<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Scobleizer - Latest Comments in Getting outside the frothy bubble</title><link>http://scobleizer.disqus.com/</link><description>Tech enthusiast, video blogger, media innovator, fanatical about startups at Rackspace, home of fanatical support for Internet entrepreneurs.</description><atom:link href="https://scobleizer.disqus.com/getting_outside_the_frothy_bubble/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 05:58:03 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Getting outside the frothy bubble</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/09/03/getting-outside-the-frothy-bubble/#comment-9652197</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Only for community &lt;a href="http://scobleizer.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="scobleizer.com"&gt;scobleizer.com&lt;/a&gt;! HOT!&lt;br&gt;1.[URL=&lt;a href="http://www.topmeds20.org/tramadol.htm" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.topmeds20.org/tramadol.htm"&gt;http://www.topmeds20.org/tr...&lt;/a&gt;]US Doctors &amp;amp; Pharmacy. Great Service and Prices. VISA-AMX-DISCOVER-COD-Mastercard FREE FEDEX SHIPPING! SATURDAY DELIVERY(where available)orders in by 3pm ship same day[/URL]&lt;br&gt;2.[URL=&lt;a href="http://www.topmeds20.org/soma.htm" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.topmeds20.org/soma.htm"&gt;http://www.topmeds20.org/so...&lt;/a&gt;]Accepting Credit cards or C.O.D. Soma  Free FedEx shipping . FDA approved Medications &amp;amp; U.S. Licensed Pharmacists[/URL]&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sergesnets</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 05:58:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Getting outside the frothy bubble</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/09/03/getting-outside-the-frothy-bubble/#comment-9652135</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I am working with a professional online IT community that's been in business since 98 and have been looking for other successful, professional communities in other verticals. Know of any?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Stephanie H.</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2006 15:19:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Getting outside the frothy bubble</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/09/03/getting-outside-the-frothy-bubble/#comment-9652154</link><description>&lt;p&gt;isnt the froth the best bit?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sparkle Road</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 08 Sep 2006 22:42:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Getting outside the frothy bubble</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/09/03/getting-outside-the-frothy-bubble/#comment-9652165</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Robert,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I've written a lengthy response inspired by this post and the comments here. Take a look at &lt;a href="http://blogs.jigzaw.com/?p=76" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://blogs.jigzaw.com/?p=76"&gt;http://blogs.jigzaw.com/?p=76&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Shannon&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">shannonclark</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2006 22:57:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Getting outside the frothy bubble</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/09/03/getting-outside-the-frothy-bubble/#comment-9652173</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Ok, that makes some sense.  Yes, there are lots of sites I use to look for specific items.  However, I do spend a great deal of time at Google looking up things that I don't already have committed to memory.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Greg Martin</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2006 21:58:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Getting outside the frothy bubble</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/09/03/getting-outside-the-frothy-bubble/#comment-9652155</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt; Q. insiders tell me that one of the top search terms over at Yahoo is actually “Google.” And one of the top search terms at Google is “Yahoo.” Why is that?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;As a long time web designer/SEO/marketer who talks to non-Web people on a constant basis, I'd say that this statistic is due to the fact that most people don't understand how browsers work (heck, they don't even know what a "browser" is and have never heard the word).  Either their browser's home page is a search engine page and all they know is how to *search* for something (e.g., "Google" at Yahoo) or they simply don't know that they can type a domain name into their browser address bar -- and this goes for most people, be they living in remote mountain areas or CEOs of billion-dollar corporations. What you'll hear is this:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Me:  go to my website, &lt;a href="http://blahblah.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="blahblah.com"&gt;blahblah.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;Them:  Don't worry -- I'll find it!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Find it? What's to find?  But that statement is your first clue, and the reason why Web marketing *must* take the search engines into consideration.  It's not like paper advertising, which you must somehow place into the hands of the consumer.  Nor like TV, which is another medium altogether. Different medium; different delivery solution.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;As to the other questions here, I'd say that sorting out a business plan comes immediately after any "bright idea" ... that is, how you'll make money from it.  Yes, it's exciting to build an audience.  Even more exciting is making a living from something you like/love.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">DianeV</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2006 17:09:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Getting outside the frothy bubble</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/09/03/getting-outside-the-frothy-bubble/#comment-9652156</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt;I wish we had a conference on “how to find customers outside of the tech bubble?