-
Website
http://www.scobleizer.com/ -
Original page
http://scobleizer.com/2008/01/08/facebook-and-google-join-dataportabilityorg/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
danja
44 comments · 4 points
-
polizeros
52 comments · 1 points
-
AndyBeard
69 comments · 4 points
-
Zachary Adam Cohen
35 comments · 8 points
-
dbarefoot
40 comments · 3 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
The best and worst thing Twitter did in 2009: RT
1 day ago · 22 comments
-
World-brand-building mistakes France’s entrepreneurs make
1 week ago · 181 comments
-
2010: the year SEO isn’t important anymore
1 week ago · 67 comments
-
A new addition here: the Meebo bar
1 day ago · 7 comments
-
iPhone developers abandoning app model for HTML5?
1 week ago · 52 comments
-
The best and worst thing Twitter did in 2009: RT
I sure HOPE the announcement means you won't be able to use an automated harvester to bulk download e-mail addresses. Like you did.
Wow, you can really act like a passive agressive child sometimes Robert.
What if funding was suddenly dropped in one of your friends hands to do the Open Data Social Platform idea?
Ah you got EMAIL!
I cannot state here which funding firm and etc...
If you keep griping about something, that was after all your fault, for breaking their T&C's, by using a script, you'll keep looking like a child who is throwing a tantrum.
For all intense purposes you could have looked like some sort of hacker to their system.
leave it, move on, and get back to the writing we know you are all capable of!
Your incident with facebook has really shined the light on this issue and particularly on DataPortability initiative.
My post about it here http://technozzle.com/?p=28
Just joining a group means nothing (except maybe they are there to disrupt the group).
NO - It means Facebook is joining Dataportability.org.
Nothing more!
The single question you seemed to have refused to answer is: what if even a single person on Facebook, in your friends list, likes being on Facebook because they have rules against things like you did? Or do you hold those people in as much contempt because they aren't likely to enjoy your opinion on rulebreaking?
Interesting that wanting privacy is so out of vogue...