-
Website
http://www.scobleizer.com/ -
Original page
http://scobleizer.com/2007/07/15/google-reader-facebook-yummy/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
danja
44 comments · 4 points
-
polizeros
52 comments · 1 points
-
AndyBeard
69 comments · 4 points
-
Zachary Adam Cohen
35 comments · 8 points
-
dbarefoot
40 comments · 3 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
The best and worst thing Twitter did in 2009: RT
22 hours ago · 20 comments
-
World-brand-building mistakes France’s entrepreneurs make
1 week ago · 181 comments
-
2010: the year SEO isn’t important anymore
6 days ago · 67 comments
-
iPhone developers abandoning app model for HTML5?
6 days ago · 51 comments
-
Google eating Yelp?
5 days ago · 25 comments
-
The best and worst thing Twitter did in 2009: RT
Could be a viral application and idea for other social network
What will it do for Mario? Well, he's already hireable because he's built a Facebook app that actually has some utility and actually works. There's lots of venture firms who'll hire him to help their companies build out their Facebook strategy.
But, yeah, other social networks are going to have to react to the Facebook application platform.
We're at the very beginning. Imagine what the apps in a year will be like?
http://www.google.com/reader/shared/user/120971...
but this app won't show that, only the root shared feed - http://www.google.com/reader/shared/12097132795... If I was able to use Mario's app to show my shared Twitter label, I'd be using it.
Absolutely "getting it" now... I'm a fast learner :)
Keep up the great work!
R.
Digg started out as an html form with a text link input and 1 paged output with a handful of categories.
Digg was never popular because of it's features.
You want proof that cloning/supersetting digg doesn't work?
Check out netscape.
Case closed.
Google Reader is already being gamed. I just took one of my regular feeds off because they have started posting their last eight or ten stories as new every few hours. My group of feeds on the N800 went from having a few stories a day to hundreds (mostly dups).
Even Slashdot with completely manual story selection has been gamed by people not-so subtly directing links in stories they suggest to their own blogs rather than to the original sources.
There is a place, even if print journalism disappears, for trusted news sources, and that is almost always going to involve some level of human intervention. Most of us, at least those of us that are sane, don't want to be constantly drinking from a fire hose.
There are of course pathological cases that we should strive to eschew:
http://apnews.myway.com/article/20070715/D8QD02...
I do like this Ap. I've got my GR shared items on several unrelated pages now allowing them to be "fresh" without my having to update them directly. Of course a really smart search engine would discount these when it comes to evaluating a sites popularity (and I assume Google already does, or soon will).
It moves into the Techmeme space too.
i just noticed that mario is from mexico, like me, and that we're going to the same university. this is sooo weird.
If you were running this blog what would YOU talk about?
Radi
So why must this thing kill Digg?
Is it a side effect of our culture that we're always on the lookout for a "killer"?
It's not good enough if it's just a cool idea to add to the toolbox. It needs to kill something to be interesting? Give me a break.
I think I need to go get some coffee. Feeling a little cranky this morning. :-)
It's just me writing a sensational headline so you'll pay attention. My original headline said "Google Reader + Facebook Application = Yummy."
But that was more boring and the Digg killer headline focuses you on the fact that there's attention data being collected by Google Reader that we didn't have access to until last night.
I get the general interest. It goes into making group certification of content a lot easier. An abstraction of techmeme to any group of people. The great thing is that there are much more readers than bloggers that can come in and contribute with the editorial capacity without having to post to direct attention. It also helps to separate the two main functions of the blog, creating content and directing attention.
I would take the needle slowly off the vinyl, and avoid any more crackle and pops from the recursive groove pattern.
There is so much you aren't covering. You are simply mirroring the popular RSS and techmeme topics. Take a tour of mugshot.org and see what the real geeks are talking about. VC are NOT real geeks. They're the sly dogs that take advantage of people who aren't very smart.
http://www.onemoreidea.org/new-media-killeth-a-...
Love your post though and added Mario's app in my facebook.
Cheers
Brij
For example, my Facebook page is quickly becoming a mess of random boxes from one web service or another. There is no integration of the data into the Facebook experience.