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;robert, you're invited to seoroadshow (this is a test, see if you can find the details all by yourself, hhh)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">rcjordan</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2006 15:56:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Getting outside the frothy bubble</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/09/03/getting-outside-the-frothy-bubble/#comment-9652161</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Q. insiders tell me that one of the top search terms over at Yahoo is actually “Google.” And one of the top search terms at Google is “Yahoo.” Why is that?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;A. One reason is because ordinary people know it's "Yahoo!" but they don't know whether it's dotNET, dotCOM, dotORG, dotGOV or something else entirely. Worse, with some sites, if you guess the extension wrong you get a NSFW squatter page. So it's easier to search.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">giafly</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2006 08:46:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Getting outside the frothy bubble</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/09/03/getting-outside-the-frothy-bubble/#comment-9652180</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Greg: if you're a geek you probably can name a few other Web sites as well. What's your favorite travel site? Mine isn't Google. What's your favorite real estate site? Mine isn't Google. What's your favorite mobile site? Mine isn't Google. What's your favorite news site? Mine isn't Google's search engine. What's your favorite blog? Mine isn't on Google.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;People outside of the tech world usually have trouble naming all these things. Then I watch how they use the computer and they mainly use the main search page they got used to.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Robert Scoble</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2006 02:47:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Getting outside the frothy bubble</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/09/03/getting-outside-the-frothy-bubble/#comment-9652160</link><description>&lt;p&gt;In your article, you mention that people "outside the bubble" just know how to "search" when they are looking for something.  I consider myself to be very technically savvy.  However, I must admit that "search" is my main means of finding things on the web as well.  For those of us in the "great unwashed" outside the bubble, what should we be doing besides using Google or Yahoo?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thanks for your help.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Greg Martin</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2006 02:35:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Getting outside the frothy bubble</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/09/03/getting-outside-the-frothy-bubble/#comment-9652171</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Well - I'm not in the valley and I've been saying for some time my website stats reflect far more the influence of start pages than search engines. So me no valley boy but life's a changing - just that netvibes is a techcrunch boost so not exactly outside the bubble.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">haydn</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2006 18:32:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Getting outside the frothy bubble</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/09/03/getting-outside-the-frothy-bubble/#comment-9652172</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Oops, I of course meant to say &lt;a href="http://joshwais.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://joshwais.blogspot.com/"&gt;joshwais.blogspot.com&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Josh Wais</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2006 18:05:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Getting outside the frothy bubble</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/09/03/getting-outside-the-frothy-bubble/#comment-9652174</link><description>&lt;p&gt;What a great post.  What a great topic.  I couldn't agree more. And on top of that, I like the way the thought's put.  The thing is, I think, that there's so much pathos involved, so much money tied up and ultimately, by those who are really in it, so much uncertainty, that the issue's hard to get to.  Hopefully this is only one of many posts like this, by Robert and the rest of the blogosphere.  I do think it's coming.  The anti-froth. The see-it-as-it-is kinda folks and consequently their posts and the repercussions of them.  Well, maybe that’s just wishful thinking, but we’ll see.&lt;br&gt;The most important thing I gather from your point, and what I’ve been thinking about in much the same way is the concept of perspective.  For example, the now famous 53,651 Kopelman post is a great example of how even while being a VC but just out of the Valley one can get a more accurate perspective (he’s from Philly).&lt;br&gt;Another example, now that I think about it, is my own.  I follow the industry closely, very closely, I know my startups, my big players and the top bloggers, but I still have the luxury of seeing it from the outside.  I’m in high school still.  Yep, I said it, high school.  I guess I have a way different perspective for that matter then.  And well, I couldn’t agree with you more, like I said.  I love this stuff, I really do, but I want more and I want it better and I think it’s going to take some pretty major changes.  Not to self promote, but I just wrote a post on this myself at &lt;a href="http://joshwais.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="joshwais.blogspot.com"&gt;joshwais.blogspot.com&lt;/a&gt; .