<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Scobleizer - Latest Comments in Firefox 2 rocks (it&amp;#8217;s way faster)</title><link>http://scobleizer.disqus.com/</link><description>Tech enthusiast, video blogger, media innovator, fanatical about startups at Rackspace, home of fanatical support for Internet entrepreneurs.</description><atom:link href="https://scobleizer.disqus.com/firefox_2_rocks_it8217s_way_faster/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2006 18:25:38 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Firefox 2 rocks (it&amp;#8217;s way faster)</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/10/08/firefox-2-rocks-its-way-faster/#comment-9655740</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I am just trying out the new release of IE7, and find it interesting all the debate about this release versus the Firefox download. One of the most interesting aspects of the IE vs. Firefox battle is the development of the ecosystem of extensions or add-ons. It’s not just about bugs and features. Right now Firefox had a great advantage in this space but you can see Microsoft trying to catch up.&lt;br&gt;I noticed an interesting extension called Trailfire, set up as a recommended download for IE7. See link:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.ieaddons.com/SearchResults.aspx?keywords=trailfire" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.ieaddons.com/SearchResults.aspx?keywords=trailfire"&gt;http://www.ieaddons.com/Sea...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I think the ecosystem for Firefox and IE will decide who wins this battle. What do you think?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mariam</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2006 18:25:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Firefox 2 rocks (it&amp;#8217;s way faster)</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/10/08/firefox-2-rocks-its-way-faster/#comment-9655739</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Just installed. Looks really nice!&lt;br&gt;Anybody knows the final release date?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alex Bogoslav</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Oct 2006 05:01:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Firefox 2 rocks (it&amp;#8217;s way faster)</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/10/08/firefox-2-rocks-its-way-faster/#comment-9655738</link><description>&lt;p&gt;[...]Earlier this week I installed Firefox 2.0 RC2, basically initiated by a post that Robert Scoble made about it.[...]&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Peter Simoons</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2006 14:36:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Firefox 2 rocks (it&amp;#8217;s way faster)</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/10/08/firefox-2-rocks-its-way-faster/#comment-9655732</link><description>&lt;p&gt;tested the beta FF 2.0. its a memory hog.. downgrades my systems performance completely! any ideas to get over this?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bsamanth</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2006 18:53:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Firefox 2 rocks (it&amp;#8217;s way faster)</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/10/08/firefox-2-rocks-its-way-faster/#comment-9655733</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'd like very much this beta 2 !very best tan 1.the "bon echo" was horrible&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Daniel</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2006 17:32:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Firefox 2 rocks (it&amp;#8217;s way faster)</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/10/08/firefox-2-rocks-its-way-faster/#comment-9655734</link><description>&lt;p&gt;anyone know of a link to a screenshot?&lt;br&gt;i think they have incorporated a lot of netscape 8's tweaks which was based on firefox.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">arabianfox</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2006 17:18:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Firefox 2 rocks (it&amp;#8217;s way faster)</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/10/08/firefox-2-rocks-its-way-faster/#comment-9655735</link><description>&lt;p&gt;BlueQute is a very nice skin, much better than the default one (though that's not that hard to do).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/1789/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/1789/"&gt;https://addons.mozilla.org/...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Eric</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2006 17:05:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Firefox 2 rocks (it&amp;#8217;s way faster)</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/10/08/firefox-2-rocks-its-way-faster/#comment-9655737</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Find working in the text area (form fields) is the single most important feature in Firefox 2 for me. It really is the little things.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Lloyd Dewolf</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2006 15:41:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Firefox 2 rocks (it&amp;#8217;s way faster)</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/10/08/firefox-2-rocks-its-way-faster/#comment-9655736</link><description>&lt;p&gt;should check out avant browser, actually an overlay for IE6 &amp;amp; is faster. almost on par. W. Firefox.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">sentinel316</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2006 15:11:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Firefox 2 rocks (it&amp;#8217;s way faster)</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/10/08/firefox-2-rocks-its-way-faster/#comment-9655705</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Can't wait for FF 2.0 to come out FF 1.0 + and above has been so good :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Granville Barnett</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2006 12:49:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Firefox 2 rocks (it&amp;#8217;s way faster)</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/10/08/firefox-2-rocks-its-way-faster/#comment-9655703</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I've recently converted to Firefox after years on Internet Explorer, and I'm very pleased with the browser so far. I haven't downloaded any addons yet, but I may do one day.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Neville</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2006 12:48:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Firefox 2 rocks (it&amp;#8217;s way faster)</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/10/08/firefox-2-rocks-its-way-faster/#comment-9655704</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hey,Opera is faster.&lt;br&gt;Opera 9 doesn't have any banners anymore and it just rocks with the ease of use. Firefox with the 'fasterfox' extension is very good though.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bristowboy</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2006 12:34:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Firefox 2 rocks (it&amp;#8217;s way faster)</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/10/08/firefox-2-rocks-its-way-faster/#comment-9655706</link><description>&lt;p&gt;There might have been other browser before with close buttons on tabs, but Safari introduced them in its version 1.x. Opera added them in Opera 8 (with the option to revert to the real MDI buttons like it always had had). The Firefox team is the only one that did some serious usability research some time ago, and the change in Firefox 2 is the result of this research.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Saved sessions (autorestore after crash, or always if you want) have been with Opera since Opera 4 or 5. Omniweb on Mac also has extensive session features. Firefox 2 is now getting some - and IE7 doesn't have them, nor Safari, IIANM.