-
Website
http://www.scobleizer.com/ -
Original page
http://scobleizer.com/2007/10/28/getting-around-school-site-blocks/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
danja
44 comments · 4 points
-
polizeros
52 comments · 1 points
-
AndyBeard
69 comments · 4 points
-
Zachary Adam Cohen
35 comments · 8 points
-
dbarefoot
40 comments · 3 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
The best and worst thing Twitter did in 2009: RT
1 day ago · 22 comments
-
World-brand-building mistakes France’s entrepreneurs make
1 week ago · 181 comments
-
2010: the year SEO isn’t important anymore
1 week ago · 67 comments
-
A new addition here: the Meebo bar
1 day ago · 7 comments
-
iPhone developers abandoning app model for HTML5?
1 week ago · 52 comments
-
The best and worst thing Twitter did in 2009: RT
http://labnol.blogspot.com/2005/12/how-to-acces...
On top of all that, I know of a high school that replaced all its windows a few years ago. The new windows are such that radios and cell phones do not work inside the building. The security had to revamp its system so it could communicate within the building.
Yes, you really, really do have to deal with the porn, not because it's so terribleawful that a normal teenager happens to want to look at porn, but because there are way too many dangers (particularly for teenagers looking for teenage-level porn) associated with downloading it and inavertently ending up with illegal content.
The Julie Group (http://thejuliegroup.blogspot.com) was formed to assist with the defense of those caught in the net of accidentally ending up with illegal content as the result of BitTorrent bulk downloads and the like. It is very difficult to defend and is one of the top priorities of the US Justice Department to prosecute. They don't care what age, either, so my advice to Patrick is stay the heck away from it, no matter how cool it might seem to find it.
When Meebo was blocked, I just setup the Meebo Repeater on a computer at home: http://blog.meebo.com/?page_id=140
Re: Bob's comment, "I know of a high school that replaced all its windows a few years ago."
That sounds kind of scary to me. What if something terrible happened and the students needed to call the police/fire department?
I was in New Zealand at a school last month that had fully open access to most things, bar the obvious.
I've got some great pics of kids using YouTube, Bebo, World of Warcraft etc for school project research on my FLickr, starting here:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/edublogger/1529121...
If he is at school, shouldn't he be learning and spending his own time on facebook instead of his teachers'? Just a thought.
Walt Mossberg is on Facebook too. Maybe he's writing a report on journalism and wants to get feedback on what it's like to work at the Wall Street Journal.
Or, maybe he is writing a report on Japan's economy and wants to talk with Joi Ito, one of the best investors in Japan.
But, no, you keep thinking that Facebook is just for fooling around.
His teachers also tell him not to use Wikipedia. Lame.
Well, anyway, a few other ways that students get around filters is by just using subdomains. It's kind of like Patrick's .co.uk method, except everyone just uses hs.facebook.com or the subdomain corresponding with their college. As for Wikipedia, etc. everyone just searches for the page on Google, then views the cached version. Proxies normally get blocked within a day of being found, since news of them spread rather quickly.
Though, I should add, I don't normally need to sneak past the filter, since I'm not viewing anything blocked. Really, I've got too much stuff to do at school to waste time on MySpace.
@9 - Every single example you give concerns a report. Exactly when did things change? I thought reports were part of homework - part of learning to budget your time and meeting deadlines. He can ask his Facebook acquaintances these things on his own time, not the teacher's.
@10 - While some school policies are lame, other's aren't. Blocking community sites is one of the latter. Kids need to learn how to focus - and this one helps to do that.
Oh, his teacher forces him to use PowerPoint for presentations too and won't let him use Apple's Keynote. Sigh.
Kids need to learn to focus. That's what a lot of policies are for.
If I were you would be thanking your school for not letting them use Wikipedia. We have enough problems with what inaccuracies our public schools are teaching our kids as it is.
Why is that the kids responsibility? Good grief! How did we ever survive getting an education before cell phones were invented?
What did schools do in an emergency when there was no such things as cell phones? How did kids occupy their time in class before the internet? If I'm not mistaken, many of the people that laid the foundation of our current technology went to school when this technology didn't exist. How did they EVER manage to learn anything????
Because it's THEIR network. THEIR hardware. Just like it's the school's property.
Care to try this one more time? You really don't have a leg to stand on with this one.
Of course the kids get around the blocks to get to the sites they want to get to. The people who really have problems with blocks at schools are teachers.
Kids bring guns and drugs to school, too. What point were you trying to make?
"The people who really have problems with blocks at schools are teachers."
Problems because they too can't get access to the sites?
I know this for fact because I just left a school district job (in an IT capacity). I know people who work at schools on both coasts and in the middle. They all say the same thing.
This crap about "every kid must be made to feel equal" is just that, crap. It's not realistic. No kid left behind is equally crap. It doesn't work. Life is not fair. Not all children were born with the same mental acuity and ability to grasp information. A child you "gets" everything faster at an early age should be encouraged to move ahead, not kept in the same grade as their peers. Doing this bores kids.
Likewise, a slow kid in a room full of average kids needs to be moved into SPED or another learning area so as not to impede kids learning at the normal rate of speed.
Some things need to occur in schools:
1. School is for learning, not socializing. Full stop. Socialize at lunch, in the hallway, or after school. Not in class. Let the teachers do what they are supposed to do.
2. Drop no kid left behind. Kids should be treated fairly and firmly, not coddled because they are all "special". No one is special. We are all the same but with differing abilities.
3. No cell phones in school. If you have an emergency, let the school office know. Likewise, they will inform you. The district I just left enforces this policy by blocking all calls. Internet is also ruthlessly firewalled (read whitelist, not blacklist). Much easier to allow sites than learn what to block. Smart. Kids need to focus only on their studies.