&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Josh Wais</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2006 17:47:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Getting outside the frothy bubble</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/09/03/getting-outside-the-frothy-bubble/#comment-9652189</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hey Don: Nice web services powered by Smugmug. I promise to look into it more. Sounds like you have great service there. Hope you find ways to get that to the masses. It's nice that it's not an advertising model. People are slowly learning that great things are worth $$ from the web--not just off the shelf. I cannot tell you how behind the photo shops are!! I have a client (a big retail chain--I am a markerter) that still has a guy hiding in a backroom printing photos at a snail's pace for a price per photo that is not competitive--and the customers have to doddle in the mall for an hour+ while they wait. SmugMug is a print service killer. Everybody these days in the photo print biz: grocers, Walmart, pharmacies. It is all so archaic. You just have to induce trial. I will celebrate you and SmugMug too.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">marie germain</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2006 17:39:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Getting outside the frothy bubble</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/09/03/getting-outside-the-frothy-bubble/#comment-9652175</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Success in web 2.0? Both the idea AND the execution make you smile. Often you get the first but not the second (Riya springs to mind). Wikipedia has both (though is it 1.0 or 2.0?), as does Flickr.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Patrick Dodds</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2006 16:12:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Getting outside the frothy bubble</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/09/03/getting-outside-the-frothy-bubble/#comment-9652178</link><description>&lt;p&gt;@marie germain:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I think you're misunderstanding me.  If you read my linked blog entries and such, you'll find that I'm an advocate of lots of competition.  I'm a Flickr competitor, in some sense of the word, yet I blogged about 'Flickr doesn't suck'.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I could care less who has more market share than I do, because I don't want to be the market leader.  It's part of our corporate strategy to NOT go for market share but rather for ecstatic customers who drive profit.  I'm sure we could have offered free accounts away and grown like a rocket, too (we were on the scene years before Flickr), but that wasn't our target.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Ask anyone who knows me and my company - we're fixated on the customer experience and customer service, not on who's in the lead.  I have to have ready answers, because everyone I meet says "But how are you different than Flickr?", but that's life.  :)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Don&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Don MacAskill</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2006 15:51:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Getting outside the frothy bubble</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/09/03/getting-outside-the-frothy-bubble/#comment-9652159</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It's not just a fantasy world 2.0 bubble - the housing one is comming to the Valley as well...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jack</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2006 15:34:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Getting outside the frothy bubble</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/09/03/getting-outside-the-frothy-bubble/#comment-9652158</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This class is worth attending. Robert posed THE question--and because his blog powers remain strong he induced wise participation from the commentarium. Thanks all. Keep it coming. I'm taking notes.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;What's a product? Something that attracts customers. What's a good show? Something that puts asses in seats. What's a leader? Someone with followers. What's a good web 2.0 service? Something that attracts clicks.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;At the end of the day, it isn't the inventers, entrepreneurs or VCs who can define success: it's the audience. They either click or they don't.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;So what's the recipe for success? I don't have it, but I can tell you where to look&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;An unsolved problem is a product opportunity. A customer pain-point is a product opportunity. But a solved problem is also an opportunity--provided you can offer a substantially easier, faster, and/or cheaper solution.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;When you play the feature war on a small scale, the best you an hope for is to trade some of your audience with your competitors. But the big win is not to seduce customers away from competitors (though that's always fun), the big win is to pull non-customers into the circle.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Anyone who wants to break out of the froth can find  hugely valuable clues and tools in "Blue Ocean Strategy" by W. Chan Kim and Renée Mauborgne. Their subtitle captures their premise very well. "How to Create Uncontested Market Space and Make the Competition Irrelevant."&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Enough with thinking outside the box. "Blue Ocean Strategy" can teach you how to think outside the bubble.