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rijk</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2006 11:11:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Firefox 2 rocks (it&amp;#8217;s way faster)</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/10/08/firefox-2-rocks-its-way-faster/#comment-9655707</link><description>&lt;p&gt;@diego,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Yes IE7 and Safari had those style of tabs first, but no one is saying anything towards them.  No one is saying who was first.  Besides I think Opera was the first, and props to them for that.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Roger Kondrat</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2006 07:47:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Firefox 2 rocks (it&amp;#8217;s way faster)</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/10/08/firefox-2-rocks-its-way-faster/#comment-9655708</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Still not as fast as OmniWeb...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">nosugrefneb</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2006 06:17:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Firefox 2 rocks (it&amp;#8217;s way faster)</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/10/08/firefox-2-rocks-its-way-faster/#comment-9655709</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The new default skin is just ugly.&lt;br&gt;Rss feeds dont't look as good as in IE7.&lt;br&gt;Visual rendering of pages is not as smooth as in IE7.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Anyway, i use FF2(RC2) because it is THE browser.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">heraclyde</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2006 05:51:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Firefox 2 rocks (it&amp;#8217;s way faster)</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/10/08/firefox-2-rocks-its-way-faster/#comment-9655710</link><description>&lt;p&gt;robert,&lt;br&gt;yest you blog was not in the top blog section.  guess your new job is taking much of your time.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.irin.co.uk" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="www.irin.co.uk"&gt;www.irin.co.uk&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jean</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2006 02:39:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Firefox 2 rocks (it&amp;#8217;s way faster)</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/10/08/firefox-2-rocks-its-way-faster/#comment-9655712</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Faster, yes, but then Opera's been miles down the road eons ago, but then I can't live without some FF extensions, so mull between Opera and FF. But IE is a long long distant memory and use Avant for those times when IE proves a neccessary evil.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Christopher Coulter</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2006 01:56:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Firefox 2 rocks (it&amp;#8217;s way faster)</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/10/08/firefox-2-rocks-its-way-faster/#comment-9655713</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm agreed with you. It’s not only faster but useful too.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">pakcar</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2006 01:48:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Firefox 2 rocks (it&amp;#8217;s way faster)</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/10/08/firefox-2-rocks-its-way-faster/#comment-9655711</link><description>&lt;p&gt;@phrostypoison&lt;br&gt;Hm, then my imported profile must have killed that. For me it opened lots of new windows. Still the restore feature is missing which I use a lot.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;@Matti&lt;br&gt;No, I haven't tried that, but I don't think it would help in this case. The dev build I used for Tab Mix Plus did work in the sense of it got activated, and some of the settings actually worked. But just some, e.g. the single window setting did not. So it seems to be more of a problem of how 2.0 opens windows which is different from how 1.5 did it.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;@Will&lt;br&gt;If you just need the features that Opera provides I don't see a reason not to use it and switch to Firefox. I switched to Firefox because Opera was missing features (most prominently ad blocking) and does not even have the concept of extensions. Whatever you like about Opera featurewise, there is definetly an extension for Firefox providing the exact same feature in a gazillion different ways so that everybody gets what he wants. And speed is not an issue for me, I have not yet encountered a browser which felt slow. There may be objetcivly fast or slow browsers, but as long as I don't notice it I don't care.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Thomas</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2006 00:29:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Firefox 2 rocks (it&amp;#8217;s way faster)</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/10/08/firefox-2-rocks-its-way-faster/#comment-9655714</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Firefox is just now catching up to where Opera has already been for quit a while - Ooh, a close box on the tab itself - how innovative.  And quick?  Gimme a break.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Will</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 08 Oct 2006 21:08:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Firefox 2 rocks (it&amp;#8217;s way faster)</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/10/08/firefox-2-rocks-its-way-faster/#comment-9655715</link><description>&lt;p&gt;RC1 had the close button on the tab, didn't it? Seems like i've been browsing that way (sans any spiffy extensions to do such behavior) for weeks now, eh? (this one looks prettier though)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Brian Warren</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 08 Oct 2006 18:55:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Firefox 2 rocks (it&amp;#8217;s way faster)</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/10/08/firefox-2-rocks-its-way-faster/#comment-9655716</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You mean the close buttons copied from Safari, right? ctrl-w is so much more convenient, and I don't accidentally close the tab I want when I click too close to the X on the tab. I'm trying to figure out how any of this is real news or worth anybody's time.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">SpecialK</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 08 Oct 2006 17:58:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Firefox 2 rocks (it&amp;#8217;s way faster)</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/10/08/firefox-2-rocks-its-way-faster/#comment-9655717</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It does go much faster, unfortunately, the tabs don't work! I'll wait for stable release as well&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jimmy Gambier</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 08 Oct 2006 17:22:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Firefox 2 rocks (it&amp;#8217;s way faster)</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/10/08/firefox-2-rocks-its-way-faster/#comment-9655720</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Does everyone forget Opera?  They were the instigators of tabbed browsing many halfmoons ago and have always had X close on each tab :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">becs</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 08 Oct 2006 16:57:36 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>