I talked with countless kids during my tenure with the school. Most of them cannot even tell you how to use a semicolon properly let alone do it. Cannot find Argentina on a map.
I learned all this in school. Why not this generation. I also had a computer in school.
I think that circumventing IT folks is an important life skill. Technology can be used for good or evil - so it pays to know how to work around it. Who says we will live in a fair, free, just society all our lives? It was neither fair nor free 40 years ago if you skin was the wrong color, or if you looked too poor, or if you were a girl.
Um, just as a side note, Wikipedia is a great starting point, but is weak sauce as a resource. If I was teaching, and I got a paper with wikipedia references in it, I'd be disappointed that the student couldn't find the real sources the article was based on.
(With the obvious exception of internet-mostly phenomena like webcomics, or Warcraft, though I look forward to the day when there are enough danah boyds in the world that you wouldn't need to rely on Wikipedia for that kind of thing.)
Circumventing authority is NOT a good life skill. Schools, by federal and most state laws must block certain content if they desire funding.
Learning to circumvent it shows an anti-authoritarian streak, and is not something we want our kids being taught or exposed to. Disagree all you want. I think schools should expel any child intentionally getting around or attempting to get around/subvert boundaries. Likewise, sharing the information on school property or using school resources should result in the same punishment.
People who say this kind of stuff breeds good techies should be flogged. It doesn't.
I spent five years as a security engineer. I finally stopped playing the game and recommended that employers don't blacklist sites. Whitelist them. It's much more effective. I once help a customer set up a security solution that employed a proxy server for outbound traffic, a firewall, and a gateway router. His bandwidth came back to normal levels. I whitelisted sites for him that were suitable. Schools are starting to whitelist. With the right combo of proxies and firewalls, even visiting a proxy server is not going to get you around the filters.
I never said or implied any such thing. I not sure how you drew such an illogical conclusion. Mr. Lackey above is making my point. Using Wikipedia as any sort of authoritative reference source is laziness. And teachers that accept it as an authoritative reference are also being lazy. Pretty much by definition Wikipedia is innaccurate as some point in the day, week, month,year. There are a plethora of examples of where Wikipedia is or has been out and out wrong on things. Yes, it's supposed to be corrected, but how do you know what you are looking at needs to be corrected if you are not an expert on the subject. That is the risk with Wikipedia. I wouldn't bet my term paper or thesis on it as a resource.
Don the point I was making was that educational uses of the Internet are blocked more effectivily than non-academic sites because teachers don't have the time or willingness to play games with power crazed IT people. Students do but students are less interested in the educational sites.
@Northern: "School is for learning, not socializing. Full stop."
That is sort of like saying "school is for learning, not reading." In fact socializing is an important part of what school is about. Spend some time with kids who were homeschooled all their lives and that will open your eyes some. Sure they are "educated" in that they often know a lot but their social skills are often underdeveloped. Kids need to socialize in school or they risk missing out on important life skills.
But the filters are there for a reason (although we are very loose on them here eg. facebook ISNT blocked) and if i find a kid who is breaking my filters and wont share knolage with me but will with other kids i do make sure they have a harse punishment
Once again I have to disagree with you on something. Teaching your kid to ignore the rules is bad parenting.
Speaking as a former teacher, I would reject any paper that sites Wikipedia as one of its sources, use other resources to find the information including books. School filters and blocks are there for a reason. Rules and laws are there for a reason.
You kid has just learned a life leasson: "Obey only the rules I want or rules I agree with" I'm so proud the next generation will be raised with that mindset.
Jonathan
As for knowing you're right. Keep believing that and see where you go. Our educational system is one of the worst in the world and you all are asking me to abide by it? Sigh.
I'm on my school's newspaper and want to write interesting stories that the student body would want to invest time in reading, but with resources cut off because of the many, many websites that are blocked, and because there are students who don't have computers at home, student's grades can suffer.
I mean, for heaven's sake: sanrio.com, the company that created hellokitty, is blocked on the very computer I'm on right now, as well as barbie.com! Does that make any sense at all? I don't forsee Matel putting up some hot barbie porn on their website anytime soon.
On top of all this, the reason school's started blocking pages like myspace and facebook anyways was because it's "dangerous". I can tell you that more so than not, when girls are raped by someone who they met on myspace, or a 12 year old is kidnapped because he or she gave too much information out on myspace, it's the victim's own fault. Go to google, do some research, and see for yourself- molestors don't automatically go to a young girl's myspace and telepathically know where she lives- in some cases, girls have GIVEN these men personal information and FLIRTED with them in messages.
How about instead of blocking kids off from these pages (which also goes against the first amendment), they teach us to not give out information that could potentially put us in harm's way?
From a student's perspective, all I have left to say is that it pisses me off when faculty go to an unnecessary extent to feel as though they have more control- especially when in less than two years I'm going off to college and will have only learned that at my high school everything was blocked- not precautions to avoid dangers that they're supposedly trying to prevent.
If they really care about getting us off sites that we get on when we have NOTHING to do then they would do a better job.
With the porn issue, I know from experience that If you are looking for porn ya gonna find it one way or another and It couldn't hurt if they find out what it looks like to have sex, I was extremely curious when i was younger and well, Google helped me out.
Well nice blog ya got set up, more power to ya
I'm at school trying to just use google, and that's even blocked.
What's the point of being in a computer science class if we can't make our required websites at the school?
It's stupid and I hate it.
Sometimes I have nothing to do during my spare so why can't I go on to my facebook? It's not us wasting the teachers time because we should be doing it on are own time its the fact that sometimes we do have nothing to do. Maybe you haven't been in school for a while but trust me I do listen in class, I find them interesting but come on. Censorship? This is stupid.