<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Scobleizer - Latest Comments in Google and Technorati blog search rewards sploggers</title><link>http://scobleizer.disqus.com/</link><description>Tech enthusiast, video blogger, media innovator, fanatical about startups at Rackspace, home of fanatical support for Internet entrepreneurs.</description><atom:link href="https://scobleizer.disqus.com/google_and_technorati_blog_search_rewards_sploggers/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 09:01:23 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Google and Technorati blog search rewards sploggers</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/12/14/google-and-technorati-blog-search-rewards-sploggers/#comment-9663300</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"That attitude will get me to switch to your competitors"&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;this is damn funny ..how would that help you and why&lt;br&gt;would google care if your small blog is in their index or not? thinking of that google takes like 70-80% of the searchengine market, good luck going to competitors..&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">memyselfandi</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 09:01:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google and Technorati blog search rewards sploggers</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/12/14/google-and-technorati-blog-search-rewards-sploggers/#comment-9663270</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Didn't Google also just finish dancing? Does that make a difference on the Google side of this irksome search results issue? I just wish &lt;a href="http://shaunblog.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="shaunblog.com"&gt;shaunblog.com&lt;/a&gt; would not come up on Google at #2 in a search for Shawn Honnick!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">shawnblog</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 16 Dec 2006 01:39:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google and Technorati blog search rewards sploggers</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/12/14/google-and-technorati-blog-search-rewards-sploggers/#comment-9663290</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Mr. David Sifry,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Can you point to a full explanation of "pinging set up correctly?"&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thanks.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">David Dalka</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2006 03:42:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google and Technorati blog search rewards sploggers</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/12/14/google-and-technorati-blog-search-rewards-sploggers/#comment-9663293</link><description>&lt;p&gt;David: I don't know. I'll check into it. Thank you so much for removing Naik!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Robert Scoble</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2006 02:55:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google and Technorati blog search rewards sploggers</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/12/14/google-and-technorati-blog-search-rewards-sploggers/#comment-9663299</link><description>&lt;p&gt;By the way, are you sure that you have pinging set up correctly Robert? We aren't seeing any pings from you via &lt;a href="http://scobleizer.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="scobleizer.com"&gt;scobleizer.com&lt;/a&gt; or via &lt;a href="http://scobleizer.wordpress.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="scobleizer.wordpress.com"&gt;scobleizer.wordpress.com&lt;/a&gt;...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Dave&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">David Sifry</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2006 01:37:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google and Technorati blog search rewards sploggers</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/12/14/google-and-technorati-blog-search-rewards-sploggers/#comment-9663271</link><description>&lt;p&gt;That site should now be gone from your future results.  This is  constant battle between freshness and relevance, something that we're working on on a daily basis.  Thanks for the report.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Dave&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">David Sifry</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2006 00:36:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google and Technorati blog search rewards sploggers</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/12/14/google-and-technorati-blog-search-rewards-sploggers/#comment-9663272</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks Matt! I owe you a nice steak dinner.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Robert Scoble</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2006 23:51:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google and Technorati blog search rewards sploggers</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/12/14/google-and-technorati-blog-search-rewards-sploggers/#comment-9663273</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I wrote about this back in September... and even got to chat with someone (wish I could remember who) from Technorati.  They could easily tie in to one of the Spog reporting sites:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.douglaskarr.com/2006/09/28/splog-your-way-to-a-higher-technorati-rank/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.douglaskarr.com/2006/09/28/splog-your-way-to-a-higher-technorati-rank/"&gt;http://www.douglaskarr.com/...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Perhaps Technorati should only rank sites based on connections from other 'claimed' blogs on Technorati.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Doug&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Douglas Karr</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2006 18:03:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google and Technorati blog search rewards sploggers</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/12/14/google-and-technorati-blog-search-rewards-sploggers/#comment-9663274</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I've been pushing the word 'sprophylactic' to describe the kind of measures that search engines could take: &lt;a href="http://www.reevoo.com/blogs/bengriffiths/2006/12/07/sprophylactic/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.reevoo.com/blogs/bengriffiths/2006/12/07/sprophylactic/"&gt;http://www.reevoo.com/blogs...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ben Griffiths</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2006 14:57:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google and Technorati blog search rewards sploggers</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/12/14/google-and-technorati-blog-search-rewards-sploggers/#comment-9663275</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Passed this on one to the blogsearch folks.