<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Scobleizer - Latest Comments in Firefox vs. IE 7 (IE7 having trouble with Google sites?)</title><link>http://scobleizer.disqus.com/</link><description>Tech enthusiast, video blogger, media innovator, fanatical about startups at Rackspace, home of fanatical support for Internet entrepreneurs.</description><atom:link href="https://scobleizer.disqus.com/firefox_vs_ie_7_ie7_having_trouble_with_google_sites/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 17 May 2009 01:08:49 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Firefox vs. IE 7 (IE7 having trouble with Google sites?)</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/10/19/firefox-vs-ie-7-ie7-having-trouble-with-google-sites/#comment-9466138</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I downloaded IE7 and can no longer get into my Internet Options. This is a bunch of bull__! Can't even delete it!!! This makes me really mad!!!!!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Denise</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2009 01:08:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Firefox vs. IE 7 (IE7 having trouble with Google sites?)</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/10/19/firefox-vs-ie-7-ie7-having-trouble-with-google-sites/#comment-9657130</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I downloaded IE7 and can no longer get into my Internet Options. This is a bunch of bull__! Can't even delete it!!! This makes me really mad!!!!!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Denise</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2009 01:08:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Firefox vs. IE 7 (IE7 having trouble with Google sites?)</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/10/19/firefox-vs-ie-7-ie7-having-trouble-with-google-sites/#comment-9657128</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I beg to differ - "shrink to fit" is a nightmare. Instead of one-click printing now, our clients have to use the menu and go into the dialog box to select 100% size. Our pages are properly styled (via CSS) to wrap print w/o cut off at 100%. IE7 does shrink to fit and you need a magnifying glass to read. You cannot right click and print an iframe without selecting everything in it. Then you still need to go into preview and choose your scale. You cannot set the scaling to 100% in javascript (only a registry hack) before calling window.print(). I have frustrated customers and wasted thousands of dollars researching a work around (none found yet). Microsoft calls this a feature? If this is how Microsoft thinks they are improving usablity they are seriously mistaken.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rob</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 17:04:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Firefox vs. IE 7 (IE7 having trouble with Google sites?)</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/10/19/firefox-vs-ie-7-ie7-having-trouble-with-google-sites/#comment-9657129</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I completely disagree. And I don't want to! But the fact of the matter is that FireFox is NOT faster than Internet Explorer, and as I said, I really wish it were, becuase I'd love more than anything to stop using any Microsoft/Windows products, so I'm always on the lookout.&lt;br&gt; I've got IE6, and have now had Firefox 2.0.0.12 for about two weeks. IE6 continues to load pages faster for me than does Firefox, though I've noticed that Firefox has improved steadily over time, so I think the day will come. People can hem and haw and all of that, claiming I must be doing something wrong, but this is simply my experience.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ariel</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 13:41:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Firefox vs. IE 7 (IE7 having trouble with Google sites?)</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/10/19/firefox-vs-ie-7-ie7-having-trouble-with-google-sites/#comment-9657127</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Try this script in IE and Firefox and see the difference between them.&lt;br&gt;Firefox takes about 1 sec to finish it, while IE takes over a minute.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;	function testing(){&lt;br&gt;	}&lt;br&gt;	function buttonClick(){&lt;br&gt;		var longString = "";&lt;br&gt;		for (var i = 0; i &amp;lt; 100000; i++){&lt;br&gt;			if (i%100 == 0){&lt;br&gt;				longString += "\n";&lt;br&gt;			}&lt;br&gt;			longString += i;&lt;br&gt;		}&lt;br&gt;		alert(longString);&lt;br&gt;	}&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dan</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 10:33:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Firefox vs. IE 7 (IE7 having trouble with Google sites?)</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/10/19/firefox-vs-ie-7-ie7-having-trouble-with-google-sites/#comment-9657126</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Here's a collection of tuning tips for IE7:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://reliancepc.com/ReliancePC/Tips/IE7tuning/IE7tuning.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://reliancepc.com/ReliancePC/Tips/IE7tuning/IE7tuning.html"&gt;http://reliancepc.com/Relia...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ReliancePC</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2007 23:37:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Firefox vs. IE 7 (IE7 having trouble with Google sites?)</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/10/19/firefox-vs-ie-7-ie7-having-trouble-with-google-sites/#comment-9657119</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I used IE 6 for a long time and it worked fine. Then I heard everyone tell me that IE 7 is much better, so I decided to try it out. Once I had it installed, it works fine on most sites, except for the one site that I visit most which is Myspace. Every time I load the Myspace homepage, it works fine, but when I put in my password and click "Log In", IE 7 crashes every time. No idea why. Any help or suggestions? Thanks&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jeremiah</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 12:36:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Firefox vs. IE 7 (IE7 having trouble with Google sites?)</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/10/19/firefox-vs-ie-7-ie7-having-trouble-with-google-sites/#comment-9657120</link><description>&lt;p&gt;FireFox has a problem in rendering. IE can easily beat it on this testcase:&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.teekoo.com/freebsd/chart.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.teekoo.com/freebsd/chart.html"&gt;http://www.teekoo.com/freeb...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Firefox will hang with 300-500 bars, Opera, which claims to be the fastest, drag with 1500 bars,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;IE, can do 5000 bars with no problem!