-
Website
http://www.scobleizer.com/ -
Original page
http://scobleizer.com/2007/09/05/email-aint-going-away/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
danja
44 comments · 4 points
-
polizeros
52 comments · 1 points
-
AndyBeard
69 comments · 4 points
-
Zachary Adam Cohen
33 comments · 8 points
-
dbarefoot
40 comments · 3 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
iPhone developers abandoning app model for HTML5?
1 day ago · 48 comments
-
2010: the year SEO isn’t important anymore
1 day ago · 42 comments
-
World-brand-building mistakes France’s entrepreneurs make
6 days ago · 178 comments
-
Challenge to Rackspace: enable 15-min $100 Twitter businesses
2 days ago · 32 comments
-
Welcome to the age of consumer HD video
2 days ago · 18 comments
-
iPhone developers abandoning app model for HTML5?
Me... I'm going to have to get my mother online. I spend too much time on the phone telling her stuff everyone else finds out online!
Why not e-mail a link to your Flickr and Twitter account pages when the baby is born? For them it'd be like clicking a link.
I do feel your pain, for most of the people my age, if its not in an IM client, they don't know how to do it.
These tools are merely great ideas used by early adopters if we don't effectively manage the conversation such that these tools create value for everyday people. This does not mean we layer the conversation with off-putting with marketing-speak. This means we need to create everyday value for people with everyday conversation in everyday channels.
And we can't expect the traditional marketers to do this. Technology threatens their profit model, and they've got their finger in their ears singing 'la la la I can't hear you'.
http://mybroadband.co.za/blogs/2007/08/24/can-s...
http://smoothspan.wordpress.com/2007/09/03/what...
Cheers!
BW
Soon... very soon :)
Seth: one problem that all leads to the "what is RSS" conversation. Or I have to go over their house and set it up for them.
Still, I like the post because it does really capture what the "real" people who aren't fascinated by each new Web2.0 app that helps us sign up for another service. (I can almost her my mother as the part of FAMILY MEMBER).
You simply create an account, tell it about all your various feeds, then create "recipient profiles"--email address, name, and what feeds you want to send them updates on.
Recipients can easily opt-out of receiving further updates, and/or configure which ones they get (overriding your initial presets, after which point, you can't change).
Okay, who's going to raise $10M VC funds first? GO!
My blog has quickly been replaced by my Flickr page for non-geek communication. I should just redirect everything there!
One of the hardest things to remember when you live in the Bay Area tech cocoon is how people outside our sphere use the Internet. We are most definitely NOT the world. We're not even close. You can fight it, or you can accept the fact that they are on a different part of the adoption curve, and they're not going to change as fast as you.
I wish you the very best for the delivery.
I fully expect to email my own daughters when your baby is born. Myself, I will learn from your Twitter account :-)
I'm going to get my email down to zero messages in the next month though.
Being that email is like the opposite of Ajax and other tech-hype buzzwords, such a service might actually be useful to the world.
I personally wish e-mail could be totally reengineered so that is was;
1.) More secure
2.) Tied in with Secure FTP services so whenever big try to send a honking big file or group of files like photos it would sent them to a server and create a link automatically.
3.) replace the concept of e-mail newsletter with RSS feeds but encapsulate them into e-mail.
Even though I use a newsreader I would prefer it to be a tighter part of an e-mail client or browser.
Yes, I get the same old "send me an e-mail" from my older relatives. The really sad thing is most of them on still on dial-up and complain because they can't download my e-mail!
Sigh. Us geeks really do seem to speak a different language, don't we? Although I am glad to say my mom finally knows to automatically check flickr if she wants to see new pictures of her grandbabies.
Get over yourselves. No one gives a rat's ass about 99% of these web services, not because they don't understand them, but because they provide little or no value to people who: A) are not paid to blog about them for a living; or B) don't enjoy spending their every waking moment engaged with a screen of some sort.
Most people use computers some times, and other times want to be away. They don't want to learn 25 new web services, even if they provide some level of "improvement" over the way they do things now. It's not enough to bother learning, especially when it won't be kewl in a week and will go out of business in two.
Having N flavor-of-the-month social networking sites where you post announcements is well and good for people who wish to use the internet in that manner, but in this case you did the equivalent of sending a video message to a person with a monochrome cell phone that only supports text messaging.
Also you could have avoided flustering them by just emailing them a link to your flikr acount. It would take 10 seconds and you'd avoid the somewhat arrogant "oh just search for me on Google" problem.
Of course I'm sure the solution is some new web 2.0 interface that allows you to chain updates through a Rube Goldbergesque chain of Web 2.0 interfaces to send the equivalent of "I updated this page" to their inbox.
Actually I think I made the same point you did, but with a lot more style and fun.
And, I'd rather not defend people who don't look for better ways to do things. Email is hardly the best way to send photos around to people. For a whole lot of reasons.
been using it for almost 3 years.
I have stopped calling it RSS when explaining it to new-tech...it is "This is 'e-mail in a box'. It is right on your desktop and their is no spam".
-wayne
P.S. Your move at Scrabulous, if you can spell your new family addition's name on the board I'll sponsor another microloan and concede.
Maybe I didn't have a way to write down their email address. It's a lot easier for THEM to do a search than force ME to figure out their email address and send them an email. Especially if we're out walking around.
Teach a man to fish and he'll have food for a lifetime.
Wait until I tell them to join Facebook. :-)
You'd be better off emailing them a link to the pics in your Flikr and let them discover it on their own, LOL...
I hesitate to put that there since I'm joining the team, but if you can get a beta account, you can put all of that stuff into your email.
And you are right.... email isn't going anywhere!
I will think about that other concept, you got my wheels spinning.
