewaveinvites.com/google-wave-invites/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://freegooglewaveinvites.com/google-wave-invites/"&gt;http://freegooglewaveinvite...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;That is, if you're willing to pay 57 bucks!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Google-Street-View</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 13:34:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Wave&amp;#8217;s unproductive email metaphors</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2009/10/03/google-waves-unproductive-email-metaphors/#comment-18559844</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I recommend trying &lt;a href="http://www.showdocument.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.showdocument.com"&gt;http://www.showdocument.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;free online web-based app for online collaboration.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Joshanderson</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 09:32:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Wave&amp;#8217;s unproductive email metaphors</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2009/10/03/google-waves-unproductive-email-metaphors/#comment-18557969</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I haven't had time to test my Wave account, but I think I will this week. Going to check out SocialWok too. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jim Gaudet</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 08:52:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Wave&amp;#8217;s unproductive email metaphors</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2009/10/03/google-waves-unproductive-email-metaphors/#comment-18553444</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You'd be surprised how few clients for email there was in first decade it was invented. I bet in a year there will be a ton of Wave clients.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alex</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 06:51:54 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>