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Try it!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jingshao Chen</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2007 15:57:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Firefox vs. IE 7 (IE7 having trouble with Google sites?)</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/10/19/firefox-vs-ie-7-ie7-having-trouble-with-google-sites/#comment-9657121</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Firefox not support Unicode like IE.&lt;br&gt;i don't know the reason for this.&lt;br&gt;do u no?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Pradees</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 12:01:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Firefox vs. IE 7 (IE7 having trouble with Google sites?)</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/10/19/firefox-vs-ie-7-ie7-having-trouble-with-google-sites/#comment-9657122</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I am constantly having problems with FF 2 and Gmail, of all sites.  I will always get the "taking longer than normal to load" message with the option of basic view.  This works, but then there are a lot less usable options.&lt;br&gt;No problems at all with IE7.&lt;br&gt;This may be caused by Ad Muncher, rather than the browser though.&lt;br&gt;Interesting, considering the affiliation between Google and Firefox.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rob</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 12:08:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Firefox vs. IE 7 (IE7 having trouble with Google sites?)</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/10/19/firefox-vs-ie-7-ie7-having-trouble-with-google-sites/#comment-9657123</link><description>&lt;p&gt;What about cpu utilization...&lt;br&gt;I use firefox and sometimes open many tabs while browsing, which makes it slow, and that is understandable. After ie7 was update from beta thru microsoft update I thought of giving it a try and it to my surprise it seemed faster. To compare properly I opened firefox and ie side by side. Opened same sites and browsed to same pages on both and this time firefox was faster. Puzzeled, I opened up task manager to see what's going on. Firefox seems to take lot more cpu cycles. I disabled all the add ons in both browsers and restarted to do an accurate test. Firefox does take about 70% more cpu cycles than ie7 when browsing the same sites/pages. And that is why firefox seemingly runs faster side-by-side with ie7 but when running separately ie7 is faster. E.g. if something takes 11 secs in firefox and 10 in ie, the same thing takes 12 secs in firefox when both browsers are running and 13 in ie, apparently because firefox tries to consume more resources and leaves rest for other apps including ie.&lt;br&gt;As I said before I am a firefox user and still am after this test (for pop-ups and security). Please do the test yourself and let everybody know.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Vinnie</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2007 00:09:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Firefox vs. IE 7 (IE7 having trouble with Google sites?)</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/10/19/firefox-vs-ie-7-ie7-having-trouble-with-google-sites/#comment-9657124</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I have been using IE7 and FF2 simultaneously for a month now... I have to admit FF2 is faster but IE7 is better at all the other things. The interface is great. The RSS reader is excellent. It takes some time to learn but it is useful nontheless.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I also used FF 1.x and IE6 once upon a time. Back then FF 1.x was better.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;My opinion, for the present try out IE7, bother with FF2 after you get tired of IE7. [Which I guess, is not happening anytime soon.]&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Kesava</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2007 12:56:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Firefox vs. IE 7 (IE7 having trouble with Google sites?)</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/10/19/firefox-vs-ie-7-ie7-having-trouble-with-google-sites/#comment-9657125</link><description>&lt;p&gt;IE 7 Sucks. ANYTIME i try to open attachments or work with contacts in GMAIL IE 7 crashes. If anyone has any ideas about this let me know soon.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thank you.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jonathan</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2007 19:01:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Firefox vs. IE 7 (IE7 having trouble with Google sites?)</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/10/19/firefox-vs-ie-7-ie7-having-trouble-with-google-sites/#comment-9657118</link><description>&lt;p&gt;FireFox is better probably for the simple fact that Microsoft didn't develop it.  Microsoft code is just so sloppy to start with.  It is like they intentionally try to see how many lines of code they can execute to do some of the most mundane tasks. They know they have the majority of the world by the balls, and they don't care if they use every cycle your computer has to add 1+1 . They are Nazi's.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Garth C.</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 17:17:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Firefox vs. IE 7 (IE7 having trouble with Google sites?)</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/10/19/firefox-vs-ie-7-ie7-having-trouble-with-google-sites/#comment-9657113</link><description>&lt;p&gt;In XP, I like Firefox.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;But IE7 is very nice in Vista. It's my main browser in Vista.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">YO</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2006 21:01:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Firefox vs. IE 7 (IE7 having trouble with Google sites?)</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/10/19/firefox-vs-ie-7-ie7-having-trouble-with-google-sites/#comment-9657114</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Well, personal experience differs.  I sure respect your views.  But,in this case, you can't say FireFox is a better browser, just because its better with AJAX sites.  By the way, I myself use FireFox also and I like it.  But I like technology more than any single technology tool and won't appreciate it when someone shows personal hatred towards any technology.  I care more about technology I use, not the companies that create them, because they don't mean anything to me.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">snt</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2006 17:30:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Firefox vs. IE 7 (IE7 having trouble with Google sites?)</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/10/19/firefox-vs-ie-7-ie7-having-trouble-with-google-sites/#comment-9657115</link><description>&lt;p&gt;SNT: huh? Firefox works a lot better on AJAX sites that I've tested IE7 on. Faster, by a mile. So, I can't say it's a better browser?