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Matt Cutts</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2006 14:13:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google and Technorati blog search rewards sploggers</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/12/14/google-and-technorati-blog-search-rewards-sploggers/#comment-9663276</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hey Robert: I caught one guy using the wordpress platform splogging my posts and collecting adsense dollars(one disugsting splog was about the recent death of my mother). I joined the forum at WP about the same splogger; their techs say there is really nothing they can do when someone uses their platform--but certainly they could make an agreement with WP users! WP don't like it either--read the vitriol. The WP forum on this is fervent. WP suggested to go after their hosts and stated that Google does not give a c**p! A string of code that catches sploggers would be smart. Hello Google PhDs! It's copyright infringement at its best and disgusting when the splogger is collecting ad revenue from venerable web behemoths like Google AdSense for it. Google is effectively geting revenue for stolen content; it must police those who sign-up at AdSense better and bind them up front. Then if they break the copyright law they can pull their advertising agreement. That should kill sploggers' motivation. WP also suggest victims pursue the advertisers. That'll get Google's attention!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Marie Germain</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2006 14:03:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google and Technorati blog search rewards sploggers</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/12/14/google-and-technorati-blog-search-rewards-sploggers/#comment-9663277</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I write a blog for LockerGnome and this happens quite a bit to me, even with a fairly new blog there. It is annoying, not about being copied so much as giving them revenue or whatever it is anyone thinks they get from Adsense. I've been reading that sites which are splogs and have no real content other than Adsense will be banned from some web directories. I think this is great. They should be banned, they offer no original content.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Laura Brown</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2006 12:05:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google and Technorati blog search rewards sploggers</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/12/14/google-and-technorati-blog-search-rewards-sploggers/#comment-9663278</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Interesting that a lot of you don't understand the difference between Google's main search engine (at &lt;a href="http://google.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="google.com"&gt;google.com&lt;/a&gt;) which uses PageRank and Google's blog search engine (at &lt;a href="http://blogsearch.google.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="blogsearch.google.com"&gt;blogsearch.google.com&lt;/a&gt;) which does NOT use Pagerank. Blogsearch is about speed. Web search is about relevancy.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The thing is that it's weird that blog search engines see a copier before they see the original.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Anyway, I really don't care to chase people like Naik all over the Internet. I'm sure he'll see my comment here if he cares about his reputation.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Robert Scoble</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2006 11:57:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google and Technorati blog search rewards sploggers</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/12/14/google-and-technorati-blog-search-rewards-sploggers/#comment-9663279</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The problem isn't the different search engines, so much as the advertising revenue which usually propels the creation of such sites. Search phrase "google must shape up" provides more info:&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.google.com/search?q=%22google+must+shape+up%22" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.google.com/search?q=%22google+must+shape+up%22"&gt;http://www.google.com/searc...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;This Naik's site doesn't get direct ad revenue, but instead uses a blogroll to boost the pagerank of a chain of auto websites. ("Blogroll" was a technique used by early A-listers to boost the traffic of friends, regardless of any currently useful content they might offer -- it would have been good if spiders had filtered out such manipulations instead of rewarding them.)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Removing the bad incentives seems a surer cure than patching the various search engines to handle each new hack as it arises.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;There's another problem in this Naik's case: the hotlinking of images back to the source site. Why should Gizmodo pay this guy's bandwidth costs? (For the record, Niall Kennedy made me laugh out loud last week.)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;jd&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Dowdell</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2006 11:45:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google and Technorati blog search rewards sploggers</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/12/14/google-and-technorati-blog-search-rewards-sploggers/#comment-9663280</link><description>&lt;p&gt;@Ross&lt;br&gt;google reader doesn't ping other services with the RSS content though. Just as well really or you'd get some pretty nasty recursion. :).&lt;br&gt;Pinging update services with an exact copy of an existing post is pretty pointless, it's just duplication.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">disenchantedtech</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2006 10:12:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google and Technorati blog search rewards sploggers</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/12/14/google-and-technorati-blog-search-rewards-sploggers/#comment-9663283</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I know how you feel, but we live in a Web 2.0 world now and most content on the Internet is stolen.  Most technology blogs are just Digg copied content reproducers.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Philip</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2006 09:34:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google and Technorati blog search rewards sploggers</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/12/14/google-and-technorati-blog-search-rewards-sploggers/#comment-9663281</link><description>&lt;p&gt;One way to look at this is that his site is no different than google reader.