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Michael Markman (Mickeleh)</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2006 15:22:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Getting outside the frothy bubble</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/09/03/getting-outside-the-frothy-bubble/#comment-9652157</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yes Don, some folks improve on others but why are you techies (I am not one) persistently fixated on who leads and who's got something better at the expense of another. There is so much room in the sandbox. Yahoo and Google are good. Microsoft and Apple are good. Tehnorati and Wiki are good. And not to tout oligopolies there's plenty of room for also rans. There is such an appetite. But I will tell you this: you have to reach the mainstream to succeed. You must end the esoteric edge. Adopt the user POV. At our web 2.0 conference (corproate audience) this May we will limit techie vitriol--for everyone's beneficial engagement and to actually galvanize them. It will be a lovefest not a hatefest so common in tech blogs. You see it's about resonating with one user. We cause self-destruction somewhat like the Republicans and Democrats cause America to be seen in the wrong light around the world day-by-day in their "conversations". Let's call on the carpet those who do wrong--this is the power of our beneficial transparency. But let's encourage everyone too. I am fan of every lab, every creator--they will empower our future. Remember almost all including Bill G. and Sergei B. started virtually alone. I don't think Sergei can even accept his own accomplishments in his persistent reference to "luck" for his success. C'mon guys let's celebrate and let's reach out to the non-techs, the masses of users yet to be born. Where your riches are. Graham is right to the extent that you have to give audiences something they want. Contrary to some bloggers cynical view it is not pornography and free videos they seek. Who have they been talking to? People want ease, speed, knowledge, help, functionality, ubiquity, pleasure... C'mon. Let's get real. Navel gazing won't generate revenue. Applaud Paul for believing in "three guys" and putting money behind them. There's plenty of room for all.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">marie germain</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2006 15:21:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Getting outside the frothy bubble</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/09/03/getting-outside-the-frothy-bubble/#comment-9652122</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Don: I don't think that many of the 1999 businesses actually had audiences of any real size or depth. And, if they did they certainly didn't have a way to monetize those audiences. Today we do.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;But, yeah, you're right. I'd rather own Printing for Less than Digg, for instance. But that's just me.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Robert Scoble</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2006 15:07:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Getting outside the frothy bubble</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/09/03/getting-outside-the-frothy-bubble/#comment-9652123</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Robert, in your update, you talk about the Paul Graham's approach to "worry about building audience first" and that "that’s actually a good point of view to take."&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Doesn't that sound like the last few internet bubbles in the Valley?  :)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I still maintain that "grow big and" [insert GET ACQUIRED BY GOOGLE or SLAP GOOGLE ADS ON MY PAGES] is still a poor business model (if you can call it that).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Let's not forget that Yahoo had "won" because their portal and search got more eyeballs than anyone.  Only what happened?  Someone with better innovation and execution (Google) came along and suddenly that vast audience switched.  Why?  Because the product was better.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Audiences are fickle and they vanish.  Better businesses, with better products, can come along and take them away.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Don MacAskill</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2006 14:45:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Getting outside the frothy bubble</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/09/03/getting-outside-the-frothy-bubble/#comment-9652124</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Brotherhood: the problem is that if your cappuccino has only froth and no cappuccino then it isn't a good cup of joe.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Robert Scoble</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2006 14:27:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Getting outside the frothy bubble</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/09/03/getting-outside-the-frothy-bubble/#comment-9652126</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Great foam on a cappuccino can last a long long time.  Poor foam won't sustain through the length of the cup.      I don't think its so much about escaping the froth, but sustaining through it.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Brotherhood of the Bean</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2006 14:11:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Getting outside the frothy bubble</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/09/03/getting-outside-the-frothy-bubble/#comment-9652125</link><description>&lt;p&gt;LayZ: we already have, gasp, real revenues and real clients. They are on the "Corporate" bar on our home page. So, no need to worry about us. At least not short term. Now, if the entire world blows up again like it did in March 2000 and everyone cuts their budgets way back? Then we'll definitely feel pain. But I'm working on diversifying our revenue streams outside the tech world so that we can ride that out.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Robert Scoble</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2006 13:57:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Getting outside the frothy bubble</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/09/03/getting-outside-the-frothy-bubble/#comment-9652130</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I do love to read your big picture take on all things soap related, Robert. Listen why don't you tell me what in web 2.0 (apps, ideas, services....)corporations can benefit from--Fortune 500 to less that 10 employees. A laundry list please--I want YOUR take. Let's get real with no froth and bring the worthy developers and ideologues to the stage, to the table, this May--face-to-face with real customers with deep wallets eager to get it and use it. I wait.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">plexusity</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2006 13:36:18 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>