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Robert Scoble</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2006 17:22:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Firefox vs. IE 7 (IE7 having trouble with Google sites?)</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/10/19/firefox-vs-ie-7-ie7-having-trouble-with-google-sites/#comment-9657116</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Saying FireFox is better than IE7 is just a immature comment.  Learn to understand and use all the better technology out there.  FireFox is a good browser with its strengths and weaknesses and FireFox is not really better than IE7, but as good as IE7.  If you like one better than the other, use it, but don't tell everyone to use it, because you like.  That is very immature.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">snt</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2006 17:14:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Firefox vs. IE 7 (IE7 having trouble with Google sites?)</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/10/19/firefox-vs-ie-7-ie7-having-trouble-with-google-sites/#comment-9657117</link><description>&lt;p&gt;What a load of BS that IE7 renders slowly, on any site i've tried it on firefox renders much slower.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Also, like pointed out the default is to check the site against phishing.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;And, what are people saying ? Tabs not intuitive, they way more intuitive in IE7 than in Firefox.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Stop talking bs.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">KL</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 03 Dec 2006 08:33:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Firefox vs. IE 7 (IE7 having trouble with Google sites?)</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/10/19/firefox-vs-ie-7-ie7-having-trouble-with-google-sites/#comment-9657031</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I prefer Firefox 2.0.&lt;br&gt;And I have to say the integrated spell check is awesome.&lt;br&gt;Only bad thing is: there are still websites not working properly with FF :(&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;If you are a Firefox fan you might want to integrate it into your Windows installation CD.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Integrate Firefox into your Windows installation CD:&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://addons.wordpress.com/2006/10/23/firefox-20-final/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://addons.wordpress.com/2006/10/23/firefox-20-final/"&gt;http://addons.wordpress.com...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The ultimate dream of every Firefox fan:&lt;br&gt;have Firefox installed since the first boot of Windows :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rado</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2006 08:40:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Firefox vs. IE 7 (IE7 having trouble with Google sites?)</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/10/19/firefox-vs-ie-7-ie7-having-trouble-with-google-sites/#comment-9657111</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Mees really don't like Gate's folly of late I've been&lt;br&gt;using Opera 9 as it more user friendly.....&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">vulpy</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 03 Nov 2006 19:39:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Firefox vs. IE 7 (IE7 having trouble with Google sites?)</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/10/19/firefox-vs-ie-7-ie7-having-trouble-with-google-sites/#comment-9657112</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Can someone elaborate on what is meant by adjective "very slow"? Doesn't make any sense to me at least. This should be supported with data. I mean on a blah-blah configuration machine loading blah-blah page takes m1 sec in IE and m2 sec in FF. This kind of data is going to help rather than saying "very slow". "Very slow" for me is 100 times slower, for someone else it might be .3 times slower. Can we get some quick data here?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kmiuc</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2006 02:39:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Firefox vs. IE 7 (IE7 having trouble with Google sites?)</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/10/19/firefox-vs-ie-7-ie7-having-trouble-with-google-sites/#comment-9657107</link><description>&lt;p&gt;On my 2nd use of IE7 , I showed it to a friend who would be using it in work. Opened Gmail &amp;amp; BBC in tabs. All seemed fine.&lt;br&gt;after 10 minutes of  looking through email, I logged out and attempted to close IE7 down.&lt;br&gt;I was asked if I wanted to close tabs. Clicked yes.&lt;br&gt;I then got told, IE 7 has encountered a problem and must be shut down and I was then asked if I I'd like to submit info to MS.&lt;br&gt;In order words IE7 crashed! On my second use. Pretty Poor.&lt;br&gt;Otherwise its grand and a huge improvement.&lt;br&gt;I always hated how opening up a new (blank) window would cause IE6 to open with the same content you were viewing.&lt;br&gt;So you had to windows showingthe same thing. This made no sense to me.&lt;br&gt;Verdict:&lt;br&gt;  I am sticking with Firefox.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Fionn</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2006 11:06:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Firefox vs. IE 7 (IE7 having trouble with Google sites?)</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/10/19/firefox-vs-ie-7-ie7-having-trouble-with-google-sites/#comment-9657108</link><description>&lt;p&gt;My blog entry on IE7's xmlhttprequest object:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.techtoolblog.com/archives/ie-7-native-xmlhttprequest-not-so-good" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.techtoolblog.com/archives/ie-7-native-xmlhttprequest-not-so-good"&gt;http://www.techtoolblog.com...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tim</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2006 16:33:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Firefox vs. IE 7 (IE7 having trouble with Google sites?)</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/10/19/firefox-vs-ie-7-ie7-having-trouble-with-google-sites/#comment-9657109</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Have you tried turning the "Enable Native XmlHttpRequest" to off?  It looks like the IE team didn't code this to spec or they have some slowness in their javascript object.  Turn this off and IE is forced to use the orginial 'Microsoft.XMLHTTP' object which seems much much faster...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tim</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2006 15:43:49 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>