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Or your own link blog via google reader.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ross</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2006 08:45:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google and Technorati blog search rewards sploggers</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/12/14/google-and-technorati-blog-search-rewards-sploggers/#comment-9663285</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I have been wondering when people will realize that Google's ranking system leaves much to be desired.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;For example, try a search for "Michigan" or "Michigan news". Now tell me that the site at &lt;a href="http://www.absolutemichigan.com/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.absolutemichigan.com/"&gt;AbsoluteMichigan.com&lt;/a&gt; doesn't match either of those searches a whole lot better than 7 different University of Michigan departments or the defunct for 1 year Michigan Indymedia Collective.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Don't get me wrong, Google is still very good. It is (however) subject to being gamed by sploggers and favors old sites over newer sites.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">farlane</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2006 08:12:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google and Technorati blog search rewards sploggers</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/12/14/google-and-technorati-blog-search-rewards-sploggers/#comment-9663284</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"I keep hearing that the engineers at Google are bored with blogs and RSS and stuff like that and would rather work on video compression systems or something “sexy.” "&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I hope this isn't true, because I think this is what has lead to most of Microsoft's problems.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Brian</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2006 08:11:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google and Technorati blog search rewards sploggers</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/12/14/google-and-technorati-blog-search-rewards-sploggers/#comment-9663286</link><description>&lt;p&gt;What Would Niall Kennedy do? :)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In all seriousness though... Have you phoned him or contacted him in some way (He's studying in Orlando according to his own profile page)? I'm sure you've rec'd (or know someone who has rec'd) a cease and desist. Serve him with one of those if you're feeling particularly strong about this to defend your material. (The bad precedent you might be setting is a lack of defending your copyright. Maybe you've already done all this and court's not particularly high on your to do list. Dunno?).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Looks like he's grubbing a lot of other content too from Engadget, etc. What's the temperature of the other sources he's pilching from? This topic might make a good future post to flesh out some issues around.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">gwhiz</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2006 07:59:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google and Technorati blog search rewards sploggers</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/12/14/google-and-technorati-blog-search-rewards-sploggers/#comment-9663287</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Robert,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Hope you will be able to make it out to Demo at the end of January. We launch Iwerx and Sentinel there. Sentinel would monitor your content and pin-point the sploggers for you.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Now, if we could get some weight with Technorati and Google to have them use our blacklist via API to prune their lists, life would be good.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tony M.</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2006 07:47:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google and Technorati blog search rewards sploggers</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/12/14/google-and-technorati-blog-search-rewards-sploggers/#comment-9663288</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Why not do an article on what is considered fair use for archiving, personal use, offline reading, etc etc. instead of pissing and moaning about someone copying content.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Better yet come up with a creative proactive solution to keep it from happening in the first place; then, only a creative hacker could grab your content.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Just a thought... with all those six figure phd'S running around.  Put the creative juices to work on creative fix's.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Please read comment through a softening filter before responding.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Russ Henry</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2006 07:41:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google and Technorati blog search rewards sploggers</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/12/14/google-and-technorati-blog-search-rewards-sploggers/#comment-9663282</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I try not to just copy peoples content outright but to incude maybe a one or two sentence quate and a linke back to their post when referencing someone elses blog. Firgure should be sending the traffic their way.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Michael Gannotti</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2006 07:31:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google and Technorati blog search rewards sploggers</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/12/14/google-and-technorati-blog-search-rewards-sploggers/#comment-9663289</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It might be because Naik is pinging those services on every rss grab, thats why his content is listed on those services before yours is crawled.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Priyan</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2006 05:54:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google and Technorati blog search rewards sploggers</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/12/14/google-and-technorati-blog-search-rewards-sploggers/#comment-9663294</link><description>&lt;p&gt;ooopsss, probably matt cutts and the guys have to tweak page rank with algorithms to take care of plagiarism...speaking of the next generation search engines, probably this is what we need...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Abhishek Sharma</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2006 05:10:35 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>