In other words, Facebook isn't really adding any value to the experience by letting me add these boxes. Sure, I can add whatever you want and move the stuff around; however, what does that give me, the people who read my Facebook page or Facebook itself long-term? I'd say not much. Seems kind of like MySpace with a better look-and-feel.
DISCLAIMER: I am the co-founder of Profilactic, so the rest of this post may come off like an infomercial :)
The reason we built Profilactic was to actually add something to the experience, not just give people a place to throw random feeds.
On Profilactic, you add the feeds for the networks you belong to (we support over 40 by default and you can add unlimited custom URLs and feeds) and we put them together into a cohesive package that's easier to consume.
To me, Facebook is missing the point by just supporting random 3rd party apps. While it will definitely get them some attention in the short term, I think people are more caught up in the hype of adding the latest app than they are getting real benefit from the apps.
Just as a comparison, check out my Facebook page which has iLike, Google Reader, twitter, Shelfari etc.
http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=500320191
And then check out my Profilactic mashup that has all of that (and more) in a much more useful (IMNSHO) format. And there is no need for a 3rd party app.
http://www.profilactic.com/mashup/smorty71
I think Facebook is being lazy because they have huge member numbers and ridiculous valuations; however, if you take a hard look at the product itself, there isn't much there.
With Platform, you have the power of numbers. Take the Google Reader app Robert posted. It not only lets people show their shared items, but aggregates them with all other Facebook users. THAT is where the power and value is. Not just the ability to add a simple app to your profile.
I'd love to see social-network (facebook or others) add a similar media-picks-sharing for podcasts and internet video. When audio video aggregators exist, why should RSS be the only aggregation/sharing tool?
I know there is more to Facebook (and I generally enjoy the site); however, I just wanted to address the topic of the apps (since that what this post was focusing on).
Sure, the Google Reader app lets you see what your Friends are sharing and see trends across the entire network. That's definitely cool and useful.
My larger question is the fact that, while Facebook is facilitating it, they are not really taking advantage of it by baking it into the product. They are letting the Mario Romeros of the world do that.
So while it is great that they are allowing users to extend their platform, the fact that they aren't doing more of this cool stuff themselves seems like a lack of vision on their part.
I actually regret bringing up my site (see, I left the name out :) in my previous post because it makes all of my comments about Facebook seem to have the agenda of promoting our service. I was just using it to point out that Facebook could be doing more with apps on the product side, rather than just enabling them on the platform side, to make a much more integrated and cohesive product.
And I agree, there is a lot to Facebook. I was just commenting on the apps since that was the topic at hand.
In case anyone is interested, http://appaholic.com/display/2354684299 this are our users stats courtesy of appaholic.com which is wicked cool site for tracking FB apps!
peace,
mario romero
what mario is doing is reminding me of stumbleupon a bit, in that "top shared" sense. the only diff is that with his app, you see where you're going. but the distributed nature is the same, and i like it.
That would be true if we were actually generating the stories, but in most cases we are just consuming the same media, much of it "old media."
Many of us are not looking for an 'all in one' community like you're trying to make Facebook into. Digg, Reddit and the other similar sites serve a singular news purpose, that of news aggregation and that's what we like them for.
Thank you for the post, I did find it interesting and I am investigating Google Reader.
It's really odd that there isn't a proper mashup tool like this. I've been looking for some Digg-like tools (white label diggs) but none of them play well with RSS or even other RSS readers.
These kinds of Auto-recommendation and collaborative filtering tools are what's going to make it big.
I fell over some more work they're doing as well and expect new facilities soon. Rights now they've asked for peace and quiet while coding.
Starting Today
I See Dc
Asterbox.com announces the beta release of their Java mobile platform. They have openly declared what many users have felt: surfing the web on a mobile device is a disappointing experience. Their claims that the internet on the phone is dead, but can live on through web services have been embodied in the Asterbox mobile platform. The Java-based platform utilizes web APIs to deliver content and interactivity to end users in a new and innovative way. The software currently provides access to the Google Reader service, but more functionality is in the works.