- Greg
-dave
To paraphrase Raymond Chen, now you have eleven problems :-)
Each medium (email, IM, twitter, blog, IM etc.) has a different coefficient of response and is useful/appropriate for different situations.
BTW I would suggest using Tumblr instead of Twitter for your linkblog, it would remove the need to having to click to the twitter page then to the right url instead of just directly to the url. In fact, you could create a second tumblr acct just for links.
In fact, I'm using tumblr to aggregate both status type and link updates. What is interesting is that Google Adsense is not able to deal well with this use case and often serves up unrelated ads.
Check it out. http://tumblelog.jauderho.com/
Now that I think about it, you could potentially use Google Alerts to email yourself and set up a rule to forward to people. It's a little hackish but doable.
KodakGallery (formally Ofoto) does a great job of easily sharing photos with groups of friends, family, or colleagues using email.
But the best part is that it is very easy for the recipient to view them at their leisure. And that is the whole point of sending pictures.
I'm a big Tumblr fan. I let it aggregate my links, Tweets, and Viddler Videos!
I won't hint at simple names, since someone might nip the url.
Then put everything there.
You can also generate an R|Mail widget for your blog that lets people subscribe by email directly. Then, if you manage to actually get them to your blog, they can do the hard work themselves without dealing with any scary RSS.
I've been using R|Mail for years now instead of an RSS reader. It's the only way I can deal with feeds. I like GMail better than any RSS reader I've found.
Grandma just told me last weekend, "I checked out your blo...g site, but you hadn't updated." Check it out again, Grandma.
I've known two guys who have live blogged the birth of their children. Makes for an interesting day at work when you can't stop refreshing the browser.
And I think you no longer have capacity to add them to your Facebook list, do you? So that wouldn't help.
Why don't you have an email of your blog available via fedblitz or some other system? It's so easy even a caveman like me can do it.
I look forward to seeing photos of the new youngun....and best to Maryam.
Ciao from Torino/Venice Italy today
D
I am so very much with you on this one. I get that conversation all the time from various clients and friends and associates. There is this wierd in built resistance to actually Listen to what was just said and instead they view that the path of least resistance to them is equal to the path of least resistance for you.
Net result we bump heads trying to do the easiest thing for both of us.
Heres the interesting twist in our society though. If you were using any other mechanism ( post, courier, family friend ) to move the photos to them then they wouldnt think twice about acquiescing to your requests. As soon as the computer is added then the asker is suddenly imbued with a right to be far more rude about their demands !
Wierd but there we go. Lets keep up the good fight eh.
I really am impressed , if this had involved physical transactions of photos there is no way your friend would have been so rude as to demand on the delivery methods.
I really am stunned that people think you were being rude you were doing the favour you would expect to be able to set the terms .Gosh I rally am amazed if only because it highlights how much people dont understand what they are doing online.
Thank you again for the blog entry.
I've made it clear where they need to get information. If they choose not to, well, I guess they stay in the dark.
I guess it helps that my mother is also an IT geek and does a lot online. Now if I could only walk her through downloading and editing her pictures to her computer without her having a meltdown that requires me to talk her down off the ledge, I'd be golden!
It's actually quite rational for the average busy (family, job, school, kids, friends, other interests) person to avoid learning all these brand new interfaces. Like I mentioned, Robert (and others) will abandon 90% of them once the "true" killer apps emerge. It's actually good for the tech elite to experiment like this, but everyone else is quite smart to wait until the tipping point occurs and they can be assured what they're learning won't be obsolete in 2 weeks.
Here's a test. Send your friends a link via email to wherever they should go (flickr, tickr, mickr, facebo, friendkyte, whatever). Hopefully that service is actually user-friendly enough for an average person to use it without instructions from you. If an average person can't figure out how to browse your photos/view your videos, etc. on whatever service you use then you're using a service that's not ready for prime time.
When is the industry going to stop blaming the average user for failing to be technical geniuses?
By the way, I was like this LONG before I ever started getting paid by the industry.
Sure it's a bit condescending to tell people "just Google me", but ultimately, you can't have a community and connection without people actually participating, be it on or off-line.
I find fascination with shiny new technology kind of pointless. After 20 years or so I'm impressed by the advances that have lasted (you won't see me arguing in favor of replacing my Powerbook G4 with a 8088) but I've also grown smart enough to realize sitting on the side lines and jumping in as a late adopter is a far more rational real world strategy than trying everything out. You waste less money, time and energy that way, and still reap all the benefits.
Which is my point about your conversation with friends. Early adopters and bleeding-edgers like yourself will always be a tiny minority. So (this goes to the tnkgrl too) if you want a wide community to interact with, you will be the ones who have to adapt until the market sorts out which new thing is "interesting" or "useful" enough for the masses to adopt it.
Unless you're just trying to be kewl. And I've seen you in videos Robert - that ship has sailed :-)
While i do not expect everyone to use every social networking tool, i think it's a good think for Robert to nicely nudge people away from email.
I find it interesting that according to some comments that email is now looked at as the "common man's" tool. or the accessible tool. far from it! it's a pit of problems!
Robert's post could be rephrased like this:
"Spoon feed me your information"
"Here's a spoon, here's the food, already cooked"
"NO, spoon feed me! my mouth. right in here, thanks."
email is a "push" tool, not a "pull" tool. that friend wanted EVERYTHING pushed, which requires no pull, which is lazy. it's also intellectually lazy - go learn some new things! ween yourself from email!
c'mon, admit it - it's a ballache emailing pictures to every tom dick and harry when you can just send them all to one place for everyone to access.
I came across something new today on techcrunch that you can annoy your relatives with instead *grin*
http://storyofmylife.com/
Sounds like the solution for all time - and they can do it right back atcha then too ;0)
http://Bluehedgehog.blogspot.com